EVE Information Portal

Please no. Many of us use commas as a decimal separator so spaces are far better option as it doesn't actually introduce any confusion.

Or even better add a setting so people can decide on thousand separator and decimal separator. That way everyone gets what they are used to.

Normally yes, a T2 Myrm is an Eos , but it says Produces 1x Myrmidon. And the whole thing about using skiff blueprint icons to make a Megathron Federate Issue that looks like Large Sabot.

You lack the most important question in the GOAL picture:

Will it be profitable and how much profit will it make?

Also, why not a world map or a meridian wireframe globe for the Map icon? Considering the ineptitude of some people to read maps and recognize regions, I find it highly dangerous to use Tunisia as an icon. People likely think it's just a random stench of white and dark.

If you mean the cost bar on the Installations tab, then that is providing an average relative price between the different facilities but as you will find out in a later blog the exact cost for installing jobs is going to vary based on both the activity and the blueprint being used.

Ideally it should pick up the regional settings from the OS (where possible) and use that. Where I live spaces are the thousand separators, not commas.

This +100

For example. To do 10 T2 Ship BPC Inventions now is a clickfest, time consuming mess.

IF this new UI doesn't make it so I can one or two click 10 invention jobs when I have all the proper stuff in one hanger than it is nothing but fluff IMO.

Fluff we don't need, less clicks and intuitive, functional interfaces we do need.

Just to elaborate on a few things, here is a section from the blog that judging from the feedback needs to be clarified more to the point:

Interactions should be efficient and meaningful

Any interaction in the Industry UI should be a gameplay-related decision done by the player instead of the player farming through confirmation windows and checkboxes. We wanted to strip out any unnecessary interaction unless it had specific purpose for the task at hand, whether that is changing actual input materials or output destination or simply adding more runs to a job. We added multiple ways to efficiently add count on runs (using keyboard shortcuts or direct manipulation on a value slider around the selected blueprint). Speed was another important factor and players will be able to start jobs super quickly and get instant updates on values when tinkering with job runs.

The TL;DR of this section is:

• The system will be smart, it will auto apply all needed materials when you on click a blueprint (you don't have to drag).
• The system will automatically go to the max runs supported by the blueprint if you have enough requirements, or go up to the amount it can handle with the requirements you have.
• Speed was one of our BIG goals, this is much much much faster than before.
• The system persists any settings so if you click another blueprint, it goes to the same settings as the one before it.
• You will be able to re-submit past jobs with a single click.

Yes, you will be able to build using materials and blueprints inside containers in a POS or in a station. The materials and the blueprint however must be in the correct assembly array.



Good point, we'll see about adding it again. A lot of the filter options are completely open for debate.



It will remember between sessions.

I also have to say that I like your wireframe a lot more than the current end-result. The wireframe appears a lot less cluttered and skeuomorphic than the end-result. It shows a clear progression for the items, whereas with your current end-result you don't know where some lines lead to. That's confusing. Also a lot of the icons and bars are less recognizable with the current end-result than with the first wireframe.
Also, why do we need the huge ship picture? Or the ISIS indicator? We don't want to fly that stuff, we want to produce it. If you need ISIS Mastery, click on it on in the ship info window. Moreover, you use 2 different symbols for the Mastery between the Info Window and the Industry window. If you must include that, at least keep consistency.

The indicators for Ready/Not ready are also not exactly clearly recognizable, the outer ring sections indicating readiness of certain parts seem to me too dark.

This flashy new UI is great and all, but this expansion is gonna fall really short of your expectations, if you keep mining as dull as it is. I know it's ~oldcode~ but sometimes you have to step out of your comfort zone CCP, and no I don't mean "revive WoD"

Please, for the love of the diety of your choice, REVAMP MINING