These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Assembly Hall

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

[Proposal] Allow negative votes to be cast in CSM election
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#41 - 2011-12-09 18:50:28 UTC
stop evading the question and tell me why the majority of players are unhappy about supercapital balancing, time dilation and POS fuel blocks

let me cut to the chase here and say that no matter how much you would like it, you are not the "majority of players"

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Amarr Champine
Doomheim
#42 - 2011-12-09 22:24:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Amarr Champine
Andski wrote:
stop evading the question and tell me why the majority of players are unhappy about supercapital balancing, time dilation and POS fuel blocks

let me cut to the chase here and say that no matter how much you would like it, you are not the "majority of players"



and you are? Its funny how we can't dictate what players want and you can. Dude gtfo here with that, what ignorance. Or you could call me a moron again, or a coward. =P

This is the problem with the CSM process, goons get a couple of CSMs and they dictate what the majority of players are.
Nikollai Tesla
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#43 - 2011-12-10 00:30:47 UTC
[quote=AkJon Ferguson

1. Strengthen the eligibility requirements for the next CSM election so that only active accounts that have been active for at least 6 months total are eligible to vote.

2. Give each eligible account 1 vote. That vote may be cast for or against any single candidate (not both.)

Any candidate with a negative vote total would not be eligible to serve on CSM in any capacity that cycle.[/quote]

Man i wish we had this for the US elections.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#44 - 2011-12-10 03:02:21 UTC
Amarr Champine wrote:
Andski wrote:
stop evading the question and tell me why the majority of players are unhappy about supercapital balancing, time dilation and POS fuel blocks

let me cut to the chase here and say that no matter how much you would like it, you are not the "majority of players"



and you are? Its funny how we can't dictate what players want and you can. Dude gtfo here with that, what ignorance. Or you could call me a moron again, or a coward. =P

This is the problem with the CSM process, goons get a couple of CSMs and they dictate what the majority of players are.


please go visit the capital ship balancing feedback thread and tell me all about the uproar by the majority!

of course, time dilation was also poorly received. everyone loves soul-crushing lag!

the only people complaining about POS fuel blocks are those who run a couple of towers in high-sec, and some w-space people, but that's not the "majority"

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Steph Wing
No Dukks Given
#45 - 2011-12-13 00:50:26 UTC
Andski wrote:
also there is already a negative vote, lol, it's called "voting for a candidate you support"
Rip Minner
ARMITAGE Logistics Salvage and Industries
#46 - 2011-12-13 06:03:41 UTC
Andski wrote:
please tick in one or more of the below boxes

You are a:

[ ] Moron
[ ] Bitter supercapital pilot
[ ] Moron
[ ] Miner who lost a hulk
[ ] Moron
[ ] Gallente POS owner upset about high oxytope prices
[ ] Mouthbreather on the bitter about (goons/nullsec) bandwagon (circle one or both)
[ ] Moron



All Supercapital pilots knew it was coming at some point.

How ever the nerf was over the top. I feel the logout timer change would have been good and mybe the drone changes though I would have given them the ablity to fit a full possible flight of both fighters and bomers. They also should have keept the 400 sig change to fighters as well. But with smaller limited drone bays ya fighers are fine as is.

The Hit point reduction was pointless with logout timer change and not realy needed.

Lose a Hulk thats the hulk pilots fault and no one alses.

Gallente POS buy a differnt POS problem solved.

So I have to pick 1/3/5/8. I'm a Moron cant you tell.Idea

Is it a rock point a lazer at it and profit. Is it a ship point a lazer at it and profit. I dont see any problems here.
Previous page123