These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

"How Highsec miners threaten EVE, and how we can stop them."

First post
Author
Omar Alharazaad
New Eden Tech Support
#81 - 2014-08-30 08:50:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Omar Alharazaad
Oh my god, please let them do this. This idea makes me as excited as a fat kid at a buffet. No, really.
As things stand right now I cannot restrain the urge to crack open every MTU I see just to find out what chocolaty goodness may be inside. This would be like that, but only exponentially more enticing.

Come hell or high water, this sick world will know I was here.

Lilly Naari
Enclave Security Forces
#82 - 2014-08-30 09:05:47 UTC
Christopher Mabata wrote:
100% Agreement here

Honestly in my opinion just remove high sec rocks that arent scordite and veldspar, leave rarer ores in site spawns, move ice belts between systems so they arent static and redistribute the loss throughout low and null sec ( especially mexallon )
1.0 - 0.8 = Veld and Scoridte normal rocks
0.7 - 0.6 = +5% rocks
0.5 = +10% rocks and more frequent anom spawns

Leaves miners with decent ISK/Hr but also makes since lore wise since over 11 years large corps would have depleted most of the high highsec mineral and resource reserves forcing operations to move closer to low and null sec. Also provides incentive to move to more dangerous space and discourages AFK mining due to the increased risk factors at play.




I find it hilarious that you all talk about these things and have the gall to sugest such absurd and asinine ideas without having a bit of knowledge or foresight about how it will actually in reality effect you the PvPer or the general economy itself.

Some points going forward:

1. You do realize that 80% to 90% of all Industry is done in Highsec yes? Including Mining.

2. People do not want to mine in Lowsec, Or they would. This is mostly due to the fact that Mining ships are "Defensless". And Mining in Low sec is a guaranteed death sentence (Which falls on you PvPers). So why would a miner do it? They wouldn't.

3. The EvE economy is fueled by Highsec Miners and Industrialists. CCP has stated this on Numerous occasions. Without the Hoighsec "Carebears". The Economy would collapse. You would be paying 1 billion ISK for a single round of ammo.

Only 5% - 20% of minerals, ships, and Goods on the market come from 0.0 and Lowsec, according to CCPs Manufacturing, Marketing and Industry Charts.

4. PvP Emergent Game-play is the real factor in a miners or industrialists decision not to go to low or null.



Lets look at number 1:

CCP has already confirmed that the vast majority of industry in EvE takes place in Highsec. The goal of the latest industrial patches was to attempt to shift the focus to Null and Lowsec, But failed Miserably because Industry in and of itself, is not the issue.

The issue is the Emergent game-play itself. Specifically, the PvPers. And the way industry happens from the back end IE: Mining.

A miner must get into a defenseless ship, in order to have a mineral income sufficient to supply a markets demands for minerals, which are then used to build ships, ammo etc with. An individual with any intelligence is not going to take said ship into a sector of space where the chance of loosing it is almost 100%.

Even if you offered ore that was worth 1 billion ISK a unit that an NPC station would buy. Very few would take you up on it.

Why?

Because retrospectively, PvPers would 100% Camp these materials and gank every single miner who came within 1 AU of it. Making the addition, Pointless. (Where the focus is concerned,( "Getting miners out of highsec").

---

So Reward, has nothing to do with how one should approach this issue. Because the reward in this case to a miner, is NEVER worth the risk, due to the Multiplier of Emergent PvP game-play.

This is why the vast majority of everything is made in an area of space that has a worthwhile risk (The occasional suicide gank) Rather then in an Area of space where the risk is: "You will die almost 100% of the time".

The other reason is because mining takes "Time".. A LONG time.... To gather sufficient minerals to build even a single ship, your talking hours, if not days. (Depending). Null, and Low do not offer the "Time" availability to do this. Sure you can ninja mine, but it will take you 10X the amount of time to gather the same minerals the high-sec miner does.

Why? Again Because of "Emergent" PvP Game-paly. Miners make easy to kill and juicy targets. PvPers want easy to kill and Juicy targets (For the most part).



Point 2:


People do not mine in Low or Null (usually) because it is time consuming, and too risky. In lowsec Combat and PvP is part of survival, so it is asinine to expect someone to go to said space, knowing they have no ability to defend themselves in the ship "Required" to mine ore in the vast quantities needed to supply a stable market.

Give Miners ships with Fat tanks and the ability to pump out DPS, and Miners will start going into low and Null to mine. But then many PvPers would have an issue with this, because then it would be a risk to them to try and kill them. It is blatantly clear that many pvpers only enjoy PvP when they are not at risk.

