These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CCP Response Regarding SOMER Blink Concerns

First post First post First post
Author
De'Veldrin
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#541 - 2014-08-21 13:34:50 UTC
Hawkr Trimodian wrote:
And What about that Volcano. I am convinced this is the gods being offended by the unfair Pirate Treatment of Somer........

A huge volcano in Iceland may be getting ready to erupt:

[Update, Aug. 20, 2014: Iceland's National Crisis Coordination Center has been activated, and a large uninhabited area surrounding the volcano has been evacuated. The Icelandic Met Office reports that about 1,000 small earthquakes occurred near the volcano on Tuesday. Also on Tuesday, Iceland's Civil Protection raised the nation's threat level from Uncertainty Phase to Alert Phase.]



Wait wait...how do you evacuate an uninhabited area? Did they import people to evacuate?

De'Veldrin's Corollary (to Malcanis' Law): Any idea that seeks to limit the ability of a large nullsec bloc to do something in the name of allowing more small groups into sov null will inevitably make it that much harder for small groups to enter sov null.

Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
#542 - 2014-08-21 13:36:16 UTC
Darbarmic wrote:
rather than have me try to prove what i have said .

Do you even realize how silly this sounds?
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#543 - 2014-08-21 13:36:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
ExplorerAlTNewb wrote:
its not just EVE Related. http://imgur.com/sCn0H1u


The scenario is basic, certain 3rd parties use ISK to pay EVE Players to create EVE content & services....

This is supposely OK"ed

And one (possibly more) of the 3rd parties uses ISK to pay EVE Players to create content & services that have nothing to do with EVE Online.

This hasnt been answered, and will most likely get ignored unless more focus is shined on it.

Multiple CSM are a part of the "entity" that is doing it so they will deflect away from this. There is also the forum crashers & non sense wing working at odds ends to cover up / jam up everything as best they can.

TMC stopped paying isk for non eve related content after the last SomerBlink debacle as far as I know; as it was deemed to be in contravention of CCP's policy with regards to isk for OOG services. A member of the mittens.com staff/mods team will be able to confirm this one way or the other.

If you feel that TMC has broken the rules, you should take it up with CCP, who will investigate the allegation and deal with it accordingly; probably by filing under B for burn it and then throwing all related paperwork into the nearest volcano because the allegation had no substance.

Also there appears to be something missing from your image, a date stamp, without it there's no way of telling how old it is.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Aivo Dresden
State War Academy
Caldari State
#544 - 2014-08-21 13:39:59 UTC
I'm extremely disappointed, even disgusted by how this was handled. CCP Falcon, how low you have fallen. This whole thing was nothing more than a CCP sponsored and CSM fueled witch hunt.

Somer had authorization from your own VP and then you go ahead claiming this was not from your 'legal' department and therefore not valid. Are you for real? What kind of shoddy internal system do you have, if your VP can make deals without running them past legal first? I don't know if that's just sheer incompetence or pure amateurism. To then come back on them, at the expense of one of your players is completely unacceptable.

Secondly, you take actions against Somer's accounts because he disclosed 'private' communication. These are message between in this context, corporate entities. Not CCP and a player. He is well within his rights to publish approval or permission given for certain promotions and say they were approved by CCP, if in fact your own VP approved them in the first place.

You had a CSM fueled witch hunt, with our precious Goon CSMs leading the charge. And CCP sponsored it all, threw Somer to the wolves. I'm so disappointed by how you handled this, words can't express.

You caused this situation and you sacrificed Somer hoping it would calm the masses. You should be ashamed of yourself, truly.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#545 - 2014-08-21 13:41:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
ExplorerAlTNewb wrote:
.. its not just EVE Related. http://imgur.com/sCn0H1u

The scenario is basic, certain 3rd parties use ISK to pay EVE Players to create EVE content & services....

This is supposely OK"ed

And one (possibly more) of the 3rd parties uses ISK to pay EVE Players to create content & services that have nothing to do with EVE Online.
Do you have any proof of this? And to qualify as RMT, do you have any evidence that the ISK is paid out in exchange for real cash?

Rroff wrote:
Did you actually read the proposal? because if what CCP got was word for word as posted by Somer its pretty clear as to its intentions
The intent was clear after the fact when it became apparent how you were meant to parse the sentences (which was different from the intuitive sense). Even so, the way it was actually enacted was now how it was described — the proposal was written to suggest that no extra ISK would be paid out, and the actual scheme hinged entirely on extra ISK being paid out.

