These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

[IDEA] WARP CORE STABS

Author
Lidia Caderu
Brave Newbies Inc.
Brave Collective
#1 - 2014-04-02 07:37:58 UTC
How about to add some small positive bonus to Warp stabilizers? For example, as a result of stabilization you recive increased warp speed : +1 AU +15% warp speed
or: reduced cap for warp activation + reduced cap used on MWD.
Seliah
Red Cloud Vigil
#2 - 2014-04-02 09:12:53 UTC
Do you have any sort of justification for adding a bonus to WCS's ? Like, why the hell would you want to do that ?
Corraidhin Farsaidh
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#3 - 2014-04-02 09:18:52 UTC
There are already other mods, skills, and implants to affect these stats I think? They would become redundant if all you needed was WCS to cover them.
Samillian
Angry Mustellid
#4 - 2014-04-02 09:27:23 UTC
Lidia Caderu wrote:
How about to add some small positive bonus to Warp stabilizers? For example, as a result of stabilization you recive increased warp speed : +1 AU +15% warp speed
or: reduced cap for warp activation + reduced cap used on MWD.


So getting out from under scram isn't enough for you?

Not supported.

NBSI shall be the whole of the Law

Yakima DWB
Baited Sting
#5 - 2014-04-02 09:53:19 UTC
I'd much prefer if they gave your suggested bonus in place of how they currently work.
Jean deVallette
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#6 - 2014-04-02 10:05:50 UTC
No, and given the staggering amount of sales since the probing changes, finding a 4x stabbed magnate doing lowsec data sites ... its a PITA.

Yes - 2x faction scrams will work, but lets add to their penalties, and make them also lower astrometric/ analyser and salvager properties significantly.

Stop people using them everywhere.
Corraidhin Farsaidh
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#7 - 2014-04-02 10:06:08 UTC
Yakima DWB wrote:
I'd much prefer if they gave your suggested bonus in place of how they currently work.


But WCS work fine as they are...if people want faster time-to-warp fit the inertia mods, faster warp speeds need the implants for it, WCS give the unarmed hauler the means to escape an attacker, but the attacker can always bring more friends whilst the hauler has limited WCS. Seems pretty balanced right now
Corraidhin Farsaidh
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#8 - 2014-04-02 10:10:29 UTC
Jean deVallette wrote:
No, and given the staggering amount of sales since the probing changes, finding a 4x stabbed magnate doing lowsec data sites ... its a PITA.

Yes - 2x faction scrams will work, but lets add to their penalties, and make them also lower astrometric/ analyser and salvager properties significantly.

Stop people using them everywhere.


Why add to the penalties? You just stated the simple counter to a WCS ship, and with 4 WCS there's no way they will lock you to do anything else other than melt...
Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation
Pandemic Legion
#9 - 2014-04-02 10:18:56 UTC
Jean deVallette wrote:
No, and given the staggering amount of sales since the probing changes, finding a 4x stabbed magnate doing lowsec data sites ... its a PITA.

Yes - 2x faction scrams will work, but lets add to their penalties, and make them also lower astrometric/ analyser and salvager properties significantly.

Stop people using them everywhere.


So? Bring more scrams. No Magnate escapes my scram boat when I get hold of it. You are just unprepared for the cowardliness of other players and thus don't deserve to get the prey. Moreover, giving stabs even more negative effects will surely help to keep people going into Low sec ... wait. Roll I don't care about stabs, because they are useless if you are properly prepared.

Change suggestion of OP and in quote not supported.

UI Improvement Collective

My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.

Lidia Caderu
Brave Newbies Inc.
Brave Collective
#10 - 2014-04-02 11:06:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Lidia Caderu
Seliah wrote:
Do you have any sort of justification for adding a bonus to WCS's ? Like, why the hell would you want to do that ?

Of cource. WCS have big negative bonus on targeting. So it would be nice to at least somehow to compensate it. Plus having increased warp speed would be nice for traveling. So overall it would be very nice for traveling!
Lidia Caderu
Brave Newbies Inc.
Brave Collective
#11 - 2014-04-02 11:12:33 UTC
Jean deVallette wrote:
No, and given the staggering amount of sales since the probing changes, finding a 4x stabbed magnate doing lowsec data sites ... its a PITA.

So what? If you will kill people more easily they will not enter lows ot null. Then you'll start complaining that hi-sec is too secure and you cant kill people there more easily there.
Try bumping for example.
Mike Voidstar
Voidstar Free Flight Foundation
#12 - 2014-04-02 12:00:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Mike Voidstar
Jean deVallette wrote:
No, and given the staggering amount of sales since the probing changes, finding a 4x stabbed magnate doing lowsec data sites ... its a PITA.

Yes - 2x faction scrams will work, but lets add to their penalties, and make them also lower astrometric/ analyser and salvager properties significantly.

Stop people using them everywhere.


Odd, if you wanted such easily killed prey served up to you just go run some level 2 missions.... or do NPCs shoot back too much and/or not cry enough when killed?

Op... You are not wrong. Stabs dont need the penalties they have except the predators dont like it when you can get away. Simply driving you off isnt enough, they must get their kill, no matter how outmatched you were. Buffing them for non-combat effects, especially travel stats would be good.
Seliah
Red Cloud Vigil
#13 - 2014-04-02 12:03:56 UTC
Lidia Caderu wrote:
Seliah wrote:
Do you have any sort of justification for adding a bonus to WCS's ? Like, why the hell would you want to do that ?

