These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Bring us the head of Veers Belvar

First post
Author
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#161 - 2014-10-27 21:45:34 UTC
Haedonism Bot wrote:
I'm still waiting for his rebuttal to my assertion that incursion runners are bad people, though. Evidently that argument was so airtight as to leave even Veers Belvar speechless.
Veers is quite adept at selectively addressing stuff, shitposting and generally being a terrible person.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#162 - 2014-10-27 22:36:45 UTC
La Nariz wrote:


You get an F for that assignment, is a thousand words so hard to come up with? That was one of my own mentees that performed that caper, damn right I'm proud of it. Veers remember this integral fact RL =/= EVE; improve your posting if you want any resolution to this. I'll give you another chance to complete my assignment.


Uh-huh. Nice to know you are proud of ripping a new player off for thousands of dollars and driving him out of the game, which in real life would result in a nice jail sentence. Glad to see what the Goons consider a victory.

And that's the great part about opposing your group - it's like fighting against Communist Russia - meaning that the opposition is so evil and despicable, that any and all tactics are justified to take it down, and the side of morality and justice is always yours. It's a good feeling to know just how bad my enemies are.
Tyyler DURden
Mordechai and Sons Distribution Co.
#163 - 2014-10-27 23:00:54 UTC
So you and Goblin teaming up then?

Tyyler DURden says "use soap"

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#164 - 2014-10-27 23:09:16 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
La Nariz wrote:


You get an F for that assignment, is a thousand words so hard to come up with? That was one of my own mentees that performed that caper, damn right I'm proud of it. Veers remember this integral fact RL =/= EVE; improve your posting if you want any resolution to this. I'll give you another chance to complete my assignment.


Uh-huh. Nice to know you are proud of ripping a new player off for thousands of dollars and driving him out of the game, which in real life would result in a nice jail sentence. Glad to see what the Goons consider a victory.

And that's the great part about opposing your group - it's like fighting against Communist Russia - meaning that the opposition is so evil and despicable, that any and all tactics are justified to take it down, and the side of morality and justice is always yours. It's a good feeling to know just how bad my enemies are.

I don't want their money, I just want their isk.

Founder of Violet Squadron, a small gang NPSI community! Mail me for more information.

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie's Space Mediation Service!

Tengu Grib
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#165 - 2014-10-27 23:35:01 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
Nice to know you are proud of ripping a new player off for thousands of dollars and driving him out of the game, which in real life would result in a nice jail sentence.


There you go again. Eve is a game my friend. Those are not real dollars. Isk is not real money. If someone were to scam an Eve player for real money, I would certainly be against that and advocate their banning. But that is not what is happening. Erotica1 himself was very much against people buying PLEX to put towards their Bonus Room bets.

You however keep confusing Eve with reality, and isk with real money. They are not the same thing and should not be.

Rabble Rabble Rabble

Praise James, Supreme Protector of High Sec.

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#166 - 2014-10-27 23:38:34 UTC
Man, the best tears of the thread so far happen today, and Eve-O is blocked at work.

Also, "Tears Belvar", best nickname ever. I shall never call him anything else.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#167 - 2014-10-27 23:38:56 UTC
Tengu Grib wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:
Nice to know you are proud of ripping a new player off for thousands of dollars and driving him out of the game, which in real life would result in a nice jail sentence.


There you go again. Eve is a game my friend. Those are not real dollars. Isk is not real money. If someone were to scam an Eve player for real money, I would certainly be against that and advocate their banning. But that is not what is happening. Erotica1 himself was very much against people buying PLEX to put towards their Bonus Room bets.

You however keep confusing Eve with reality, and isk with real money. They are not the same thing and should not be.


Values and morality don't get checked at the door of the game. In game actions have real emotional impacts on the human players. Doing really bad things and justifying it as "just a game" doesn't pass my smell test.
Paranoid Loyd
#168 - 2014-10-27 23:42:59 UTC
Yes, they do. Anyone who can not separate a game from reality is the one who is sick.

"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix

Fix the Prospect!

La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#169 - 2014-10-27 23:43:02 UTC  |  Edited by: La Nariz
Veers Belvar wrote:
La Nariz wrote:


You get an F for that assignment, is a thousand words so hard to come up with? That was one of my own mentees that performed that caper, damn right I'm proud of it. Veers remember this integral fact RL =/= EVE; improve your posting if you want any resolution to this. I'll give you another chance to complete my assignment.


Uh-huh. Nice to know you are proud of ripping a new player off for thousands of dollars and driving him out of the game, which in real life would result in a nice jail sentence. Glad to see what the Goons consider a victory.

