These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Medium taregtting systems stabilizer
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Bastion Arzi
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#1 - 2014-11-03 16:27:49 UTC
Is this rig any good on a pilgrim?
Battle BV Master
Bacon Never Dies
#2 - 2014-11-03 16:57:52 UTC
The bonus it gives is the same on every ship...Pilgrim or otherwise
Paranoid Loyd
#3 - 2014-11-03 17:13:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Paranoid Loyd
You have to use both rig slots to save a tick, so not really.
Using targeting system subcontrollers can be more beneficial depending on the target, but not by much.

"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix

Fix the Prospect!
Bastion Arzi
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#4 - 2014-11-03 17:42:50 UTC
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
You have to use both rig slots to save a tick, so not really.
Using targeting system subcontrollers can be more beneficial depending on the target, but not by much.


thats what i would have expected seeing as its only a 10% bonus but with two of these on my sensor recalibration time is 4.86 seconds down from 10 seconds.
Bastion Arzi
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#5 - 2014-11-03 17:45:52 UTC
Battle BV Master wrote:
The bonus it gives is the same on every ship...Pilgrim or otherwise


thanks for poitning out the elephant in the room. i would definitely have missed that
Paranoid Loyd
#6 - 2014-11-03 17:48:04 UTC
My mistake, thought is was 5 seconds.

"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix

Fix the Prospect!
Aplier Shivra
#7 - 2014-11-03 22:06:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Aplier Shivra
Bastion Arzi wrote:

thats what i would have expected seeing as its only a 10% bonus but with two of these on my sensor recalibration time is 4.86 seconds down from 10 seconds.


I would like to see the math behind this. Because by my math, to end up at 4.86 seconds you'd have to start at 6 seconds, not 10.
Bastion Arzi
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#8 - 2014-11-03 22:09:49 UTC
dont ask me im just looking at the attributes info for sensor recalibation time when the module is fitted against when its unfitted
Aplier Shivra
#9 - 2014-11-03 22:16:31 UTC
Don't forget that when unfitted there's nothing affecting the module, while when fitted there's skills, other modules, etc. So it's not just the two rigs making up that 5.14 difference, they're only giving you that extra 1.14 down from 6.
Aplier Shivra
#10 - 2014-11-03 22:20:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Aplier Shivra
For which, if you're not running sensor boosters in your mid slots, you'll get faster lock times on most cruiser and under targets by instead using the scan resolution rigs.

Edit: probably other targets too, depends on a lot on your skills. I really suggest using a fitting program like EFT or PYFA to crunch the numbers for you.
Bastion Arzi
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#11 - 2014-11-03 22:41:43 UTC
i do use pyfa.

but tell me what skills affect sensor recalibration time?
Zhilia Mann
Tide Way Out Productions
#12 - 2014-11-04 03:16:37 UTC
Bastion Arzi wrote:
i do use pyfa.

but tell me what skills affect sensor recalibration time?


Cloaking. 10% reduction per level, which on a covops cloak with a recalibration delay of 10s natively translates into the base figure everyone is using: 6s. Very few people bother training cloaking 5, but in that case you'd be looking at a 5 second base recalibration instead.
Bastion Arzi
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#13 - 2014-11-04 14:49:55 UTC
i see, this makes the rig wholley less appealing id rather have armor or something than 1.15 seconds faster last time...
Sweetsthehooker Zateki
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#14 - 2014-11-06 19:09:13 UTC
I always ask John Wayne for pilgrim related questions