These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Community Concerns Regarding SOMERblink

First post First post
Author
Pitchfork Vendor
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#281 - 2014-08-19 15:07:03 UTC
CCP Falcon wrote:
Mai Maid wrote:
CCP Falcon wrote:


Thatt Guy wrote:
BTW, why is it that if John Q. Player is suspected of anything, the account is banned pending an investigation. However this is the second time Somer has done this, yet no action has been taken?


This came to light late on Sunday evening. Investigating an individual can take a day or so, investigating this case given the sheer number of transactions that have occurred, and tracking exactly where everything is going, takes considerably more time. We're actively working on it.


That reply makes no sense, it doesn't answer the question at all?

If this gets the OK, it might be a good way to cash out though.


From my original post:

CCP Falcon wrote:
While some temporary action has been taken in order to keep a handle on the situation, any outcome of an investigation is still to be determined, and I can’t give any further information regarding the process while it’s ongoing.


Smile

Me wonders if this "temporary action" is related to the reports by a Somer rep in their channel last night that Somerset Mahm is unable to connect to EVE? Smile

Pitchforks! Pitchforks! Get your pitchforks here!

Big Lynx
#282 - 2014-08-19 15:08:08 UTC
CCP Leeloo wrote:

They've been amazing through this, and have been willing to show up for all the scheduled meetings that we've had at short notice at ridiculous time with a very clear, constructive and unified voice on what should be done to fix this problem.


Stop all lotteries? Ban Somer?
Green Gambit
Blue Republic
RvB - BLUE Republic
#283 - 2014-08-19 15:13:42 UTC
Rain6637 wrote:
Man, if only gambling was integrated with the game and players didn't need third party sites for it.


CCP won't do that, as there are specific laws/regulations/taxes/etc that cover gambling in most places in the world. As you can convert real money into credits to gamble, CCPs business is running a MMORPG - not an online casino.

Now third parties, like Somer Blink, who are encouraging people to buy credits to gamble, and actually running online casinos are responsible for making sure that they conform with laws/regulations/taxes/etc covering running an online casino.
Edward Harris
Inner Geek
#284 - 2014-08-19 15:15:28 UTC
CCP Falcon wrote:


Thatt Guy wrote:
Turns out that CCP DID authorize this: http://cogdev.net/blink/lisa.txt (unless this is a blatant lie)

So now we're back to CCP allowing this to go on, but only for their special snowflakes.

Don't worry Somer, I'm sure you get some more limited edition ships, or other goodies outta this.


This was not authorized by our legal department.



That is such an easy way out, isn't it Falcon?
So apparently this was authorized by a VP position in CCP, but you simply refuse to man up and admit a mistake.

This tells me that if I personally were to communicate anything towards CCP and get an "OK, go ahead" from you, there is no way to know for sure if your internal communication will pass the information around.
For me, this is the absolute worst that can happen, since I no longer have any trust whatsoever in anything CCP says.

If anything, this was a huge mistake on CCPs side and it should be seen as such, instead of the usual witchhunt you are actively promoting.
ISquishWorms
#285 - 2014-08-19 15:15:47 UTC
It seems to me that the rules are not being applied equally.

‘No, this isn't it at all. Make it more... psssshhhh’.

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#286 - 2014-08-19 15:16:53 UTC
Green Gambit wrote:
Rain6637 wrote:
Man, if only gambling was integrated with the game and players didn't need third party sites for it.


CCP won't do that, as there are specific laws/regulations/taxes/etc that cover gambling in most places in the world. As you can convert real money into credits to gamble, CCPs business is running a MMORPG - not an online casino.

Now third parties, like Somer Blink, who are encouraging people to buy credits to gamble, and actually running online casinos are responsible for making sure that they conform with laws/regulations/taxes/etc covering running an online casino.


I doubt they conform to the regulations for online casinos. I also doubt that those regulations have applied to them because there hasn't been a direct link between making a purchase and getting credits since their previous GTC bonus was shut down.

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Schmata Bastanold
In Boobiez We Trust
#287 - 2014-08-19 15:19:09 UTC
Green Gambit wrote:
Now third parties, like Somer Blink, who are encouraging people to buy credits to gamble, and actually running online casinos are responsible for making sure that they conform with laws/regulations/taxes/etc covering running an online casino.


Except you cannot pay RL money to SOMER and get blinks to play with. You pay them space money for pixel credits you can gamble with - there's no law to prohibit or control this since whole casino/lottery works with imaginary currency. Only thing law applies to is SOMER's income from PLEX referral link but I'm sure he has it nicely sorted as any responsible adult would do.

Invalid signature format

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#288 - 2014-08-19 15:21:50 UTC
Edward Harris wrote:
That is such an easy way out, isn't it Falcon?
So apparently this was authorized by a VP position in CCP, but you simply refuse to man up and admit a mistake.

This tells me that if I personally were to communicate anything towards CCP and get an "OK, go ahead" from you, there is no way to know for sure if your internal communication will pass the information around.
For me, this is the absolute worst that can happen, since I no longer have any trust whatsoever in anything CCP says.

