These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Peace between the Empire and the Republic, a Moderate viewpoint

Author
Fredfredbug4
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#361 - 2014-01-29 21:39:47 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:

The pair of you are expansionist. You cannot co-exist.


And yet, we have not had any actual confrontations with each other. In fact, over the years, we've been very cooperative economically, socially, and even militarily.

The reason why the Golden Fleet didn't accompany Heth into Luminaire or Gallente special forces assisting the Elder fleet is because the Federation and Empire's foreign policy with each other can best be summed up as "Don't conflict with my interest, and I won't conflict with yours."

Admittedly, we both have expansionist ideals. Us Gallenteans want our culture to spread far and wide, and the Amarrians want everyone to follow their faith. However, this doesn't prevent coexistance. Both of our cultures and beliefs are often compatible with each other.

Then, there's the Mutually Assured Destruction bit. The reason the Amarrians didn't send a bunch of slave ships our way upon first contact was because we were the first nation they encountered that would be too costly, if impossible, to subjugate into slavery. At the end of the day, whether it looks like it or not, Gallenteans and Amarrians value human life. Gallenteans see life in a humanitarian way, whereas the Amarrians see life as a gift from God and should only be snuffed out in the most dire of circumstances.

The real problem we have with the Amarrians is slavery and reclaiming. Both of which are contradictory to our beliefs (and even to theirs in certain circumstances) and we simply cannot allow ourselves to associate with slavers. Human beings are worthy of independence, dignity, and respect. Slavery unjustly deprives someone of those things. Then there's that nasty reclaiming business. It's like being forced to sign a contract without knowing what's in it first. Reclaiming is an oppressive and destructive belief held by many Amarrians and needs to disappear before a serious alliance can be proposed. However the Empire is slowly but surely moving towards the lessening or even abolition of slavery and only the most conservative of Amarrians seem to really be fond of this reclaiming crap.

The Empire would be much better off adopting the Gallentean policy of expansion, cultural warfare. We typically show non-member states the benefits of what it means to be part of the Federation. We let them taste our exquisite food, listen to any genre of our vast repertoire of music and so on. We do the opposite of what the Amarrians do, we show them what's in the contract before they sign. There has never been any race or nation that was forced into the Federation. However I have to admit with some degree of sorrow that we have forced people to stay. It's very hard or even impossible to break from the Federation without violence erupting.

To sum things up, we both have proven to have the ability to cooperate and even collaborate with each other despite our differences and would likely be allies were it not for disagreements regarding slavery and reclaiming.

However, because we have an alliance with the Minmatar, I would not support becoming allies with the Amarr and most people in the Federation share this opinion. Unless the Minmatar go behind our backs and work with the Caldari, then I don't think we'll see a Gallente-Amarrian alliance.

Watch_ Fred Fred Frederation_ and stop [u]cryptozoologist[/u]! Fight against the brutal genocide of fictional creatures across New Eden! Is that a metaphor? Probably not, but the fru-fru- people will sure love it!

Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Doomheim
#362 - 2014-01-29 21:54:02 UTC
Marnian Veroe wrote:


Please be our guest then. I am eager to see your face the day the Federation will sign treaties with the Empire again.

It is hard for me to take your volatile threats very seriously.


What threat exactly was made? Or did you just need a moment for an asinine non-sequitur? I spoke about the realpolitik of shifting alliance in the event that the Empire, presenting itself as a clear and present danger to the survival of the State, necessitating a backing of the Minmatar Republic in order to maintain the fundamental interest of survival. A simple and easy logic.

Maker, if you're a politician then it's no wonder you're not in political office because if your commentary is any indication you probably couldn't tie your own shoe laces together without managing to take a step and falling flat on your face.

Kurilaivonen|Concern

Constantin Baracca
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#363 - 2014-01-29 23:35:34 UTC
Gaven Lok'ri wrote:
The goal is to have as many people returned to the fold as possible. This means that we must protect those that convert.

The militant reclaiming began because we were attacked. The Udorians attacked the Amarr, we counter attacked. It was decided after that that the best way to protect the faithful would be to remove the external threats. In the conflict to do so, the Khanid became our allies and joined us peacefully. Both models of reclaiming were established. You either become our ally and remain our ally, or you set yourself up as an enemy and are a threat that must be dealt with.

We honor our alliances. So long as our allies remain steadfast, we do not take action against them, regardless of their religion.

We do not expect the Caldari to convert any time soon. In fact, I find Constantin's activities towards the Caldari worrisome. You cannot be Amarr and serve another state than Amarr. There is no room for mixed loyalty in Amarrian faith. Missionaries to the Caldari should not go to the people, but to the boards of directors. Conversion would mean annexation into Amarr in some form or another. Therefore, if the Caldari convert it should be a decision made by their legitimate governing bodies, not their outcast populations. What Constantin describes doing is an act of subversion of an Allied population. This is immoral.

It is my hope that someday the Caldari will be the Caldari-Amarr, but this is not a hope that we will ever enforce with violence so long as the Caldari remain allies. If they join us, it will be because their legitimate leadership actively believes that this is the correct course for the Caldari people.

The militant reclaiming is aimed at those who do not sign alliance agreements with us. If you are not willing to be an ally, history says that you fully intend to become an enemy. That you intend to attack Amarr at the first opportunity. Just like your ancestors on the old world did.

The logic of the militant reclaiming is that we should not give you that chance. We experimented with the peaceful alternative in the last century. Two emperors worked peacefully with states that were openly hostile to us. That ended in a duplicitous attack that to many minds proves the original logic of the reclaiming to be correct. If peace means that the Matari, with Gallente support, will build up a Navy to attack us with full intention of using it the first opportunity they get, then persistant war is the better alternative.

