These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE New Citizens Q&A

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Allies

First post
Author
Samantha Falco
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#1 - 2014-10-13 01:09:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Samantha Falco
Greetings.

I’m here to ask some questions on behalf of a young and growing corporation which wishes to remain anonymous. It seems another capsuleer, belonging to another corporation, has taken an extreme interest in my client’s corporation, asking in-depth questions about corporation activities and objectives. The other corporation is asking to be allies with my client’s corporation but my client is uncertain as to the ramifications of what is involved with formally being allies with other corporations.

It’s well know there are many nefarious types in the Eve Universe, who come across as friendly and helpful on first meeting, only to later prove to have ulterior motives. These individuals can cause great harm and create havoc with other capsuleers and corporations.

What vulnerabilities would my client’s corporation be opening themselves up to should they become formal allies to another corporation?

Would the members of one allied corporation be free to attack the members of another allied corporation without repercussions from Concord?

Eve Universe can be a friendly place, but it can just as easily be cold, dark and unforgiving. Any words of wisdom would be appreciated by my client.
NightCrawler 85
Phoibe Enterprises
#2 - 2014-10-13 02:42:30 UTC
I will assume that the proposal is that your friends join an official alliance?

Basing my opinion on my own experiences, others might feel completely different.

When someone joins an alliance there is a couple of things that will change, such as your members will have a new permanent channel "alliance", and if the alliance gets a war dec every corp in the alliance is in war.

You should also consider whether the people want you to join just to boost their own numbers, or use you as meat shield.
Chances are also high that you will have to alter your corporations rules to align with the alliance's rules, and in many cases you will not have a say in what the alliance do, or what plans they have.
So, if nothing else try to make sure that your CEO gets a say in future decisions and similar so that your corporations members wishes is expressed and taken into account.
Needless to say that even if you have a someone from your corp within the alliance's leadership that does not mean that your opinions/wishes will make a difference, which is a risk you have to take.

You should also keep in mind that alliance leaders can (and often will) abuse their members. By this i mean things like "Hey we have this great plan! But we need to get X amount of ISK first", which in turn ends up with plans falling trough, and ISK being lost or being used for the alliance leaders own benefit.

Basically you run into a lot of the same risks as you would joining a corporation, but since alliances tends to have more people, more people in leadership, and more drama, the risk of things going wrong gets a bit higher.

Alliance members can not freely shoot at each other.

If by allies you mean that you just set each other blue.
Well some of the same things can happen of course. In general you would have a new chat channel that all/both corporations share, agreements on things like who to war dec, sharing blues (and reds), following the same ROE... you get the idea.

But i have found that many that set each other blue really have no real reason to do so. You set each other blue, and you never really interact or see each other. So before you start setting everyone who asks blue, make sure that there is a reason behind doing it. Whether or not its joint mining operations, or making low sec life easier.

Also remember to the basic back ground checks.
As an example you have someone approach you saying that they are a pvp corp living in low sec and they want to set you blue and let you set up in their systems. Then you look at their KB and realize that they really have no idea what they are doing, and are getting slaughtered on a daily basis. Chances are high they just want you as blue to protect them, not for your mutual benefit.

Hope that helped answer some of your questions Smile



Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat
Working Stiffs
#3 - 2014-10-13 03:46:25 UTC
NightCrawler 85 wrote:
Alliance members can not freely shoot at each other.

Quoting for emphasis.

My opinion: give it a try. Your corp doesn't have to stay in the alliance if it doesn't work out. At least it will be a new experience.
J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#4 - 2014-10-13 08:13:15 UTC
Samantha Falco wrote:
Greetings.

I’m here to ask some questions on behalf of a young and growing corporation which wishes to remain anonymous. It seems another capsuleer, belonging to another corporation, has taken an extreme interest in my client’s corporation, asking in-depth questions about corporation activities and objectives. The other corporation is asking to be allies with my client’s corporation but my client is uncertain as to the ramifications of what is involved with formally being allies with other corporations.

It’s well know there are many nefarious types in the Eve Universe, who come across as friendly and helpful on first meeting, only to later prove to have ulterior motives. These individuals can cause great harm and create havoc with other capsuleers and corporations.

What vulnerabilities would my client’s corporation be opening themselves up to should they become formal allies to another corporation?

Would the members of one allied corporation be free to attack the members of another allied corporation without repercussions from Concord?

Eve Universe can be a friendly place, but it can just as easily be cold, dark and unforgiving. Any words of wisdom would be appreciated by my client.



You can be friendly on 2 manners:

1. Form an official alliance together.
2. Set each other as blue standings.


With the first, whenever your alliance is wardecced, you have to fight together. Other then flying under the same banner, there is nothing in common (they can't shoot you without CONCORD, etc.)

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#5 - 2014-10-13 10:58:53 UTC
Tau Cabalander wrote:
NightCrawler 85 wrote:
Alliance members can not freely shoot at each other.

Quoting for emphasis.

