These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Why are many people on these forums so negative, and so hostile?

First post First post
Author
Salvos Rhoska
#161 - 2014-02-26 20:59:38 UTC
Kimmi Chan wrote:
So wait, Bruce Wayne plays Eve?

You picked up on that too, eh? Lol
Akirei Scytale
Okami Syndicate
#162 - 2014-02-26 21:05:06 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Why are many people on these forums so negative, and so hostile?

Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Because people are in general, rabbits.

Yeah.
Rabbits are extremely hateful, negative and hostile creatures.
Dont be fooled by the soft fluffiness.


QFT
Qalix
Long Jump.
#163 - 2014-02-26 21:09:47 UTC
Anhenka wrote:
Divine Entervention wrote:
Grandiose highfalutin speech on his moral superiority to the inferior subhuman that surround him.


C'est moi, c'est moi, tis I.

Honestly, you fit the role perfectly. It's amazing. I'm even reading your posts in his voice the resemblance is so strong.

Which is probably far more of a vocal complement than you deserve, cause Rober Goulet absolutely pinned that role.



A Camelot reference! Kudos, sir! Kudos!

Victoria Thorne
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#164 - 2014-02-26 21:13:03 UTC
All this feels somehow familiar... Did I travel back in time?

EVE = game

Action in game does not equal action in real life.

Best of luck to all in this discussion!



Divine Entervention
Doomheim
#165 - 2014-02-26 21:23:51 UTC
Victoria Thorne wrote:
All this feels somehow familiar... Did I travel back in time?

EVE = game

Action in game does not equal action in real life.

Best of luck to all in this discussion!





The action in real life creates the action in the game.

Real life is real life, sitting at a computer or jogging around the block.
Victoria Thorne
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#166 - 2014-02-26 21:36:12 UTC
Divine Entervention wrote:
Victoria Thorne wrote:
All this feels somehow familiar... Did I travel back in time?

EVE = game

Action in game does not equal action in real life.

Best of luck to all in this discussion!





The action in real life creates the action in the game.

Real life is real life, sitting at a computer or jogging around the block.


You're silly! Big smile You are making me smile!

It's your choice to play, if you disapprove of the rules of the game, then don't play. Simple as that, really. If you don't approve of morally questionable behavior, then don't play games which involve it.

It's like getting mad at someone for assassinating someone in Crusader Kings 2... Your moral objection is completely irrelevant in a game which revolves around it as a core principle of gameplay. If you feel that strongly about it, either do something about it in game, or don't play. Forum warrioring certainly won't achieve your goal.
Divine Entervention
Doomheim
#167 - 2014-02-26 21:57:14 UTC
Victoria Thorne wrote:
Divine Entervention wrote:
Victoria Thorne wrote:
All this feels somehow familiar... Did I travel back in time?

EVE = game

Action in game does not equal action in real life.

Best of luck to all in this discussion!





The action in real life creates the action in the game.

Real life is real life, sitting at a computer or jogging around the block.


You're silly! Big smile You are making me smile!

It's your choice to play, if you disapprove of the rules of the game, then don't play. Simple as that, really. If you don't approve of morally questionable behavior, then don't play games which involve it.

It's like getting mad at someone for assassinating someone in Crusader Kings 2... Your moral objection is completely irrelevant in a game which revolves around it as a core principle of gameplay. If you feel that strongly about it, either do something about it in game, or don't play. Forum warrioring certainly won't achieve your goal.


There's no personal investment. Crusader Kings 2, a great game btw, has a definitive beginning and ending. I don't know if you mean multiplayer, if you do kudos to you for getting it to work, but I would assume since being continuously assassinated by 1 guy causing you to lose the game, well whatever. I didn't have to work for anything. Seeing as that game is over, I'll go start another one. CK2 games start and end constantly. EVE carries on indefinitely. Winning in one game and losing in another, ultimately is the same because win or lose the game is over and if you desire to keep playing, another one must be started.

The only real thing I feel strongly about so far on these forums is my opportunity to discuss opinions with others. If someone wishes to steal/rob/gank/extort someone within the confines of EVE, by all means, have at it! Knock yourself out! Go hard in the paint!

But I'm not going to do it. And while some people will applaud one's ability to "outsmart" others and ruin their game play, well, I'll condemn it for them choosing to ruin someone elses game.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#168 - 2014-02-26 22:02:36 UTC
Divine Entervention wrote:


But I'm not going to do it. And while some people will applaud one's ability to "outsmart" others and ruin their game play, well, I'll condemn it for them choosing to ruin someone elses game.


Do you know what an "awox" is?