I would rather see soldiers die on the front lines than Amarrian civilians die because we made the mistake of believing that peace agreements were worth anything. Unless the Matari state can show that it is actually capable of sticking to its agreements, then it cannot be allowed to continue to exist. The lives of millions, maybe billions or even trillions, of Amarr depend on it.


You don't have to worry an awful lot about my involvement with the Caldari as a missionary or my loyalties, if it is any consolation. In all honesty, the Caldari are already our allies and don't precisely need their arms twisted to read available literature. I'll describe my Caldari operation, if you can call it that, if you'd like, but I do make sure I watch where I step wherever I go. Being a missionary in foreign space isn't as easy in jail or dodging legal hurdles to keep you out. In any case, I don't think that the community-based diocese I try to manage in Matari space would work in Caldari space. The approach in ministry changes from place to place and person to person. You can't reach everyone with one-size-fits-all teaching.

At the same time, the I.N.D. in my title doesn't mean I'm not subject to having my vestments withdrawn. Either way, this isn't a bad time to be an Amarrian. Even if I was tempted to leave the service of the Empire for one reason or another, I'm actually objectively pleased with the manner our Empire has largely conducted itself. It has maintained the Pax even when presented with the opportunity for gain in breaking it, has expanded our economic ties through the cluster, and the Empress' emancipation decree was not only something I welcomed, but something that made my work out here much easier. If I was going to suddenly bolt from the fold and go rogue, I certainly wouldn't do it now. I think we've much to be proud of lately, as Amarrians.

To the rest, if the Caldari have any qualms, don't. As Fred mentioned, we signed a peace deal with the Gallente once we met them and we have honored it. We honor our military alliance with the Caldari as well. Until the Elder Fleet's invasion broke the peace treaty we had signed with Midular, we were honoring the peace with the Republic. Even now, we honor the CEWPA and our limited role.

Even if we brought closer ties with the Gallente, as I very often promote, it wouldn't change our military alliance with the Caldari in the event that you are attacked en masse and call for aid. For better or worse, Amarrians are very often judged on being men and women of their stated word and their honor.

I do go to a Gallente tailor for my suits, though, and I would prefer if I didn't have to declare and pay tariffs on everything I buy in Gallente space. Just a convenience thing, really.

"What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

-Matthew 16:26

Saya Ishikari
Ishukone-Raata Technological Research Institute
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#364 - 2014-01-30 00:26:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Saya Ishikari
Marnian Veroe wrote:
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:

Never forget our alliance is one of mutual interests, and there exists nothing as a permanent alliance, only permanent Interests. Overstepping cultural limits is no doubt an excellent method to cause interests to shift elsewhere. Certainly, the Republic has never in my mind spoke of conquering the State or converting its citizens to a foreign and alien culture.


Please be our guest then. I am eager to see your face the day the Federation will sign treaties with the Empire again.

It is hard for me to take your volatile threats very seriously.

What's this "again"? The closest to a treaty the Federation has ever had with the Empire is the same "treaty" that all four empires are a part of, even now, you idiot. Unless the Federation has done an about face regarding the stance on slavery that it's held sacrosanct for centuries within the last few hours? No? Go back to your imaginary world already, so the rest of us can get on with life. Maker... I RARELY agree with Gesakaarin-haani about anything, but in this case, she's dead on in her appraisal.

"At the end of it all, we have only what we've left in our wake to be remembered by." -Kyoko Ishikari, YC 95 - YC 117

Fredfredbug4
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#365 - 2014-01-30 01:49:24 UTC
Constantin Baracca wrote:
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
With all due respect, Msl Veroe, The Republic is closer to reaching detente with the State than the Federation is with the Empire.

The pair of you are expansionist. You cannot co-exist.


You know, oddly, I can see where you're coming from. Neither of us should be able to get along. But, all things considered, I just don't run into any issues in Gallente space. I'm not sure if it's just because the Gallente don't necessarily mind someone preaching ideas that aren't necessarily popular or whether their political idealism and our spiritual idealism just don't clash as badly as I thought. It's a bit strange, considering they're technically meant to be our enemies and considering what should be a vast cultural gulf between us. I know that their relative cultural liberalism is supposed to make them incompatible with our more conservative nature. Perhaps it's because I'm not such a stuffed shirt myself, but t's relatively pleasant to be there.

People are perhaps more impassioned but... I suppose less touchy is a good way to put it? They'd prefer to give you a good logical and reasonable debate rather than take every different idea as a competition? I can't say for sure. It's not necessarily good to generalize, obviously there is always more variation in a people than there is true difference between us. All I know is that Veikitamo's suggestions that I have a lot more in common with a Gallente intellectual than you'd assume might have a touch of truth to it. I certainly can't say I take it as an insult.

I don't know that's an Imperial sentiment, but it's been my experience. I couldn't begin to give you a hard and fast reason why that is, I suppose I just never wondered about it.


I believe I can explain this phenomenon. What someone would define as "Gallente" culture is really a conglomerate of all the various groups within our nation. We love to take in things from outside of the Federation and put a Gallentean twist to it. You'll find Caldari teashops with Gallentean nanites in the tea that accent the flavor and even offer medicinal qualities. Minmatar sports are competitive and aggressive, making them absolutely fantastic to watch and bring billions of isk into the economy a year. I'm sure you know the positive and negative things we've done to Amarrian Churches here.

On the topic of religion, it's something most Gallenteans find fascinating, despite the majority of us having no religious beliefs at all. Almost every Gallentean at least tries to dabble in a religion at one point. Of course, sometimes these religions are a lot less orthodox than they should be. A Gallentean practicing wayism is almost always going to butcher it and make it some hippie thing. You have people claiming to follow the Amarr faith yet can't even recite one line of scripture. Though there are positive sides. While still controversial and in many parts of the Federation, illegal, Sabik cultist often use synthetic or even donated blood for their rituals. They're still really creepy and gross, but to each his own. As long as they're not hurting anyone like "true" Sani Sabik then it's fine by me.

