These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

Bribes for Faction Standing

Author
Efraya
V0LTA
OnlyFleets.
#1 - 2014-10-19 10:11:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Efraya
Hello folks,

Fairly recently we're had the opportunity to bribe concord with tags and isk to look the other way with regards to security status.

Surely we should be able to bribe the empires to get faction standing back to zero? Having it go above zero would be very overpowered. But bribing them into neutrality would be sufficient.

Thanks,

Ef.

[b][center]WSpace; Dead space.[/center] [center]Lady Spank for forum mod[/center][/b]

Donnachadh
United Allegiance of Undesirables
#2 - 2014-10-19 17:02:01 UTC
I say no to any new idea that allows players to "buy" standings whether you call it bribes or whatever.

My personal opinion is that they should remove ALL forms of pay for standings and that includes any and all of the current methods used. Negative standings is one of the prices to pay for certain game play styles and it should not be easy to repair that negative standing. If you want back into high sec without the hassles of low standings then you should have to work to repair them. After all everyone always says EVE is a game of choices and consequences why should it be easy(even if it is expensive) to overcome the negative sides of this game choice.
Efraya
V0LTA
OnlyFleets.
#3 - 2014-10-19 18:52:49 UTC
Donnachadh wrote:
I say no to any new idea that allows players to "buy" standings whether you call it bribes or whatever.

My personal opinion is that they should remove ALL forms of pay for standings and that includes any and all of the current methods used. Negative standings is one of the prices to pay for certain game play styles and it should not be easy to repair that negative standing. If you want back into high sec without the hassles of low standings then you should have to work to repair them. After all everyone always says EVE is a game of choices and consequences why should it be easy(even if it is expensive) to overcome the negative sides of this game choice.


Thanks for your comments, I would certainly agree that eve should be a game of consequences, but I feel that it would be appropriate to have some sort of mechanism for faction standing resetting. A costly one in my opinion.

[b][center]WSpace; Dead space.[/center] [center]Lady Spank for forum mod[/center][/b]

Ix Method
Doomheim
#4 - 2014-10-19 19:04:21 UTC
The problem with 'costly' is its always relative. They said the same about tags4sec and then went and balanced it against the income of people still in the starter systems.

Not that I disagree particularly, standings are a mechanic which are way too biased towards the people who need them least and a way for Indy/PVP types to 'invest' in standings for refining, clones or whatever would probably see a lot of use.

Travelling at the speed of love.

Zan Shiro
Doomheim
#5 - 2014-10-20 03:15:32 UTC
Most faction corps have stations in the other empires. Spam them in space you aren't shoot on site with to not get shoot on site standing.

Then you can bribe them at the data centres they run buying tags.


Depending on faction you made mad at you, SOE is also an option. I had gallente really not like me once. SOE missions (unless changed) give a somewhat decent splash faction boost to gallente and iirc just a bit to minmatar. I hit SOE agents not in gallente space until I was cleared for their space.

Brigadine Ferathine
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#6 - 2014-10-20 04:33:28 UTC
My issue is that many missions lower standings. Doing Minnmitar missions lowers your Galentee standings sometimes to the point where you cant enter their space.

Just another example of PvE risk not being worth the reward.

Getting banned from entire areas of the game so I can make 300k isk from an empire?

CCP you listening?
Tabyll Altol
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#7 - 2014-10-20 06:36:57 UTC
Brigadine Ferathine wrote:
My issue is that many missions lower standings. Doing Minnmitar missions lowers your Galentee standings sometimes to the point where you cant enter their space.

Just another example of PvE risk not being worth the reward.

Getting banned from entire areas of the game so I can make 300k isk from an empire?

CCP you listening?


You know you can say no to missions (once per 4 h), so don´t do the missions which lower you standing or fly for both sides missions.

-1
Andrew Indy
Cleaning Crew
#8 - 2014-10-20 08:20:53 UTC
+1

I stopped missioning ages ago and getting into a mission ship brings back memories of endless boredom in the quest for isk.