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Ivan Krividus
Cold Lazarus Inc
The-Expanse
#169 - 2014-02-26 23:59:37 UTC
If you leave GD you will find lots of nice people
Mourn LeBlade
Jupiter Roughriders
#170 - 2014-02-27 01:29:10 UTC
It's both sad and funny that there is so much anger, arrogance, and hostility in a thread concerned about the same.

Perhaps there is no hope for the OP's concerns.

LTCOL LeBlade 177 Division Live Free or Die

Mourn LeBlade
Jupiter Roughriders
#171 - 2014-02-27 01:42:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Mourn LeBlade
Also @ the OP, if you go to the thread Collisions, you'll see many great examples of angry and arrogant posters tearing up a thread that is a legitimate idea. You can see that anyone that agrees with the OP is hammered immediately, even by people tearing apart grammar. This is how the few try to control the many. These people you take issue with are actually worse than trolls, because they successfully set the agenda for these forums by suppressing any and all new ideas. They justify their bias and hatred by simply dismissing all they disagree with as "stupid." I doubt it would be appropriate for me to suggest other forums, but in my opinion the "official" forums attract the worst behavior, perhaps because that's where the sociopaths attempt to control the Devs and thereby enforce their game narrative. You are correct that a new player has virtually no chance of constructive feedback on these forums.

LTCOL LeBlade 177 Division Live Free or Die

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#172 - 2014-02-27 01:55:18 UTC
Mourn LeBlade wrote:
Also @ the OP, if you go to the thread Collisions, you'll see many great examples of angry and arrogant posters tearing up a thread that is
…so old, tired, pointless and redundant that it has been answered many many many times (including in the forum where it should have been posted to begin with). The thread is being torn up because of the OP's failure to search, failure to post in the right section, and failure to bring anything remotely new to the table.

It gets no constructive feedback because it was never a constructive thread to begin with — it just pointlessly clogs up the place.
Anhenka
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#173 - 2014-02-27 01:56:55 UTC
Mourn LeBlade wrote:
It's both sad and funny that there is so much anger, arrogance, and hostility in a thread concerned about the same.

Perhaps there is no hope for the OP's concerns.


Mourn, when the OP is a voice of reason, we will treat him with respect and with a reasonable discussion.
Many of the threads he posted were treated without hostility, like his suggestion to give Rohk 8 unbonused missile slots. Although that one was treated with much bafflement, there was no hostility.

Keep in mind though that this current thread was started after he arbitrarily posted rants threads demanding buffs/nerfs to ship without backing them up, while including gems like the following. Needless to say, statements like the following are about tailor designed to annoy every single F&I poster. Unsurprisingly, he caught **** for them, then got mad at peoples "negativity"

Chihiro Chugakusei wrote:
Anyone who opposes the talos being nerfed, with out some serious counter point, is just angry because they like how broken it is.

I'd I'll also say nerf the talos, because wtf (has most cargo capacity, most drones, no penalties and the best cruiser bonuses - seriously who the fk designed it and how did they get away with it?

I don't agree. You're just making excuses. That there is a long winded way around doesn't mean that this thread is any less valid.


TLDR: The people getting negative comments are not saints by default, not or the people being negative automatically devils.
There is plenty of blame to go around for all parties involved. Being courteous will get politeness in return. Not doing so and you end up like the OP. Welcome to the EVE forums.
Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
#174 - 2014-02-27 01:58:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Kimmi Chan
Mourn LeBlade wrote:
Also @ the OP, if you go to the thread Collisions, you'll see many great examples of angry and arrogant posters tearing up a thread that is a legitimate idea. You can see that anyone that agrees with the OP is hammered immediately, even by people tearing apart grammar. This is how the few try to control the many. These people you take issue with are actually worse than trolls, because they successfully set the agenda for these forums by suppressing any and all new ideas. They justify their bias and hatred by simply dismissing all they disagree with as "stupid." I doubt it would be appropriate for me to suggest other forums, but in my opinion the "official" forums attract the worst behavior, perhaps because that's where the sociopaths attempt to control the Devs and thereby enforce their game narrative. You are correct that a new player has virtually no chance in constructive feedback on these forums.


Here's a post from a new player that was received very warmly overall by this community.

Here is the proper forum for posts such as this.

Just like this one, this one, and various posts in other threads.

And yet people keep throwing this idea out like they just thought of it. Even if they did, should they be encouraged to start a new thread rather than contributing to one of the already existing ones?

Furthermore,

Quote:
16. Redundant and re-posted threads will be locked.

As a courtesy to other forum users, please search to see if there is a thread already open on the topic you wish to discuss. If so, please place your comments there instead. Multiple threads on the same subject clutter up the forums needlessly, causing good feedback and ideas to be lost. Please keep discussions regarding a topic to a single thread.