Constantin Baracca wrote:


It wouldn't make a horrible idea, though, using that as a basis for comparison. Housing and feeding people in exchange for providing them cultural and professional education might serve a fairly good model to use so that we don't slide into our worse habits. It simply takes longer to educate people into being productive citizens than you'd think.

In the end, the Federation might free more slaves than the Republic ever will. The reason slavery has such a reputation for abuse is because there is an idea of having free work being economically beneficial. Gallente drone building will eventually make all the work slaves do cheaper to automate, so the only Holders left will be the ones that work on educating citizens. Those who are most prone to use for purely economic reasons will have replaced their slaves with automated machines.

It feels like a bit of a cheat rather than convincing Holders to the man and woman of right thinking, but I have a feeling that just good, old-fashioned human technological progress will lessen the pressure on more slaves than the Republic ever will.


The real problem with slavery is that it isn't regulated well. For every Holder who works diligently to bring their slaves to redemption and cares deeply for them, there are ten others that use slaves like a Gallentean would use drones. Insignificant little workers who I can treat however I like and if one of them doesn't make it, so what? There's plenty more where that came from!

Slaves need to be treated like proper workers. Feel free to make them do labor, but don't work them to death, let them live comfortably while educating them on your beliefs, and hell, even pay them a little bit. This indentured servitude wouldn't be great, but it's still better than full slavery at least. Just make it mandatory for all Holders to treat their slaves well and use slavery for what the original purpose was intended to be.

On the topic of tech, we will certainly see a decline in slaves being used merely as a labor force as drones become more and more advanced and capable of doing a wide array of work. The Gallenteans don't even need to be the ones to do it, as the Empire has been investing more and more research and money into drone tech. Either to compete with us, alleviate their reliance of slaves, or both. Even Holders who wish to educate their slaves rather than whip them will have trouble. Even a slave who wants to become a full Amarrian would be a little reluctant to remain in servitude when so many others are being released.

Which leads to another subject that I feel needs to be addressed. Without slavery and violent reclaiming, will it be feasible or even possible for The Empire to convert the cluster?

Watch_ Fred Fred Frederation_ and stop [u]cryptozoologist[/u]! Fight against the brutal genocide of fictional creatures across New Eden! Is that a metaphor? Probably not, but the fru-fru- people will sure love it!

Constantin Baracca
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#366 - 2014-01-30 02:02:03 UTC
Saya Ishikari wrote:
Marnian Veroe wrote:
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:

Never forget our alliance is one of mutual interests, and there exists nothing as a permanent alliance, only permanent Interests. Overstepping cultural limits is no doubt an excellent method to cause interests to shift elsewhere. Certainly, the Republic has never in my mind spoke of conquering the State or converting its citizens to a foreign and alien culture.


Please be our guest then. I am eager to see your face the day the Federation will sign treaties with the Empire again.

It is hard for me to take your volatile threats very seriously.

What's this "again"? The closest to a treaty the Federation has ever had with the Empire is the same "treaty" that all four empires are a part of, even now, you idiot. Unless the Federation has done an about face regarding the stance on slavery that it's held sacrosanct for centuries within the last few hours? No? Go back to your imaginary world already, so the rest of us can get on with life. Maker... I RARELY agree with Gesakaarin-haani about anything, but in this case, she's dead on in her appraisal.


I believe Marnian is referring to the Gallente-Amarr Free Trade Agreement signed in FC89. It is essentially the reason we haven't gone to war, we've had the Minmatar Rebellion, our alliance with the Caldari, and everything else that has happened in the meantime, yet we do still have this treaty. It isn't exactly a free trade agreement per se (the Gallente were required to market only to Holders instead of commoners and the Amarr were not allowed to sell anything produced by slave labor), but it also was written with the charter that we were not going to go to war. To the Federation's credit, though we've both probably emboldened and strengthened each others' enemies in the political power game, we've never been directly at war despite our ideological differences.

I think we've expanded the agreement somewhat, but that treaty, as far as I am aware, still stands. I've never heard of it being revoked, at any rate.

"What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

-Matthew 16:26

Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#367 - 2014-01-30 02:17:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Samira Kernher
Constantin Baracca wrote:
To the Federation's credit, though we've both probably emboldened and strengthened each others' enemies in the political power game, we've never been directly at war despite our ideological differences.


We are at war now.

People seem to consistently want to believe that it's two separate wars even though this is blatantly untrue.

The Empire-State alliance is at war with the Federation-Republic alliance. One war, two fronts.
Fredfredbug4
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#368 - 2014-01-30 02:18:00 UTC
Saya Ishikari wrote:
Marnian Veroe wrote:
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:

Never forget our alliance is one of mutual interests, and there exists nothing as a permanent alliance, only permanent Interests. Overstepping cultural limits is no doubt an excellent method to cause interests to shift elsewhere. Certainly, the Republic has never in my mind spoke of conquering the State or converting its citizens to a foreign and alien culture.


Please be our guest then. I am eager to see your face the day the Federation will sign treaties with the Empire again.

It is hard for me to take your volatile threats very seriously.

What's this "again"? The closest to a treaty the Federation has ever had with the Empire is the same "treaty" that all four empires are a part of, even now, you idiot. Unless the Federation has done an about face regarding the stance on slavery that it's held sacrosanct for centuries within the last few hours? No? Go back to your imaginary world already, so the rest of us can get on with life. Maker... I RARELY agree with Gesakaarin-haani about anything, but in this case, she's dead on in her appraisal.