Darbarmic wrote:
plz stay on topic, rather than have me try to prove what i have said .
If you aren't willing to prove what you say, what you say is of no relevance at all — least of all to the topic at hand. So yes, please say on topic and try to prove your claims.
AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
Ferguson Alliance
#546 - 2014-08-21 13:44:44 UTC
Describing a post as 'lawyer-speak' (or did I say lawyer language?) is now a personal attack. That's rich.

...

CCP has always known that Somer made money from his website. CCP gave this guy unique ships just for kicks. CCP's VP of Sales corresponded with this guy regularly. CCP approved this latest promotion and learned about it FROM SOMER HIMSELF, not through some SUPER-AWESOME investigation. CCP's VP of Sales thought Somer was JOKING when he asked for consent from legal (presumably because the idea was so preposterous to her.)

If this episode is so wonderfully 'transparent' then why doesn't the initial post contain any of that information?

If Somer was just a player like everyone else and didn't have a business relationship with CCP, I would also like (as a regular player of EVE Online like Somer) regular emails from CCP's VP of Sales making friendly inquiries into my plans for the month.

...

As far as RMT, I loathe gold farmers who then turn around and RMT because that combination breaks MMO's. But it's the gold farming, the botting, the multi-boxers, the exploiters who break the game for people who play the game as intended (because it becomes impossible for them to compete.) NOT some guy who runs a gambling website and makes a few shekels out of the deal with CCP's full knowledge and consent and then gets banned because someone at CCP got butthurt that actual communications demonstrating shady behavior by CCP (yet again) were made public.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#547 - 2014-08-21 13:46:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Aivo Dresden wrote:
I'm extremely disappointed, even disgusted by how this was handled. CCP Falcon, how low you have fallen. This whole thing was nothing more than a CCP sponsored and CSM fueled witch hunt.
How on earth is it a witch hunt?
They're enforcing the EULA — is this now a bad thing?

Quote:
You had a CSM fueled witch hunt, with our precious Goon CSMs leading the charge.
What do the goons have to do with anything and why does it matter? How is it a “goon CSM” when 85% of the CSM aren't goons? You're not making any sense here.


AkJon Ferguson wrote:
CCP has always known that Somer made money from his website. CCP gave this guy unique ships just for kicks. CCP's VP of Sales corresponded with this guy regularly. CCP approved this latest promotion and learned about it FROM SOMER HIMSELF, not through some SUPER-AWESOME investigation.
Making money was never the issue. And no, CCP did not approve this latest promotion — they approved something very different, that Somer then used as a cover for a drastically different scheme that broke the rules.

Quote:
As far as RMT, I loathe gold farmers who then turn around and RMT because that combination breaks MMO's. But
But nothing. RMT isn't allowed. Period. The form is irrelevant. You don't get to skip past the rules just because you don't engage in the regular type of rule-breaking and instead come up with a new kind. He could have made money without RMTing but instead chose to simply revive a simplified version of the same scheme that was shut down hard a year ago.
Garai Nolen
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#548 - 2014-08-21 13:48:50 UTC
Aivo Dresden wrote:
Secondly, you take actions against Somer's accounts because he disclosed 'private' communication. These are message between in this context, corporate entities. Not CCP and a player. He is well within his rights to publish approval or permission given for certain promotions and say they were approved by CCP, if in fact your own VP approved them in the first place.


No, they aren't. If they were, he'd already be in violation of the EULA for being a "corporate entity" using EVE for business purposes. These were precisely between "CCP and a player". Anything else would be exactly the sort of privileged/special/favouritist relationship that CCP is/was accused of fostering with Somer, which is pretty much THE source of the community backlash.

As for his rights to publish them... certainly, he is well within his legal rights to publish (in most jurisdictions anyway). But CCP can ban his accounts for any reason they see fit, and publishing private CCP correspondence is one of those reasons clearly spelled out in the EULA that people get smacked with all the time.

Pretty much all of your arguments appeal to Somer's "special status", which is exactly the problem. No other player entity enjoys this special status with CCP. If CCP wants to spell out how we can apply for this same special status, great, we'll all be on even footing with Somer. Otherwise they MUST treat Somer like any average Joe regular player subject to the same EULA as anyone else, because that's exactly what he is.
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#549 - 2014-08-21 13:53:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Rroff wrote:
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
carbomb wrote:
I might be wrong, quite often am but this seems to me that someone at ccp signed off on this without reading it properly. Someone higher caught it after the scheme had started and called a stop. Somer in protest posted copies of the conversations showing the given consent and rather than admit that they f**ked up, ccp digs a breach of service out of their pocket and bans somer.

just saying
Someone in sales, who should have passed it to legal but didn't, signed off on a proposal that was worded in such a way that it appeared to say one thing, and meant another, thus obscuring the true intent.