And that's the great part about opposing your group - it's like fighting against Communist Russia - meaning that the opposition is so evil and despicable, that any and all tactics are justified to take it down, and the side of morality and justice is always yours. It's a good feeling to know just how bad my enemies are.


New players don't fly 50+ billion isk missioning golems/ravens. So tell us all Veers what is your final solution to the goon menace?

There is still time for you to repent your badposting ways.

E: Go ahead and tell us how the side of justice is on your side when you doxx someone over an internet video game. Or when people call your old employers, threaten your wife, threaten your dog, and threaten you with death threats. Please Veers tell us all how that's justified because we did a mean thing in a video game.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#170 - 2014-10-27 23:44:17 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:

Values and morality don't get checked at the door of the game.


So winning at Monopoly makes you every bit as bad as an East St Louis slum lord, got it.

Quote:

In game actions have real emotional impacts on the human players.


Only the ones with borderline narcissism or some other such mental illness. But they shouldn't be playing the game anyway if you ask me.


Quote:

Doing really bad things and justifying it as "just a game" doesn't pass my smell test.


And shooting people in a game that is about shooting people does not constitute "really bad things". It does not require justification to shoot someone in Call of Duty, that's the entire point of the game.

Why should someone who is deliberately playing the game wrong be taken into account? Why should their failure to play the game correctly handcuff my potential choices as a player?

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Veers Belvar
Swordmasters of New Eden
#171 - 2014-10-27 23:56:12 UTC
La Nariz wrote:
[quote=Veers Belvar]

New players don't fly 50+ billion isk missioning golems/ravens. So tell us all Veers what is your final solution to the goon menace?

There is still time for you to repent your badposting ways.

E: Go ahead and tell us how the side of justice is on your side when you doxx someone over an internet video game. Or when people call your old employers, threaten your wife, threaten your dog, and threaten you with death threats. Please Veers tell us all how that's justified because we did a mean thing in a video game.


Well, http://evenews24.com/2014/10/27/eve-online-phoebe-pre-game-null-sec-alliance-movements/ is a good start. Your Sov and rental empire is collapsing, the whole "bring everyone into the CFC and set to blue" model is dying. You are actually going to need to PLAY the game now. No more just sitting around making rental fees, the Goons will need to justify their sorry existence.

Oh and no one is talking about blowing up officer fit ships of vets, I'm fine with that. We are talking about stomping new players in ventures, in retrievers, in T1 haulers, and blowing them right out of the game for lolz. That is the kind of sick stuff that I would like to see gone. And that guy you scammed WAS a new player who used a lot of $$$ to get Plex and pay for his ship.

And CCP has already taken steps to combat this garbage - if you chase after the same miner to bump and gank him throughout multiple systems, even though those are legitimate gameplayer choices, CCP calls it griefing and can ban you. They don't say "it's just a game, HTFU." They accept that in-game actions can be used for unacceptable griefing, and therefore disallow them.

But please do spend your time putting 100 mil bounties on me while your alliance crumbles into dust, soon to be nothing but a distant and forlorn memory. Thankfully I think we can find some more decent and ethical folks to replace you.
Tengu Grib
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#172 - 2014-10-27 23:58:36 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Why should someone who is deliberately playing the game wrong be taken into account? Why should their failure to play the game correctly handcuff my potential choices as a player?

I don't think it's quite fair to say a carebear is inherintly playing the game 'wrong' though they may be trying to play it peacefully. The moment they forget that the game deliberately allows for violence at all times in all places and complain that they experienced violence is the moment they begin playing the game 'wrong.' It is quite possible to play the game peacefully without being angry at those who wish to play it violently. In fact the intelligent among the peaceful fully recognize that the games economy relies on the violence as much as it does on the miners. I have actually met a few miners who fit into that category (though they are unfortunately rare).

Tears Belvar however, I would agree that he is deliberately playing the game wrong.

Rabble Rabble Rabble

Praise James, Supreme Protector of High Sec.

Paranoid Loyd
#173 - 2014-10-27 23:59:27 UTC
Goons are dying Roll

"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix

Fix the Prospect!

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#174 - 2014-10-28 00:01:04 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:

And CCP has already taken steps to combat this garbage - if you chase after the same miner to bump and gank him throughout multiple systems, even though those are legitimate gameplayer choices, CCP calls it griefing and can ban you. They don't say "it's just a game, HTFU." They accept that in-game actions can be used for unacceptable griefing, and therefore disallow them.


Ha, no.