My opinion: give it a try. Your corp doesn't have to stay in the alliance if it doesn't work out. At least it will be a new experience.

Shocked really!?
I assumed they could.
hmm, this is why I post here I suppose.

Good post night crawler.
Cherri Minoa
Serendipity Technologies Inc
#6 - 2014-10-13 11:00:01 UTC
It's difficult to advise without knowing more about your "friend's" corp and the one offering alliance. However, I would be inclined to adopt the following strategy:

1. Start by doing some research on the other corp. EVEkill, forums, anything you can use to get some intel on them.
If there are no obvious alarm bells ringing, then ...
2. Contact the CEO and ask them about their corp, aims, objectives etc..
If those seem reasonable, then ...
3. Propose a "trial" period (maybe a month) where you set each other to +10, organise some joint activities, chat together on voice comms, etc..
If that goes well then ...
4. Join Alliance, kiss, cuddle, live happily ever after

"If I had been censured every time I have run my ship, or fleets under my command, into great danger, I should have long ago been out of the Service" - Horatio Nelson

Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#7 - 2014-10-13 12:09:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Vimsy Vortis
Given zero information about either corp it's very difficult to give any but the most generic advice, but I'll try.

Alliances are to corps as corps are to players, in the same way a corp has a CEO an alliance has an Executor corp, the members of that corp are the individuals capable of alliance level button pushing. It's important to know exactly what corp is going to be that executor corp and who the characters in it are going to be. Often an executor corp is a specifically constructed corp that only contains alts of the leadership of various corps in the alliance, but sometimes it's the "main" corp in that alliance. Regardless, before you commit to anything you should know who the people with authority are going to be.

It's also important to determine what they think they'll gain from being in an alliance with you and what you could gain from being in an alliance with them.

Also mutual defense is important. If the members of an alliance aren't willing to cooperate during periods of strife to protect eachothers members and/or assets then there's not much point in it being an alliance at all.

Although I obviously have a particular perspective on the last part. It is a routine occurrence for me to declare war on some generic highsec alliance, kill some mining barges and mission runners, siege a POS yet nobody even attempts to mount a defense even when they have 30 people online and we have exactly two dudes flying around in assault frigates killing their members with impunity, later on all the member corps drop out without ever firing a shot back. I always wonder what the point of that alliance was if they weren't actually willing to protect it.
Samantha Falco
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#8 - 2014-10-13 17:45:33 UTC
I thank everyone for their replies.

I would like to clarify; the other corporation does not seek an alliance. They only wish to be allies.

I've done some research into the other corporation and they appear to hold the same interests as my client’s corporation. They appear to operate mostly in Hi-Sec, with occasional ventures into Low and Null Sec. Since the other corporations founding, they have been involved in only two wars. Neither war was recent and both appear to have ended badly for them.

The overall security rating for the other corporation is on the positive side. They have less than 30 members and having looked at each member individually, approximately 1/ 3 have no security listing I could find. Of the remaining members, all have security ratings on the positive side, with several having a security rating of only 0.1.

From looking at individual kill-boards, it appears the corporation members do not fair to well in combat situations. They appear to be doing alright financially as they have been able to replace the loss of several high value assets (….only to lose them again).

Further comments and observations would be greatly appreciated.
ISD LackOfFaith
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#9 - 2014-10-13 18:54:23 UTC
Try a cost/benefit analysis.

Your client's corp: what would they have to do to maintain this "ally" state (time, money, resources, etc)? What do they lose getting into this? What are they giving/providing to their new "allies" (including information, however intangible it might be)? What opportunities does doing this close?

On the other hand, what do they gain? Why should they want this particular ally? What (figurative) doors are opened for them by doing this? What might they have/gain in the future from such an ally?

The potential ally: Why do they want to be allied? What do they gain from this? Why do they want to ally with your client's corp in particular rather than another one? What are they looking to achieve? What are they looking to contribute? What are they giving up by becoming your client's corp's ally?



For example: suppose I'm the CEO of a corp that focuses on hisec ganking, and someone from a hisec industry corp contacts me, looking to be allies.

Outcome for me:

  • (gain) Cheaper ships, presumably.
  • (gain) Wider network of contacts, maybe pointing me to more targets.
  • (gain) Social aspect of having friends and collaboration.
  • (gain) Possibly convert some of the industry players into gankers themselves.
  • (loss) Fewer targets to shoot at.
  • (loss) Leaks of operational information to someone who would normally be my enemy.
  • (loss) Opening myself up to a possible trap.
  • (loss) Some of my own corp mates may leave for a more industry-heavy life.


Outcome for them:

  • (gain) More customers, better flow of industry.
  • (gain) Extra safety, fewer gankers shooting them.
  • (gain) Social aspect of having friends and collaboration.
  • (gain) Possibly convert some of the gankers into industry players.
  • (gain) Acquire information on locations cleared out by the gankers.
  • (loss) Leaks of operational information to someone who would normally be their enemy.
  • (loss) Opening themselves up to a possible trap.
  • (loss) Some of their own corp may leave for a ganker life.
  • (loss) Loss of trust with other industry corps.


