These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Class 7 Wormhole Suggestion

Author
Bane Nucleus
Dark Venture Corporation
Kitchen Sinkhole
#61 - 2014-02-18 21:19:47 UTC
Quinn Corvez wrote:
things that would attract more people to WH space and revitalise WH life... Things like a C7 WH


Please tell me how a c7 is going to attract more people to wh space. No corp or group of people that aren't already in c5/c6 will ever have a chance to take advantage of it. It will simply line the pockets of people who already have shiit tons of isk lining their pockets.



No trolling please

unimatrix0030
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#62 - 2014-02-18 21:30:23 UTC
Quinn Corvez wrote:
CCP and the CSM have already said that a pos revamp isn't going to happen, so it's pointless talking about it. Instead I would prefer to talk about things that would attract more people to WH space and revitalise WH life. Things like a C7 WH fit that bill but I'm sure someone will tell that I'm wrong and what I actually want is a fix to black holes and less to live in C6/5 space.

I don't think they said that it won't change it but that it will take several years... .
Will i like your c7 idea, i think they bether be used to fix blackholes, there is already to few people per system in w-space.
New content might mean more people so i am for that.

No local in null sec would fix everything!

Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#63 - 2014-02-18 22:06:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Jack Miton
Rek Seven wrote:
You can't win with the wormhole community. They all say that we need to add things to wormhole space to encourage new people to move in but then everyone starts to reach for their pitchforks if someone suggests a new feature or a change in mechanics.

no no no...
YOU, and a few others, say we need to add new things and keep suggesting the same old crap.
Then I, and many others, spend a lot of time calling out your ideas for the stupidities that they generally are.

you've repeated many times in this thread that people should move up to higher class WHs as they grow. why?
there's nothing more 'fun' about high class WHs, the mechanics are all the same. literally the only difference is how easy it is to make isk.
ok, sure, I get that people need to make isk, but to enjoy whs? to learn whs? to play productively in whs? for these you most certainly do not need a high end wh and in many cases actually having a high end wh is a hindrance.

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout

Bane Nucleus
Dark Venture Corporation
Kitchen Sinkhole
#64 - 2014-02-18 23:42:09 UTC
Come on Jack. If you can't field 2 guardians per armor T3, you don't matter. You know this.

No trolling please

Indo Nira
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#65 - 2014-02-18 23:54:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Indo Nira
What i don't understand is why everyone is talking about suggesting features and ideas in a forum that is called wormholes, when there's a forum called exactly FEATURES AND IDEAS!!!

Every new feature, even wh-related should be discussed and dissected by everyone, cause it may affect everyone, in some way... even though you might disagree with that.

Plus, with the current wh community (by this I mean the regular Wormholes forum posters) you might not even discuss stuff properly just because of egos the size of the empire state building and pissing contests everywhere.

Just look at a couple of posts above mine and you'll see people who dismiss other people's ideas just cause they disagree on how you should play the game you're subscribed to, and they think they're god knows what fountain of knowledge.
Bane Nucleus
Dark Venture Corporation
Kitchen Sinkhole
#66 - 2014-02-18 23:57:46 UTC
Post with your main! P

While you are not incorrect good sir, a lively discussion on the matter is definitely good in the wormholes section. I would also love to see more of the smaller groups speaking up, as wormhole space more than us big ego folks

No trolling please

Indo Nira
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#67 - 2014-02-18 23:59:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Indo Nira
Bane Nucleus wrote:

While you are not incorrect good sir, a lively discussion on the matter is definitely good in the wormholes section. I would also love to see more of the smaller groups speaking up, as wormhole space more than us big ego folks


Maybe they don't want to SPEAK UP because of all the dickheads around here, and their ****-waving
Gnaw LF
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#68 - 2014-02-19 00:08:59 UTC
Indo Nira wrote:
Bane Nucleus wrote:

While you are not incorrect good sir, a lively discussion on the matter is definitely good in the wormholes section. I would also love to see more of the smaller groups speaking up, as wormhole space more than us big ego folks


Maybe they don't want to SPEAK UP because of all the dickheads around here, and their ****-waving



But at least we are doing all the waving with our mains...
Indo Nira
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#69 - 2014-02-19 00:13:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Indo Nira
~double post delete~
Indo Nira
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#70 - 2014-02-19 00:15:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Indo Nira
Gnaw LF wrote:

But at least we are doing all the waving with our mains...


ooooooo and so it starts again.

ONE OF US! ONE OF US!! ONE OF US!


