These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Missions & Complexes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

T 3´s allowed again in 4/10 sites?

Author
Zhilia Mann
Tide Way Out Productions
#21 - 2014-11-12 21:34:44 UTC
Andrew Indy wrote:
Estella Osoka wrote:
Maybe there is some confusion. I believe the ban was only for hisec. Lowsec sites should be unaffected.


No is Low and High.

I was in a 4/10 in low and a few pirates came to get me. The Legion was stuck outside and raged in local about it.


This. The ban definitely applied to low as well; I checked several times.

What I haven't done is check one since the alleged change. Guess we'll see.
Mnemosyne Gloob
#22 - 2014-11-12 23:24:26 UTC
Tehee.

CCP forgot to check butan 'ban tengu'?


It's interesting how much attention this gets, shows a lot. IMO they werent banned because of lots of ehp or attack (i bet you can beat tengus in a ded4 with a suiteable HAC/pirate cruiser) - but the combination of (back then hugely abused) DSPs and good combat ability.

DSPs are no longer the case, nor really is any other form of sig band filtering with the ease of scanning now. So why not allow them in again?

As a lowsec inhabitant i was pretty okay with them not getting in. Kept out a lot of competition (they only hunted for 5 or 6).

I think the variety of what could go in which site was okay. The change back was unnecessary.
Andrew Indy
Cleaning Crew
#23 - 2014-11-13 08:13:25 UTC
Mnemosyne Gloob wrote:
Tehee.

CCP forgot to check butan 'ban tengu'?


It's interesting how much attention this gets, shows a lot. IMO they werent banned because of lots of ehp or attack (i bet you can beat tengus in a ded4 with a suiteable HAC/pirate cruiser) - but the combination of (back then hugely abused) DSPs and good combat ability.

DSPs are no longer the case, nor really is any other form of sig band filtering with the ease of scanning now. So why not allow them in again?

As a lowsec inhabitant i was pretty okay with them not getting in. Kept out a lot of competition (they only hunted for 5 or 6).

I think the variety of what could go in which site was okay. The change back was unnecessary.


I have a feeling it was because at the time there was no a combat scanning ship other than T3s (now we the SOE ships). So it combined Great Tank, Good DPS and fast scanning.
Jeremiah Saken
The Fall of Leviathan
#24 - 2014-11-13 10:02:59 UTC
Andrew Indy wrote:
I have a feeling it was because at the time there was no a combat scanning ship other than T3s (now we the SOE ships). So it combined Great Tank, Good DPS and fast scanning.

Tengu is really ineffective in Hisec (never used other T3s). Lots of frigate size rats - medium lanuchers are really bad idea to fight them, even elite cruisers are ungrateful targets (no drone bay). There are no necessity for scanning subsystem, sisters are all that you need on non explorer hull, like HACs or pirate hulls. I have no idea how the rest of T3 are in hisec sites but you can find way much better ships for the job than tengu.
As for low sec: i took my tengu with covert subsystem (for cloak) to last escalation pocket there. Even more ineffective ship. Covert adds only RoF, 4 lanuchers, not T2 ver. but still, dps was anemic (fit was passive tanked with one TP, faction missiles against elite frigs, some elite cruisers, 1 BS).

Tank could be great and that may the the reason to ban them. Ppl would just go for triggers and loot overseers.

"I am tormented with an everlasting itch for things remote. I love to sail forbidden seas..." - Herman Melville

SFM Hobb3s
Perkone
Caldari State
#25 - 2014-11-14 14:49:01 UTC
Tengu was a great ship for the job. You could blitz the sites, warp around very fast (with the right sub), tank the site, and tank other players easily.

From experience, I can tell you, there was NO other better ship for the job. I could not have run/hijacked nearly 76 GSO's in the three weeks before Odyssey landed in a different ship. I understand 100% why they were banned.
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#26 - 2014-11-15 22:01:12 UTC
So the question remains :

Are T3 Cruisers now allowed to access DED 4/10 sites?



DMC
Zhilia Mann
Tide Way Out Productions
#27 - 2014-11-15 22:25:34 UTC
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
So the question remains :

Are T3 Cruisers now allowed to access DED 4/10 sites?


Funny, I went out looking last night in a Legion. No dice. Plenty of 5s though. Guess I'll try again tonight....
Lasius Norialis
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#28 - 2014-11-17 10:33:27 UTC
2 days ago i have warped into a GSO in a tengu and had no problems warping in. T3´s can access 4/10s
Sam Spock
The Arnold Connection
#29 - 2014-11-17 18:14:01 UTC
Ran into it a couple of times now. All in The Citadel High Sec area.

I saw a Loki fly up to a 3/10 but not enter. I think he was scanning for the ship that did enter which was a T1 cruiser of some kind.

I did try to beat a Tengu to kill the radio telescope and can say I don't think he had a specific advantage there over my Ishtar even though he did win the race. It was close though. Luck of the draw as to who gets the last shot.

I would not have an issue if they were allowed to run Expedition 4/10's but if they are supposed to be banned from the scanned ones then they should be.

I have only seen Tengu's so not sure if the other T3's can run them.

Giving you Inconsistent grammar, speilling and Punct-uation since 1974!

