These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

yes, its over

Author
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai
#161 - 2011-12-02 07:50:39 UTC
And now I'm gonna tell you the funniest thing of all...

The Stellar Souncil is supposed to represent the players, but due to its own nature and mechanics, it only represents nullsec alliances.

Starting with an alliance whose goal is to spoil every MMORPG they put their claws on, and whose visible head is head of the SC.

I really wonder who is in charge of customer satisfaction in CCP... What?

Roses are red / Violets are blue / I am an Alpha / And so it's you

Swooshie
USA Canada Private Corp
#162 - 2011-12-02 07:55:11 UTC
The game is back and you are leaving? Oo

I iz confuzed!!!

"It is when I think about meaning that I lose what I meant to say."     -Swooshie

First Lieutenant Dan
Doomheim
#163 - 2011-12-02 08:09:34 UTC
Consider using actual money to play the game.

(Insert story here)
Thorn Galen
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse
The Curatores Veritatis Auxiliary
#164 - 2011-12-02 08:20:04 UTC
leavwiz wrote:
message clearly received. High sec players that are soloists or in small corps are not wanted.

As the last remaining player in my once fun and thriving corp, I too will be moving on to an mmo where production and harvesting are operational spheres that dont require subjecting yourself to gank happy pvp'ers

I have taken down the POS with its construction and research bays
I have hauled our stuff to Jita and sold it at buy prices (so no you cant have my stuff)
I will not bother to visit my PI sites again as launch taxes now exceed the market value of the goods from my humble , low efficiency high sec planets.

When my plex runs out you can add me to the growing statistic of casual players that find no game value in EVE anymore.

perhaps i should turn on my CQ option again to remind me how well dev resources were spent on creating a login lagfest, so I wont wax sentimental about rejoining the game.

To those who I have been able to assist with materials and ships, perhaps our paths will cross again in the mmo's we discussed. in the meantime, fly safe. have fun
leavwiz


Sad to see you're leaving. I understand where you're coming from and that makes it even sadder, but holds a great deal of truth. At least you're going out with dignity, well done man. Perhaps I can "turn the wheel" and ask you to mail me ?

Whatever your endeavours, go well.

Peace out.
o/
Meow Galore
Doomheim
#165 - 2011-12-02 08:38:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Meow Galore
I too am sorry to see you go but if the game isn't fun for you then there's no point playing. However, it's only been a couple of days since the release. I'd highly recommend that you stick around for a couple of weeks to see if it grows on you.

In any case, good luck for the future.
xxxTRUSTxxx
Galactic Rangers
#166 - 2011-12-02 08:43:33 UTC  |  Edited by: xxxTRUSTxxx
another whining shite who feels the need to share his/her whine when the game becomes boring to him/her and he/her decides to unsub and **** off.

to OP hey ! there is a limit on doing one thing in game, doing only one thing in any game becomes boring.

refusal to do other stuff in game will lead to being here on the forums within a year whining like a ***** that everyone else ruined the game when infact it was the whining little ***** who refused to accept that eve is a PVP game and you must work hard to survive. this is what makes eve what it is kids, it is not a single player game where you can log on do shite for a few minutes and then sit talking shite on vent/TS3 for the rest of the night while spinning your ship on station boasting about killing ******* NPC's.

fairwell OP it's is a pity you don't understand that to make an omelette you must crack a few eggs.

PS: an industrialist who sold to buy markets and didn't get that he gave his stuff to a real players anyway, that statement explains a lot.
Cailais
The Red Pill Taker Group
#167 - 2011-12-02 09:07:51 UTC
leavwiz wrote:
Cailais wrote:
One thing I would like to ask the OP, before he leaves, is this question:

If 'crafters' can produce in complete security what is their inherent value to the game as a whole that couldn't be provided by an NPC delivering a product to the "market" instead?

C.


perhaps CCP should consider having npc's provide everything so there is no need for people to derive enjoyment from the act of making things for other people. If the game was all about combat (which it wasnt when i started playing) then your question is valid. The fact that immense processes for BP's , production, resource gathering all tell me that CCP intended for this sphere to be part of the enjoyment of the game. In most worlds, crafters are admired for putting their skills into their craft at the expense of being adventurers. let the adventurers keep them safe and fight as they wish amongst themselves. We choose where to spend our skill points. Our inherent value is providing things to others in a timely fashion often in exchange for other things we need to do our work. I rather liked that aspect of the game.


I cant see why anyone would 'admire' some poor bloke pick axing away at a rock to then press a few buttons to make a sword or whatever.