You seem fairly ignorant or Amarr-Gallente affairs.

-Despite being allied with the natural enemies of each other, we have continued our non-aggression pact since we first made contact with each other.

- We signed a free trade agreement shortly after first contact that remains enacted to this day. Despite our political and religious differences, we've always been excellent business partners. Even with our Minmatar allies, trade isn't as easy as it is with the Amarrians.

- Gallenteans immigrating to the Empire and Amarrians immigrating to the Federation is a common occurrence

- Emperor Heideran VII won the Aidonis Award, (a Gallentean Peace Prize) for his efforts of improving relations with not only the Gallente, but all Empires.

- In order to capture Anvent Eturrer, the traitor that allowed Heth to invade Luminaire, Empress Jamyl allowed the Gallente Military to raid his hideout on Kador Prime (an Amarr throne world mind you) with no military intervention in order to obtain him.

We're far from allies, but we have a long history of cooperation and mutual understanding.

Watch_ Fred Fred Frederation_ and stop [u]cryptozoologist[/u]! Fight against the brutal genocide of fictional creatures across New Eden! Is that a metaphor? Probably not, but the fru-fru- people will sure love it!

Saya Ishikari
Ishukone-Raata Technological Research Institute
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#369 - 2014-01-30 02:24:03 UTC
Constantin Baracca wrote:
Saya Ishikari wrote:
Marnian Veroe wrote:
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:

Never forget our alliance is one of mutual interests, and there exists nothing as a permanent alliance, only permanent Interests. Overstepping cultural limits is no doubt an excellent method to cause interests to shift elsewhere. Certainly, the Republic has never in my mind spoke of conquering the State or converting its citizens to a foreign and alien culture.


Please be our guest then. I am eager to see your face the day the Federation will sign treaties with the Empire again.

It is hard for me to take your volatile threats very seriously.

What's this "again"? The closest to a treaty the Federation has ever had with the Empire is the same "treaty" that all four empires are a part of, even now, you idiot. Unless the Federation has done an about face regarding the stance on slavery that it's held sacrosanct for centuries within the last few hours? No? Go back to your imaginary world already, so the rest of us can get on with life. Maker... I RARELY agree with Gesakaarin-haani about anything, but in this case, she's dead on in her appraisal.


I believe Marnian is referring to the Gallente-Amarr Free Trade Agreement signed in FC89. It is essentially the reason we haven't gone to war, we've had the Minmatar Rebellion, our alliance with the Caldari, and everything else that has happened in the meantime, yet we do still have this treaty. It isn't exactly a free trade agreement per se (the Gallente were required to market only to Holders instead of commoners and the Amarr were not allowed to sell anything produced by slave labor), but it also was written with the charter that we were not going to go to war. To the Federation's credit, though we've both probably emboldened and strengthened each others' enemies in the political power game, we've never been directly at war despite our ideological differences.

I think we've expanded the agreement somewhat, but that treaty, as far as I am aware, still stands. I've never heard of it being revoked, at any rate.

Oh good, some facts. I'm not surprised at the source being you, really, Father. Still, i think we can agree that a free trade agreement is a far cry from the "State crushing alliance" Marnian is daydreaming about.

In point of fact, I'd be perfectly happy to have free trade with Federal markets, provided there was oversight and enough compromise on both ends to make it a reasonably level field. Do I use Federal goods? Absolutely. If it's better, it gets my attention. CreoDron drones, Duvolle Labs weapons and body armor, among other things. Do I neglect what I find widely available in the State? Of course not. But frankly, with societies as starkly different as ours, anything closer than trade is a difficult prospect with voices calling loudly for intolerance on both ends. We are who we are. Anyone who can accept this and still come to the table is welcome.

Since we're on the subject of trade, our current economic upswing comes to mind... That will last as long as the drums of war are beating. Without some forethought, we'll be right back where we were at the beginning of YC110. You can't run markets as self contained loops for profit in any model that doesn't have outside movement of goods. Period. We tried. And that is why I support free trade. Not because of some soft spot for the Federation, but because it is a sound move for the State, and a means to exist, our way, without civilians left helpless in "cage match" wars being the losses on the balance sheet.

There, I don't think i can get much clearer on my core stance in the matter.

"At the end of it all, we have only what we've left in our wake to be remembered by." -Kyoko Ishikari, YC 95 - YC 117

Fredfredbug4
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#370 - 2014-01-30 02:25:44 UTC
Samira Kernher wrote:
Constantin Baracca wrote:
To the Federation's credit, though we've both probably emboldened and strengthened each others' enemies in the political power game, we've never been directly at war despite our ideological differences.


We are at war now.

People seem to consistently want to believe that it's two separate wars even though this is blatantly untrue.

The Empire-State alliance is at war with the Federation-Republic alliance. One war, two fronts.


It's not a war, it's a proxy war entirely fought by capsuleers and limited to lowsec. And even then, the Federal militias are occupied fighting the State militias and the Empire militias are occupied fighting the Republic militias.

War is the Battle of Caldari Prime, the Elder Attacks, and of course, the Battle of B-R.

Not trying to discredit the brave men and women fighting for these militia and loyalist factions, you are all fighting for noble causes, however there is no formal war at the moment.

Watch_ Fred Fred Frederation_ and stop [u]cryptozoologist[/u]! Fight against the brutal genocide of fictional creatures across New Eden! Is that a metaphor? Probably not, but the fru-fru- people will sure love it!

Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#371 - 2014-01-30 02:36:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Samira Kernher
You've never been in the warzone, have you?

The Federal militias fight in both the Federation-State and the Amarr-Minmatar warzones. I myself was deploying with Pyre in the Federation-State warzone at the beginning of this month. Pyre and other Caldari militia organizations have also deployed to the Amarr-Minmatar warzone in the past.