For example look at the Old Battle Hulk, Used by many miners in lowsec and null once it was discovered that it could kill a battle-cruiser if fitted properly. PvPers sent an outrage of 1000's of posts to the forums "Demanding CCP Nerf the hulk so it couldn't kill them anymore and they could gank in peace again"....

I mean really people..... Really....



Point 3

The economy in EvE is a fluid monstrosity, fueled by players from everywhere right?.... Wrong.

80% Of everything created, Built or made in EvE, is exported from highsec. CCP already confirmed this, and again was the reason for some of the industrial changes which those of us who are actual Industrialist and deal witht he EvE economy, marketing and such things every day, told CCP would not solve the Issue, we even told them what issues it would create, and yet CCP went ahead with it. Lo and Behold...

We told you so never says it enough.

What did we tell CCP?

* It would not make miners and industrialists move because industry was not at the core the issue stopping them from going to null and low to mine and do such.

* It would cause prices to skyrocket (which it has).

* PvPers would still ***** about how highsec miners need to get into 0.0 and lowsec. (Which they do this thread is proof).

> Continued
Lilly Naari
Enclave Security Forces
#83 - 2014-08-30 09:14:37 UTC
* CCP was told that the main core issue had to do with the way EvE handled Emergent PvP Gameplay. And that Industry and Mining did not Mesh enough to allow Industrial/PvP Emergent game-play to compensate for the difference.

IE: Defenseless mining vessels.


Point 4:

The real Issue is Emergent PvP Gameplay.

Well what is this? compared to industry it is when CCP gives industry a boost by placeing better refining rates or materials in more riskier space as a motivation for miners to mine there, and PvPers also take advantage of said changes in order to Gank gank gank.

Which has the effect of making all of CCPs work.... Pointless and a waste of time since no miner will care that he or she can get those minerals because it's not worth the risk, since they can;t defend themselves.


BUT EvE is an MMO!!! Work together.

It's a good idea. However 0.0 and lowsec alliances would rather kill miners then protect them. Which again while part of eve makes the changes pointless since Miners and Industrialists will not take advantage of the changes due to such.


Bottom line:

If the player base of EvE want miners to go into lowsec, or null. You need to change your own behavior to encourage them to do so. Atempting to create game mechanics which force miners into low and null will not work, all you will do is cause your ships to cost billions of isk per frigate.

What you do not seem to understand is that Industrialists don't care what minerals are available where. We can buy every thing we need. And you those in low and 0.0 Must accept OUR prices for such. And you also Must accept OUR prices on the market if you choose to "Buy" anything.

So go ahead, remove everything except veldspar from highsec, we will happily jack our prices up to compensate for it.
Sasha Nyemtsov
Doomheim
#84 - 2014-08-30 10:02:26 UTC
La Rynx wrote:
Sasha Nyemtsov wrote:
La Rynx wrote:
Sasha Nyemtsov wrote:
Hi Lilly, can I just place before you a telling quote from James 315?

"everything in EVE is connected.


Lord help us!
Ugh
Thats not Jimmy, thats a quote from a speech to said comming from Chief Seattle, but was written by Ted Perry.

Chief Seattle all things are connected


Well-grabbed!

I did notice the spoiler beneath the quote: "The words Chief Seattle has become famous for were written by Ted Perry, the screenwriter for home, a 1972 film about ecology."

In the interests of honesty, I should say that, according to Wikipedia, the attribution of the content of the speech is disputed.

Perhaps it was James 315 who wrote the speech for Chief Seattle, then used one of his 4000 alts to ghost it as Ted Perry?


*facepalm*

You could have checked my link, there is more about the dispute. Since there are more then just one rewrite and all text depict or try to depict Chief Seattles thoughts, it would be hard for the likes of you to say CS could have been an alt of Jimmy.
Ugh

Oh and its not grabbed -> i noticed (as in knowing and recognising). Its allways important from what sources bad propaganda derives.
Jimmy isn't a great writer, he is just a thief.


Ouch!

I clicked the link you provided, and read enough to be able to endorse what you said in your post. A quick check of Wiki reinforced the 'disputed' nature of the content of the speech.

That was shoddy of me, I know, but come on, hardly worth a facepalm?

James 315 is a writer, and a far better one than either you or me. For any artist it must be true that 'There's nothing new under the Sun'; they simply find new and interesting ways to represent stuff. Whether or not James 315 was influenced by Native American speechmaking or the scribbles of a screenwriter doesn't really matter; he used the idea appropriately, in the context of Eve Online.

