These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

EVE and lack of CCP

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Tajic Kaundur
Collapsed Out
Pandemic Legion
#21 - 2014-10-24 08:51:29 UTC
Ormand Yvorme wrote:
Forgot something in my original post, too much effort to edit..
93k ehp?
Your fit (https://zkillboard.com/kill/41959208/) Doesn't even have 49k ehp. Apparently the IGF shows it with reps though, so that may be why.


he's forgetting to mention the fact that the pod he lost was a full high-grade slave set

which just makes this even better
Rockstede
30plus LLC
Brave Collective
#22 - 2014-10-24 08:52:56 UTC
Also it's worth expanding on the EHP subject.

I recently learned EHP is subjective at best, that Stratios may have had 20k or so EHP but as his tank was repping more than you were able to deal out in DPS his EHP was effectively inifinite.




The math never lies my fiend.
Gregor Parud
Imperial Academy
#23 - 2014-10-24 08:57:42 UTC
So, as I stated in my first post; hasn't learned anything at all.
Ormand Yvorme
Doomheim
#24 - 2014-10-24 08:58:24 UTC
Rockstede wrote:
Also it's worth expanding on the EHP subject.

I recently learned EHP is subjective at best, that Stratios may have had 20k or so EHP but as his tank was repping more than you were able to deal out in DPS his EHP was effectively inifinite.




The math never lies my fiend.

Yeah, you fiend.
I don't understand the EHP is subjective thing. I understood the rest though, the Stratios had a tank that was nearly double the damage that the Brutix could deal and the Brutix didn't have high alpha, so it was irrelevant how much ehp the stratios had.
Big Lynx
#25 - 2014-10-24 08:59:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Big Lynx
Kanz aye hazz yoar staffzz?

Edit: Morning coffee + tears = tasty
Xercodo
Cruor Angelicus
#26 - 2014-10-24 08:59:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Xercodo
Oh also, before this gets locked, I'd like to point out that his ganking you is totally normal game play and there is no reason for CCP step in, least of all because of exploits because the others in this thread already debunked all of the exploitive possibilities by showing normal working game play for every point you've made.

And since your knowledge of game mechanics is so poor your also far from qualified to even identify what an exploit would even look like. But if you reeeally wanna be sure you can still put in a support ticket for CCP to take a look into it. The forums are not the place for this sort of thing nor do CCP monitor every kill day and night for this sort of thing.

Exploits are called exploits because they're abusing a bug. And CCP would never allow a bug that was so game breaking to go in willingly if they knew about it.

I'm saying this because you seem to be the type of fellow that expects CCP knows about every exploit the moment it happens and are just ignoring this to **** people like you off...

The Drake is a Lie
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#27 - 2014-10-24 09:01:48 UTC
To OP: a special message from CCP Starbuck.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104
mr ed thehouseofed
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#28 - 2014-10-24 09:03:08 UTC
buttered popcorn for me please Smile

i want a eve pinball machine...  confirming  CCP Cognac is best cognac
Ormand Yvorme
Doomheim
#29 - 2014-10-24 09:04:11 UTC
Xercodo wrote:
Exploits are called exploits because they're abusing a bug. And CCP would never knowingly allow a bug that game breaking to go in willingly if they knew about it.

*coughcoughbandofbrothershangartransportbugcoughcough*
I do agree with the rest of your statement though. Has anyone covered how he was attacked without concord? I gotta re read the thread..
Xercodo
Cruor Angelicus
#30 - 2014-10-24 09:04:32 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
To OP: a special message from CCP Starbuck.


Oh man I need to save that for later

The Drake is a Lie
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#31 - 2014-10-24 09:07:14 UTC
Quote:
3. Ranting is prohibited.

A rant is a post that is often filled with angry and counterproductive comments. A free exchange of ideas is essential to building a strong sense of community and is helpful in development of the game and community. Rants are disruptive, and incite flaming and trolling. Please post your thoughts in a concise and clear manner while avoiding going off on rambling tangents.

Thread closed.

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode

Senior Lead

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department
Previous page12