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#30 - 2014-11-17 22:40:16 UTC
It wouldn't be just a specific racial version of T3 Cruiser. It would apply to all T3 Cruisers.

So it now seems CCP did a stealth change to the game mechanics allowing T3 Cruiser's to access DED 4/10 sites.

Gonna have to check this out in-game.



DMC
Omnathious Deninard
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#31 - 2014-11-18 00:19:00 UTC
IMO T3s are no better at running 3/10 and 4/10 than the current meta of Ishtars and Gilas. So barring them is still is kinda silly at this point.

If you don't follow the rules, neither will I.

Lasius Norialis
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#32 - 2014-11-18 11:15:35 UTC
Sam Spock wrote:
I did try to beat a Tengu to kill the radio telescope and can say I don't think he had a specific advantage there over my Ishtar even though he did win the race. It was close though. Luck of the draw as to who gets the last shot.


It was me i remember your name Big smile but it was just a 10mil drop anyway :D i tested if t3´s can enter 4/10s that day.
They can, BUT imo my Gila or probably any other Pirate Cruiser or HAC completes it faster.
With 4 rapid light missile launchers on my gila and 7 on my tengu, the gila is still faster because of the drone bonus.
I just tried it in a T3 to clarify it for myself.
In Highsec i will totally stick to my Gila. In Lowsec however, i will do the 4/10´s in a T3 because of cloaky advantages.

Regards,
Lasius
Jeremiah Saken
The Fall of Leviathan
#33 - 2014-11-19 11:04:34 UTC
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
IMO T3s are no better at running 3/10 and 4/10 than the current meta of Ishtars and Gilas. So barring them is still is kinda silly at this point.

I did one den when i was returning from lowsec site to check how my tengu will do it. Far worse that gila (it was with covert subsystem for cloak so no splendid dps, with proper subsystem i think they would be even).

"I am tormented with an everlasting itch for things remote. I love to sail forbidden seas..." - Herman Melville

Surama Badasaz
Almost Dangerous
Wolves Amongst Strangers
#34 - 2014-11-23 15:53:40 UTC
You can simply get a HAC like the Cerberus....or Better Sacrilege from amarr...Check my fitting (402 Dps,21kehp,44% stable,600 speed).This ship can do ALL Hs anoms and some of the low sec ones very easy.You don't really need a t3.I got a tengu and a legion but i chose this.The Sacrilege is better than the Cerberus because it can put scan mods on mid.Cerberus can't because it has the resists there.

[Sacrilege, 1]
Medium Armor Repairer II
Armor Thermic Hardener II
Reactive Armor Hardener
Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II
Ballistic Control System II

10MN Afterburner II
Scan Acquisition Array I
Scan Pinpointing Array I
Scan Rangefinding Array I

Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Scourge Fury Heavy Missile
Sisters Core Probe Launcher, Sisters Core Scanner Probe

Medium Auxiliary Nano Pump I
Medium Warhead Calefaction Catalyst I

Hobgoblin II x5
Hobgoblin II x5
Unezka Turigahl
Det Som Engang Var
#35 - 2014-11-23 23:12:12 UTC
Oh yeah, forgot about this thread. T3s were indeed stealthily allowed back into 4/10s. At least in Caldari hisec. I did a couple in a Tengu. Then I went back to my Gila, because its better. I've only come across one other person using a Tengu in a 4/10 so far and my Gila had no problems beating him to the kill on the GSO tower.
Renegade Heart
Doomheim
#36 - 2014-12-05 19:25:01 UTC
Just been reading the Rhea patch notes and found this bit:


PvE:

Some 4/10 exploration sites have had their gate access corrected to prevent entry by Strategic Cruisers.
Tsukino Stareine
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#37 - 2014-12-05 21:37:42 UTC
yeah i was in serpentis space and my loki was not allowed in, seems only certain sites were able to be bypassed.
Jeremiah Saken
The Fall of Leviathan
#38 - 2014-12-06 09:47:56 UTC
Unezka Turigahl wrote:
Oh yeah, forgot about this thread. T3s were indeed stealthily allowed back into 4/10s. At least in Caldari hisec. I did a couple in a Tengu. Then I went back to my Gila, because its better. I've only come across one other person using a Tengu in a 4/10 so far and my Gila had no problems beating him to the kill on the GSO tower.

Shhh, they will ban pirate ships also, and then sentry stratioses, because of new pilots right, CCP? T3 are obviously OP in there...

"I am tormented with an everlasting itch for things remote. I love to sail forbidden seas..." - Herman Melville

Samantha Calderon
Heavenly Forge
#39 - 2014-12-07 21:10:18 UTC
Looks like the accesibility of the T3s in the DED 4/10s was a bug, and it will be corrected in Rhea:

Quote:
PvE:

Some 4/10 exploration sites have had their gate access corrected to prevent entry by Strategic Cruisers.


[url]http://community.eveonline.com/news/patch-notes/patch-notes-for-rhea[/url]

Wherever I May Roam: Blog sobre EVE Online en castellano!

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#40 - 2014-12-10 03:20:20 UTC
Seems T3's got lucky being able to enter 4/10 sites for a couple of weeks, more or less due to a bug.

But as usual, all good things must come to an end.



DMC
Previous page12