Oh, and I am fired upon by the Federal Navy when I enter Federation space. So much for there being a 'non-aggression pact'.

Stop fooling yourself. Our navies are not engaging each other only because they are held back by CONCORD CEWPA policies. It is still a formal war, limited though it may be.
Saya Ishikari
Ishukone-Raata Technological Research Institute
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#372 - 2014-01-30 02:39:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Saya Ishikari
Fredfredbug4 wrote:
Saya Ishikari wrote:
Marnian Veroe wrote:
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:

Never forget our alliance is one of mutual interests, and there exists nothing as a permanent alliance, only permanent Interests. Overstepping cultural limits is no doubt an excellent method to cause interests to shift elsewhere. Certainly, the Republic has never in my mind spoke of conquering the State or converting its citizens to a foreign and alien culture.


Please be our guest then. I am eager to see your face the day the Federation will sign treaties with the Empire again.

It is hard for me to take your volatile threats very seriously.

What's this "again"? The closest to a treaty the Federation has ever had with the Empire is the same "treaty" that all four empires are a part of, even now, you idiot. Unless the Federation has done an about face regarding the stance on slavery that it's held sacrosanct for centuries within the last few hours? No? Go back to your imaginary world already, so the rest of us can get on with life. Maker... I RARELY agree with Gesakaarin-haani about anything, but in this case, she's dead on in her appraisal.


You seem fairly ignorant or Amarr-Gallente affairs.

-Despite being allied with the natural enemies of each other, we have continued our non-aggression pact since we first made contact with each other.

- We signed a free trade agreement shortly after first contact that remains enacted to this day. Despite our political and religious differences, we've always been excellent business partners. Even with our Minmatar allies, trade isn't as easy as it is with the Amarrians.

- Gallenteans immigrating to the Empire and Amarrians immigrating to the Federation is a common occurrence

- Emperor Heideran VII won the Aidonis Award, (a Gallentean Peace Prize) for his efforts of improving relations with not only the Gallente, but all Empires.

- In order to capture Anvent Eturrer, the traitor that allowed Heth to invade Luminaire, Empress Jamyl allowed the Gallente Military to raid his hideout on Kador Prime (an Amarr throne world mind you) with no military intervention in order to obtain him.

We're far from allies, but we have a long history of cooperation and mutual understanding.

I'll be more concise; I'm still waiting to hear of the joint anti-State movement that your compatriot seems so sure is just waiting in the wings. None of this points to anything of the sort.

As for the bullet points...
-A Republic border world said otherwise in YC113. You may have heard of the skirmish there, you may not. Further, I think you'll find a disproportionate number of Amarrian operations taking place in Gallente space, if you'd care to look, and even a war by proxy is a war, albeit a strange one.
-The lack of a formal agreement didn't stop the Federation from trading with pretty much everyone, including the Caldari State. This continues on through today, especially in Jita.
-Gallente weren't uncommon in State space either before YC110. You and yours get around. Likewise for Caldari living in the Federation. Even though the numbers have fallen, it still happens for various reasons.
-So did Noir. You'll pardon me if that sullied the sheen of the award a bit. Heideran is still held in good regard in general, award or no, since his lasting contribution was JUST a little less murderous. Just a tad.
-I'd expect just about anyone with sense to give up a war criminal of that caliber. If it wasn't done nicely, you'd have gotten him anyways. Acquiescence to the inevitable to avoid future complications.

"At the end of it all, we have only what we've left in our wake to be remembered by." -Kyoko Ishikari, YC 95 - YC 117

Constantin Baracca
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#373 - 2014-01-30 02:46:04 UTC
Fredfredbug4 wrote:


The real problem with slavery is that it isn't regulated well. For every Holder who works diligently to bring their slaves to redemption and cares deeply for them, there are ten others that use slaves like a Gallentean would use drones. Insignificant little workers who I can treat however I like and if one of them doesn't make it, so what? There's plenty more where that came from!

Slaves need to be treated like proper workers. Feel free to make them do labor, but don't work them to death, let them live comfortably while educating them on your beliefs, and hell, even pay them a little bit. This indentured servitude wouldn't be great, but it's still better than full slavery at least. Just make it mandatory for all Holders to treat their slaves well and use slavery for what the original purpose was intended to be.

On the topic of tech, we will certainly see a decline in slaves being used merely as a labor force as drones become more and more advanced and capable of doing a wide array of work. The Gallenteans don't even need to be the ones to do it, as the Empire has been investing more and more research and money into drone tech. Either to compete with us, alleviate their reliance of slaves, or both. Even Holders who wish to educate their slaves rather than whip them will have trouble. Even a slave who wants to become a full Amarrian would be a little reluctant to remain in servitude when so many others are being released.

Which leads to another subject that I feel needs to be addressed. Without slavery and violent reclaiming, will it be feasible or even possible for The Empire to convert the cluster?


I do believe it is, though sometimes you might find even Amarrians to doubt the power of the faith. One thing we have going for us that you don't find elsewhere in the cluster is the depth of our collectivism. I suppose we simply see things differently. Slavery, you have to remember, didn't begin as a system to cut labor costs. It began as a humanitarian solution. We ended up winning a war and had a surrendered people on our hands. We weren't very well going to take the money and run, leaving them to fend for themselves with nothing, nor were we going to kill them (in the story that provides the account for this moment in history, both of those options were raised). In the end, the system of slavery was a way of integrating these prisoners of war into our society as citizens, if not in this generation but the next.

