Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Well if we add to the shield in anyway that would make the signature grow.

I can't see anything wrong with it ;
maybe we can wind up with cases where
resistance is buffered by another set of items;
thus, resistance goes from somethin like 60% to 80%+ ;
You know, like a fleat of ships that have 80%+ reistance in everything .

And before we know the local "fashion cop parade" goes of
prancing around on its fancy shoes yelling in its horse voice
"omg y u no use that setting foo"
... and then everybody does that ...
and then game balance ,eventually, kicks in and everybody dies.

Maybe we could say that resisteance can only be so,
and so, much improved/incremented from any, and all, affecting modules;
Such as, when you turn on your, mentioned, remote hardener,
and the target ship would already have 3 items affecting its EM (for example) shiled resistance
then the added remote hardener would fall into
index 4 on the "how much effect" you module actually does.

Compared to allowing your moduel to have 100% effecton top of your target ship already hardened reistance.

The penalty index goes something along the lines of
1:100% 2:50% 3:25% 4:12.5% 5:6.25% 6:3.125% . . . effect of used multiple modules

This would absolutely make logistics even more powerful than they already are, which CCP has clearly stated they want to avoid pretty much "no matter what'.

normal remote repairs have no effect on the ships local reps, nor do they augment the power of other logi ships in fleet. These do, and they are way too powerful.

eehh, maybe, not sure.
Maybe if it was a new hull/role for that instead of adding to the existing Logi hulls.
And then also if there was a counter added with another ewar hull to each race that also reduced resistances.

Pretty much this. They are called fleet boosters.

these modules would have to have INSANE stacking penalties - to the point that if you activate more than 3 or 4 on a target, it's resist profiles start to go down.