These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Peace between the Empire and the Republic, a Moderate viewpoint

Author
Constantin Baracca
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#301 - 2014-01-27 22:35:56 UTC
Aldrith Shutaq wrote:
I personally take offence at being called a 'backward conservative'. You'd think people would do their research.


Well that's why I didn't call you one, though I've heard you spoken of as such in the past. PIE has a reputation for being quite a bit more conservative than they are simply because their cause is military. Then again, so do Ardishapur vassals, which I am, technically. Simply putting forward that you can't call a political generalization fact just because of your job.

"What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

-Matthew 16:26

Constantin Baracca
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#302 - 2014-01-27 22:41:32 UTC
Elsebeth Rhiannon wrote:
If this mess is a PR victory, I am not sure I ever want to see a loss.

Else


An old Amarrian general in a story once said, "If this is the price of victory, defeat is beyond our Empire's means to afford."

I suppose you could call driving the Elder Fleet out of our space, regaining our borders, and reinforcing the Empire a victory for us. I lost my grandfather in the initial assault. I don't feel like we won anything.

"What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

-Matthew 16:26

Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Doomheim
#303 - 2014-01-27 22:48:55 UTC
Constantin Baracca wrote:


It isn't really warfare, peaceful Reclamation, nor even really a process of assimilation. It's mostly a process of growing together as one, large, cohesive society. An element of our society that I would think Statists might appreciate.


I made no mention of the Empire. I said that cultural assimilation is warfare. A war fought by pursuing the means to ensure that the target of your cultural conflict is unable to resist subscribing to your memes -- with force and violence being the historically most successful method of doing so. Although since you brought up the Empire, I do not see it having ever embarked upon a peaceful Reclaiming for in the long history of Crusade and slavery I see nothing more than the use of force and violence to propagate the memes of God and religious dogma over the people, societies and cultures it has subjugated through force of arms.

The most effective means of resistance against any form of cultural assimilation is the identity to be found in nationalism, and it is in nationalism where the true purpose of the human spirit resides. Where in the cultivation of prejudice one is able to to see clearly the cultural delineations of race and ethnicity and act with that true purpose to discriminate what is Volk and what is not. It is when the life of the Volk is combined with the laws and power of the State that the strongest bulwark against assimilation is found, where a true Fatherland exists. Where an individual is willing to live for their People and ready to fight and die for the State.

That being said I can only hope the Amarr Empire has more like you in the future, Mr. Baracca. Those whose pursuits of peace and belief that violence can never solve anything in human affairs will convince your compatriots to beat the swords of your Paladins into the plowshares to till the fields until the day the soil is enriched with their blood by those who recognize that violence and force are the sole arbiters in life from which all else derives.

Kurilaivonen|Concern

Scherezad
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#304 - 2014-01-27 23:09:40 UTC
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
Where in the cultivation of prejudice one is able to to see clearly the cultural delineations of race and ethnicity and act with that true purpose to discriminate what is Volk and what is not. ... from which all else derives.

I'm sorry for interrupting, and I've been meaning to ask, but is that a KK slang of some sort, Gesakaarin-ojabuun? I've never heard the term "volk" used before, but it seems to be a synonym for Vaktikun (State, for those who haven't a napanii translator)? Or is it more like hiimot (people)? Thank you, and again, I'm sorry for the interruption in your excellent conversation.
Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Doomheim
#305 - 2014-01-27 23:45:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Scherezad wrote:
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
Where in the cultivation of prejudice one is able to to see clearly the cultural delineations of race and ethnicity and act with that true purpose to discriminate what is Volk and what is not. ... from which all else derives.

I'm sorry for interrupting, and I've been meaning to ask, but is that a KK slang of some sort, Gesakaarin-ojabuun? I've never heard the term "volk" used before, but it seems to be a synonym for Vaktikun (State, for those who haven't a napanii translator)? Or is it more like hiimot (people)? Thank you, and again, I'm sorry for the interruption in your excellent conversation.


