These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Track System Indices By Corporation Alone

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Faceless Enemy
Doomheim
#1 - 2014-05-22 05:08:04 UTC
PETITION: Change System Index Tracking To Only System Owner Corporation Member Input

At present, any amount of ratting or mining will contribute to a system index, thus removing incentive for a given corporate owner of a system to be directly involved in its development or management.

A simple though not simplistic approach sets the index to track only actions by members of that corporation.

If you take a system, you must use it to claim the rewards.

This increases member participation in null security space, which appears to dovetail nicely with the industrial goals that CCP has laid out for this expansion.
Velicitia
XS Tech
#2 - 2014-05-22 11:15:07 UTC
s/corporation/alliance/ and then I think this is useful (as, IIRC, systems are held by the alliance as a whole, and "corporation homes" are outside the game mechanics themselves) ...

edit -- though it's been ages since I've actually paid attention to sov mechanics.

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia
Kireitsugu Secheh
Les chips electriques
#3 - 2014-05-22 15:04:09 UTC
So basically you are against real estates ?

How to clone swap in worm holes
Faceless Enemy
Doomheim
#4 - 2014-05-22 15:19:21 UTC
Kireitsugu Secheh wrote:
So basically you are against real estates ?



I want more real estate. I want real estate to be something hard won and that inspires a spirited defense by its owners.

Fewer sharecroppers, more family farms.
Loraine Gess
Confedeferate Union of Tax Legalists
#5 - 2014-05-23 05:03:29 UTC
Corporations don't own systems - alliances do. Umbrella alliances for renting would already handle this nicely, and surprise, they already exist...
Kireitsugu Secheh
Les chips electriques
#6 - 2014-05-23 07:13:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Kireitsugu Secheh
Faceless Enemy wrote:
Kireitsugu Secheh wrote:
So basically you are against real estates ?



I want more real estate. I want real estate to be something hard won and that inspires a spirited defense by its owners.

Fewer sharecroppers, more family farms.


You want people to do a lot of housekeeping then.
Oh man that would be great.
And there will be ISboxing maids with an army of rorquals and hulks to keep your system in high ranking.

I always wanted caldari maids in my ships .

How to clone swap in worm holes
SJ Astralana
Syncore
#7 - 2014-05-23 08:34:09 UTC
Reported as off-topic. Go here please: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=topics&f=270

Hyperdrive your production business: Eve Production Manager

Faceless Enemy
Doomheim
#8 - 2014-05-23 16:09:38 UTC
No, the Science and Industry tab specifically mentions outposts, starbases, and other components of nullsec sov mechanics.
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#9 - 2014-05-24 14:22:50 UTC
Moving this from Science and Industry to Features and Ideas.

ISD Dorrim Barstorlode

Senior Lead

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department
Faceless Enemy
Doomheim
#10 - 2014-05-25 23:16:40 UTC
Then I would like this idea featured.

It solves the rental problem, the nullsec is loving empty problem, and gets the playerbase engaged with systems directly.
Rowells
Blackwater USA Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#11 - 2014-05-26 00:56:15 UTC
So this gets rid of holding corps. What else was it supposed to fix?