I would (and do) admire those who do manufacturing and resource extraction in an environment where there is a risk of failure. Separating EVE into 2 distinct spheres of invulnerable PVE and vulnerable PVP then you may as well make two separate games - the true value of resource collection, manufacture and trade is that it is a competitive process with inherent risk.

C.
Khanh'rhh
Sparkle Motion.
#168 - 2011-12-02 09:15:51 UTC
Ol Gregg wrote:
Khanh'rhh wrote:
Ol Gregg wrote:
Actually, the OP was making an acute point about everything wrong with EVE.

No, he wasn't.
He was whining his profit margins are lower because of a change introduced that he doesn't understand, that will actually balance out, possibly in his favour if a lot of other idiots quit doing PI this week, too.

The "OMG ITS ALL BLOBS!!" retort is just a weak, apologetic excuse for not even trying.

Well done, anonymous forum alt #61223, for being too risk averse to even try.


A Sudden Buggery pilot that defends blobs. Imagine that. How rich.

Yeh, our 4 man fleets really blot out the (now brighter!) suns

Roll

"Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual,

Shardivh
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#169 - 2011-12-02 09:26:50 UTC
Sorry for making your boring, monotonous activites a little bit lively and exciting.

Wait, no.

Go away.
Bad Messenger
Rehabilitation Clinic
#170 - 2011-12-02 09:33:26 UTC
Usually trying to PVE in PVP server is bad idea, if you want to just PVE join PVE server.
Jarnis McPieksu
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#171 - 2011-12-02 10:15:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Jarnis McPieksu
leavwiz wrote:

I will not bother to visit my PI sites again as launch taxes now exceed the market value of the goods from my humble , low efficiency high sec planets.


Sorry, this just doesn't happen in EVE.

If you look at the market sell prices and then see that the way those goods are produced takes more ISK than what the end product is being sold for (ten times over, if the "taxes exceed market value" is true), you could then multiple your ISK reserves by buying every single unit off the market that is being sold at a loss, holding them for a few days and then selling them again.

Market prices follow gameplay changes with a lag. If you are smart and capable of doing math, you can predict upcoming market prices and absolutely bathe in ISK as the change happens.

This patch has been simply epic because so many people keep selling stuff "at the market price" without ever checking what the cost for the product is, allowing anyone with a spreadsheet software (thank you google docs for a free one) to make so much ISK that it is just ridiculous.

Why are you not doing the same if you understand that the "market price" is too low?

Also if you are crying that others will be doing PI at 0% tax, that is irrelevant. The vast majority of PI is done in highsec. The vast majority of your competition is paying the same tax. The prices will be set at this level as there is nowhere near enough supply at "0% tax" price level. Yes, those who can do PI under lower tax regime (by investing in personal POCO in non-highsec) will profit more, but that doesn't change the fact that your (highsec) profit level is what sets the price. Period. You make money. POCO owner makes bit more money. POS runner/T2 builder pays the extra money to you and the module/ship buyer pays the extra money to the POS runner/T2 builder. ISK goes around, nobody sells at a loss and nobody has to quit because of "unprofitable market prices".

Edit: FREE TIP FOR EVERYONE WHO HAS BEEN DOING PI:

The POCO/Tax change will greatly increase the market price of PI goods. All of them. If you currently have any stock, selling them below cost is silly as the "market price" will rapidly readjust. Once the new equilibrium is found, you will be making exact same ISKies as before. Potentially more, as bunch of math-deficient crybabies give up on PI, cutting down supply while the demand is not going anywhere. If anything, this is great news for PI as it allows PI producers to squeeze more ISK out of T2 producers, POS runners and Starbase equipment builders.

TAXES ON PRODUCTION ARE IRRELEVANT - YOU JUST HAVE TO SHIFT THE TAXES TO THE BUYER OF YOUR PRODUCT

In the end, the purchaser of a module or a ship is then one who pays the tax and at that point it is a fraction of the final sell price of the module/ship so it becomes irrelevant.
Khanh'rhh
Sparkle Motion.
#172 - 2011-12-02 10:38:22 UTC
Jarnis McPieksu wrote:
Edit: FREE TIP FOR EVERYONE WHO HAS BEEN DOING PI:

The POCO/Tax change will greatly increase the market price of PI goods. All of them. If you currently have any stock, selling them below cost is silly as the "market price" will rapidly readjust. Once the new equilibrium is found, you will be making exact same ISKies as before. Potentially more, as bunch of math-deficient crybabies give up on PI, cutting down supply while the demand is not going anywhere. If anything, this is great news for PI as it allows PI producers to squeeze more ISK out of T2 producers, POS runners and Starbase equipment builders.

