EVE General Discussion

I realize that removing supers would mean all the Goon F1 monkeys would overrun the rest of the universe with sheer numbers alone. It's the only reason your self serving leader made his laughable suggestion without addressing blobbing and power-projection.

it also has to be in diamond, yes a real living pony made of diamond, and we will call it Butt Stallion!

I dont want supers to be removed.
But i do want a change for them.
At the moment all other ships immume to e-war, dreads in siege, carriers in triage and marauders in bastion, get a benefit in some area's and deficits in others. Namely benefits immume to e-war, increased local tank, increase in effecting other ships (dps for triage, application for bastion, remote repping for triage).
They also get several downsides. Immobile, immune to remote assistance(trackinglinks remote sensorboosts remote repping remote eccm remote captransfers)apart from this the modules have some unique properties like sieged dreads get a penalty to locked targets, carriers in triage lose the ability to command drones, bastioned marauders get imptoved resistance.

My suggestion for supers is give them a downside due to beeing immume to e-war, taken from the list above. Beeing immobile would be rediculess so thats out. But beeing immume to remore assistance would be a nice idea. It does mean that the local tank is utterly inadequate, thus it needs to be buffed. Taking carriers as a base with half cycle time and double amount repaired we need something better since the use the same capital mods but need a better tank then a triage carrier. My suggestion would be something like give supers a third of the cycle time for their reps and triple the amount repaird and give titans a quarter repair time and four times the amount healed. one of the things i like in capital fights is that there is on the cap warfare so supers and titans should be vulnerable to cap drain. And should be abled to recive captransfers.

i like remote ECM-bursts so w I ll not change them. I also like the current doomsday no change for them either.

Now to Titan bridging. This one is really hard, i have not figured out a way to keep it in the game in a changed way that deminishes powerprojection without invoking malcanis' Law.

just my 2 cents

Some other ship that cannot dock and costs a lot of ISK.

/c

a backrub by a naked George Clooney while being fed grapes by Alissa White-Gluz.

seems like a fair deal to me

We've already seen more than 300 carriers used, it was very exciting.

I still think capitals were the biggest mistake CCP ever made.

I don't think CCP has much to fear if they pulled them then really reading the posts.

Repayment seems quite reasonable / acceptable.

Provided structures get normalized inline with the potential DPS an entity could muster, a much needed change of game play would ensue.

Reasons for insulating yourself by having thousands of blues you can't shoot would disintegrate. What once was a luxury will become a burden when they only prevent you from making ISK (unless you are an indy character selling stuff to them).

Such clustering will soon yield to chaos, loosening the bowels of 'intestine heavy' entities.

Argue all you want about people clustering up. You would just sound moronic as clustering up will serve no useful purpose. It will just mean you have to compete harder against people you really don't know to make your ISK.

You'll spread out and move on or stagnate as your wallet withers.

Ex-Titan/SuperCap owners will start the next phase with a very healthy wallet and hopefully create something new for us all to read about. If they want to sit on their ISK and pee it away, that's their business. Not everyone needs their hands held after the first 2 years playing this game.

If that's not for you, then please move on.

/WHAT_IF_THE_GENIE_GOT_PUT_BACK_INTO_THE_BOTTLE

The Wishmaster was never evil, it's not his fault that fools are only giving him selfish and badly worded contracts.