These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The Ultimate Solution to the T2 BPO Problem Announced by CCP

First post
Author
Gamer4liff
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#81 - 2014-05-03 23:07:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Gamer4liff
The only thing wrong with T2 BPOs is that there is no legit way to get them without having to buy them from somebody like a chump. :colbert:

E: Oveur Did Nothing Wrong.

A comprehensive proposal for balancing T2 Production: here

MailDeadDrop
Archon Industries
#82 - 2014-05-04 01:56:08 UTC  |  Edited by: MailDeadDrop
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
I don't have one. I just have a problem with CCP vaporizing player's CCP's assets to make up for their own past mistakes.

FTFY

MDD
Hurtado Soneka
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#83 - 2014-05-04 01:58:44 UTC
T2 BPOs should have be wiped out when invention got introduced, it shouldnt have taken this long
Doireen Kaundur
Doomheim
#84 - 2014-05-04 01:59:34 UTC
Who is T2-BPO?

Was he in star wars and why is he a problem?

_[center]For your Freighter **sized shipping needs, contact _[u]Lord Chanlin[/u].** _ Fast, affordable, reliable service._

https://gate.eveonline.com/Profile/Lord%20Chanlin[/center]

Zappity
New Eden Tank Testing Services
#85 - 2014-05-04 02:03:16 UTC
Reverse lottery: you win it, you lose your BPOs. It's only fair.

Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec and nullsec.

Wrayeth
Inexorable Retribution
#86 - 2014-05-04 02:10:59 UTC
mkint wrote:

No, "that sucks" goes a long way to making invention even worse. And yes, there are definitely items where invention is not a thing because of the BPOs... devs have talked about it before, most recently in some of the industry threads. If you've got the right T2 BPO it will dominate that market to the point where it is literally impossible to profit from invention. In those particular cases, the production capabilities of the BPO outpace demand, apparently by a wide enough margin that normal playerbase growth will never offset it. I believe it's some certain ships... like the HACs or something. Or at least it used to be. I honestly don't know all the economic details of which ones, I just know what's shown up in devblogs, dev posts, and to a lesser extent what some of the players have said on the forums.


For those BPOs that make invention unfeasible due to there being more supply than demand, there's a simple solution: increase the time to produce items from those BPOs so that production from the BPOs alone can't keep up with demand. This will create room for inventors to step into the market. This is a far better solution than removing T2 BPOs from the game and shafting those who have them.

Admittedly, I personally own a Torpedo Launcher II BPO, but I rarely build from it anymore since the profit margin isn't exactly huge and the production rate is slow. An inventor can easily out-produce me just by building from multiple BPCs at once, making up in volume what he lacks in efficiency.
Hurtado Soneka
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#87 - 2014-05-04 02:12:18 UTC
Doc Fury wrote:
Revman Zim wrote:

I don't do T2 manufacturing.

I just want the mechanics of EVE to be equal for all. This is an instance where it is NOT.

Note, I said MECHANICS. Not skills, not experience... etc. So don't try to derail and turn this into "making EVE easier".


O.K. You admittedly don't do T2 manufacturing so you have no idea what you are talking about and have never done the math because you'd know that invention is more lucrative.

Just because you *believe* something is bad due to simple ignorance or because someone else told you to believe so is not a good reason for CCP to take something away from another player because you can't have it too.

Gotcha. All is clear now. Original synopsis affirmed.


stop sounding like a stupid scrub, T2 BPOs outside the scope of invention should and WILL be eradicated.

/thread
Knights Armament
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#88 - 2014-05-04 02:14:39 UTC
I think that hurting t2 BPO owners is a good thing, because of jealousy.
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#89 - 2014-05-04 02:15:57 UTC
Hurtado Soneka wrote:
Doc Fury wrote:
Revman Zim wrote:

I don't do T2 manufacturing.

I just want the mechanics of EVE to be equal for all. This is an instance where it is NOT.

Note, I said MECHANICS. Not skills, not experience... etc. So don't try to derail and turn this into "making EVE easier".


O.K. You admittedly don't do T2 manufacturing so you have no idea what you are talking about and have never done the math because you'd know that invention is more lucrative.

Just because you *believe* something is bad due to simple ignorance or because someone else told you to believe so is not a good reason for CCP to take something away from another player because you can't have it too.

Gotcha. All is clear now. Original synopsis affirmed.


stop sounding like a stupid scrub, T2 BPOs outside the scope of invention should and WILL be eradicated.

/thread

Except, of course, that he is right. Blink

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Octoven
Stellar Production
#90 - 2014-05-04 02:18:11 UTC
I would love to see all T2 BPOs just eliminated completely, the recent changes makes copies more competitive but BPOs will always remain king simply because of the negative ME factor. I've heard quite a few BPO owners getting butt-hurt over this and to tell you the truth its because they cant be the proverbial bully in the sandbox holding a toy over a little child's head (in industrial terms that is). They wanted massive superiority and they are getting that reduced, they still hold an upper hand just not a huge one anymore. They should be thankful for that, personally I'd rather eradicate all of them period, they were a mistake to the game and has haunted the markets since. Take a look at Deep Space Probes for example, when Odyssey removed those the probes got converted over as did any DSP BPOs...no one got to keep them, granted they wouldn't really have much of a usage to build them except nostalgia; however, the concept remains the same, an item was removed from the game. Although...T2 BPOs weren't technically removed so much as just not seeded for sell anymore.

SO yes, get the Jovians to do a raid on everyone and get them back Twisted after all, according to John Rourke, "getting this tech out of the universe can only be a good thing." P
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#91 - 2014-05-04 02:30:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Ranger 1
If this comes to pass, I'll adapt and adjust as I always have. Invention has always been far more lucrative for me than my T2 BPO's have anyway... which is precisely the same boat all others producing with them are in.

