Player Features and Ideas Discussion

so it would ruin everything if CCP made hull tanking viable in any way shape or form?

seeing as there are armour and shield tanks
i guess adding a third would be too much to handle for you all , good job trying to troll but this whole post prove my point , single minded beings

Is it possible to forcibly biomass spammertrolls from the forumcontrol panel?

It should be.

I don't believe this.

This idea is somehow even worse then the last one. It's so goddamn horrible I'm at a loss of what could be worse then this.

So props to you, OP. I have no idea how a battleship could be stupider then the idea you vomitted on to this forum. How about a faulty warp-drive which automatically fails whenever someone aggresses you? Why not make the ship randomly explode?

If something like this ship ever gets made, suicide will be the only relieve for the poor pilots unlucky enough to be cursed with this ship.

I don;t understand why you want to have a ship that is all faction... just by doing that you immediately limit the possible strength of the ship because of how it could be min/maxed.

aside from that hull tanking in it's current state is not really a viable tanking method, and i agree with others in this post that say it probably shouldn't be, it is essentially the same as armour tanking so would not really provide any benefit with it's addition.
Further to that if hull tanking was rebalanced in a way to make it viable then i would expect to see a new line of ships that would make use of it from a single specific faction etc.

aside from that the actual fittings and design numbers your putting against this ship are mostly nonsense.

• it would have almost no dps meaning it would neither be efficient for PVE or a threat in PVP.
• Despite giving it relatively high base speed this would be negated by using bulkheads to give it any sort of acceptable tank.
• the 1% aper lvl bonus doesn't really make any sense as neither skill relate to hull. (i'd imagine even if you were to use that bonus 2%/lvl of mechanic would make more sense)
• I don't understand why a hull tank focused ship would have equal shield, armour and hull.
• even as a bait ship, if you used hull reps then you would lose the mid slots required for tackle which would be required to make it a useful bait ship.

I'm sure there would be more problems if i thought about it some more, but seeing as though you clearly haven't, i'm not going to bother.


I'd strongly suggest before you make any more suggestions actually try and work through what the core concept is, what is needed to make viable, and what limitations are required to ensure it is balanced / in line with it's class.

heh ....................... troll alright closing thread Lol