I had to use an archaic Deteaas word-phrase and that is what turned up. I think it can be difficult to fully translate the poet's language but in the simplest term it could be defined as, "The snows between the heavens and the peaks." In this context, it was the notion that although snow, rock, and sky may differ in our minds it is when they come together in ones vision we become struck with an ineluctable depth of beauty and feeling we cannot describe but which exists in your heart nonetheless. It is the concept of coming together as a family and the joy in being together. I know it may be an insufficient explanation, but that is the best I am able to describe the phrase used, anachronistic and evocative as it was.

In modern Napanii the closest I think it can come to is: "State and People, together, indivisible."

As to whether or not such a notion in your mind elicits an ineluctable depth of beauty and feeling is for your heart alone.

Kurilaivonen|Concern

Constantin Baracca
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#306 - 2014-01-28 00:19:35 UTC
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
Constantin Baracca wrote:


It isn't really warfare, peaceful Reclamation, nor even really a process of assimilation. It's mostly a process of growing together as one, large, cohesive society. An element of our society that I would think Statists might appreciate.


I made no mention of the Empire. I said that cultural assimilation is warfare. A war fought by pursuing the means to ensure that the target of your cultural conflict is unable to resist subscribing to your memes -- with force and violence being the historically most successful method of doing so. Although since you brought up the Empire, I do not see it having ever embarked upon a peaceful Reclaiming for in the long history of Crusade and slavery I see nothing more than the use of force and violence to propagate the memes of God and religious dogma over the people, societies and cultures it has subjugated through force of arms.

The most effective means of resistance against any form of cultural assimilation is the identity to be found in nationalism, and it is in nationalism where the true purpose of the human spirit resides. Where in the cultivation of prejudice one is able to to see clearly the cultural delineations of race and ethnicity and act with that true purpose to discriminate what is Volk and what is not. It is when the life of the Volk is combined with the laws and power of the State that the strongest bulwark against assimilation is found, where a true Fatherland exists. Where an individual is willing to live for their People and ready to fight and die for the State.

That being said I can only hope the Amarr Empire has more like you in the future, Mr. Baracca. Those whose pursuits of peace and belief that violence can never solve anything in human affairs will convince your compatriots to beat the swords of your Paladins into the plowshares to till the fields until the day the soil is enriched with their blood by those who recognize that violence and force are the sole arbiters in life from which all else derives.


I appreciate your sentiment, Veikitamo, and you are correct that my people (in reality, all people) of the cluster have very rarely been bereft of armed conflict of any kind, and few could say that there was not a major conflict once in every century for their people. I wouldn't call our Empire the most peaceful of them all, either, given out history.

However, God gives us chances to reflect. After millenia of victories, or conquering peoples by force of arms, I don't think any of us could say that we've had the same experience since we came upon the Gallente. After the war with the Jove, the Minmatar Rebellion, and the Elder Fleet, we've had plenty of opportunities to reflect back on that history of warfare and our legacy to the cluster. Were our most successful acquisitions coerced with arms? The Khanid came to us freely, left us, and returned again freely by purely peaceful means. What Matari still stay with us, even though they bore the brunt of the Elder Fleet? The Ammatar, who joined us freely.

I suppose Amarrians of my generation have a tendency to look at warfare as more of a limited, short-term cure instead of a panacea. Guns simply do not cure the diseases of the human condition. This had an effect on me even as my family has always been relatively less limited in terms of inclusion of other races into our family line and our relations with our neighbors. I can't, as you say, posit that I am the median of my people (though really, no one can).

Not to say there is no time when violence is appropriate, I'd be a hypocrite if I'd said that. I've had to destroy my fair share of pirates attacking civilians in my time. It simply hasn't proven effective at doing the thing that matters: spreading and teaching the Word. In the end, it wasn't our guns that made good, Godly people, it was those good Holders and teachers in our society that essentially made living with us worthwhile. When we forgot that, and we relied on our guns more than our books, we were quickly taught otherwise. It was that arrogance that required adjustment, and even we are not above God's lessons if we forget our primary purpose. We were simply not living up to the right standards.