I'm not sure the intent was to keep slaves for eight or nine generations working in a mining colony with no education, but I think that sort of monstrous stereotype is a bit more common in media than practice. Still, that was really where the practice began. We thought it was the best we could do at the time. The point was that you didn't just leave people behind to suffer if you could help it. Life is precious and every single Amarrian is both the responsibility of, and is responsible for, the entire Empire. We recognize that our criminals are our fault and our responsibility to put to work and educate (I suppose forcibly, for full disclosure, they are sold into slavery). We recognize that it is a good cause to suffer and endure if it is for the better for one's family, one's lord, or one's Empire. It might simply be the de-emphasis on the importance of the self and the ever driving cultural pressure to live one's life "up the ladder" as it were.

I think that sort of thing is the future of the cluster simply because the Word isn't just a book of arbitrary rules, it's the compendium of the sum of Amarrian knowledge and very often helpful advice.

On the other hand, I wouldn't dare say that what comes in the future will be precisely what we have in the Empire now. Not only would that completely devalue what we could learn and adopt from other cultures that are good ideas, it would be the outright falsehood that the Amarr Empire is already perfect and cannot be improved. I'm actually somewhat interested in the Gallente democratic experiment, at least moreso than my peers, simply because it has such promise. The idea that everyone gets together and decides what works best is a great theory and agrees well with the Amarrian reliance on peer review. In fact, though I suppose candidates and votes are limited, we do select a leader by choosing the most worthy from a pool of candidates.

It isn't a far stretch, is what I'm saying. I think the larger problem with it is that it relies on knowledgeable and informed people making the decision, and freedoms in the Gallente Federation mean people are free to remain ignorant and uneducated while retaining their vote. Still, as we've discussed, it's worth keeping a system going that works well in theory but might need better regulation in practice. I'm at least interested to see if the kinks can ever be worked out of it.

The Amarr Empire does change, slowly, trying to make sure we don't absorb something that destabilizes society. We are mandated to, in fact, as not changing would be a tacit assertion that we are precisely what God wants us to be as a society. We obviously are not yet, or he would have approached us by now. We aren't close yet, but I think, if there is one thing in Amarrian society that could improve the life of anyone living anywhere, it's the Word. Whether you believe in our political models or our conquering (or peaceful) politics, I think the Scriptures provide valuable advice and knowledge that will surely form the basis of societies of the future.

I guess that's faith for you, but I like to teach the practical things. Discipline, charity, wisdom, and all the basics. I've always thought the core Amarrian approach to life and work is the sort of thing that pulls people out of the dredge of modern life and gives you a sense of purpose even in the small, seemingly insignificant parts of life.

We just need a bit of faith in our faith.

"What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

-Matthew 16:26

Constantin Baracca
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#374 - 2014-01-30 03:22:29 UTC
Saya Ishikari wrote:
Oh good, some facts. I'm not surprised at the source being you, really, Father. Still, i think we can agree that a free trade agreement is a far cry from the "State crushing alliance" Marnian is daydreaming about.

In point of fact, I'd be perfectly happy to have free trade with Federal markets, provided there was oversight and enough compromise on both ends to make it a reasonably level field. Do I use Federal goods? Absolutely. If it's better, it gets my attention. CreoDron drones, Duvolle Labs weapons and body armor, among other things. Do I neglect what I find widely available in the State? Of course not. But frankly, with societies as starkly different as ours, anything closer than trade is a difficult prospect with voices calling loudly for intolerance on both ends. We are who we are. Anyone who can accept this and still come to the table is welcome.

Since we're on the subject of trade, our current economic upswing comes to mind... That will last as long as the drums of war are beating. Without some forethought, we'll be right back where we were at the beginning of YC110. You can't run markets as self contained loops for profit in any model that doesn't have outside movement of goods. Period. We tried. And that is why I support free trade. Not because of some soft spot for the Federation, but because it is a sound move for the State, and a means to exist, our way, without civilians left helpless in "cage match" wars being the losses on the balance sheet.

There, I don't think i can get much clearer on my core stance in the matter.


I can see your point there, in that there isn't a true non-aggression pact between the Empire and Federation outside of the CEWPA agreement. With that said, the Gallente and Amarr have a buffer zone of trade systems that, as far as I am aware, still stands to this day. That trade agreement, however insignificant, has held better than, I think, any other inter-imperial treaty in the cluster. While Amarrians and Republicans fight each other and the Caldari and Gallente fight in their border war, the border zone that marks the division between Gallente and Amarr space remains peaceful. That treaty said we were not allowed to fight there and we haven't.

That hasn't stopped us from sending people to take part in each others' proxy wars, but that's largely because we are still supporting each others' mortal enemies. It's one of those fine distinctions. I imagine my brethren in PIE aren't particularly keen on that distinction and aren't fond of them. But, for all intents and purposes, we share a border and, despite the CEWPA essentially giving us free reign to begin a war, we didn't legislate our buffer zone into a warzone. I suppose we're a bit friendlier than the Caldari and Minmatar, considering we had some diplomatic relations beforehand that have held. In reality, though, we're probably not going to get a chance to enhance relations with our closest allies at war with us. Whatever our intentions on either side of that zone, the Caldari are our military allies and we must honor that agreement.

On the subject of trade, though, I can say that it's certainly given us and the Gallente a good excuse to not want each other in too dire of straits. Trade may seem like a small thing, but it is opening your culture to the goods of another and vice versa. As afraid as people are, good trade relations are the best way to maintain peace; you don't want people with whom your economy is intertwined to suddenly snap off connections or disappear. A friend brought up to me recently that, if it hadn't been for the now-interlinked economy of the empires, we would really have descended into total war.