Bane Nucleus wrote:

Post with your main! :P


I hope that was tongue in cheek Bane. Also if you thought that I called you a dickhead, I didn't intend to. That was directed towards Gnaw and Jack
Bane Nucleus
Dark Venture Corporation
Kitchen Sinkhole
#71 - 2014-02-19 00:18:06 UTC
I was hoping the tongue face deal got the joking part across haha

No trolling please

Indo Nira
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#72 - 2014-02-19 00:19:34 UTC
Bane Nucleus wrote:
I was hoping the tongue face deal got the joking part across haha


It did initially, but the drinks i ingested are messing with me
Bane Nucleus
Dark Venture Corporation
Kitchen Sinkhole
#73 - 2014-02-19 00:21:36 UTC
Indo Nira wrote:

Maybe they don't want to SPEAK UP because of all the dickheads around here, and their ****-waving


While I do enjoy a good troll, I would genuinely appreciate some input from the less vocal crowd. They can send me an eve mail if they wish, and I will post their concerns. That way their view points get across and I will take the heat Lol

No trolling please

Bane Nucleus
Dark Venture Corporation
Kitchen Sinkhole
#74 - 2014-02-19 00:22:47 UTC
Indo Nira wrote:
Bane Nucleus wrote:
I was hoping the tongue face deal got the joking part across haha


It did initially, but the drinks i ingested are messing with me


After hanging out with our massive AU tz, sober people are becoming extinct haha

No trolling please

Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#75 - 2014-02-19 01:28:35 UTC
Indo Nira wrote:
I hope that was tongue in cheek Bane. Also if you thought that I called you a dickhead, I didn't intend to. That was directed towards Gnaw and Jack

OI!! I resemble that remark!

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout

HTIDRaver
Neurosurgical Reconstruction Centre
#76 - 2014-02-19 02:06:24 UTC
That moment when noob alts rage on forums
CeNSeR
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#77 - 2014-02-19 02:49:19 UTC
If you dont like the idea of a C7 wormhole dont go in it.

Will a C7 wormhole create massive alliances? Who knows but guess what you dont have to interact with them if you dont want.

Too much sex on channel 5 for your tastes then change the fookin channel.

Too many Mary Whitehouses on this bloody forum.

And what have all the Mary Whitehouses suggested? Nothing, nothing at all, lets just keep wormholes as they are stagnent and not move on to something a little different that maybe will add a little spice that if I dont feel like interacting with......

Maybe a C7 wormhole would be a bad thing.

What have we had the last few updates, the wormhole wobble and sigs that appear out of Bobs arse and farts them onto your screen with no work needed.



Gnaw LF
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#78 - 2014-02-19 03:04:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Gnaw LF
CeNSeR wrote:
If you dont like the idea of a C7 wormhole dont go in it.




No, **** you. Because its not about liking or not liking something, its about spending dev hours on developing features that would not be useful or superfluous at best. So pull your head out of the collective ass of your alliance mates and explain HOW the c7s would be useful and WHY they should get priority over fixing some of the current underdeveloped features in w-space.
CeNSeR
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#79 - 2014-02-19 03:28:50 UTC
Gnaw LF wrote:
CeNSeR wrote:
If you dont like the idea of a C7 wormhole dont go in it.




No, **** you. Because its not about liking or not liking something, its about spending dev hours on developing features that would not be useful or superfluous at best. So pull your head out of the collective ass of your alliance mates and explain HOW the c7s would be useful and WHY they should get priority over fixing some of the current underdeveloped features in w-space.


Sorry Gnaw this was a post writen by my hand and nothing to do with who I fly with.

As I am sure most of your posts on here are so do you best and try and see past that.

I am not saying we should have a C7 what I am saying is stop the nay naying and lets get something implimented that we want and have constructive imput without the snide comments!
Joan Greywind
The Lazy Crabs
#80 - 2014-02-19 04:00:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Joan Greywind
Bane Nucleus wrote:
Conflict drivers should be player created, not CCP installed.


So why are you pushing for CCP to change the self destruct mechanism in poses (I 100% support this btw). If conflict should only be created by players then why ask ccp for anything?

We need CCP to give us the tools so we can more efficiently create that conflict, or incentivize it, we are not asking them to force upon us. For the people that like consensual fights on wormholes then fine things will not affect them, but is it too bad to ask for in game rewards or goals for the conflict you are creating? Blobs can always be limited by the limiting factors of wh masses and connections

If "feuds" and "shooting for the sake of it" is enough then why do many of these so called wormholers have the bulk of their kills in k-space???