These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CCP! Please clarify the future plans for WiS!

First post
Author
Mai Khumm
172.0.0.1
#1121 - 2011-12-04 10:58:40 UTC
If you really want WIS so bad for of the furturistic look and/or feel of.....walking on a spacestation in space. Then go and play Phantasy Star. That has plenty of it. And it only gets slightly less boring when you're playing it online...
oldbutfeelingyoung
Perkone
Caldari State
#1122 - 2011-12-04 11:03:15 UTC
Daemon Ceed wrote:
Before CCP even spends another dime on WiS, a majority of us agree that the following needs to be fixed:

1.) Greater incentive to live in 0.0 and hold Sov there
2.) Fix lowsec, ffs. Besides roams, there's hardly any reason to be there. The fact that lowsec is mostly empty should be a clear sign of that.
3.) Make highsec Incursions less profitable so more people are enticed to try 0.0 once you complete problem #1
4.) Fix at least 70% of all the things on the "Sucking Chest Wounds" and "Papercuts" list
5.) Make a more intuitive UI that doesn't wear out my mouse every 3 months and totally scare off new players to the game.
6.) Fix POS's, please! They need a total redesign beyond just fuel blocks.
7.) Make more T2 BPO's available to those who didn't get lucky in the first lottery. Price and production competition is good!
8.) Rebalance distribution of tech moons.

Then, and only then, should you even fathom working on WiS again.



Well you got a your patch they call an expansion already,so have patience for the rest
All what wislovers ask is a small team back into WIS .
CCP stated that the latest expansion was done in six weeks ,although i still don,t believe that
So for the next 6 months they can come up with a lot of solutions for the only FISwhiners
enough to have a team back to WIS

I love what they done so far with FIS,but like to see WIS picked up again,even if its with a small team





R.S.I2014

Grukni
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#1123 - 2011-12-04 11:26:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Grukni
Quote:

CCP stated that the latest expansion was done in six weeks ,although i still don,t believe that


It may be true for some features and to put together all the features on which they had been previously working. Things like nebulaes, warp tunnel and engine trails work comes from further back.

As WoD development continues, at a lower pace, though, I believe CCP will take up WiS again sometime in the future (my bets are that it won't happen before DUST is released)
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#1124 - 2011-12-04 11:29:52 UTC
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:

All what wislovers ask is a small team back into WIS .


What makes you think that there isn't a WiS team?

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Cadela Fria
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#1125 - 2011-12-04 11:52:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Cadela Fria
Call me an over-sentimental, nostalgic dork, but I see this as a difference of attitude. What do I mean? Let me explain very briefly:

I've played this game passionately since 2004 (on a break right now though), so please consider what I am about to say in that time-frame.
It used to be that the various total online count-Milestones, testing scenarios on SiSi, debates about technologies, suggestions for improvements and expansions and so on, were something we accomplished together..by together, I mean CCP and us. We'd accomplish these things different obstacles and milestones by working together and being equally excited on each other's behalf when we achieved something new.
We actually used to work together to some extent. Maybe not necessarily in any focused way, but there was somewhat a sense of cohesion and a sense of "facing down the MMO world together as something to be conquered ,or fought against for our piece of land that was mostly controlled by WoW and games like it". We wanted to be different and show that we were powerful in our own right in that respect.

This brought us really far and got us one victory after the other. Victories I can't blame Hilmar for feeling good about, perhaps even smug and entitled because we really did a good job. However that is only excusable up until the moment you start forgetting how and why you got there. See it wasn't "you", it was "us". EVE belongs to us, the players and the people involved in making it collectively, and that used to be the mantra of CCP.
Somewhere along that line, someone forgot that whole thing and it has permeated the development and direction of the whole thing ever since.

What has all this got to do with WiS? Simple - I contend that if that mantra hadn't been forgotten and if we had kept that cohesion by means of hearing each other out (not just CCP hearing us out, but us hearing them out..takes two people to have a conversation after all) and reasonably factoring in the various points either party has, we wouldn't be in this big a mess.
Sure there is still input from players that makes it to the game, and CCP still communicates somewhat - I don't deny that at all..but there is something wrong with it isn't there? Something about the whole thing is tainted, or "not as it used to be". Things change over time, we all know that and it should, otherwise things will grow stale....But not like this. Its hard to explain, but something just isn't right about the whole thing.