If it were up to me, it would be down to weighing the cheaper ships, plus target information, versus the loss of these guys as targets, plus the possibility of it being a trap. Then, I'd decide to actually ally with them, or to decline their offer by ganking their CEO, or ally with them for a few days, then bait a big fleet of theirs out and betray them in a giant fireball they'll remember for the rest of their lives.



But I digress. There's a point where further analysis is fairly pointless navel-gazing, and I think you may be rapidly approaching it. Just make a yes/no decision based on what you know and go with it. It's a game. Mistakes make it fun, so don't be afraid to make them.

ISD LackOfFaith

Captain

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department

I do not respond to Eve Mail or anything other than the forums.

Nerath Naaris
Pink Winged Unicorns for Peace Love and Anarchy
#10 - 2014-10-13 19:43:00 UTC
Samantha Falco wrote:
IThey have less than 30 members and having looked at each member individually, approximately 1/ 3 have no security listing I could find. Of the remaining members, all have security ratings on the positive side, with several having a security rating of only 0.1.


IMO, this hints at at the 1/3 being Alts of other members, though it is likely that number is higher, perhaps 1/2 of them or even more.
So, my guess is that Corp has 10 to 15 real players.

Samantha Falco wrote:
From looking at individual kill-boards, it appears the corporation members do not fair to well in combat situations. They appear to be doing alright financially as they have been able to replace the loss of several high value assets (….only to lose them again).


Are the losses mostly PvE losses? Mining losses? What did they lose during the times of their wars?
What are they doing when venturing into Low- and Null-sec?

Je suis Paris // Köln // Brüssel // Orlando // Nice // Würzburg, München, Ansbach // Saint-Étienne-du-Rouvray

Je suis Berlin // Fort Lauderdale // London // St. Petersburg // Stockholm

Je suis [?]

Samantha Falco
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#11 - 2014-10-13 21:06:41 UTC
Nerath Naaris wrote:


Are the losses mostly PvE losses? Mining losses? What did they lose during the times of their wars?
What are they doing when venturing into Low- and Null-sec?




The loses all appear to be PvP. It looks as if on two occasions they attempted to set up a mining base in Null Sec. In both instances the kill boards show the installation structures being destroyed, the lose of mining vessels, transports and various fighter ships.
voetius
Grundrisse
#12 - 2014-10-13 21:14:38 UTC
Samantha Falco wrote:
Nerath Naaris wrote:


Are the losses mostly PvE losses? Mining losses? What did they lose during the times of their wars?
What are they doing when venturing into Low- and Null-sec?




The loses all appear to be PvP. It looks as if on two occasions they attempted to set up a mining base in Null Sec. In both instances the kill boards show the installation structures being destroyed, the lose of mining vessels, transports and various fighter ships.


I would still look at Vimsy's post as your guideline. The only difference I can see from what you have said is that the Alliance is a more formal type of ally system.

And LackofFaith has a good analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, tactics (SWOT analysis).
J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#13 - 2014-10-13 21:44:57 UTC
voetius wrote:
Samantha Falco wrote:
Nerath Naaris wrote:


Are the losses mostly PvE losses? Mining losses? What did they lose during the times of their wars?
What are they doing when venturing into Low- and Null-sec?




The loses all appear to be PvP. It looks as if on two occasions they attempted to set up a mining base in Null Sec. In both instances the kill boards show the installation structures being destroyed, the lose of mining vessels, transports and various fighter ships.


I would still look at Vimsy's post as your guideline. The only difference I can see from what you have said is that the Alliance is a more formal type of ally system.

And LackofFaith has a good analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, tactics (SWOT analysis).


Thanks Voetius. Thanks alot.

You now made me remind that aweful lecture at Uni about SWOT analysis...

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#14 - 2014-10-13 22:23:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Vimsy Vortis
Edit: Whoops, missed the first line there.

So, if they're not interested in an actual alliance, what do they actually want? If they just want positive standings set,, then whatever that's a non-issue. If they actually want to intimately co-operate with your client's corporation on a regular basis that kind of thing is typically a precursor to actually forming an alliance.

For example, after several months of co-operating on wars, taking joint merc contracts, joining each others incoming wars as defenders and using the same teamspeak sever the alliance Pendulum of Doom became part of our alliance Break-A-Wish Foundation by having the main corp leave and join us instead (since we have the fancy unicorn logo).

If they're just going to sit there and be buddy buddy with your clients without actually promising some kind of tangible benefit and don't entertain the possibility of merging or forming an alliance then they're not your friends, they're the competition.
Samantha Falco
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#15 - 2014-10-14 19:16:45 UTC
I thank everyone for their inputs. I will take this information back to my client. As ISD LackOfFaith said, it's time to make a decision.
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#16 - 2014-10-15 15:53:56 UTC
In my opinion your clients should kill them and eat their hearts to gain their power.