SHHHHHHH!!!

Stop telling them. I'm filling loads of buy orders at "current market prices" Lol

"Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual,

Khanh'rhh
Sparkle Motion.
#173 - 2011-12-02 10:40:05 UTC
n.b. @OP:

Do you feel suitably stupid yet? You realize you dedicated your gameplay to "industry" but the "PVPers" have pwned you at your own game?

"Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual,

Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#174 - 2011-12-02 10:41:23 UTC
leavwiz wrote:
As the last remaining player in my once fun and thriving corp, I too will be moving on to an mmo where production and harvesting are operational spheres that dont require subjecting yourself to gank happy pvp'ers


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IvFbcK6Pa2M
Ocih
Space Mermaids
#175 - 2011-12-02 10:50:36 UTC
leavwiz wrote:
Serial Chi wrote:
what game are you going to btw?


i had avoided naming other mmo's in my post, but in response to your question, I play vanguard (all my primary characters are crafters and diplos)
It is a game for mature players that dont expect to make max level in a matter of weeks. great community as well.


I've heard good things about Vanguard but I 've also heard that it was coded bad and minimum requirements are through the roof.
While I can't provide empathy from a PI point of view I can respect how your niche in a niche game of niche ships got nerfed to extinction and you now feel obselete. Have fun in Vanguard.
Halcyon Ingenium
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#176 - 2011-12-02 11:01:08 UTC
I love how the term "risk averse" has become a pejorative, as if there was ever a businessman worth his pound of flesh that wasn't risk averse. Or combat pilot for that matter. Really, when people use "risk averse" in this way, all they are really saying is, "I'm a dumbass with no ability to judge consequences, I can be baited into any fight, bilked of all my money, and taken for everything I have; I have no ability to evaluate risk, and I'm also too stupid to realize this is a bad thing." Pretty funny.

By the way, since we're already talking, do you want to buy a rifter? I've got the cheapest rifters in Metropolis. If you can find a cheaper rifter, buy it!

Elson Tamar
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#177 - 2011-12-02 11:16:37 UTC
Yep damn those risk advers carebears i hate them, now im going to fly my drake/Drameil/insert ship here and shoot at industrials with five of my corp mates or hunt shoot three month old characters in tech 1 ships.
Damn those risk adverse carebears, im going to suicide gank an unarmed miner in a cheap ship where i cant be podded.
Damn those risk adverse carebears and all thier isk i cant make any money on anything other than my incursion alt.
I hate all these small risk adverse carebear corps, if someone wants to join my 100 man wardecing corp i demand thier limited api.
Damn them and their level 4 mission running that lines my pockets as i ninja them.
Gods i hate them becasue of inflation and i have to pay my money to play a awsome game with my main, my scam alt, my suicide gank alt, my capital alt and my spy alt.
Damn all carebeares to heck, oh theres a carebear with tears lets mock them as this make me feel like a grown up.
I cant pvp that small corp with my 100 man corp casue they dropped alliance, damn them for being risk adverse!

You do realise that all of this is tears don't you, the concept tha people who are risk adverse is stupid. I might add, how risk adverse is a gate camp?

And befor you get all sniffy and tell me you have elite skillzz and stuff i engage in at least one of the above activities and am just as guilty, i'm just not a hypocryte.

OP, can i have you stuff? Cool
Mnengli Noiliffe
Doomheim
#178 - 2011-12-02 11:46:55 UTC
i have not even tried pi and am doing great being industrialist.

i knew it's a trap at the moment PI was introduced :)
Ai Shun
#179 - 2011-12-02 12:01:08 UTC
leavwiz wrote:
EVE is no longer fun for casual players that choose to remain in high sec.


That is a very bold statement. Why can't you simply say it is no longer fun for you? I don't want to be dragged into your "my favourite MMO dumped me so it's a ****" meme, thank you.
pussnheels
Viziam
#180 - 2011-12-02 12:05:49 UTC
In a way theOP made a valid point in saying that the solo casual player is unwanted by ccp so are the small independent corporations
for me everything CCP has done over the last year or is planning is so biased in favor of nullsec alliances it feels that all others not in a null sec alliance are unwanted

Even this whole expansion is nothing more than to keep us happy with some toys that they had planned anywaybut now had to implement

Good timing by bethesda for me , atleast i have more fun playing skyrim these days
Not even logging in to change skills anymore , wodering if i should stop my subscriptions aswell

I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire