These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

CSM Campaigns

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM 9

First post First post
Author
#101 - 2014-03-21 10:20:24 UTC
Being a highsec industrialist, what are your views on Highsec POSs?

Mainly, the acquiring standings part. Do you think something should be done to allow corps with lower standings place POSs in highsec?
For example: Having 1.0 - 2.0 standing with X allows small POSs to be anchored, 2.0 - 3.0 medium, 3.0 - 5 large.

About abandoned POSs, should people be able to use the Hacking "minigame" to hijack or steal them?

...

Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#102 - 2014-03-21 10:39:30 UTC
Azami Nevinyrall wrote:
Being a highsec industrialist, what are your views on Highsec POSs?

Mainly, the acquiring standings part. Do you think something should be done to allow corps with lower standings place POSs in highsec?
For example: Having 1.0 - 2.0 standing with X allows small POSs to be anchored, 2.0 - 3.0 medium, 3.0 - 5 large.

About abandoned POSs, should people be able to use the Hacking "minigame" to hijack or steal them?



Oh god, POSes. I'm a small part of the community.

I've been running a POS in highsec space for a while now (Also considering one for lowsec, but that's another matter)

Mostly I'd like to get rid of them completely, and replace them with something better. More deployables (for corporations). Asteroids you can stick arrays into. That kind of thing.


I'd actually be reasonably happy if:

A: POS were no longer tied to moons. Any kind of opening up of POS anchoring with no other changes will make little difference, due to the number of free moons (unless opened up at 0.8 and up)

B: You could anchor at any standing level, but it adjusted the cost. Possibly a direct ISK cost as well as the LP for the charters. Have good standings, have cheaper POS (with charges depending on size)


Abandoned POS:

I'd be fairly happy if you could take down other people's POS by hacking. Still have the undeploy timer.
The issue is defining Abandoned. 'Out of fuel' isn't abandoned. I'd think that you'd need to wait at least a month before it would count. And after that, you may need to hack (successfully) multiple times, with fairly long delays. Mostly to make sure it actually is abandoned.

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

#103 - 2014-03-21 14:07:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Azami Nevinyrall
I agree that POSs should be deployed to wherever you damn well feel. But, the code forbids it!

With the new deployable stuffs, its a possibility!

With the hijacking POSs, there's several ways to approach this idea.

-edit-

Side note, where in highsec can you toss up POSs?

...

Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#104 - 2014-03-21 15:17:37 UTC
Azami Nevinyrall wrote:
I agree that POSs should be deployed to wherever you damn well feel. But, the code forbids it!

With the new deployable stuffs, its a possibility!

With the hijacking POSs, there's several ways to approach this idea.

-edit-

Side note, where in highsec can you toss up POSs?



Right now, any moon in 0.7 and below.

But the corporation has to have faction standing equal to 10 times the security level.

so 5 for 0.5, 6 for 0.6 and 7 for 0.7.

Get a newbie in corp, and you may not be able to anchor your pos without kicking everyone.

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

#105 - 2014-03-21 21:42:34 UTC
Steve Ronuken wrote:
Azami Nevinyrall wrote:
I agree that POSs should be deployed to wherever you damn well feel. But, the code forbids it!

With the new deployable stuffs, its a possibility!

With the hijacking POSs, there's several ways to approach this idea.

-edit-

Side note, where in highsec can you toss up POSs?



Right now, any moon in 0.7 and below.

But the corporation has to have faction standing equal to 10 times the security level.

so 5 for 0.5, 6 for 0.6 and 7 for 0.7.

Get a newbie in corp, and you may not be able to anchor your pos without kicking everyone.

I meant personally, like you! Where can you toss up a POS?

...

Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#106 - 2014-03-21 22:19:43 UTC
Azami Nevinyrall wrote:
I meant personally, like you! Where can you toss up a POS?


Are you asking:

Where I, personally, have standings to anchor a pos (if it wasn't for other characters in my corp pulling down the corp standing)?
Where my corp does?
Something else?

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

The Initiative.
#107 - 2014-03-21 22:58:39 UTC
I infer that he is alluding to the shortage of unused moons in hi-sec

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#108 - 2014-03-22 18:03:30 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
I infer that he is alluding to the shortage of unused moons in hi-sec



Ahhh.

I've not surveyed that recently (Just the last time I moved system.)

I'm not entirely happy with tying structure to moons. Sure, there are benefits from an orbital mechanics POV, but it's not a huge one.