When I started missioning I did not know about faction standings losses and while mines not negative enough to be locked out of space , if it was it would limit a lot of other activities (PVP ect).
Arronicus
State War Academy
Caldari State
#9 - 2014-10-20 09:12:20 UTC
I'm in agreement that repairing terrible standings to a workable point is an overly difficult and time consuming tax, for little value. To that end, exchanging tags to repair it up to NO HIGHER THAN 0, or even -1, or allow us to run missions for that faction with increased standing gain, but no isk/lp payout, up to 0, would be of great benefit.

Of course allowing players to buy their way up above 0 standing would be a bad thing, but I don't see the harm in allowing players to bribe it back up to a beginner level, even if the price is fairly steep.

+1
Efraya
V0LTA
OnlyFleets.
#10 - 2014-10-20 12:11:35 UTC
Andrew Indy wrote:
+1
When I started missioning I did not know about faction standings losses and while mines not negative enough to be locked out of space , if it was it would limit a lot of other activities (PVP ect).


This is one of the cruxes of the issue. I would like to add that I don't have a negative enough standing to warrant any sort of worry but the key thing here is knowledge.

Now that we know to decline, we decline.

This sort of leads to whole sections of content being automatically being declined.

Doing something similar to tags for sec, thereby bringing another reason to rat in belts in low. More targets, more "Content" or a straight isk charge at concord.

[b][center]WSpace; Dead space.[/center] [center]Lady Spank for forum mod[/center][/b]

Arronicus
State War Academy
Caldari State
#11 - 2014-10-20 12:27:15 UTC
Efraya wrote:
Andrew Indy wrote:
+1
When I started missioning I did not know about faction standings losses and while mines not negative enough to be locked out of space , if it was it would limit a lot of other activities (PVP ect).


This is one of the cruxes of the issue. I would like to add that I don't have a negative enough standing to warrant any sort of worry but the key thing here is knowledge.

Now that we know to decline, we decline.

This sort of leads to whole sections of content being automatically being declined.

Doing something similar to tags for sec, thereby bringing another reason to rat in belts in low. More targets, more "Content" or a straight isk charge at concord.


This is really something so huge that I don't quite understand why CCP doesn't address in some way. Considering how commonplace it is for missioners to reject all empire faction missions, there must be a pretty high incidence of that content simply being skipped, and doing nothing else than to create an obstacle for mission runners. Perhaps the incidence of anti-empire faction missions needs to be cranked up in highsec, and removed from lowsec, to incentivize mission running in null. Perhaps a less obtrusive option like paying to repair your standing up to a certain point is better.
Ix Method
Doomheim
#12 - 2014-10-20 12:40:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Ix Method
Arronicus wrote:
Of course allowing players to buy their way up above 0 standing would be a bad thing

I know this is accepted wisdom but I have to disagree, particularly now with the highsec anchoring requirement removed.

Forcing Trade Alts/Miners/Frigate pilots into training for ships just to grind L4s is a bad thing, particularly if they have to do it everytime they move station.

If it was properly implemented in a way that at least potentially generated content - belt tags isn't terrible but perhaps sharing them out amongst High/Low/Null/WH Sites? - it strikes me as long as someones out their risking their necks, allowing people to cough up a couple of bill for Jumpclone/Refining/Market standings wouldn't be the end of the world.

Travelling at the speed of love.

Donnachadh
United Allegiance of Undesirables
#13 - 2014-10-21 02:03:20 UTC
Ix Method wrote:
it strikes me as long as someones out their risking their necks, allowing people to cough up a couple of bill for Jumpclone/Refining/Market standings wouldn't be the end of the world.


Ah so now you are saying that only those players that have a few bil laying around they have no use for should be able to take advantage of this? Yet another reason why this is a bad idea, only those with massive amounts of ISK can use it.

Others have brought up the new player that because of a lack of understanding of the game has allowed their standings to get to bad for one or more of the empires. As one who spends most of my game time with new players I can see the value in a one time only option to use a pay for standings to correct this common new player error.