If anything, this was a huge mistake on CCPs side and it should be seen as such, instead of the usual witchhunt you are actively promoting.


If CCP tell you "yes, you're allowed to do x" one day and change their minds later, it's well within their rights to do so.

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Edward Harris
Inner Geek
#289 - 2014-08-19 15:25:20 UTC
Andski wrote:

If CCP tell you "yes, you're allowed to do x" one day and change their minds later, it's well within their rights to do so.


Of course it is. If CCP decides to ban your account because they don't like your face, it is also well within their rights - it is their game after all and there is nothing you could do against it.

What I am saying here is, the internal communication apparently did not work at all in this situation. CCP should admit the mistake and that's that. There is no need to blame anyone else but themselves.
NFain
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#290 - 2014-08-19 15:25:59 UTC  |  Edited by: NFain
Honestly,

My biggest issue with this is there was an official response not to long ago about doing this. CCP is not the type of company to throw that aside so easily, especially when their stance is quite clear: Linkage. I think Somer should be punished none the less. They knew exactly what they were doing and they knew exactly what happened last time.

You can't claim ignorance for something that's already happened to you. *Remembers all of the negative wallets CCP has provided to innocent people who unwillingly accepted RMT ISK via purchases/wallet transfers/etc*

Its exploitation of a known system with CCP response combined with RMT. Ban hammer is deserved.
111010110
The Darwin Initiative
#291 - 2014-08-19 15:30:22 UTC
Edward Harris wrote:
CCP Falcon wrote:


Thatt Guy wrote:
Turns out that CCP DID authorize this: http://cogdev.net/blink/lisa.txt (unless this is a blatant lie)

So now we're back to CCP allowing this to go on, but only for their special snowflakes.

Don't worry Somer, I'm sure you get some more limited edition ships, or other goodies outta this.


This was not authorized by our legal department.



That is such an easy way out, isn't it Falcon?
So apparently this was authorized by a VP position in CCP, but you simply refuse to man up and admit a mistake.

This tells me that if I personally were to communicate anything towards CCP and get an "OK, go ahead" from you, there is no way to know for sure if your internal communication will pass the information around.
For me, this is the absolute worst that can happen, since I no longer have any trust whatsoever in anything CCP says.

If anything, this was a huge mistake on CCPs side and it should be seen as such, instead of the usual witchhunt you are actively promoting.


That mistakes were made is a no-brainer. But when you do not yet know where, and more particularly how, it is too early to simply throw out a blurb saying "k dudes we made a boo boo that's all folks".

Which is something CCP did in the past, and it tended to have more negative consequences than taking the time to figure things out and then coming out with a clear analysis, a good overview of what happened why and how followed by a well argumented verdict on what's to be done / what was done.

Nothing personal, but as strange as it may seem now that things are a little heated and hectic, it's actually a good thing. CCP have learned from the past in these regards. Keep in mind that until that moment of "coming out" there really isn't much you can do right, you can only walk an incredibly fine line of not doing wrong too badly.

After all, they're dealing with us. And EVE players are quite something.


Personally I hope they do take the time to figure this one out. Less even for what happened where (see my previous post), but much more so for balancing CCP's commercial interests here with that intrinsic uniqueness of EVE's own dynamic. I hate to use the term, but on an in-game level the current situation - if it becomes one of allowed and precedent as such (or even an excemption case) - can all too easily become one of that infamous "slippery slope".

That's something you can't risk stepping on, because players are batshit were it comes to taking things to the max. As individuals, and even more so as groups. Once upon a time - to name but one example , there are many - where people bought influence by means of affiliate RMT mechanisms. Within weeks it was the de facto modus operandi of that Alliance. Scant weeks later groups allied with that Alliance adopted the same mechanisms. I'm not even talking about how - with such a scheme as this being allowed - easy it would become for people to cash out on EVE and just leave. We've seen consequences of that as well over the years, there was a time where folks quit and sold their supers for 7 grand or x64's - even alliances and support mechanisms were traded that way. Back then the scale was limited. Fast forward to today though, where buy power has increased a Thousand fold, where vested interests are much more profound, where organisation of large groups requires means to sponsor low level entertainment to keep the plebs happy without harming the status quo.

Sure, things can easily take a life of their own here. So give them time to figure this one out, to dig back to past cases, to get input and discuss interests and then put matters on the table.

Kneejerking isn't a sport. It's what happens when you don't do it right.
Talvorian Dex
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#292 - 2014-08-19 15:35:05 UTC
Edward Harris wrote:
CCP Falcon wrote:


Thatt Guy wrote:
Turns out that CCP DID authorize this: http://cogdev.net/blink/lisa.txt (unless this is a blatant lie)

So now we're back to CCP allowing this to go on, but only for their special snowflakes.

Don't worry Somer, I'm sure you get some more limited edition ships, or other goodies outta this.


This was not authorized by our legal department.



That is such an easy way out, isn't it Falcon?
So apparently this was authorized by a VP position in CCP, but you simply refuse to man up and admit a mistake.

