EVE General Discussion

There are plenty of ways to protect against that, think about it.

HIgh Sec Prison

You people don't understand, I'm not locked up in here with you, you are locked up in here with me

CCP does do it for you, no player organisation would be able to produce the same reaction as Concord

Also if you try to police high sec then Concord starts working for the other side.

Dunno, I just heard the screams and tears down the intercom, which secretly slightly amused me. Don't get me wrong when I say the game should include a more workable provision for bounty hunters, it's only a view of what might make the game better. Unfortunately we are stuck with wall of Concord until someone has a better idea. That better idea isn't going to be easy to think of because I'm fairly sure a lot of people have already tried.

Not sure if this was mentioned, but. I'm fairly new and i'm sure some of you will say super new, ive been playing for a couple of months and enjoying the game as much as i can get on and play.

I find the hardest thing to do in this game is making "new" friends. When i first started i was found by a mining group that took me in. they've basically disbanded now.

I'm still in the corp, but what i find the most obnoxious is that they tell you don't talk in local chat at all, or it will start a war. So i never did it, i didn't wanna be the problem.

How was i supposed to find and meet new people tho? I finally made a post on here about finding a Corp tonight so hopefully that helps. i think that's a big reason why new players have trouble tho. gets lonely out there all alone sometimes.

Concord doesn't punish crime, it reacts consistently and invariably with a specific response to one type of action.

This is overcome by gathering the correct resources to get past it, ie; Lots of players , lots of cheap ships

A lot of the time Concord responds to crime by not doing anything if you see my point.

And yet the VAST majority of EVE players never post on these forums. So how can you tell what others want? lol at "look at all the post asking for nerfs" (that's called confirmation bias btw, and you're doing it). We can prove most EVE characters don't post on the forums, but you can't prove what you believe. Not that you're the type that requires evidence to form an opinion, just saying.

The point here is that you are in no way representative of the real PVE community in this game, which (despite the vocal minority who can't handle the loss of imaginary space ships) is rather tough compared to pve types in other games.

Same. other than buying a 100 million isk hauler because i was in too much of a hurry to count the zeros and had my market window misconfigured (and of course their was the "autopiliting JF to jita while both drunk and war decced incident ) I've had no problems (and since most people don't post on forums, we can assume this is the same for many, maybe most pve players). The people (like Veers and the OP) who whine about these things are simply the folks who can't take responsibility for their own actions. They need things to be someone Else's fault to in order to protect their egos.

As in real life in this case, so in EVE: 90+% of an individuals 'problems' in any given situation (at least in the "First World") stems from their internal faults, bad thinking and/or bad choices. people stop thinking stupid thoughts, people stop having stupid problems, but of course, that's a lot harder than just saying "those people over their are bad and the cause of all evil".

The maximum punishment a ganker can administer to a target is the destruction of their ship and pod. Why should a ganker be forced to risk more than other players when undocking?

Eve is not an experiment in creating a harmonious space society. If it was CCP could cancel the clone contracts of gankers or put them on space trial and put them in space prison forever for continued ganking. Eve is a PvP game where there is suppose to be combat and ganking everywhere including highsec. You can't seem to grasp the idea that ganking is baked into the design. The fact that autopiloting untanked ships are being destroyed or that overloaded, unescorted freighters are being taken down by groups of dozens of players, is suppose to happen. New Eden is a dangerous place.

Players already have the tools to prevent almost all of these attacks. And if they do almost everything right but are very unlucky, well they are suppose to be able to absorb the loss of a ship by not flying what they cannot afford to lose, and then learn from that loss. Why do you even want to "protect" these other "players", when they won't even bother to take the time to protect themselves?