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

Caldari State
#109 - 2014-03-25 01:09:12 UTC
CSM9 Candidate Interview: Steve Ronuken
http://www.capstable.net/2014/03/15/csm9-candidate-interview-steve-ronuken

Executive Editor, CSM Watch || Writer, Co-host of the Cap Stable Podcast || Twitter: @Lanctharus

#110 - 2014-03-29 14:16:41 UTC
You will get my vote for sure.
Amarr Empire
#111 - 2014-04-01 02:08:04 UTC
A corpmate and fellow software developer recommended that I take a look at your thread, and I'm definitely impressed with what you've had to say. You've got a vote on all three of my ballots, and I'll recommend you to my friends, as well. It would be awesome to have a hardworking third party developer and industrialist on the CSM.
#112 - 2014-04-01 03:08:27 UTC
Even if we are both running for CSM, we are part of the same club and so I give my full support to Steve.

Servant of the Secret League, Wielder of the Monocle Clubhouse Flame.

#113 - 2014-04-03 21:18:30 UTC
I have removed a rule breaking post and those quoting them.

The Rules:
10. Discussion of warnings and bans is prohibited.

Such matters shall remain private between CCP and the involved user. Questions or comments concerning warnings and bans will be conveyed through email or private messaging. CCP respect the right of our players to privacy and as such you are not permitted to publicize private correspondence (including petition responses and emails) received from any of the aforementioned parties.

ISD Ezwal Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Esha Amphal
#114 - 2014-04-04 02:09:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Esha Amphal
Mr Ronuken,

As I've stated in passing on the twitters you are rather high on my vote ballot. I gave you serious consideration last year. This time it was a no brainer to pen you in almost a month ago when I started my list. I strongly believe that your services will be required very soon, considering the upcoming expansion/s appear to have an industrial inclination and current CSM representatives have hinted that your expertise will be in demand shortly.

A main focus of mine has been the CSM outwardly communicating with the player base. All things considered NDAs are a constant obstacle where outward communication is concerned. However I feel that CSM8 has raised the bar on interacting with the players in a variety of ways (town halls, blogs, podcasts, twitter, google hangouts, etc). I would hate to see that particular sandcastle knocked over in the coming term. As someone who has been campaigning and getting his message across long before this election month, I don't think you're one to worry about in this regard Mr Ronuken.

I'm interested in your opinion about how CSM9 will communicate with the players even more effectively than CSM8. They set an excellent example, but what can they do better? Which groups of players are still isolated and how can you and the rest of the council go about creating new communication lines with them?

I'm also curious about your take on Planetary Interaction. Do you think it's in a good place? What do you think about the state of the in-game PI tutorial and the new player experience with PI? What would you like to see considering the potential for the Dust514 - PI connection?

Thank you in advance for your time.
Clockwork Pineapple
#115 - 2014-04-04 02:20:03 UTC
Hello.

Currently the Serpentis are the only pirate faction in the game that don't have a rated 6/10 and 9/10 DED complex available to be run. These sites have been on the "coming soon" list for quite a few years, but no further news or information has been released. Would you be willing to request that CCP introduce these sites to the game so that areas like syndicate that rely on running sites as the main form of income can continue to grow and prosper?
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#116 - 2014-04-04 18:46:28 UTC
Elmnt80 wrote:
Hello.

Currently the Serpentis are the only pirate faction in the game that don't have a rated 6/10 and 9/10 DED complex available to be run. These sites have been on the "coming soon" list for quite a few years, but no further news or information has been released. Would you be willing to request that CCP introduce these sites to the game so that areas like syndicate that rely on running sites as the main form of income can continue to grow and prosper?

Sounds good to me Smile

(Though mynnna's already done it)

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

The Initiative.
#117 - 2014-04-05 14:27:21 UTC  |  Edited by: S1euth
Hope you win Steve!

Thanks for all of the contributions to the 3P App community; If you get CCP to release CREST with user friendly documentation then your CSMship will be a fantastic success.
#118 - 2014-04-05 14:52:18 UTC
#119 - 2014-04-05 15:46:54 UTC
I have removed a rule breaking post.

The Rules:
11. Discussion of forum moderation is prohibited.

The discussion of EVE Online forum moderation actions generally leads to flaming, trolling and baiting of our ISD CCL moderators. As such, this type of discussion is strictly prohibited under the forum rules. If you have questions regarding the actions of a moderator, please file a petition under the Community & Forums Category.

ISD Ezwal Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#120 - 2014-04-05 18:06:45 UTC



Answered

Smile
Short version: A fair chunk this month (40-50 hours), though mostly in mining missions as I'm working up standings, and gaining LP (handy for refining implants)

It's higher than normal, but pulling out my miners isn't an uncommon activity.

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

Forum Jump