I have literally done this for seven hours at a time, to one guy. When I was petitioned for it, the GM told me to put up a petition myself if the guy kept trying to harass me with unjustifiable petitions. Cool

Turns out that constantly reshipping to the same belt in the same tankless mining barge does not constitute a genuine effort to escape.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Generic5Guy
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#175 - 2014-10-28 00:01:37 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:


You are such a joke. You are part of the biggest scam organization in Eve. You and your pathetic henchmen get your sociopathic highs from ripping off people, see http://themittani.com/features/alod-go-back-wow , among others. See also Goonfleet.com

I mean the evidence is clear, seriously impaired moral values, sick achievement of pleasure by stealing from others, massive market manipulation/price fixing, depraved pleasure from blowing up the "pubbies" and "carebears" in worthless events like "Burn Jita" and through suicide ganking by "Miniluv." Not to mention the well founded concerns that this demented behavior spills into real life harassment, which it apparently often does.

.


Man, thanks for linking that story. Pretty happy ending I would say. ;)
Tengu Grib
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#176 - 2014-10-28 00:03:33 UTC
Veers Belvar wrote:
And CCP has already taken steps to combat this garbage - if you chase after the same miner to bump and gank him throughout multiple systems, even though those are legitimate gameplayer choices, CCP calls it griefing and can ban you. They don't say "it's just a game, HTFU." They accept that in-game actions can be used for unacceptable griefing, and therefore disallow them.


What you're talking about here and what you were talking about before are not the same thing. Constantly harassing someone and following them anywhere they go (unless you are currently at war with them) IS harassment. The act of ganking or bumping in and of itself, is NOT harassment. I can show up in a system and gank anyone in local for months on end, that's not harassment. If I case the same person around and gank them every day for months on end, that is. You are using this as an example of where CCP will in fact ban someone, and yet you mostly talk about ganking and bumping themselves being harassment. Your arguments are not consistent.

Rabble Rabble Rabble

Praise James, Supreme Protector of High Sec.

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#177 - 2014-10-28 00:04:13 UTC
Tengu Grib wrote:

I don't think it's quite fair to say a carebear is inherintly playing the game 'wrong' though they may be trying to play it peacefully. The moment they forget that the game deliberately allows for violence at all times in all places and complain that they experienced violence is the moment they begin playing the game 'wrong.'


Basically, yes. But understand that I strictly maintain the difference between a PvE player and a carebear. Carebear is not what you do, it's an attitude.

Jenn Aside is a PvE player. Jonah Gravenstein is a PvE player.

Tears Belvar is a carebear.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Tengu Grib
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#178 - 2014-10-28 00:04:21 UTC
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Goons are dying Roll

If anything Goons will be stronger than ever. Deklein is going to be a veritable fortress with the projection nerf.

Rabble Rabble Rabble

Praise James, Supreme Protector of High Sec.

Tengu Grib
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#179 - 2014-10-28 00:07:18 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Tengu Grib wrote:

I don't think it's quite fair to say a carebear is inherintly playing the game 'wrong' though they may be trying to play it peacefully. The moment they forget that the game deliberately allows for violence at all times in all places and complain that they experienced violence is the moment they begin playing the game 'wrong.'


Basically, yes. But understand that I strictly maintain the difference between a PvE player and a carebear. Carebear is not what you do, it's an attitude.

Jenn Aside is a PvE player. Jonah Gravenstein is a PvE player.

Tears Belvar is a carebear.


With that definition of carebear I fully agree with you. I generally refer to carebears as characters who do PVE over PVP and generally avoid PVP. But the difference between that and what you go by is splitting hairs and more or less irrelevant. So yes, people who live as carebears as a mentality are in fact playing the game wrong and I withdraw my argument.

Rabble Rabble Rabble

Praise James, Supreme Protector of High Sec.

Tengu Grib
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#180 - 2014-10-28 00:08:29 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Veers Belvar wrote:

And CCP has already taken steps to combat this garbage - if you chase after the same miner to bump and gank him throughout multiple systems, even though those are legitimate gameplayer choices, CCP calls it griefing and can ban you. They don't say "it's just a game, HTFU." They accept that in-game actions can be used for unacceptable griefing, and therefore disallow them.


Ha, no.

I have literally done this for seven hours at a time, to one guy. When I was petitioned for it, the GM told me to put up a petition myself if the guy kept trying to harass me with unjustifiable petitions. Cool

Turns out that constantly reshipping to the same belt in the same tankless mining barge does not constitute a genuine effort to escape.

I would fully agree. Now if he had fled to the furthest reaches of HS that would have been a different thing.

Rabble Rabble Rabble

Praise James, Supreme Protector of High Sec.