It's a strange dichotomy, living in a world where most people would rather live in peace but cannot seem to avoid warfare. In any case, I think to have any chance of spreading the Word, we need to demonstrate not that it is the way of the strong, but the way of the wise. We simply have to prove it works in the real world, especially in an unobtrusive way. It's a lot harder to do, and will take much longer than simply aiming a gun at someone and telling them to read. However, if the Word is good and it works, it is bound to catch on. People won't want to even try it if they see the faith as an armature of a conquering army

In essence, if people see the faith as the province of the Amarr people, I wouldn't blame them for trying to avoid it. It's important to show that the Amarr people are the province of the faith, and it is not our tool. We are tools of the faith, trying to bring us collectively toward enlightenment and eventual ascension into something greater.

It's worth taking longer to do if it saves a few lives, at the very least.

"What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

-Matthew 16:26

Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Doomheim
#307 - 2014-01-28 02:05:23 UTC
I would say expressing the belief that you see most people desiring peace but unable to escape warfare shows an inability to reconcile optimism with reality, Mr. Baracca.

As for expressing the Matari having not been coerced through force of arms and having accepted the Amarr faith peacefully and through their own volition, I might say as being an inability to reconcile history with revisionism.

Kurilaivonen|Concern

Ava Starfire
Khushakor Clan
#308 - 2014-01-28 05:15:34 UTC
Samira Kernher wrote:
Milady Devonshire,

There are already uplifted peoples in PIE Inc--such as the Khanid and the Ni-Kunni. The Auxiliary is for those of us who are still in need of guidance, who are still at risk of falling back to the influences of our original cultures outside the Empire.

The race hierarchy is not archaic. It is the way of things. We all have our proper places, and we all serve those higher than ourselves. The True Amarr are the Chosen of God; they carry out His Divine will and rule His creations. The rest of us, as having turned from God, serve the Amarr. But as we return to His light, we cleanse our lines of the sins of our ancestors and become teachers ourselves to those further behind than us.

Eventually, there won't need to be an Auxiliary, because our races will have fully embraced God, like the Khanid, the Udorians, the Ni-Kunni, and others. But we are not there yet. We are still far behind on that path. We should not demand greater position than what we have been given, for those wiser than us know better than us how far we are on the path to salvation.


And Mr. Makari,

I already have an understanding of Matari society, as I lived in the Republic for several years. I still fail to see how the Starkmanir were any different from any other slave. Their former tribal culture had been eliminated as they have been living in the Empire for generations. There was nothing left for the Republic to preserve. They were servants of Amarr and God.


You disappoint me.

"There is no strength in numbers; have no such misconception." -Jayka Vofur, "Warfare in the North"

Lady Katherine Devonshire
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
#309 - 2014-01-28 06:32:44 UTC
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
As for expressing the Matari having not been coerced through force of arms and having accepted the Amarr faith peacefully and through their own volition, I might say as being an inability to reconcile history with revisionism.


Thirty settled systems and you think that we do not exist? I find that amusing to say the least.
Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#310 - 2014-01-28 06:55:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Samira Kernher
What she means is that the Ammatar Mandate was not created through peace, as the Nefantar joined the Empire in response to our invasion of the Minmatar Empire.
Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gradient
Electus Matari
#311 - 2014-01-28 07:11:24 UTC
Captain Baracca, in a war, it is entirely possible that both parties lose.

Elsebeth
Constantin Baracca
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#312 - 2014-01-28 13:44:43 UTC
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
I would say expressing the belief that you see most people desiring peace but unable to escape warfare shows an inability to reconcile optimism with reality, Mr. Baracca.

As for expressing the Matari having not been coerced through force of arms and having accepted the Amarr faith peacefully and through their own volition, I might say as being an inability to reconcile history with revisionism.


