Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Look, average lowsec/highsec scrump - Pizza/Pasta likes to pick on the sov empires more than most, and I can honestly tell you that these changes would make our life a lot easier and probably lead to more entities like us popping up around the map. Do you think thats something the blue doughnuts want? I personally don't think so, but the fact that people like N3 and PL are asking for NPC null space in the east and goonies would be okay with it in the north should make you wake up and realise they aren't in it for personal reasons.

When people suggest things that are directly detrimental to their own coalitions income for the sake of the game, I think it's pretty safe to assume they aren't trying to pull a fast one on you.

Which just shows why this change is so badly needed.

Creating a 3-rd party, 4-th party, n-th party instead of 2 giant gravity wells to polarize null-sec. Sadly, EVE is too much of a game that promotes "big is better" and no matter what CCP will do, they won't be able to nerf friendship.

No need. Just make simple rules. During the first month, all stuff in destroyed stations are moved to nearest low sec station, that will give time to everybody LEARN about it. Also make that any character Unsubscribed has their stuff always moved when they outpost is destroyed.

sounds complicated and bit unrealistic...like welcome back, station you had your stuff in was destroyed but there was an old man with long beard coming around and he agreed to magically move your stuff to low sec in exchange for a doughnut. Dunno how they wanna make this but I still havent heard any many good ideas on how they want to implement it. Removing players ability to build stations would prove interesting....leaving us with what we have built in a long years.

On the other hand stations exploding with players assets may prove interesting way how to slow down inflation and money stockpilling in eve.

hey,

i read about 10pages before writing this, so if someone already said this, too bad.

Ops wants npc stations for content, agents I figure, others are against stations so people dont get safe plases in 0.0

that could be easily solved so that when occupancy is high enough, Cosmos type agents fly there in their ships, light up a beacon

and start offering missions, if people dont work for said agents enough they move to some other system or go home wherever

their corp or alliance is from.

my cent for this...

How does it exactly hurt them so much?

They hold sov with the threat of presence.

Conflict is already as avoided right now as it would be then. And whether or not occupancy based sov is considered, force projection needs to be wound down, so either way the effect is the same.

Erm... what? There would still be fights, reimbursments, capital ships, etc. The thing you don't seem to understand is that many people WANT fights. We play this game for entertainment, not so we can stare at our wallet balance and fap while writing blogposts. The problem is that at the moment force projection pretty much means any fight will escalate into a 10% tidi brawl, and anyone outside of the major blobs stands very little chance of moving in to null without being crushed. By shortening the range of force projection and condensing the current superpowers they open up the floor to other groups moving in and growing into power themselves.

*Snip* Removed reply to an edited out part of the quoted post. ISD Ezwal.

It doesn't hurt them, or they wouldn't have proposed it.