EVE General Discussion

Interesting. I had no idea what ISKboxer was until I saw this thread. A couple of YouTube videos later and I see you can have your very own little pirate army. Nothing like authorized cheating, but as long as it sells accounts I guess it's ok.

Only by a Devine entervention.

ftfu

Can't say I blame people though.

With that razor sharp wit and intellect so keen I find it sexually arousing, I'd love to trap Tippia. But not in a thread (it's way too public for what I'd have in mind).

There was this ego noob in Hek yesterday,
chestbeating with his seven accounts.

He made an embarassment out of himself.

Oh I love seeing Tippia slice an argument to pieces

Unfortunately, this is neither a good argument or an actual one

Someone should crowdfund a mouse with built-in support for that ****

These threads are ******* ridiculous by now.

Since you're on the whole "that one time" thing, then that one time, you should have gone to band camp and stuck it in, but shoved it so far it ******* hit your brain. Only problem is, you don't ******* appear to have one.*

That would have been a service to the World.










* I'll take my forum ban now. Thanks. Even I can see that's a bit outside the rules and all. Not my usual style, but sometime idiots need to be put in their place banned from the forum like me

Another ISBoxer thread already? Keep 'em comin please. Gotta top off the pool for a birthday party this weekend.

Also, I will ask you to use proper bucket filling technique. Please face down into the bucket in such a manner, that will allow your tears fall directly away from your eyes and into the collection receptacle. I prefer purity, and tears rolling down the cheeks may be tainted by Cheetos dust, dried Koolaid, hot pockets grease, etc... This is unacceptable.

The thing i dont like about ISBoxer is it takes away the human factor of error that grows with the more humans you have.

take bombing runs for example

a standard bombing run with lets say 10 people

first need to land on there bomber fc at 0 cloaked if just 1 is uncloaked every gets decloaked

after that they need to align/approach target fc will tell you when to decloak and bomb and finally warp off once bombs away.

ISboxer bombing run with 10 toons controlled by 1 mouse/keyboard

they warp to there ping much the same as in standard (isboxer advantage: with 1 click of the cloaking device you can be quite certain all you fleet as cloaked)

align/approach target (Isboxer advantage: 1 double click towards target/ align click will get all your fleet aligned at the same time removes the m/s delay that every 1 has when communicating via voice com's (teamspeak,mumble,ect) insureing all your ships start there approach at the exact same time to the same location, removing the human factor for misunderstanding what they were meant to be aligning to.

decloaking, bombing, warping off (Isboxer advantage: 1 click of the cloak and 10 bombers decloak at the exact same time again removes the light latency that people get with voice com's, the bombing its self all bombs will be released at the exact same time. the warp off no real advantage here as the fc of the bomber could fleet warp.

Conclusion

10 player controlled bombers has lots of chances for something to go wrong to prevent a "perfect" bombing run 1 bomber might have aligned to the wrong target another might misclick the bomb launcher and not fire at all.

1 player controlling 10 bombers has far fewer chances for something to go wrong.

its quite clear to me at least that isboxing does give an advantage should it be banned? that is CCP's call but i wouldn't be upset if it was relegated to the realm of botting/exploit