Source

Obviously, I can't speak for everyone in the community, but this is why I generally get negative and hostile. Follow the rules and if you're going to post a new idea that has not already been posted you'd better make it good. If it's a stupid idea, the community is going to let you know it's stupid. That's what we're here for.

Just because someone disagrees with you does not mean they are negative and hostile. They very well may be negative and hostile for the same reason I am negative and hostile.

"Grr Kimmi  Nerf Chans!" ~Jenn aSide

www.eve-radio.com  Join Eve Radio channel in game!

Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#175 - 2014-02-27 02:03:56 UTC
Mourn LeBlade wrote:
Also @ the OP, if you go to the thread Collisions, you'll see many great examples of angry and arrogant posters tearing up a thread that is a legitimate idea.
Perhaps, but it's also possible that the strong language used in forums arises because most of what we take for granted in communication is lost in the instant written reply.

Tone, inflection, expression and body language which can make even a single word have different meaning or emphasis are all absent here.

As a result, the strength purely of the words written has to convey so much more.

While it seems that writers are rude and negative, I often put it down to them trying to get across a view that in other forms of communication they would be able to convey more simply and in a manner that we all use every day.

It's easy to interpret these replies as anger and negativity because as the reader, the interpretation is totally up to us without any other visual or auditory clues about the actual tone intended.

The reality from the writers perspective could be totally different, which I think we all need to recognize when we read posts in the forum.
Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
#176 - 2014-02-27 02:06:10 UTC
Scipio Artelius wrote:
Mourn LeBlade wrote:
Also @ the OP, if you go to the thread Collisions, you'll see many great examples of angry and arrogant posters tearing up a thread that is a legitimate idea.
Perhaps, but it's also possible that the strong language used in forums arises because most of what we take for granted in communication is lost in the instant written reply.

Tone, inflection, expression and body language which can make even a single word have different meaning or emphasis are all absent here.

As a result, the strength purely of the words written has to convey so much more.

While it seems that writers are rude and negative, I often put it down to them trying to get across a view that in other forms of communication they would be able to convey more simply and in a manner that we all use every day.

It's easy to interpret these replies as anger and negativity because as the reader, the interpretation is totally up to us without any other visual or auditory clues about the actual tone intended.

The reality from the writers perspective could be totally different, which I think we all need to recognize when we read posts in the forum.


Man you should see what I can do with a big whiteboard. Smile

"Grr Kimmi  Nerf Chans!" ~Jenn aSide

www.eve-radio.com  Join Eve Radio channel in game!

Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#177 - 2014-02-27 02:16:10 UTC
Separate to my previous reply, sometimes it's simply a matter that:

1. The same thing is posted over and over and over without first using the search function and posting in an already existing thread

2. CCP has already published an official response to an issue but because the search function isn't used a new topic is started

In those cases, the negativity isn't really in the replies, but it starts from the failure of an OP to take even a short period of time to ensure that "New Topic" really does need to be pressed. In most cases it only serves to disjoint and rehash on arguments.

So then, gtfo (in the stronest and most negative possible way).
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#178 - 2014-02-27 03:07:48 UTC
Divine Entervention wrote:
Also, along the same lines of choosing to be a criminal in game being an association of potential regarding choices to be a criminal out of game:

As a male, if you choose to play a female character, that is justifiable proof that at some times, you like to pretend you are a woman. Do you pretend you're a woman offline? I don't know. I can't know. But I do not that some times, at least while on your computer, you pretend to be a woman. Meaning potentially, since I cannot know if you do so offline as well, that at least from what you've demonstrated online, you pretend you're a girl.


You say that like it's a bad thing. Transphobic much?

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Divine Entervention
Doomheim
#179 - 2014-02-27 03:32:40 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Divine Entervention wrote:
Also, along the same lines of choosing to be a criminal in game being an association of potential regarding choices to be a criminal out of game:

As a male, if you choose to play a female character, that is justifiable proof that at some times, you like to pretend you are a woman. Do you pretend you're a woman offline? I don't know. I can't know. But I do not that some times, at least while on your computer, you pretend to be a woman. Meaning potentially, since I cannot know if you do so offline as well, that at least from what you've demonstrated online, you pretend you're a girl.


You say that like it's a bad thing. Transphobic much?


Show me where on these forums I've ever said a man pretending to be a woman was a bad thing. I don't understand what your issue with me is but I hope you get over it. I've seen you post in different forums on different topics and I'm not following you around insulting you.
Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#180 - 2014-02-27 03:38:21 UTC
Divine Entervention wrote:
As a male, if you choose to play a female character, that is justifiable proof that at some times, you like to pretend you are a woman.


Oh I don't know, it's no more realistic than assuming if you choose to be a forum hardcase, that is justifiable proof that at some times, you like to pretend you are a man.

I don't think either is realistic really.