It isn't really so, Veikitamo, and culturally we are taught very early on to have somewhat complex views of the universe.

To give you an example, I suppose we as a people seem very verbose (compared to our fellows). We actually use a different form of Amarrian for speech that should be read through a translator because a great many of our words have no direct translation into another language. For example, curretregus is a "state of being" word. It's conjugated the way our version of "to be" is conjugated, as most of the other words of that nature are. It describes the state in which you think you are correct about something, but that you find it unfortunate and wish wholeheartedly to be proven wrong. I suppose the closest I can think of in common parlance is when you say, exasperatedly, "Well, I hope you're right." However it isn't quite the same.

I suppose it does seem that we live in worlds of contradictions, but we're taught very early on to reconcile that dissonance logically. It isn't hard to see why people who want peace seem to see so much war; it doesn't take that many people to start a war and its consequences are not limited to those who fight it. Therefore, good people will end up fighting each other as long as people who want war threaten them. The majority of our peoples are not fighting each other at all; they have regular jobs. The majority of us aren't even participating in the CEWPA conflict. Not even everyone involved in that conflict really wants to be there fighting. So, in essence, a proportionally small amount of people who are affected by the warfare are the ones that are actually there, fighting.

Hence, people want peace but expect war.

As for the Matari, I did specifically say the Ammatar. The tribe which used to make up their number joined us willingly and took part in the Reclaiming of the rest of their people. The rest of their people formed the Republic, while they stayed. Even after the Elder Invasion that they bore the brunt of and that shook their faith with its revelations, they remain.

That's the sort of faith you don't have after being forced at gunpoint. That's pure and true faith, a belief in larger and greater things.

"What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

-Matthew 16:26

Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#313 - 2014-01-28 14:37:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Samira Kernher
Constantin Baracca wrote:
That's the sort of faith you don't have after being forced at gunpoint. That's pure and true faith, a belief in larger and greater things.


"Only through many hardships
Is a man stripped to his very foundations
And in such a state
Devoid of distractions
Is his soul free to soar
And in this
He is closest to God"
- Book of Missions 42:5


The sins in our blood cannot be cleansed simply by word. It is only through experiencing and learning from suffering that we rise above our evils and attain salvation.

Remember the Starkmanir, Father Baracca. Their Holder treated them too softly, and so instead of finding God they put their faith in a man. And when that man was punished for his heresies, they rose in rebellion--for they loved him more than they loved God--and had to suffer even greater than what they had been shielded from. I pray that God will bless you with the wisdom to avoid leading your charges onto the same path as the Starkmanir.
Anabella Rella
Gradient
Electus Matari
#314 - 2014-01-28 17:19:16 UTC
Kernher you do realize that your deity didn't order a fleet of battleships to fire their tachyon lasers at Starkman Prime, right? That order was given by a man; a man who was making a coldly calculated political statement. He was showing his vassals and the rest of the empire that he was strong and willing to wipe out an entire planet's population as revenge for his father's murder. No more, no less.

But, let's assume that the genocide of the Starkmanir was divinely orchestrated. What does this say for your deity? That it's a hateful, vengeful, totally amoral entity willing to put to death millions of its innocent "creations" in order to scare the rest into subservience? How can you worship such a monstrous construct?

And you wonder why we resist you. I want no part of a universe supposedly created and controlled by such an entity.

When the world is running down, you make the best of what's still around.

Samira Kernher
Cail Avetatu
#315 - 2014-01-28 17:44:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Samira Kernher
God is not to blame for the evils done by His creations, because He gave us free will. The fault lies in the Starkmanir Holder for teaching the wrong lessons. It is why he was struck from the Book of Records. The Starkmanir would have never risen up in rebellion if they had been instructed properly. Most of their descendants would now be living as free, loyal citizens of the Empire. But like a dog that has been raised poorly and not been taught that it is wrong to bite and attack its owners, they had to be put down. The fault isn't in the dog, and it isn't in the people who have to euthanize the dog before it can hurt others. The fault lies in that original owner, who abused his position of authority and failed to carry out his responsibilities.