I know there is a mechanic in the game that allows for those with negative standing to "buy" it back up, but since we are talking about changing that mechanic then we need to look at how this affects players all across the entire spectrum and not just those with negative standings. If we are going to change this and allow for you folks with negative standing to "buy" your way back to 0 then I expect to be able to "buy" my way to the higher plus side standings that my play style requires.


James Baboli
Warp to Pharmacy
#14 - 2014-10-21 02:40:35 UTC
Already exists in limited form. Check out the data center agents.

Talking more,

Flying crazier,

And drinking more

Making battleships worth the warp

Brigadine Ferathine
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#15 - 2014-10-21 05:33:33 UTC
Tabyll Altol wrote:
Brigadine Ferathine wrote:
My issue is that many missions lower standings. Doing Minnmitar missions lowers your Galentee standings sometimes to the point where you cant enter their space.

Just another example of PvE risk not being worth the reward.

Getting banned from entire areas of the game so I can make 300k isk from an empire?

CCP you listening?


You know you can say no to missions (once per 4 h), so don´t do the missions which lower you standing or fly for both sides missions.

-1

That doesn't make making isk doing missions more viable or make it easier to avoid standings lowing missions.
WhyYouHeffToBeMad IsOnlyGame
#16 - 2014-10-21 05:53:34 UTC
Lol

you silly! <3

Everything's a game if you make it one - Uriel Paradisi Anteovnuecci

CCP: Continously Crying Playerbase - Frostys Virpio

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#17 - 2014-10-21 06:10:45 UTC
Remove tags from the LP store.
This will result in all those faction modules that currently needing tags seeing more use and getting blown up.
Replace use of those tags to bring you back up to -1.5 or so faction standing.

This gets you past the 'shoot on site' level. But not to the 'can instantly run lvl 4's as long as corp standing is good enough' level
Making for some lasting impact without crippling.

And should keep a market for the tags intact.
Spugg Galdon
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#18 - 2014-10-21 07:14:31 UTC
I'm just gonna leave this here........



Link
Ix Method
Doomheim
#19 - 2014-10-21 07:34:32 UTC
Donnachadh wrote:
Ix Method wrote:
it strikes me as long as someones out their risking their necks, allowing people to cough up a couple of bill for Jumpclone/Refining/Market standings wouldn't be the end of the world.


Ah so now you are saying that only those players that have a few bil laying around they have no use for should be able to take advantage of this? Yet another reason why this is a bad idea, only those with massive amounts of ISK can use it.

Others have brought up the new player that because of a lack of understanding of the game has allowed their standings to get to bad for one or more of the empires. As one who spends most of my game time with new players I can see the value in a one time only option to use a pay for standings to correct this common new player error.

I know there is a mechanic in the game that allows for those with negative standing to "buy" it back up, but since we are talking about changing that mechanic then we need to look at how this affects players all across the entire spectrum and not just those with negative standings. If we are going to change this and allow for you folks with negative standing to "buy" your way back to 0 then I expect to be able to "buy" my way to the higher plus side standings that my play style requires.

Well that's kinda the point isn't it. If you were to do something like this it would need to be priced high enough that, in general, players would only be able to do it for few enough corps as not to make standings completely redundant and that tags/whatever are used would be valuable enough to farm.

New players aren't particularly the focus for any system like this I'd have thought. To get down to such horrible levels is going to require decent amounts of L4s - if that is considered a problem the way to flag this for them would be via mission text/NPE, not an easily affordable instafix.

Travelling at the speed of love.

Efraya
V0LTA
OnlyFleets.
#20 - 2014-10-21 10:12:51 UTC
Spugg Galdon wrote:
I'm just gonna leave this here........



Link


Great minds think alike. I'm sorry that you didn't get more traction on your thread. I wasn't aware that it was already suggested.

[b][center]WSpace; Dead space.[/center] [center]Lady Spank for forum mod[/center][/b]

123Next page