CSM Campaigns

Hello everyone,

You can find Azami Nevinyrall's interview which he had with me at the following link:

Mp3 Download Link:
http://www.legacyofacapsuleer.com/mp3/CSM9_interview_06_Azami_Nevinyrall.mp3

Watch It On YouTube At:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsKAi0kGS8o

Hope you guys enjoy the interview and I hope you get to know Azami Nevinyrall a bit better.

Greetz & thanks,

Tyrant Scorn

Where I live there is no local.
And I'm gonna be mad if you force me to sit uncloaked in a forcefield just cause I'm (semi)afk a bit or busy chatting :p

Thanks for your feedback guys!

Cloaking has been complained about since 2007, by a lot of players. I know my idea is an unpopular one, but remember its just a suggestion. CCP can ignore it outright, use part of it for something they might be a working on, or implement it outright.

I'd actually love it if you'd tell me what part exactly you disagree with. Then I can ponder about it and maybe we can come up with a better solution that would please everyone.... or almost everyone!

With the Cyno Jammer deployable, less of a issue.

Covert cyno is mainly used for larger scaled fleet engagements, where there's a few hundred hostiles in system. A regular cyno is used for hit and run tactics where people are doing PVE stuffs. Also a cloaked ship could be a warpin for a gang 1-2 jumps out, or they might try to solo you if they think you're AFK running a site. (YAY drone boats!)

I think, if this idea was to be implemented, to and make it not OP. I would like it so if someone is not moving and cloaked you're not going to get a 100% hit on them. But know they're there with a general idea of the location.

Teleportation is another issue altogether, and a non issue in wormhole space.

True, those who are AFK don't care about Intel channels. But the PVP orientated players usually form their own gangs to go after or scare off hostiles. This would be another tool and more toys for them to use and play with.

Thanks man!

I really appreciate your support!

I listened to your interview on Cap Stable.

When you were asked what your strengths are, you said, "I don't see myself having a particular strength."

When you were asked what you liked about EVE Online, you said, "With the game itself, not much."

When you were asked about what distinguishes you from other candidates, you said, "Nothing, in my mind, sets me out differently."

When you were asked if there was anything you would like to say, you said, "Uh, off the top of my head, not really."

So you have no strengths, don't like the game, there is nothing special about you, and you have nothing to say.

Nobody is asking you to talk trash about the other candidates. You were asked directly what makes you a better candidate than the other people running. Refusing to answer the question is not some kind of moral high ground; all it means is that you are an obstructionist.

If you aren't willing to promote yourself, why should anyone care about your campaign?

As it stands right now, a vote for you is a vote for a bland, no-personality, no platform nobody.

When someone asks you what your strengths are, they are asking you what you are good at. When you say you don't have a strength, that is saying that you aren't good at anything.

When someone asks what distinguishes you as a candidate, they are asking why they should vote for you instead of the other 30+ people running. When you say that nothing sets you apart, that is saying that there is no compelling reason to vote for you.

Your platform can be summed up as, "Hey guys, I read on the forums that akf cloaking and null sec sov mechanics are disliked."

You seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of the English language. I say that not as an insult, but merely to point out that there is a language barrier that is preventing you from interviewing well. For example, when I talk about promoting yourself, I am talking about marketing yourself as a viable candidate to the playerbase. The word promote has more than one meaning, and you do not seem to be able to discern the meaning of a word through context.



This is the part that really irks me. You are submitting yourself to us so that we as a playerbase can pass judgement upon you to determine your worthiness to be on the CSM. And yet you act as if the idea of judgement, which you have demanded from us, is beneath you.

Sure, but it doesn't mean you ARE good at anything either. But it is a bland, ambiguous statement that doesn't tell us anything about your experiences or qualifications.



It absolutely means that there is no reason to vote for you. You were asked why we should vote for you, and you refused to answer. You can try to dress it up with politeness any way you want, but the fact is you are refusing to tell us why we should give you space on our ballot instead of other people. Again, nobody was asking you to talk badly about the other candidates. That was your chance to tell us all about your good qualities and how those qualities relate to the CSM (aka promoting yourself). Instead, we got some bland drivel about how nothing really sets you apart.



So your platform is "Vote for me and I pinky swear to do the job"?



There are 2 possibilities here: either he didn't have the heart to tell you that you bombed the interview, or you have made this up.

There were several times when he asked your opinion of a topic, and you said, "Well me personally...". You are running for an elected position and yet you act bewildered that he would ask your opinion.

In fact, there were no curveballs. Everything he asked you was based on public statements you had made previously, or were questions about public statements you had made previously. There were no twists or shocking revelations; it was all stuff you have talked about before.

Not to mention the obvious softball questions he lobbed at you that we already discussed (what are your strengths, what distinguishes you as a candidate, do you have anything to say). These were your chances to talk about what you can do well, to tell the voters what you bring to the table, and your answer was nothing.



First of all, I have 10 accounts that are currently active and another dozen or so that are not active right now. I rarely post on the forums, but when CSM election time rolls around, I log in and ask questions of the candidates I don't fully understand. I logged in with this account, and this was the default character.

Secondly, this alt has been around for longer than I have known of your existence. Its creation had absolutely nothing to do with you.

In the third place, despite what you believe, I am not trying to discredit you. I am researching all the CSM candidates so that when CSM elections happen, I don't have to rely on some third party vote matching. I want to understand who you are as a candidate and what you would bring to the CSM table, but you are taking my questions as a personal attack instead of an opportunity to tell me what your platform is. Because right now, you have no platform. Reading the forums is not a platform.