I can see his point. We like to say that people are making money on warfare, but our governments certainly aren't those people. They have to pay the soldiers in the warzones in rewards and spoils, they have to pay bounties, pay CONCORD to manage the whole thing. The only ones actually making money are those fighting the war and those supplying those fighting the war. Everything else is paid with tax money. Every bullet and rocket fired, every ship destroyed, is ISK removed from the economy and reduced to scrap. If the four empires weren't making much more money collectively together rather than individually, they'd never be able to afford to pay for it all. Certainly, if the war weren't limited to a few systems in low-security space, they would go bankrupt fighting.

In that same vein, free trade will likely finally end the wars even if we can't through other diplomatic means. I would never underestimate the power of corporations to overcome those making money on the situation in order to make more themselves.

"What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

-Matthew 16:26

Lady Katherine Devonshire
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
#375 - 2014-01-30 04:02:55 UTC
Saya Ishikari wrote:

What's this "again"? The closest to a treaty the Federation has ever had with the Empire is the same "treaty" that all four empires are a part of, even now, you idiot. Unless the Federation has done an about face regarding the stance on slavery that it's held sacrosanct for centuries within the last few hours? No? Go back to your imaginary world already, so the rest of us can get on with life. Maker... I RARELY agree with Gesakaarin-haani about anything, but in this case, she's dead on in her appraisal.


Apparently you have never heard of the Gallente-Amarr Free Trade Agreement?

Allow me to quote:

"Regardless of the negotiated restrictions, the agreement did serve as the foundation for a shaky peace between the two sides. It established a neutral border between the two sides which ships were allowed to enter unrestricted. While the two empires have never been friendly, they have also never entered into open warfare. With the first treaty signed, the Gallente appointed an official ambassador to the Empire, Yanou Lautere. The Empire sent several dignitaries of its own to the Federation, including a sizable missionary group to attempt a peaceful reclaiming. " (Emphasis mine)

I would like to finish by adding that this treaty had been in effect for over 140 years now. So I must express surprise that you have someone managed to remain unaware of it.
Saya Ishikari
Ishukone-Raata Technological Research Institute
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#376 - 2014-01-30 04:34:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Saya Ishikari
Lady Katherine Devonshire wrote:
Saya Ishikari wrote:

What's this "again"? The closest to a treaty the Federation has ever had with the Empire is the same "treaty" that all four empires are a part of, even now, you idiot. Unless the Federation has done an about face regarding the stance on slavery that it's held sacrosanct for centuries within the last few hours? No? Go back to your imaginary world already, so the rest of us can get on with life. Maker... I RARELY agree with Gesakaarin-haani about anything, but in this case, she's dead on in her appraisal.


Apparently you have never heard of the Gallente-Amarr Free Trade Agreement?

Allow me to quote:

"Regardless of the negotiated restrictions, the agreement did serve as the foundation for a shaky peace between the two sides. It established a neutral border between the two sides which ships were allowed to enter unrestricted. While the two empires have never been friendly, they have also never entered into open warfare. With the first treaty signed, the Gallente appointed an official ambassador to the Empire, Yanou Lautere. The Empire sent several dignitaries of its own to the Federation, including a sizable missionary group to attempt a peaceful reclaiming. " (Emphasis mine)

I would like to finish by adding that this treaty had been in effect for over 140 years now. So I must express surprise that you have someone managed to remain unaware of it.

That makes two of us. But hey, I'm not against being wrong. Especially if it gives me new reading material. I'd contest the lack of open warfare, but that's a debate that could go on forever.

All that said... I still see nothing pointing towards the Empire allying with the Federation against the State.

"At the end of it all, we have only what we've left in our wake to be remembered by." -Kyoko Ishikari, YC 95 - YC 117

Fredfredbug4
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#377 - 2014-01-30 04:40:16 UTC
Saya Ishikari wrote:

As for the bullet points...
-A Republic border world said otherwise in YC113. You may have heard of the skirmish there, you may not. Further, I think you'll find a disproportionate number of Amarrian operations taking place in Gallente space, if you'd care to look, and even a war by proxy is a war, albeit a strange one.
-The lack of a formal agreement didn't stop the Federation from trading with pretty much everyone, including the Caldari State. This continues on through today, especially in Jita.
-Gallente weren't uncommon in State space either before YC110. You and yours get around. Likewise for Caldari living in the Federation. Even though the numbers have fallen, it still happens for various reasons.
-So did Noir. You'll pardon me if that sullied the sheen of the award a bit. Heideran is still held in good regard in general, award or no, since his lasting contribution was JUST a little less murderous. Just a tad.
-I'd expect just about anyone with sense to give up a war criminal of that caliber. If it wasn't done nicely, you'd have gotten him anyways. Acquiescence to the inevitable to avoid future complications.


- These Skirmishes you speak of are Militia forces. They represent the Empire but are by no means taking direct orders from the Empire.

- We do indeed trade heavily with the Caldari. Quafe is even considered to be an honorary Megacorp. However, we do not have a free trade agreement. Once Heth took power and conflict and hostilities began again, trade restrictions were imposed heavily by the Caldari, while here in the Federation, the act of even trading with the State can be considered espionage.

The Free Trade Agreement we have with the Amarrians is not only a trade agreement, but a peace treaty, dictating that we shall never go to war along our shared border (at the very least). This has been honored without any issues by both sides for a long time.

Trade with the State and even our Republic allies is frequent and very successful. However, when the political scene gets messy, things slow down or even grind to a halt. That can't be said for the Amarrians.

- Oh trust me I'm fully aware of Gallente living in the State and Caldari living in the Federation. I am half Deteis afterall. However ever since Heth took power Caldari rarely show up in the Federation and Gallenteans who visit the State often find themselves being held in custody for half a day before they can enter the country again.

- There is more to what happened with Noir than we will ever know. His final horrifc act, be it an act of sudden madness or something in the works for many years, it didn't erase the century of progress he made for both our people.