'Everything is connected' was not even an original idea when voiced by Chief Seattle/Ted Perry/Charley's Aunt/Currin Trading. It is as old as the hills; older, in fact.

Still, pleased to see you're paying close attention, La Rynx.

Fly Safe!
Sasha Nyemtsov
Doomheim
#85 - 2014-08-31 06:51:46 UTC
Sasha Nyemtsov wrote:
]Manifesto II - How Highsec miners threaten EVE, and how we can stop them.

James 315's closely argued evisceration of the real threat to EVE. The links take you to the relevant SoundCloud file. New files are initially linked from the MinerBumping Forum by my MB Forum alt, Klaus.


If you'd like to discuss the content of the following audio files, I entreat you to do so in a mature and reasonable manner.

The Accusation
The Carebears Killed Nullsec PvP


I've added a new audio file to the original post and shuffled stuff around so that any future uploads will be easy to find.

In the latest file 'The Carebears Killed Nullsec PvP' you'll hear more about the poisonous influence of the carebear, and in addition, the golden era of PvP and just why James 315 and his New Order of Highsec are so vital to the future of Eve Online.


The Manifestos retain their relevance because:

“the New Order philosophy, grounded in the Code and built upon the foundation of its Saviour's Manifestos.” -James 315.

From his famous and hugely entertaining 'Falcon Punch' Blog of Aug 30 2014.
Sabriz Adoudel
Move along there is nothing here
#86 - 2014-08-31 10:50:49 UTC
Oh yes, even more awesome.

I support the New Order and CODE. alliance. www.minerbumping.com

Rabe Raptor
The Conference Elite
The Conference
#87 - 2014-08-31 22:22:53 UTC
More and more gold coming from Sasha. Great to hear the "good ol' stuff" again!

Together we can make Highsec a better place! www.lawofhighsec.com

Read it, share it, learn it, quote it, memorize it,  live it, breathe it!

Hiply Rustic
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#88 - 2014-09-02 00:30:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Hiply Rustic
Mallak Azaria wrote:
Tolkaz Khamsi wrote:
tl;dr version: botting is the only sane way to deal with Eve's horribly broken mining mechanic. If CCP wants to end botting, they need to change how mining is done, at a fundamental level.


Some people actually enjoy mining because they find it relaxing or they like feeling as though they're contributing to something or they're stoned. Who are you to imply that they're insane for not botting?



There are times, once in a while, when all I want out of my game time is to chill out in a major way. Sometimes when I'm in that mood I fire up the old EvE jukebox song set I saved off into iTunes and point a modestly tanked retriever at some hisec rocks, keep a causal eye on local and dscans, and relax.

So what?

Anyone who thinks that activity (as opposed to rampant afk mining) is what's wrong with the game is welcome to their opinion, and welcome to see if they can find me and convince me it's part of what's wrong with the game.





On the other hand, I don't expect to be safe doing it...so there's that.

Ralph King-Griffin wrote: "Eve deliberately excludes the stupid and the weak willied." EvE: Only the strong-willied need apply.

Hiply Rustic
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#89 - 2014-09-02 00:51:37 UTC
Hiply Rustic wrote:
Mallak Azaria wrote:
Tolkaz Khamsi wrote:
tl;dr version: botting is the only sane way to deal with Eve's horribly broken mining mechanic. If CCP wants to end botting, they need to change how mining is done, at a fundamental level.


Some people actually enjoy mining because they find it relaxing or they like feeling as though they're contributing to something or they're stoned. Who are you to imply that they're insane for not botting?



There are times, once in a while, when all I want out of my game time is to chill out in a major way. Sometimes when I'm in that mood I fire up the old EvE jukebox song set I saved off into iTunes and point a modestly tanked retriever at some hisec rocks, keep a causal eye on local and dscans, and relax.

So what?

Anyone who thinks that activity (as opposed to rampant afk mining) is what's wrong with the game is welcome to their opinion, and welcome to see if they can find me and convince me it's part of what's wrong with the game.




nm

Ralph King-Griffin wrote: "Eve deliberately excludes the stupid and the weak willied." EvE: Only the strong-willied need apply.

RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#90 - 2014-09-02 01:19:50 UTC
Hiply Rustic wrote:
On the other hand, I don't expect to be safe doing it...so there's that.


And that's the difference.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Charax Bouclier
Silvershield Universal
#91 - 2014-09-02 16:55:29 UTC
I’ll preface to say that I am still only a month into EVE, so please excuse any fundamental errors that I might make in this post. I have listened, with great amusement, to the two segments of the manifesto and found it to be a rather interesting perspective.

