EVE General Discussion

Again, you need to get the concept of "player choices" drilled into your thick cranium. Target selection, ship fitting - these are all player choices and don't warrant intervention from CCP. And you have yet to argue that they do, and you have yet to suggest a better system then what currently exists.

If fighting an Industrial corp is "low risk" it's only because the Industrial corps choose to make it that way. No reason for CCP to do anything about it.



Again, your opinion is wrong. The reward is up to the players - if they want KMs, they'll get more reward going after "soft targets". If they want "guudfites" they'll get that reward deccing other "mercs" (and there are indeed groups that do this).



Thanks, this is exactly what I wanted. You're not listing "classes of players", you're listing career choices (which anyone can train into and perform) and overall game balances. Exploration ships were balanced not with "runners vs hunters" in mind but because exploration ships were lacking before. Mining barges were balanced not with "miners vs gankers" in mind but because the mining barge line was a mess. There are no "player classes" in EVE. :) And I challenge you to find any DEV quotes to back up your assertions. :)



Cop out.

PErsonal attacks aside, I've covered this one multiple times. Yes, it's their choice, but so is the choice of target. There will ALWAYS be a weakest target and that's what the wardeccers would always aim for, because there is no BENEFIT to taking a challenge. Why not provide them a benefit for doing so? You are whining on about player choice, so give players a REASON to choose something better.

Its not the wardeccers fault the corp they chose is a pushover, they can't know what any corp is like before a wardec.

I have had people wardec my solo corp a few times now to take on my tower thinking it was going to be easy only to find the production tower became a Dickstar and they died horribly.

Now look who's misrepresenting other people's statements. :)

Hypocrite much, kid?

And BTW I'm Xuixien, and I'm better than you in every way.

Their targets have the same option so what's the issue?

Not I. I suggested adding more reward for more risk and reducing reward for low risk and you told me EVE doesn't work that way.

I believe you, honestly I do. I lay awake at night wishing I could be just like you.

Most of the time they know, and like I say, the odd time they make an error in judgement, they can just run and hide.

That running away is boring and I strongly believe EVE should try to bring people together to interact, and not make the most convenient option "run away and stay docked".

So they run and hide. Its their isk they just wasted.

I don't get involved in wardeccers. My high sec guys operate from NPC corps and my mains operate from null. Much like many people operating from NPC corps, I don't consider it entertaining to lose an unarmed hauler to 20 12 year olds who then proceed to pat themselves on the back chanting "GF" in local. And therein lies the issue. You can't expect NPC players to choose to put themselves out for nothing.

Thus increasing their risk as they are now in players corps. And yes, reducing the player corp risk, but not mechanically, through giving the wardeccers a better choice of targets.

Or NPC corps stay the way they are, people continue to wardec soft targets and people continue to move into NPC corps to avoid them. The end result of that being exactly what we see now, which is that wardecs are a broken mechanic that can and will be avoided.