Of cource. WCS have big negative bonus on targeting. So it would be nice to at least somehow to compensate it. Plus having increased warp speed would be nice for traveling. So overall it would be very nice for traveling!


Well, the negative bonus (which is usually referred to as a malus btw) is here for a good reason, so there's nothing to compensate. The targeting malus is already here to compensate the huge bonus the WCS already gives.

And as people stated before, if you want travelling speed, fit modules that are designed for it, not a WCS.
WouldYouEver HaveSexWith aGoat
Doomheim
#14 - 2014-04-02 12:40:18 UTC
WCS use on exploration frigates does need a bit of a nerf, I agree with who said that.

However I disagree with those saying these suggested bonuses in the OP would make WCS overpowered. It would in fact become a viable way to increase warp speed on any given ship, without sacrificing rig or implants slots. You sacrifice lock time and range by fitting them thus there is a clear trade-off.

For game balance sake I think it's important that warp speed can be adjusted through the use of a high/med/low slot. Nearly all other factors can be adjusted as such, so this falls in line with that mentality.

As of now WCS is used solely to escape. It would be nice to see it have other positive affects in relation to one's warp drive.

Rivr Luzade
Coreli Corporation
Pandemic Legion
#15 - 2014-04-02 12:46:57 UTC
And after that WCS are still only used to escape and in case of ceptors are even more powerful. No.

UI Improvement Collective

My ridicule, heavy criticism and general pale outlook about your or CCP's ideas is nothing but an encouragement to prove me wrong. Give it a try.

stoicfaux
#16 - 2014-04-02 12:49:13 UTC
Lidia Caderu wrote:
How about to add some small positive bonus to Warp stabilizers? For example, as a result of stabilization you recive increased warp speed : +1 AU +15% warp speed


+1 It would make for a nice traveling fit. I would keep it as a % warp speed bonus rather than a flat +1 AU.

Quote:
or: reduced cap for warp activation + reduced cap used on MWD.

Meh, not so much.


Pon Farr Memorial: once every 7 years, all the carebears in high-sec must PvP or they will be temp-banned.

Mike Voidstar
Voidstar Free Flight Foundation
#17 - 2014-04-02 12:57:19 UTC
Seliah wrote:
Lidia Caderu wrote:
Seliah wrote:
Do you have any sort of justification for adding a bonus to WCS's ? Like, why the hell would you want to do that ?

Of cource. WCS have big negative bonus on targeting. So it would be nice to at least somehow to compensate it. Plus having increased warp speed would be nice for traveling. So overall it would be very nice for traveling!


Well, the negative bonus (which is usually referred to as a malus btw) is here for a good reason, so there's nothing to compensate. The targeting malus is already here to compensate the huge bonus the WCS already gives.

And as people stated before, if you want travelling speed, fit modules that are designed for it, not a WCS.


They didnt always have the penalties. They were added to discourage thier use on PvP fit ships. They honestly dont need the penalty... You sacrifice Damage, Tank, or both fitting them as it is.

Making them beneficial for non-combat purposes would not be out of line.
Corraidhin Farsaidh
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#18 - 2014-04-02 13:00:04 UTC
WouldYouEver HaveSexWith aGoat wrote:


As of now WCS is used solely to escape. It would be nice to see it have other positive affects in relation to one's warp drive.



And scram is used solely to capture, this is a mod and its counter working as intended I would say. Use implants to improve warp speed which as you say means using (not sacrificing) an implant slot for this purpose. Choices have to be made when fitting your ship and your clone and this is game balance in action to my mind.
Daichi Yamato
Jabbersnarks and Wonderglass
#19 - 2014-04-02 14:53:57 UTC
Mike Voidstar wrote:
Stabs dont need the penalties they have except the predators dont like it when you can get away.


well lets consider a shield fit cane here...it has a lot of lows to play with. if WCS didnt have their penalties u wouldnt be sacrificing much by swapping out that second tracking enhancer, or third gyro for a wcs. its not about getting away for good, its about being able to warp out of the fight and then warp back in again at range.

tier 3 BC's could abuse this to hell.

they were justly nerfed such that anything using it doesnt just suffer from a missing damage mod, it cripples a PvP viable fit. this way u can still use WCS for travelling, but not in fights. which makes complete sense.

i dnt think im keen on the WCS giving extra warp speed. there are other means to get that benefit. but at the same time, its not overpowered or game breaking. i cant imagine it changing the dynamics of a chase that much, but can provide a QOL improvement for traveling.

EVE FAQ "7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided"

Daichi Yamato's version of structure based decs

Mike Voidstar
Voidstar Free Flight Foundation
#20 - 2014-04-02 15:36:45 UTC
It isnt abuse to use the benefit the module is meant for.

This goes back to my constantly harping about the failure of the game to give real goals in pvp other than ship kills and tears. If it had no drawbacks you could still catch a target with faction mods, multiple ships, dual scram, or heavy interdictors... But without a reason to stay and fight hard tackle is required for every fight and eve pvp will always be about victimizing someone rather than fighting them over something else.
12Next page