TL;DR SomerBlink attempted to pull the wool over CCP's eyes, and failed due to those pesky Eve players.


Did you actually read the proposal? because if what CCP got was word for word as posted by Somer its pretty clear as to its intentions - if Somer intentionally side stepped CCP procedure to get someone to OK it under another pretext, etc. then that is another matter and one I have no info on.
Yes I've read the proposal, have you?

Proposal, with the relevant parts highlighted for your convenience The justification is an outright lie, SomerBlink was rewarding players with extra isk by paying above market value for the PLEX they were purchasing.

The highlighted part of the workflow doesn't specify the price that SomerBlink would pay for the PLEX, it merely says best price. Which is basically an ambiguous term to try and cover their arse.

SomerBlinks affiliate paid them RL cash for every sale he received via them, by driving traffic and sales to him they increased his sales, and their own RL cash income.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Rroff
Antagonistic Tendencies
#550 - 2014-08-21 13:53:43 UTC
Tippia wrote:
[quote=ExplorerAlTNewb]The intent was clear after the fact when it became apparent how you were meant to parse the sentences (which was different from the intuitive sense). Even so, the way it was actually enacted was now how it was described — the proposal was written to suggest that no extra ISK would be paid out, and the actual scheme hinged entirely on extra ISK being paid out.


The bit about extra ISK was context sensitive albeit in the description of a relatively complex system I can see why people might lose sight of the context but it was pretty plain to me on first read (as you can see in the Somer thread where I explained how it worked before all this kicked off).
AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
Ferguson Alliance
#551 - 2014-08-21 13:54:53 UTC
Aivo Dresden wrote:
I'm extremely disappointed, even disgusted by how this was handled. CCP Falcon, how low you have fallen. This whole thing was nothing more than a CCP sponsored and CSM fueled witch hunt.

Somer had authorization from your own VP and then you go ahead claiming this was not from your 'legal' department and therefore not valid. Are you for real? What kind of shoddy internal system do you have, if your VP can make deals without running them past legal first? I don't know if that's just sheer incompetence or pure amateurism. To then come back on them, at the expense of one of your players is completely unacceptable.

Secondly, you take actions against Somer's accounts because he disclosed 'private' communication. These are message between in this context, corporate entities. Not CCP and a player. He is well within his rights to publish approval or permission given for certain promotions and say they were approved by CCP, if in fact your own VP approved them in the first place.

You had a CSM fueled witch hunt, with our precious Goon CSMs leading the charge. And CCP sponsored it all, threw Somer to the wolves. I'm so disappointed by how you handled this, words can't express.

You caused this situation and you sacrificed Somer hoping it would calm the masses. You should be ashamed of yourself, truly.


You captured it so well. Thanks.

I'm especially disgusted with Mang and Ali who were both +5 before this incident but have demonstrated themselves to be complete tools.
Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
#552 - 2014-08-21 13:55:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Doc Fury
De'Veldrin wrote:
Hawkr Trimodian wrote:
And What about that Volcano. I am convinced this is the gods being offended by the unfair Pirate Treatment of Somer........

A huge volcano in Iceland may be getting ready to erupt:

[Update, Aug. 20, 2014: Iceland's National Crisis Coordination Center has been activated, and a large uninhabited area surrounding the volcano has been evacuated. The Icelandic Met Office reports that about 1,000 small earthquakes occurred near the volcano on Tuesday. Also on Tuesday, Iceland's Civil Protection raised the nation's threat level from Uncertainty Phase to Alert Phase.]



Wait wait...how do you evacuate an uninhabited area? Did they import people to evacuate?


A common necessity. They have to canvas the area and run-off all of the looky-loos who inventively gather and want to gawk at things like this first-hand.

There's a million angry citizens looking down their tubes..at me.

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#553 - 2014-08-21 14:00:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Rroff wrote:
The bit about extra ISK was context sensitive albeit in the description of a relatively complex system I can see why people might lose sight of the context but it was pretty plain to me on first read (as you can see in the Somer thread where I explained how it worked before all this kicked off).