Unfortunately, mankind are not dogs--we are even more dangerous. We learn from the examples of those before us. The Amarr were too late to stop the damage done by the Starkmanir Holder. Their example encouraged so many others, and caused countless more deaths.

If the Holder had carried out his duties responsibly, there would have been no Starkmanir rebellion. If there had been no Starkmanir rebellion, there would have been no greater Minmatar rebellion. And if there had been no Minmatar rebellion, then the Minmatar may have been, today, at the same status and level of respect in the Empire as the Ni-Kunni.

That this thread even exists can be traced back to that one man, and those like him. Had it not been for him, there would be no Republic. There would be one whole Empire, and the Matari honored citizens of it, faithful before God.

It is very sad that such a tragedy happened.
Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Doomheim
#316 - 2014-01-28 20:46:23 UTC
Constantin Baracca wrote:
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
I would say expressing the belief that you see most people desiring peace but unable to escape warfare shows an inability to reconcile optimism with reality, Mr. Baracca.

As for expressing the Matari having not been coerced through force of arms and having accepted the Amarr faith peacefully and through their own volition, I might say as being an inability to reconcile history with revisionism.


It isn't really so, Veikitamo, and culturally we are taught very early on to have somewhat complex views of the universe.



A Gallentean bourgeois would typically say much the same thing. I might say a clockwork mechanism is complex with all its interconnected gears, flywheels, and springs but if they are all designed to perform a pointless task like rolling a rock up and down a hill for all eternity then complexity has no inherent value in and of itself.

Kurilaivonen|Concern

Constantin Baracca
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#317 - 2014-01-28 22:03:24 UTC
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
Constantin Baracca wrote:
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
I would say expressing the belief that you see most people desiring peace but unable to escape warfare shows an inability to reconcile optimism with reality, Mr. Baracca.

As for expressing the Matari having not been coerced through force of arms and having accepted the Amarr faith peacefully and through their own volition, I might say as being an inability to reconcile history with revisionism.


It isn't really so, Veikitamo, and culturally we are taught very early on to have somewhat complex views of the universe.



A Gallentean bourgeois would typically say much the same thing. I might say a clockwork mechanism is complex with all its interconnected gears, flywheels, and springs but if they are all designed to perform a pointless task like rolling a rock up and down a hill for all eternity then complexity has no inherent value in and of itself.


I think you misunderstood the concept of complexity I was referring to. Being able to see a situation from several angles is a complex task, not a complex solution. Rolling a rock up and down a hill can be done with complex equipment, but was being done with logs and sleds ten million years ago. It isn't so easy to, say, design and build your warp drive or bring peace to the cluster. Those sorts of things require a lot more abstract thinking, much of which seems ludicrous at the time.

You can have a simple approach to the universe as much as you'd like, for sure it would likely make someone in your position much more comfortable. It's just not an approach you can have in my vocation. People expect you to have answers to extremely difficult questions, often on the spot. It's not the sort of skill you can learn via injection.

"What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

-Matthew 16:26

Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#318 - 2014-01-28 22:09:04 UTC
Constantin Baracca wrote:


That's the sort of faith you don't have after being forced at gunpoint. That's pure and true faith, a belief in larger and greater things.


Of course it is not. Most Ammatars living these days did not live through the Minmatar Rebellion. They were raised in Derelik generation after generation.

Forced at gunpoint or not, that does not make a lot of difference, since it is all about cultural assimilation.

Anabella Rella wrote:


But, let's assume that the genocide of the Starkmanir was divinely orchestrated. What does this say for your deity? That it's a hateful, vengeful, totally amoral entity willing to put to death millions of its innocent "creations" in order to scare the rest into subservience? How can you worship such a monstrous construct?


Because it is the exact reflection of the Universe and the Creation ? The Amarr have always been keen to put a great emphasis on humility and fear in front of the unforgiving nature of the universe, but eventually the Amarr God is not much different from Achura's ideology or various other religions.

