These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Capital Travel Changes - Take a Vote
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
J A Aloysiusz
Risk Breakers
SONS of BANE
#1 - 2014-10-03 01:28:27 UTC  |  Edited by: J A Aloysiusz
Apparently capital projection is a touchy subject. Who knew.
The changes in question:
http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/long-distance-travel-changes-inbound/

The related forum is full of so much flaming and mass posting in general that it's hard to get a solid idea of the "consensus" (or lack thereof).

I'd like to see some quantitative data, so...

TAKE A VOTE:
"Like" the reply that most accurately represents your opinion!
J A Aloysiusz
Risk Breakers
SONS of BANE
#2 - 2014-10-03 01:28:42 UTC
1) I WILL QUIT EVE
(I like the way things are and I am against the proposed changes)
J A Aloysiusz
Risk Breakers
SONS of BANE
#3 - 2014-10-03 01:29:31 UTC
2) It’s a good thought but…
(I am for the spirit of the changes, but they are too harsh and/or unbalanced)
J A Aloysiusz
Risk Breakers
SONS of BANE
#4 - 2014-10-03 01:30:20 UTC
3) Dem changes be on point!
(I think they accurately address the issues present and provide a strong solution)
J A Aloysiusz
Risk Breakers
SONS of BANE
#5 - 2014-10-03 01:31:20 UTC
4) MAKE ALL CAPITALS BURN
(I believe the changes do not go far enough)
Ssabat Thraxx
DUST Expeditionary Team
Good Sax
#6 - 2014-10-03 09:25:21 UTC
5) I have more than one account and am a troll.

\m/ O.o \m/

"You're a freak ..." - Solecist Project
Althalus Stenory
Flying Blacksmiths
#7 - 2014-10-03 09:34:50 UTC
6) Anything that helps to stop power projection and improve 0.0 is better to the game. (Changes always afraid people).

EsiPy - Python 2.7 / 3.3+ Swagger Client based on pyswagger for ESI
Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
#8 - 2014-10-03 09:50:04 UTC
Shouldn't #6 be "Death to anything with a jump drive"?

I say that it should be.
El Creepo
Therapy.
The Initiative.
#9 - 2014-10-03 09:56:08 UTC
Like my posts because I really want more likes!
Aakkonen
Yoyodyne Industries
#10 - 2014-10-03 10:22:34 UTC
Death to all capitals!

Bad Jokes since -09.... Fly Safe! o7
Bronson Hughes
The Knights of the Blessed Mother of Acceleration
#11 - 2014-10-03 12:53:45 UTC
I voted for option 2, primarily because of how CCP appears to have done an end run around the CSM and presented these changes as having strong CSM approval when, in fact, the CSM had barely seen the bulk of the material until a few hours before they were released to us, and certainly not at the CSM Summit.

Overall, I think they're a step in the right direction, and pretty close to on-point. But the whole CSM thing doesn't pass my sniff test.

Relatively Notorious By Association

My Many Misadventures

I predicted FAUXs
Ellendras Silver
CrashCat Corporation
#12 - 2014-10-03 12:56:24 UTC
J A Aloysiusz wrote:
1) I WILL QUIT EVE
(I like the way things are and I am against the proposed changes)


can i have your stuff Lol

[u]Carpe noctem[/u]
J A Aloysiusz
Risk Breakers
SONS of BANE
#13 - 2014-10-03 16:46:35 UTC
Bronson Hughes wrote:
I voted for option 2, primarily because of how CCP appears to have done an end run around the CSM and presented these changes as having strong CSM approval when, in fact, the CSM had barely seen the bulk of the material until a few hours before they were released to us, and certainly not at the CSM Summit.

Overall, I think they're a step in the right direction, and pretty close to on-point. But the whole CSM thing doesn't pass my sniff test.


I would personally agree with you here. A bit of shameless self-promotion:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=5077328#post5077328
Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
#14 - 2014-10-03 16:52:21 UTC
7) Replace Jump Fatigue with Thargoids.

Sovereignty and Population

New Mining Mechanics
Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#15 - 2014-10-03 17:03:07 UTC
8) rablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerable

Murderers of Negotiable Motivations

=]|[=
Leonard Nimoy II
Doomheim
#16 - 2014-10-03 17:08:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Leonard Nimoy II
9) It will make null sec more interesting and makes sense for most ships - but JF and BLOPS are being nerfed too hard.
Komi Toran
Perkone
Caldari State
#17 - 2014-10-03 17:30:54 UTC
10) I didn't want non-T3 subcaps anyway.
Arronicus
State War Academy
Caldari State
#18 - 2014-10-03 18:11:28 UTC
Posting in a Ledditor's attempt to get upvotes from all different viewpoints, thread.
Sigras
Conglomo
#19 - 2014-10-04 07:02:12 UTC
Taking things like these down to a poll is making two huge assumptions:

1. The common player knows what is best for the game as a whole - Im dubious... This assumption is doubtful at best
2. If the common player knew what was best for the game was in conflict with what was best for him, he would choose what is best for the game - This assumption is known to be false because people are selfish.

TL;DR
It doesnt matter what the players want, what matters is what is best for the game.
Rowells
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#20 - 2014-10-04 07:29:37 UTC
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
8) rablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerablerable

Threadzilla
12Next page