…and that “context sensitiveness” is there solely to confuse matter and hide what is actually going on: namely that, contrary to the rules and contrary to the policy put in place the last time he tried this scheme, extra ISK will be paid out for ensuring that he gets real-life cash. If it's context sensitive, it has no place in the proposal — it is only injected to throw off the perception of (read: lie about) how the program will work.

There is exactly one mention of extra ISK in the proposal, in a sentence that claims there will be none. That is because if the proposal would describe where the extra ISK comes in, it would instantly be slapped down for the RMT scheme (carbon-copied from last year) it is.

Garai Nolen wrote:
No, they aren't. If they were, he'd already be in violation of the EULA for being a "corporate entity" using EVE for business purposes. These were precisely between "CCP and a player". Anything else would be exactly the sort of privileged/special/favouritist relationship that CCP is/was accused of fostering with Somer, which is pretty much THE source of the community backlash.

As for his rights to publish them... certainly, he is well within his legal rights to publish (in most jurisdictions anyway). But CCP can ban his accounts for any reason they see fit, and publishing private CCP correspondence is one of those reasons clearly spelled out in the EULA that people get smacked with all the time.
…and, if anything, the “corporate entity” defence would mean that he was leaking corporate deal flow information, which is an even bigger nono and very possible real-life illegal, depending on the partnership structure. If that's the view one wants to take, he should probably be happy that all that happened was a ban, as opposed to a ban and a hoard of bearded Icelandic vikings lawyers (arguably much more frightening) ripping his business apart.

Doc Fury wrote:
De'Veldrin wrote:
Wait wait...how do you evacuate an uninhabited area? Did they import people to evacuate?

A common necessity. They have to canvas the area and run-off all of the looky-loos who inventively gather and want to gawk at things like this first-hand.

Also, people aren't the only thing you'd want to evacuate — a field of cows is generally considered uninhabited too, for instance, and expensive livestock is probably something you want to save.
SomeDudeInLocal
Late Night Holding
#554 - 2014-08-21 14:05:51 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Rroff wrote:
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
carbomb wrote:
I might be wrong, quite often am but this seems to me that someone at ccp signed off on this without reading it properly. Someone higher caught it after the scheme had started and called a stop. Somer in protest posted copies of the conversations showing the given consent and rather than admit that they f**ked up, ccp digs a breach of service out of their pocket and bans somer.

just saying
Someone in sales, who should have passed it to legal but didn't, signed off on a proposal that was worded in such a way that it appeared to say one thing, and meant another, thus obscuring the true intent.

TL;DR SomerBlink attempted to pull the wool over CCP's eyes, and failed due to those pesky Eve players.


Did you actually read the proposal? because if what CCP got was word for word as posted by Somer its pretty clear as to its intentions - if Somer intentionally side stepped CCP procedure to get someone to OK it under another pretext, etc. then that is another matter and one I have no info on.
Yes I've read the proposal, have you?

Proposal, with the relevant parts highlighted for your convenience The justification is an outright lie, SomerBlink was rewarding players with extra isk by paying above market value for the PLEX they were purchasing.

The highlighted part of the workflow doesn't specify the price that SomerBlink would pay for the PLEX, it merely says best price. Which is basically an ambigous term to try and cover their arse.


Well, buying plex for above the average market price isn't really committing RMT on its own. If you bought plex through legit means such as an approved reseller or CCP directly you can sell it at whatever price you want to, same applies for buying plex from someone who got it in a timecode or such. Market prices in EVE pose no restrictions as its all player driven.

The main reason somer got into trouble was because he stated CCP approved something they actually didn't, and because he posted a log of an email without permission. The RMT element is still at CCP's discretion as to whether it occured, as Falcon mentioned they have nothing to say on it.

Dont get me wrong, Somer deceived CCP and anyone who bought from the service with the whole CCP Approval thing and also basically gave a '**** you' to all by pulling the service.

AkJon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
Ferguson Alliance
#555 - 2014-08-21 14:08:08 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
The highlighted part of the workflow doesn't specify the price that SomerBlink would pay for the PLEX, it merely says best price. Which is basically an ambigous term to try and cover their arse.


The BEST price, in context, clearly means the highest price. There is nothing ambiguous about it. Which is why the proposal even mentions that it will prevent people from buying PLEX in Jita and then selling it to Blink.