I do not see what is especially surprising in that ? Unless you believe the Universe to be intrinsically good and benevolent ?

Samira Kernher wrote:
And if there had been no Minmatar rebellion, then the Minmatar may have been, today, at the same status and level of respect in the Empire as the Ni-Kunni.


Or the Ealur ? You forgot again the Ealur.


Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Doomheim
#319 - 2014-01-29 01:26:38 UTC
Constantin Baracca wrote:


You can have a simple approach to the universe as much as you'd like, for sure it would likely make someone in your position much more comfortable. It's just not an approach you can have in my vocation. People expect you to have answers to extremely difficult questions, often on the spot. It's not the sort of skill you can learn via injection.


The simple truth is that the history of humanity is written in blood. My acceptance of that truth does not negate my ability for abstraction or theory; no, rather I do not permit the delusions of the mind to change perception of reality. For in the end those who profess only hope can be silenced with the knife at their throat and those who have only belief can be burned upon the pages they write.

Kurilaivonen|Concern

Constantin Baracca
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#320 - 2014-01-29 02:30:36 UTC
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
Constantin Baracca wrote:


You can have a simple approach to the universe as much as you'd like, for sure it would likely make someone in your position much more comfortable. It's just not an approach you can have in my vocation. People expect you to have answers to extremely difficult questions, often on the spot. It's not the sort of skill you can learn via injection.


The simple truth is that the history of humanity is written in blood. My acceptance of that truth does not negate my ability for abstraction or theory; no, rather I do not permit the delusions of the mind to change perception of reality. For in the end those who profess only hope can be silenced with the knife at their throat and those who have only belief can be burned upon the pages they write.


The perception of reality, Veikitamo, is precisely that. We very often see what we want to see. Can you really think of no single event in history that came about requiring a blood sacrifice? Is it necessary that you destroy a civilization to develop warp drive technology? Did people have to die to open the stock market? Certainly, many of our goods come from vast wars in nullsec space that consume lives, but is that a necessary part of the gathering process?

No, history is not written in blood. History has trudged on, trying to advance irrespective of the losses incurred. I suppose when all you know about other cultures is violence, it can seem a very hostile place up in space. Certainly I was told the Matari were a pack of bloodthirsty savages who knew nothing of the faith. I came out here to find that believers were still out there in the Republic, practicing on as best they could.

But you can learn so much. They developed a ball game during their period before the Amarrian invasion that attracts vast crowds in stadiums. The games themselves are amazing to watch and be part of if you can catch on to the chants quickly enough to follow along. Nobody has to die to take part in this game; you can go and watch. Enjoy yourself. You can have fun and no one needs to die over it.

I suppose it's been trying to experience the less militant areas of the cultures of others that gives me the perspective I have. We here in space may find combat in dead space to be a ritual part of life, but most citizens on the ground will grow old and die never having fired a weapon at another human being in anger. Unfortunately, the rule of law here is enforced by CONCORD and few capsuleers have much of an interest in helping to secure and expand safe space. It's really the unfortunate failure of us as capsuleers. We could have done so much more than we have. Instead, we took the paths of least resistance, we did what was easiest to reinforce our own beliefs and make the most money. We never did anything difficult, like trying to bridge that gap between us that is the source of all wars.

We were uniquely suited to do it, because we are impossible to kill. We could have brought an end to the conflicts simply because we could not be silenced by gunfire, as you said. Destroying your ship in space would do nothing to quiet you.

It's not a failure beyond rectifying on our part. We can still make a difference in this world without bloodshed. Sometimes we forget that just because something becomes history, does not mean it becomes something to be pleased about. One day, many thousands of years from now, we may have finally grown beyond war as a means to grab at the fleeting figs from the intergalactic tree. What will they think of us then? Will they wonder what drove men and women to kill over differences such as ours?

"What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

-Matthew 16:26