Player Features and Ideas Discussion

This is a pointless point. Most of the people on these forums know how CCP lay it out and understand that. CCP ahve already released the names of the next 10 patches, and your not gonna like some of them.

Well, from the optimist perspective, I see his point. At least for the people playing this game not so hardcore and checking their assets, doing missions time to time. Yet, at the same time, it is a little bit absurd. One might argue that CCP's ideas about naming expansions depleted or what?

He has a request of his point, which argues about the name of an expansion, and name of an expansion itself, is a property of an expansion and an asset name at the same time, which puts the name in conflicting state. So, this state, makes this thread is very valid to argue from his standpoint.

The conflicting state created a valid confusion and he supported this with a good example. His standpoint should be considerable for future releases at least. One might argue or doesn't find his point valid, but it is by no means should go far to lock this thread or whatsoever. I don't see any reason for a harsh measure of that kind. Definitely he is not trolling.

It was bad enough when Tyrannis rolled out. Now its not just similar, its exact.

You know how many words there are in the English language? Lots! Even more tossing in recognisable Greek, Roman etc... No double dipping needed.



By the way, the idea is fix names. The feature is reduce confusion.




And as a percentage of total eve players thats small and also irellevent as it doesnt just effect the forum.