- If the Amarr were truly as hostile or unfriendly with us as you believe, then why would they give him up? He knew our defense strategy and military doctrine inside and out. He knew codes to bypass security systems. He knew when patrol ships would have to change shift. Every possible weakness in our defense could of been revealed. If the Amarr were truly enemies of the Federation, they would of offered him political asylum in exchange for all his information. But they didn't. Not only did they give him up, but they let us launch a raid on an Amarrian Throne world in order to get him. Do you understand how significant that is? That would be like the Federation giving the Republic permission to attack say, Caille in order to get the assassin of Midular.

If it were in Amarrian interest to maintain an unfriendly or hostile attitude towards the Federation, they would have had plenty of opportunities to do so. And besides, most of what you said is honestly irrelevant to the topic. In order to prove that the Gallente and Amarr would never get along you...told me how the State and the Federation do? I don't see how anything you said, apart from the last point, disproves my historical fact about Amarr and Gallente relations

Watch_ Fred Fred Frederation_ and stop [u]cryptozoologist[/u]! Fight against the brutal genocide of fictional creatures across New Eden! Is that a metaphor? Probably not, but the fru-fru- people will sure love it!

Saya Ishikari
Ishukone-Raata Technological Research Institute
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#378 - 2014-01-30 05:06:15 UTC
Fredfredbug4 wrote:
Saya Ishikari wrote:

As for the bullet points...
-A Republic border world said otherwise in YC113. You may have heard of the skirmish there, you may not. Further, I think you'll find a disproportionate number of Amarrian operations taking place in Gallente space, if you'd care to look, and even a war by proxy is a war, albeit a strange one.
-The lack of a formal agreement didn't stop the Federation from trading with pretty much everyone, including the Caldari State. This continues on through today, especially in Jita.
-Gallente weren't uncommon in State space either before YC110. You and yours get around. Likewise for Caldari living in the Federation. Even though the numbers have fallen, it still happens for various reasons.
-So did Noir. You'll pardon me if that sullied the sheen of the award a bit. Heideran is still held in good regard in general, award or no, since his lasting contribution was JUST a little less murderous. Just a tad.
-I'd expect just about anyone with sense to give up a war criminal of that caliber. If it wasn't done nicely, you'd have gotten him anyways. Acquiescence to the inevitable to avoid future complications.


- These Skirmishes you speak of are Militia forces. They represent the Empire but are by no means taking direct orders from the Empire.

- We do indeed trade heavily with the Caldari. Quafe is even considered to be an honorary Megacorp. However, we do not have a free trade agreement. Once Heth took power and conflict and hostilities began again, trade restrictions were imposed heavily by the Caldari, while here in the Federation, the act of even trading with the State can be considered espionage.

The Free Trade Agreement we have with the Amarrians is not only a trade agreement, but a peace treaty, dictating that we shall never go to war along our shared border (at the very least). This has been honored without any issues by both sides for a long time.

Trade with the State and even our Republic allies is frequent and very unsuccessful. However, when the political scene gets messy, things slow down or even grind to a halt. That can't be said for the Amarrians.

- Oh trust me I'm fully aware of Gallente living in the State and Caldari living in the Federation. I am half Deteis afterall. However ever since Heth took power Caldari rarely show up in the Federation and Gallenteans who visit the State often find themselves being held in custody for half a day before they can enter the country again.

- There is more to what happened with Noir than we will ever know. His final horrifc act, be it an act of sudden madness or something in the works for many years, it didn't erase the century of progress he made for both our people.

- If the Amarr were truly as hostile or unfriendly with us as you believe, then why would they give him up? He knew our defense strategy and military doctrine inside and out. He knew codes to bypass security systems. He knew when patrol ships would have to change shift. Every possible weakness in our defense could of been revealed. If the Amarr were truly enemies of the Federation, they would of offered him political asylum in exchange for all his information. But they didn't. Not only did they give him up, but they let us launch a raid on an Amarrian Throne world in order to get him. Do you understand how significant that is? That would be like the Federation giving the Republic permission to attack say, Caille in order to get the assassin of Midular.

If it were in Amarrian interest to maintain an unfriendly or hostile attitude towards the Federation, they would have had plenty of opportunities to do so. And besides, most of what you said is honestly irrelevant to the topic. In order to prove that the Gallente and Amarr would never get along you...told me how the State and the Federation do? I don't see how anything you said, apart from the last point, disproves my historical fact about Amarr and Gallente relations

Sorry Fred, but it ate my entire response four times now. Not doing it again. ><))

"At the end of it all, we have only what we've left in our wake to be remembered by." -Kyoko Ishikari, YC 95 - YC 117

Marnian Veroe
National Republican Party
#379 - 2014-01-30 21:39:08 UTC
Saya Ishikari wrote:

All that said... I still see nothing pointing towards the Empire allying with the Federation against the State.


That is still an... infinite more past positive historical events between both of them than between the State and the "Republic".

Which is as far as I recall, zero, void. Which was my initial point, really.
Saya Ishikari
Ishukone-Raata Technological Research Institute
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#380 - 2014-01-30 22:39:26 UTC
Marnian Veroe wrote:
Saya Ishikari wrote:

All that said... I still see nothing pointing towards the Empire allying with the Federation against the State.


That is still an... infinite more past positive historical events between both of them than between the State and the "Republic".

Which is as far as I recall, zero, void. Which was my initial point, really.

Disregarding joint development of technology, colonization, and other endeavours before everyone went their separate ways, sure. But, in the end, its pretty plain neither of us cares to step out and offer an olive branch anymore, so, if you think you and yours can pull us "back into the fold" you're welcome to try.

"At the end of it all, we have only what we've left in our wake to be remembered by." -Kyoko Ishikari, YC 95 - YC 117