This tells me that if I personally were to communicate anything towards CCP and get an "OK, go ahead" from you, there is no way to know for sure if your internal communication will pass the information around.
For me, this is the absolute worst that can happen, since I no longer have any trust whatsoever in anything CCP says.

If anything, this was a huge mistake on CCPs side and it should be seen as such, instead of the usual witchhunt you are actively promoting.


This is a good point. Please tell us more, based on your first-hand experience observing these conversations, your personal interactions with CCP staff members, and your minutes from attending these meetings.

Writer of Target Caller, an Eve Online PvP blog, at http://targetcaller.blogspot.com

Edward Harris
Inner Geek
#293 - 2014-08-19 15:39:25 UTC
Talvorian Dex wrote:

This is a good point. Please tell us more, based on your first-hand experience observing these conversations, your personal interactions with CCP staff members, and your minutes from attending these meetings.


I can read what was written in the forums - you should look into that, it can be quite interesting.
Qalix
Long Jump.
#294 - 2014-08-19 15:41:36 UTC
Mike Azariah wrote:
Trust me, neither CSM nor CCP is sitting back waiting for this to 'blow over'.

m

That's what they said last year. Remember when they said they were going to provide direction about third party sites and blah blah blah. Whatever happened to that?
Telerus Malix
Giant Banana Legion
#295 - 2014-08-19 15:43:29 UTC
I simply do not understand the implications of this, Why is it of any concern to what somber blink does for promotions?

500 billion isk they are giving out is already circulating in game, and somer has at least 30-40 trillion in just pure profits from a mathmatical stand point.

They run a tight ship, people aren't being scammed, so what concern is it if they give 10 people 50 billion?

CCP couldn't stop it if they wanted to.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#296 - 2014-08-19 15:47:03 UTC
Telerus Malix wrote:
I simply do not understand the implications of this, Why is it of any concern to what somber blink does for promotions?


Because when it violates the rules that us mere mortals play by, it is of concern.

Telerus Malix wrote:
people aren't being scammed


You don't know that.

Telerus Malix wrote:
CCP couldn't stop it if they wanted to.


Yes they could.

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Retar Aveymone
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#297 - 2014-08-19 15:47:29 UTC
Telerus Malix wrote:
I simply do not understand the implications of this, Why is it of any concern to what somber blink does for promotions?

500 billion isk they are giving out is already circulating in game, and somer has at least 30-40 trillion in just pure profits from a mathmatical stand point.

They run a tight ship, people aren't being scammed, so what concern is it if they give 10 people 50 billion?

CCP couldn't stop it if they wanted to.

Somer has more isk than he can ever practically use, and is turning to what everyone who has more isk than they can use at least idly thinks of: RMT. And if Somer can do it, so can anyone else, and that's not a door you want opened.
Pitchfork Vendor
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#298 - 2014-08-19 15:48:08 UTC
Telerus Malix wrote:
I simply do not understand the implications of this, Why is it of any concern to what somber blink does for promotions?

500 billion isk they are giving out is already circulating in game, and somer has at least 30-40 trillion in just pure profits from a mathmatical stand point.

They run a tight ship, people aren't being scammed, so what concern is it if they give 10 people 50 billion?

CCP couldn't stop it if they wanted to.

Did you read the thread? It's not about Somer giving away isk. It's about them giving away isk for money.

Pitchforks! Pitchforks! Get your pitchforks here!

Caius Sivaris
Dark Nexxus
#299 - 2014-08-19 16:01:27 UTC
Schmata Bastanold wrote:
Green Gambit wrote:
Now third parties, like Somer Blink, who are encouraging people to buy credits to gamble, and actually running online casinos are responsible for making sure that they conform with laws/regulations/taxes/etc covering running an online casino.


Except you cannot pay RL money to SOMER and get blinks to play with. You pay them space money for pixel credits you can gamble with - there's no law to prohibit or control this since whole casino/lottery works with imaginary currency. Only thing law applies to is SOMER's income from PLEX referral link but I'm sure he has it nicely sorted as any responsible adult would do.


Actually :

- Somer get lots of ISK from running a gambling operation
- Somer sells ISK for RL money (trying hard to disguise the fact, but still)

Connecting those two facts, Somer runs a gambling operation, which is heavily regulated about everywhere. There could well a lot worse coming to Somer than an in game ban... It only take a motivated prosecutor wanting to make a name for himself in whatever county he operates...
Csill Es
Doomheim
#300 - 2014-08-19 16:02:26 UTC
From the Making Policies Clear: TOS and Third Party Policy thread:
( https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4855035#post4855035 )

"CCP Falcon wrote:

...... Trading your in game stuff or ISK for out of game currency or services is bad, and the GM Team will spank you.

We make exceptions for this, such as people paying for killboard hosting, or
commissioning other players for forum signatures or artwork, because these are services that are directly related to
EVE Online and are something that enriches both the game and community.

It's a solid rule, but CCP will always use our own judgement and
discretion on a case by case basis, the same as with every other aspect of our policies. ....."


Not having well defined, consistently applied and - most important - transparent policies lead to a slippery slope.
When policies are applied "case by case" combined with total lack of transparency, the outcome is always questionable.