Mining is the building block for all industrial efforts that produce ships, weaponry and other modules that are used to conduct war against each other. If the ore flows freely, the economy remains healthy and players become less risk-averse if replacement ships remain relatively cheap based on low input costs (ore).

The Manifesto seems to touch on the fact that miners will conduct their activities in high-sec due to simple cost/rewards analysis. The suggestion is that high sec should be less safe to encourage miners to populate null sec and thus create more PvP content (ships guarding/attacking mining fleets).

Whether this creates compelling content is questionable, and it is always prudent to see if there are some selfish motivations attached. Null sec seems to be rampant with these so-called “renter alliances”. These abominable structures allow the weak to conduct their ISK-making activities in peace, while providing tribute to these mafia-like coalition cartels. Not being content enslaving these null sec blue collar workers, these mafia coalition cartels are projecting propaganda at high sec residents in order to pervert more wealth distribution to their coffers. Indeed, what is being proposed is to replace CONCORD with mafia coalition cartel overlords for protection, provided you give them a piece of your action.

No doubt, a more dangerous high sec would cut ore supplies down, and drive prices up. Miners would not reap additional rewards, and instead, would be worse off as they would be subjected to “rent” (i.e., protection money). Simple pilots of limited means would be hurt with higher costs, and thus would be forced to fly less powerful ships… unless, of course, they join up with these mafia cartels.

It seems like an insidious plot to further accumulate wealth into the hands of the few and already rich, while also furthering their power hold on the galaxy by making devices of war prohibitively expensive.

I am starting to wonder if CODE is merely a puppet organization of these rent-sucking coalitions that purport to be about furthering PvP and saving EVE, while their true cause is to enslave more freedom-loving empire citizens by denying them arms, and providing them with higher taxation.

I look forward to listening to further distributions of this Manifesto, but I will maintain my healthy skepticism of what you are truly trying to accomplish.
Thomas Mayaki
Perkone
Caldari State
#92 - 2014-09-03 12:06:25 UTC
Sasha Nyemtsov wrote:
Manifesto II - How Highsec miners threaten EVE, and how we can stop them.

James 315's closely argued evisceration of the real threat to EVE. The links take you to the relevant SoundCloud file. New files are initially linked from the MinerBumping Forum by my MB Forum alt, Klaus.


If you'd like to discuss the content of the following audio files, I entreat you to do so in a mature and reasonable manner.

The Accusation
The Carebears Killed Nullsec PvP


Its good to hear my AFK mining is now ok with the New Order.
Leto Thule
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#93 - 2014-09-03 15:25:14 UTC
Charax Bouclier wrote:


It seems like an insidious plot to further accumulate wealth into the hands of the few and already rich, while also furthering their power hold on the galaxy by making devices of war prohibitively expensive.

I am starting to wonder if CODE is merely a puppet organization of these rent-sucking coalitions that purport to be about furthering PvP and saving EVE, while their true cause is to enslave more freedom-loving empire citizens by denying them arms, and providing them with higher taxation.



Ok, lets assume, for a minute, that you are correct, ( I guess its not THAT far of a stretch) and TNO is just an extension of nullsec politics.

You can bypass that entirely. How? Go mine in lowsec. Yes, you will need protection when you do this. You can either join a corp that has the ability to protect its mining fleets, create your own corp, or pay a lowsec pirate alliance to allow you to operate in "their" space.

Even MORE alternatively, you can mine in WH space. Much more dangerous, much more lucrative. Although refining/selling the minderals gets to be a pain in the ass.

Thunderdome ringmaster, Community Leader and Lord Inquisitor to the Court of Crime and Punishment

DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite
The Conference
#94 - 2014-09-04 08:45:59 UTC
RubyPorto wrote:
Helicity Boson wrote:
b) resources in the form of coders


10 GOTO 30
20 PRINT "HELLO WORLD"
30 END

I am help?


Fixing this for you.

10 PRINT "HELLO WORLD"
20 WAIT 5
30 GOTO 10

Take it from a pro coder :P
DJentropy Ovaert
The Conference Elite
The Conference
#95 - 2014-09-04 08:51:09 UTC
Lilly Naari wrote:


What you do not seem to understand is that Industrialists don't care what minerals are available where. We can buy every thing we need. And you those in low and 0.0 Must accept OUR prices for such. And you also Must accept OUR prices on the market if you choose to "Buy" anything.