The only markets where T2 BPO's out pace Invention in terms of percentage of supply are those items that move very slowly in comparison with the rest of the market (my Pilgrim BPO is an excellent example of this). It's kind of hard to become filthy rich with a slow manufacturing BPO of an item that isn't particularly popular.

Someone brought to my attention some figure a dev dragged out a couple of years ago that said Pilgrim's produced from invention only made up 20% of their total sales, with the rest coming from T2 BPO's. Now we all know that Pilgrims are not exactly in high demand, so I suppose that might still be true.

But consider that Pilgrims are about to be buffed. If this process turns out well their popularity will sky rocket, while the amount produced from BPO's will not change. The lions share will be created from Invention, just like 2/3rds of the products for which T2 BPO's are available.

Now what factor do you think would hold those prices (which will inevitably rise) in check? Yeah, you guessed it... T2 BPO producers. In fact, the main factor keeping the prices in line on all T2 items are the fact that some influence on pricing is exerted from the slow but steady supply of these items created from BPO's.

So you folks go right ahead making things "fair" for everyone at the greedy T2 BPO owners expense, it won't bother me a bit. In fact I'll be highly amused as prices start trending steadily upwards on all T2 items, especially on my soon to be buffed Pilgrims and for the ever popular Guardians that I also produce. Since my Invention lines have always been far more profitable due to sheer volume, I'll be just fine.

Will you? Blink

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#92 - 2014-05-04 03:10:21 UTC
Pilgrims are about to be buffed?

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

firepup82
The Inf3cted
Pathog3n
#93 - 2014-05-04 03:21:54 UTC
How are they broken? Just sounds like a bunch if Indy people mad that they don't have one. Exactly how are they broken?
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#94 - 2014-05-04 03:30:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Ranger 1
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Pilgrims are about to be buffed?

Yep, Fozzie and Rise announced that Recons are getting reworked next in the ship balancing discussion at Fanfest. The Pilgrim in particular was described as being one of the ones most in need of buffing.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#95 - 2014-05-04 03:35:13 UTC
firepup82 wrote:
How are they broken? Just sounds like a bunch if Indy people mad that they don't have one. Exactly how are they broken?

Apparently they long for the olden days, where a good HAC could cost from 300 to 500mil and up.

Of course, back then you'd be on a waiting list for it for a few months as well.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#96 - 2014-05-04 03:39:03 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Pilgrims are about to be buffed?

Yep, Fozzie and Rise announced that Recons are getting reworked next in the ship balancing discussion at Fanfest. The Pilgrim in particular was described as being one of the ones most in need of buffing.


Glad to hear that, I use that ship. The entire class could use EHP buffs, however, not just the Pilgrim.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
#97 - 2014-05-04 03:43:07 UTC
firepup82 wrote:
How are they broken? Just sounds like a bunch if Indy people mad that they don't have one. Exactly how are they broken?


Prince Kobol wrote:
Goons want your T2 BPO'S

Goons sperg post to create panic that they all going to get removed and your going to be holding nothing.

Stupid people rush to sell their T2 BPO's for next to nothing.

Goons buy lots of T2 BPO's very cheap and laugh at how stupid people are.

CCP announce they will do something to T2 BPO's in soon..

x number of years later T2 BPO's still exist in their current form.



There's a million angry citizens looking down their tubes..at me.

Netan MalDoran
Hail To The King
The Silent Syndicate
#98 - 2014-05-04 03:45:26 UTC
CCP, why remove T2 BPO's? Are they majorly hurting anyone or are you just succumbing to the whines of the carebear indys who are playing with penny profits? I mean really, it's like you just deleting the Goonswarm alliance just because half of the players of EvE hate them, but I don't see you doing that because there would be an outrage and there would be a permanent burn Jita. If you do need to compensate, the likes of 3 free Plex/month sounds nice to the BPO holders.

"Your security status has been lowered." - Hell yeah it was!

Falcon's truth

sloany
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#99 - 2014-05-04 03:45:57 UTC  |  Edited by: sloany
Weaselior wrote:
...snip...

*citation needed*

The solution to T2 BPOs was invention, and it's done its job. You just need to see the price reduction of Cap Recharger IIs pre and post invention to see this.

This whole topic and been trashed out over the years in many threads and I'm yet to read a cohesive argument why any further action should be taken. T2 BPOs have lost their power, there are only a few markets left where they still dominate, and this is due to low demand. If anything the action CCP should take is to buff these items to increase demand and encourage invention participation.

T2 BPOs are something for industrialist to aspire to, just as PvP alliances aspire to own a titan. However they are not the be all and end all of the game.

What a dull game it would be without something to aspire to. Yes even industrialists need something to aspire to. This is not hello kitty island adventure, or some other game where everyone is treated equally. This is Eve Online. The world is cruel, and you don't get what you want, but you have the opportunity to. If anyone wants to remove T2 BPOs from the game, buy them out and trash them, or infiltrate corporations who own them and steal them.
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#100 - 2014-05-04 04:20:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Ranger 1
Doc Fury wrote:
firepup82 wrote:
How are they broken? Just sounds like a bunch if Indy people mad that they don't have one. Exactly how are they broken?


Prince Kobol wrote:
Goons want your T2 BPO'S

Goons sperg post to create panic that they all going to get removed and your going to be holding nothing.

Stupid people rush to sell their T2 BPO's for next to nothing.

Goons buy lots of T2 BPO's very cheap and laugh at how stupid people are.

CCP announce they will do something to T2 BPO's in soon..

x number of years later T2 BPO's still exist in their current form.




I believe you scored a direct hit.

Especially when you consider upcoming changes to null sec industry and copy creation. Smile

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.