These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Limit FW plexes to FW players

Author
Samillian
Angry Mustellid
#21 - 2014-03-25 11:31:49 UTC
I cannot support this proposal.

I've lost count of the number of times we've warped to a plex and got a real fight out of neutrals. Far more often than we have got fights out of our opposition certainly.

NBSI shall be the whole of the Law

Elshar Khandar
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#22 - 2014-03-25 11:37:45 UTC
Samillian wrote:
I cannot support this proposal.

I've lost count of the number of times we've warped to a plex and got a real fight out of neutrals. Far more often than we have got fights out of our opposition certainly.


Are you disagreeing with my original proposal or the altered proposal? I can see why you'd disagree with the original but if it's the altered could you explain why? I can't see why this would alter your or their play at all. It just addresses an imbalance.
Corraidhin Farsaidh
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#23 - 2014-03-25 11:40:46 UTC
Samillian wrote:
I cannot support this proposal.

I've lost count of the number of times we've warped to a plex and got a real fight out of neutrals. Far more often than we have got fights out of our opposition certainly.



The current proposal wouldn't stop; this, it would put the onus on the neutral to find the site and then put all concerned on an equal footing for combat. This shouldn't change your proposal as the neutrals would still put up a fight and would have agreed to it being in a 'pocket-null' setting where sec status doesn't apply. Everybody goes guns free at will., no limitation on engagement, no CONCORD interference.

Making the sites need scanning and pop a DED style warning means that no player can stumble into such an area accidentally too.
Sean Parisi
Blackrise Vanguard
#24 - 2014-03-25 11:48:28 UTC
No. The fact you even made this thread clearly shows you hardly fw enough to understand it.
Nebaile Sharisa
Annoying Flies At A Barbecue
#25 - 2014-03-25 11:49:53 UTC
Man you fw pilots feel you should be treated special because you joined an empires cause. Just because you choose to follow doesn't mean that those that didn't should be treated different. If you don't want to fight neutrals then run. Don't forget the sec status hit you get works the same for the neutrals. Meaning you can buy tags as well. So man up and learn to fly or go back to wow.
Elshar Khandar
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#26 - 2014-03-25 12:06:48 UTC
Sean Parisi wrote:
No. The fact you even made this thread clearly shows you hardly fw enough to understand it.

In the interests of education could you explain what it is I don't understand please?
Elshar Khandar
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#27 - 2014-03-25 12:10:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Elshar Khandar
Nebaile Sharisa wrote:
Man you fw pilots feel you should be treated special because you joined an empires cause. Just because you choose to follow doesn't mean that those that didn't should be treated different. If you don't want to fight neutrals then run. Don't forget the sec status hit you get works the same for the neutrals. Meaning you can buy tags as well. So man up and learn to fly or go back to wow.

Are you sure you can't fit any more unoriginal clichés into that mild rant? Also, I've never played WoW. What's it like?

In all seriousness, you're right about both sides being able to buy tags. This suggestion benefits the neutrals as well as the FW people though as both wouldn't take a sec hit. It's not biasing towards the FW people, merely a sensible suggestion to make the situation better for all.

The part about it only showing up to FW people is about balance, as has been mentioned several times. I'm not sure what this has to do with learning to fly. If it does, could you explain how please?
Ashlar Vellum
Esquire Armaments
#28 - 2014-03-25 12:55:29 UTC
Idea about scannable plexes for neutrals is not a bad one imho. Only concern I have is that it will lead to fewer fights.
Previous page12