Many have raged, whined, complained (ponies have explained the difference between whining and complaining, remember that!), pleaded and even quit in protest of what has happened along the way. I would say a large chunk of that is justified, I mean sure you get the average forum trolling warrior who deliberately sets himself/herself and others up to hate on CCP. I don't just mean yell loudly, but genuinely hate on CCP because these kind of people (not CCP, the other bunch I was talking about) are irrational, trolling, conspiratorial, over-critical, self-important fruitcakes.
However, considering the complaints, outrage and demonstrations and so forth WITHOUT the aforementioned group, I would say it was and still is the duty of CCP to do what they used to do, and that is to talk to us openly. I know PR is a harsh mistress within CCP and you have to be very careful about what you do and say in public or you'll be lynched, and sure I could even see the reason for that within the context of any standard high-end business..but here is what some may have forgotten. This is EVE and CCP - The charm and selling point of much of this, is its openness ..the willingness to challenge the status quo and for once be human and collaborative with your customers.

Sure, disagreements will happen - Violent disagreements even, they always do, even if you don't talk, so what do you have to lose? Are you really going to say that because it takes effort and a lot of mudslinging, mud-dodging, various ninja moves(!!!) and so forth - to get to that conversation/message, it isn't worth it for what is actually in there? Which is a genuine concern for the state of- and progression of this great game that has taken, at least me, this far and probably beyond...Isn't that worth listening to even if it takes stamina to get to it. I say it is and I also say that you (CCP) have no right to betray that mantra you originally created, but thats my opinion.

Do I say we wouldn't be in any mess at all? No, I can't say that for sure..but I'm fairly confident that we'd be standing somewhere much more vibrant, productive and constructive at this point.

There, thats what I think..or as they say, my 2 cents. Take it over leave it.

EDIT: So much for "explain briefly"
Captain Mastiff
#1126 - 2011-12-04 12:33:29 UTC
I would like to see full scale Incarna, I was bitterly disappointed when the expansion "Incarna" was nothing more than a virtual good store with horrifically over priced items along with the forcing us to look at a door image or sit watching our graphics cards cook. As well as some nerfs here and there to make it complete. It offered no content at the expense of a few GB.

Rash decisions were made to axe things and the general player base was completely ignored, perhaps they've changed their ways? Though it doesn't mean Incarna needs to be scrapped, I have waited years for it.
oldbutfeelingyoung
Perkone
Caldari State
#1127 - 2011-12-04 14:03:55 UTC
Grukni wrote:
Quote:

CCP stated that the latest expansion was done in six weeks ,although i still don,t believe that


It may be true for some features and to put together all the features on which they had been previously working. Things like nebulaes, warp tunnel and engine trails work comes from further back.

As WoD development continues, at a lower pace, though, I believe CCP will take up WiS again sometime in the future (my bets are that it won't happen before DUST is released)



Yes i think you are right on that ,but ccp is wanting to believe us that all this work in their latest expansion/patch is done in 6 weeks.
just to say they care about what we want ,do or say

R.S.I2014

oldbutfeelingyoung
Perkone
Caldari State
#1128 - 2011-12-04 14:08:08 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:

All what wislovers ask is a small team back into WIS .


What makes you think that there isn't a WiS team?


maybe a blog from a very important person from CCP?


But the only real persons answer the question if WIS is really put back to a DUSTy self,is CCP itself.
But i don,t think CCP will answer this thread about this one

R.S.I2014

Ocih
Space Mermaids
#1129 - 2011-12-04 14:20:17 UTC
I'd like to see the development of WiS as well and in light of Crucible I might also suggest that they step away from out dated rule sets in EVE and make it a paid/ Optional expansion. For those of us that think Ambulation will improve EVE, $25 for the add on, for those that like EVE space only, don't buy it. Use projected expack revenue to determine development budget guidelines.

I know CCP said no paid expacks but you have been wrong before CCP and crucible was about that. Things change, adapt or die.
Jarnis McPieksu
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1130 - 2011-12-04 14:25:00 UTC
WiS is fine if it has some gameplay.

WiS as we have now is a bad excuse for microtransactions with zero gameplay. Hence people burned CCP at the stake.

Take the time to design compelling, interesting avatar-based gameplay (that also runs on people's crappy PCs). As the current avatars are fairly "high end", I wouldn't be too surprised if CCP just takes 1-2 years and waits for people to upgrade to more modern systems before going for more (=multiplayer) WiS with actual gameplay elements.