"You can only sell 2 PLEX at this rate for each ETC you purchased (so you can't just go buy PLEX in Jita and resell them to Blink for more than you paid.)"

It's right there in the proposal that the rate would be MORE than Jita prices.

But you knew that already, didn't you?


Koniforous
Tauren Transit
#556 - 2014-08-21 14:08:18 UTC
Guess who called it?!

I want the community team to know how amazingly this was handled. Wonderful job guys.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#557 - 2014-08-21 14:10:15 UTC
SomeDudeInLocal wrote:
Well, buying plex for above the average market price isn't really committing RMT on its own. If you bought plex through legit means such as an approved reseller or CCP directly you can sell it at whatever price you want to, same applies for buying plex from someone who got it in a timecode or such. Market prices in EVE pose no restrictions as its all player driven.

The interesting part is that it could still be RMT even if he bought them at half market price. As long as the in-game trade is contingent on an out-of-game trade, it raises the RMT flag. Sure, at that point, it would be very unfavourable RMT (for the ISK buyer) so there would be absolutely no incentive to engage in it, but the nature of the thing doesn't really change just because it's too poorly set up to attract any customers… P
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#558 - 2014-08-21 14:11:10 UTC
SomeDudeInLocal wrote:

Well, buying plex for above the average market price isn't really committing RMT on its own.
True enough, but when you combine it with a RL cash payment for every one purchased from your affiliate, who is receiving increased trade due to your promotion it becomes RMT.


In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
#559 - 2014-08-21 14:12:32 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Rroff wrote:
The bit about extra ISK was context sensitive albeit in the description of a relatively complex system I can see why people might lose sight of the context but it was pretty plain to me on first read (as you can see in the Somer thread where I explained how it worked before all this kicked off).

…and that “context sensitiveness” is there solely to confuse matter and hide what is actually going on: namely that, contrary to the rules and contrary to the policy put in place the last time he tried this scheme, extra ISK will be paid out for ensuring that he gets real-life cash. If it's context sensitive, it has no place in the proposal — it is only injected to throw off the perception of (read: lie about) how the program will work.

There is exactly one mention of extra ISK in the proposal, in a sentence that claims there will be none. That is because if the proposal would describe where the extra ISK comes in, it would instantly be slapped down for the RMT scheme (carbon-copied from last year) it is.

Garai Nolen wrote:
No, they aren't. If they were, he'd already be in violation of the EULA for being a "corporate entity" using EVE for business purposes. These were precisely between "CCP and a player". Anything else would be exactly the sort of privileged/special/favouritist relationship that CCP is/was accused of fostering with Somer, which is pretty much THE source of the community backlash.

As for his rights to publish them... certainly, he is well within his legal rights to publish (in most jurisdictions anyway). But CCP can ban his accounts for any reason they see fit, and publishing private CCP correspondence is one of those reasons clearly spelled out in the EULA that people get smacked with all the time.
…and, if anything, the “corporate entity” defence would mean that he was leaking corporate deal flow information, which is an even bigger nono and very possible real-life illegal, depending on the partnership structure. If that's the view one wants to take, he should probably be happy that all that happened was a ban, as opposed to a ban and a hoard of bearded Icelandic vikings lawyers (arguably much more frightening) ripping his business apart.

Doc Fury wrote:
De'Veldrin wrote:
Wait wait...how do you evacuate an uninhabited area? Did they import people to evacuate?

A common necessity. They have to canvas the area and run-off all of the looky-loos who inventively gather and want to gawk at things like this first-hand.

Also, people aren't the only thing you'd want to evacuate — a field of cows is generally considered uninhabited too, for instance, and expensive livestock is probably something you want to save.


Now I'm imagining a Puffin round-up...



There's a million angry citizens looking down their tubes..at me.

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#560 - 2014-08-21 14:14:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
AkJon Ferguson wrote:
The BEST price, in context, clearly means the highest price.
So you're saying that this part of the proposal was a lie too — yet another thing that was in the proposal but not actually how it worked?

Quote:
Which is why the proposal even mentions that it will prevent people from buying PLEX in Jita and then selling it to Blink.
…except that it doesn't do that at all. What prevents that from happening is the PLEX credit system.

Doc Fury wrote:
Now I'm imagining a Puffin round-up...

Lol I'd imagine the opposite, if anything. When new volcanic islands pop up from the sea bed, they become a great place to store puffins on. But sure, you have to round them up before introducing them to their new habitat, I suppose.