These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Anything going to be done about the people breaking rules on SIsi ???

First post
Author
Penny Anne
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#1 - 2014-07-21 20:23:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Penny Anne
I'm rather pi**ed off. A little about what's occurred online but more so for the fact I haven't heard from CCP about the issue that's been reported.

Can't even undock my main or alts without being podded. TwistedTwistedTwistedTwistedTwistedTwistedTwisted
Sooyoung snsd
EndlessRain
Naval Defence Alliance
#2 - 2014-07-21 21:45:00 UTC
podding isnt against the rules....
Penny Anne
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#3 - 2014-07-21 21:52:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Penny Anne
Sooyoung snsd wrote:
podding isnt against the rules....


2. Combat by consent only, except in the designated combat systems (6-CZ49, PVH8-0).

Not to mention, putting up blockade units and attacking my POS .. also taking over sovereignty.
Schayol Sunkeeper
Oruze Cruise
White Stag Exit Bag
#4 - 2014-07-21 21:55:40 UTC
Sooyoung snsd wrote:
podding isnt against the rules....

Yes it is, even in the combat areas
Sooyoung snsd
EndlessRain
Naval Defence Alliance
#5 - 2014-07-21 22:03:22 UTC
Penny Anne wrote:
Sooyoung snsd wrote:
podding isnt against the rules....


2. Combat by consent only, except in the designated combat systems (6-CZ49, PVH8-0).

Not to mention, putting up blockade units and attacking my POS .. also taking over sovereignty.

all you said was you cant undock without being podded.

Schayol Sunkeeper wrote:
Sooyoung snsd wrote:
podding isnt against the rules....

Yes it is, even in the combat areas

no its not, podding hasnt been a rule for over a year now.
Schayol Sunkeeper
Oruze Cruise
White Stag Exit Bag
#6 - 2014-07-21 22:41:59 UTC
Sooyoung snsd wrote:
Penny Anne wrote:
Sooyoung snsd wrote:
podding isnt against the rules....


2. Combat by consent only, except in the designated combat systems (6-CZ49, PVH8-0).

Not to mention, putting up blockade units and attacking my POS .. also taking over sovereignty.

all you said was you cant undock without being podded.

Schayol Sunkeeper wrote:
Sooyoung snsd wrote:
podding isnt against the rules....

Yes it is, even in the combat areas

no its not, podding hasnt been a rule for over a year now.


Podding is no longer disallowed, so keep your clone up to date. Keep in mind that repeated and intentional podding without consent still falls under interfering with testing, so you can still be banned if you abuse this.

No fighting or other aggressive actions at the station and gates (no targeted or AoE warp inhibiting modules).

If you get podded on the undock, it's a violation of the rules in more than one way
Penny Anne
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#7 - 2014-07-22 22:03:40 UTC
Still not a word EvilEvilEvil
CCP Goliath
C C P
C C P Alliance
#8 - 2014-07-23 11:34:07 UTC
Penny Anne wrote:
Still not a word EvilEvilEvil


That's because we don't discuss rule violations and the actions taken because of them.

CCP Goliath | QA Director | EVE Illuminati | @CCP_Goliath

Kusum Fawn
Perkone
Caldari State
#9 - 2014-07-23 14:05:44 UTC
CCP Goliath wrote:
Penny Anne wrote:
Still not a word EvilEvilEvil


That's because we don't discuss rule violations and the actions taken because of them.

more like you never do anything to be discussed

Its not possible to please all the people all the time, but it sure as hell is possible to Displease all the people, most of the time.

Penny Anne
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#10 - 2014-07-23 16:11:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Penny Anne
CCP Goliath wrote:
Penny Anne wrote:
Still not a word EvilEvilEvil


That's because we don't discuss rule violations and the actions taken because of them.



I'd just like to get the system back that's been taken along with my hub leveled so I can build things.

I could have sat all 4 of my toons outside the station with carriers and taken the system back, but I choose to follow the rules. Just seems that the rules are only there to favor others ... a pick and choose situation. Why even have the rules if they are not going to be implemented?
Zanza Mechonis
What is tax
#11 - 2014-07-27 10:24:52 UTC
Openly discussing actions taken against offenders of rules would have an antagonizing effect, and is thus a very bad idea.

"On the internet you can be anything you want... It's strange that many people choose to be stupid."

hellswindstaff
Syndicate Enterprise
Sigma Grindset
#12 - 2014-07-27 22:06:50 UTC
Would be nice if they addressed the mass purchasers. That affects everyones testing when you have to go track down items because someone bought 99 million cap booster 800's