I mean, take 10 avatars like they are now and stick them into a room and watch current low end GPUs melt trying to render them...

I know my GPU can handle it, but I also know a lot of people play EVE on computers that are so old they could be stolen from a museum...
oldbutfeelingyoung
Perkone
Caldari State
#1131 - 2011-12-04 14:25:47 UTC
Ocih wrote:
I'd like to see the development of WiS as well and in light of Crucible I might also suggest that they step away from out dated rule sets in EVE and make it a paid/ Optional expansion. For those of us that think Ambulation will improve EVE, $25 for the add on, for those that like EVE space only, don't buy it. Use projected expack revenue to determine development budget guidelines.

I know CCP said no paid expacks but you have been wrong before CCP and crucible was about that. Things change, adapt or die.



so we pay extra on the fail project called world of darkness
sorry but if CCP implemented WIS as they promised a while ago they didn,t have to cut off their workforce by 20% but increase it by 20%

R.S.I2014

Ocih
Space Mermaids
#1132 - 2011-12-04 14:32:19 UTC
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:
Ocih wrote:
I'd like to see the development of WiS as well and in light of Crucible I might also suggest that they step away from out dated rule sets in EVE and make it a paid/ Optional expansion. For those of us that think Ambulation will improve EVE, $25 for the add on, for those that like EVE space only, don't buy it. Use projected expack revenue to determine development budget guidelines.

I know CCP said no paid expacks but you have been wrong before CCP and crucible was about that. Things change, adapt or die.



so we pay extra on the fail project called world of darkness
sorry but if CCP implemented WIS as they promised a while ago they didn,t have to cut off their workforce by 20% but increase it by 20%


Assume and presume

CCP went through debt restructuring. I'm sure that had more to do with thier workforce than our little display in Jita, shooting memorials.
If the development of optional content allows CCP to put a WoD egg in thier basket, I don't care. If I decide I do care, I don't buy the add on. You have it, I don't? oh well.
oldbutfeelingyoung
Perkone
Caldari State
#1133 - 2011-12-04 14:44:56 UTC
Ocih wrote:
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:
Ocih wrote:
I'd like to see the development of WiS as well and in light of Crucible I might also suggest that they step away from out dated rule sets in EVE and make it a paid/ Optional expansion. For those of us that think Ambulation will improve EVE, $25 for the add on, for those that like EVE space only, don't buy it. Use projected expack revenue to determine development budget guidelines.

I know CCP said no paid expacks but you have been wrong before CCP and crucible was about that. Things change, adapt or die.



so we pay extra on the fail project called world of darkness
sorry but if CCP implemented WIS as they promised a while ago they didn,t have to cut off their workforce by 20% but increase it by 20%


Assume and presume

CCP went through debt restructuring. I'm sure that had more to do with thier workforce than our little display in Jita, shooting memorials.
If the development of optional content allows CCP to put a WoD egg in thier basket, I don't care. If I decide I do care, I don't buy the add on. You have it, I don't? oh well.


Ok you got a point!
so every real expansion on Eve will cost us money,looking forward to this

R.S.I2014

oldbutfeelingyoung
Perkone
Caldari State
#1134 - 2011-12-04 14:52:15 UTC
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:
Ocih wrote:
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:
Ocih wrote:
I'd like to see the development of WiS as well and in light of Crucible I might also suggest that they step away from out dated rule sets in EVE and make it a paid/ Optional expansion. For those of us that think Ambulation will improve EVE, $25 for the add on, for those that like EVE space only, don't buy it. Use projected expack revenue to determine development budget guidelines.

I know CCP said no paid expacks but you have been wrong before CCP and crucible was about that. Things change, adapt or die.



so we pay extra on the fail project called world of darkness
sorry but if CCP implemented WIS as they promised a while ago they didn,t have to cut off their workforce by 20% but increase it by 20%


Assume and presume

CCP went through debt restructuring. I'm sure that had more to do with thier workforce than our little display in Jita, shooting memorials.
If the development of optional content allows CCP to put a WoD egg in thier basket, I don't care. If I decide I do care, I don't buy the add on. You have it, I don't? oh well.


Ok you got a point!
so every real expansion on Eve will cost us money,looking forward to this




Ok latest expansion was nothing more but a big patch,but we did get :

enginetrails
a new walpaperbackgroundf
a few new ships
able to oneclick loot from wrecks or containers

so we pay more ???? right??