You do realize that mineral wealth is not only generated by mining, right? :) In fact, even after mission loot drop nerfing - not even close :)

Also, I hear tales of some large collations that seem to be sitting on... moderate sized stockpiles of minerals :P
BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#96 - 2014-09-04 19:06:04 UTC
Concord Guy's Cousin wrote:
La Rynx wrote:
codies fight only rookie targets.
lol, I look at their killboard, I see plenty of kills that aren't rookies, haulers or miners; in fact I see lots of ships that can shoot back being killed by them. In short, you're full of it.
Quote:
All others are better protected, pros and botters alike.
By whom, or what?
Quote:
That they can mine longer without returning to base. Higher productivity / better output.

netflixblabla = propaganda
Ahh the old ISK/hr defence. As for propaganda, would you kindly explain what the Mackinaw that I've been mining next to (on my main) for the last hour* is doing? He's certainly not playing Eve, I know this for a fact because his mining lasers haven't activated once, nor has he moved.
Quote:
codies shoot newbies and drive them from EvE before they can HTFU.
Now that is propaganda, it's not good propaganda, because it can be easily proved false. I've spoken to a few gankers, they've been more than happy to give me advice on how not to get ganked, how to fit my ships, explained various game mechanics and generally helped me out.

Probably because I treat them like human beings, not like scum; you should try it sometime.

*Make that 2 hours and counting.... he's still there. It's such a shame that the system is well off the beaten track for the usual suspects, and that I don't have the skills to gank him Sad

I know this post is a bit old, but its a shame I can only give it one 'like'.

Founder of Violet Squadron, a small gang NPSI community! Mail me for more information.

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie's Space Mediation Service!

RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#97 - 2014-09-04 19:23:25 UTC
DJentropy Ovaert wrote:
RubyPorto wrote:
Helicity Boson wrote:
b) resources in the form of coders


10 GOTO 30
20 PRINT "HELLO WORLD"
30 END

I am help?


Fixing this for you.

10 PRINT "HELLO WORLD"
20 WAIT 5
30 GOTO 10

Take it from a pro coder :P



So:
10 PRINT "HELLO WORLD"
20 GOTO 40
30 END
40

is gud?

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Steppa Musana
Doomheim
#98 - 2014-09-04 20:52:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Steppa Musana
James 315 himself is a bigger threat to EVE than any miner. He doesn't exist in the community for any real reason other than griefing players... particularly new players. He doesn't go out and create content. He spend nearly the entirety of his EVE time writing articles that humiliate players whom are already on the cusp of leaving due to their experiences.

This is not a knock on ganking, baiting, or any such players in particular. It's a knock on people who wouldn't even play the game if they couldn't find a way to **** off other players.

He is literally a cancer to this game. Sorry to burst anyone's bubble P. The maybe ~50 players who've had their gameplay expanded due to him does not outweigh the many more who have lost their motivation to play over having their characters smeared forever due to a humiliating article on a troll website.

Hey guys.

NoLife NoFriends StillPosting
Doomheim
#99 - 2014-09-05 14:05:36 UTC  |  Edited by: NoLife NoFriends StillPosting
Mallak Azaria wrote:


To be fair those hundreds of people probably would have quit soon anyway.


if they are quitting its probably because EVE is continually a stale, broken, skill-less and imbalalanced pos where risk averse cowards are rewarded for beating up on casual players and noobs in high sec.

Meanwhile derps come to the forums claiming that the MTU drone aggression bug was an intended mechanic and we should just accept that sociopaths have it oh-so-easy in EVE. Roll

If EVE weren't so brokenly easy and so gentle on the sociopaths, we wouldn't have a forum filled with these life-less degenerates who somehow think the game is supposed to be designed to reward risk-averse cowards who have gotten **** on in every other pvp game. And we might be seeing more players instead of a decline.
Paranoid Loyd
#100 - 2014-09-05 15:57:25 UTC
NoLife NoFriends StillPosting wrote:
Mallak Azaria wrote:


To be fair those hundreds of people probably would have quit soon anyway.


if they are quitting its probably because EVE is continually a stale, broken, skill-less and imbalalanced pos where risk averse cowards are rewarded for beating up on casual players and noobs in high sec.

Meanwhile derps come to the forums claiming that the MTU drone aggression bug was an intended mechanic and we should just accept that sociopaths have it oh-so-easy in EVE. Roll

If EVE weren't so brokenly easy and so gentle on the sociopaths, we wouldn't have a forum filled with these life-less degenerates who somehow think the game is supposed to be designed to reward risk-averse cowards who have gotten **** on in every other pvp game. And we might be seeing more players instead of a decline.


You really gotta take it easy man. This much rage about a video game can't be good for your health. Ugh

"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix

Fix the Prospect!