R.S.I2014

Ocih
Space Mermaids
#1135 - 2011-12-04 15:14:07 UTC
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:
Ocih wrote:
oldbutfeelingyoung wrote:
Ocih wrote:
I'd like to see the development of WiS as well and in light of Crucible I might also suggest that they step away from out dated rule sets in EVE and make it a paid/ Optional expansion. For those of us that think Ambulation will improve EVE, $25 for the add on, for those that like EVE space only, don't buy it. Use projected expack revenue to determine development budget guidelines.

I know CCP said no paid expacks but you have been wrong before CCP and crucible was about that. Things change, adapt or die.



so we pay extra on the fail project called world of darkness
sorry but if CCP implemented WIS as they promised a while ago they didn,t have to cut off their workforce by 20% but increase it by 20%


Assume and presume

CCP went through debt restructuring. I'm sure that had more to do with thier workforce than our little display in Jita, shooting memorials.
If the development of optional content allows CCP to put a WoD egg in thier basket, I don't care. If I decide I do care, I don't buy the add on. You have it, I don't? oh well.


Ok you got a point!
so every real expansion on Eve will cost us money,looking forward to this




Ok latest expansion was nothing more but a big patch,but we did get :

enginetrails
a new walpaperbackgroundf
a few new ships
able to oneclick loot from wrecks or containers

so we pay more ???? right??


Right????????????

No actually. And nobody said any such thing. You need the content in Crucible to play EVE. It was a content patch.
You don't need Incarna to play EVE. You can spin ships and dock and undock and be a happy little space pirate.

I have faith in the ability of CCP to create a new division and to allocate a budget to that division based on its demand. EVE subs pay for EVE development in an EVE as we know it now state. EVE paid expansions pay for additional EVE and it develops based on demand.
Meryl SinGarda
Belligerent Underpaid Tactical Team
#1136 - 2011-12-04 15:55:11 UTC
Xoria Krint wrote:
The people that want WiS more then FiS don't understand what Eve is about.. All off them are just new players that want Eve to become Sims Online. Don't listen to them, they are the devil.


You're a moron. Nana-nana-boo-boo.
Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#1137 - 2011-12-04 16:24:17 UTC
WiS does not have to mean "no FiS". I want FiS and WiS. CCP can deliver both, and I want to know if they still intend to.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Trotula
#1138 - 2011-12-04 16:49:54 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
WiS does not have to mean "no FiS". I want FiS and WiS. CCP can deliver both, and I want to know if they still intend to.


Where you even here for the expansion before Crucible? It's obvious that CCP can NOT deliver both, that is what they tried and failed at miserably.
Daelorn
State War Academy
Caldari State
#1139 - 2011-12-04 17:05:52 UTC
Montevius Williams wrote:
I think most people DO want walking in stations, just not the way it was implemented.

Alaric Faelen
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#1140 - 2011-12-04 17:11:38 UTC
the dream is to integrate all aspects of a game world. CCP wants the ship combat, foot combat (WiS), toss in tank warfare or atmospheric dogfighting and even massed infantry.
It sounds great, but probably best developed as individual games using the same gameworld backstory. The way the old paper and dice Mechwarrior game connected to the board game (yeah, I'm freaking OLD) Battlemech (or was it Tech? with age comes the mad cow)
I'm all for that kind of immersion, but right now, with current limitations, it's not good for either game (FiS or WiS) to force them into a single game. It's very much robbing from peter to pay paul and either the WiS is weak because the FiS is the focus, or vice-versa.
It's especially hard with Eve, because this game is gorgeous. It's a resource hog as a result (not complaining, it's so worth it IMO) and trying to piggyback WiS in has not done justice to it.

People who really want WiS should be asking CCP to develop a standalone game (within Eve canon) that will tax resources that much on it's own.

I'm not for or against a WiS game experience, but the Eve experience is FiS and it's a legitimate complaint that any development in the FiS game that isn't FiS, is a step in the wrong direction.
It's also not a slam to say that as is- the WiS in Eve is flatly useless until they have a combat mechanic for it. Right now it's little more than a slow ugly replacement for buttons on the side of the screen. No one should have hated Incarna more than fans of WiS, because you got ugly models and little more than barbie clothes to put on it. Until it's a worthwhile as a standalone game, it's just going to be a distraction and resource thief in the FiS game, Eve.