These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

I-RED Deploys to Defend Ishukone Assets from Invasive Federation Elements

Author
Constantin Baracca
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#21 - 2014-01-10 00:43:14 UTC
Katran Luftschreck wrote:
Has anyone asked what Intaki want, or does no one care?


I think as soon as they were included in the CEWPA warzone, what they wanted became somewhat irrelevant. For better or worse, unfortunately, their fate is no longer in their hands.

"What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

-Matthew 16:26

Leopold Caine
Stillwater Corporation
#22 - 2014-01-10 02:12:00 UTC
Constantin Baracca wrote:
Katran Luftschreck wrote:
Has anyone asked what Intaki want, or does no one care?


I think as soon as they were included in the CEWPA warzone, what they wanted became somewhat irrelevant. For better or worse, unfortunately, their fate is no longer in their hands.


I believe ms. Silphy en Diabel would beg to differ.
  • Leopold Caine, Domination Malakim

Angels are never far...

Stillwater Corporation Recruitment Open - Angel Cartel Bloc

Rinai Vero
Blades of Liberty
#23 - 2014-01-10 02:16:33 UTC
Am I the only one who's confused what this announcement is announcing? Is I-RED joining the State Protectorate aligned forces? Or are they just supporting some random group? Clarification would be nice.
John Revenent
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#24 - 2014-01-10 13:49:17 UTC
Ishukone-Raata's deployment is not a direct response to the regular capsuleer activities in the region, but rather to the recent influx of “immortal mercenaries.” We have been observing their actions since their introduction. They have proven themselves to be exponentially more destructive than regular soldiers and do not carry any restrictions on that power within their areas of operation.

Add in the new role capsuleers are playing in bombarding these planets (many of which are inhabited, and it should be noted the Intaki have voiced several concerns against the use of Orbital Weapons against populated planets) and you can see why we are concerned with the safety of Ishukone-Raata assets, along with Ishukone's and/or the Intaki’s planetary interests. It must be noted that while planetary and orbital security will be our primary directive, Ishukone-Raata will not hesitate to engage any and all elements that wish to interfere with these operations as should be expected.

Ishukone Loyalist - Private Contractor

"Holding on to anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned."

Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Doomheim
#25 - 2014-01-10 13:59:46 UTC
I'm not really sure what to make of this now.

Heiian Kirjuun is a channel specifically designed to call for Orbital bombardment support -- yet if I-RED are going to support such operations how can they say they are seeking to prevent Orbital strikes against populated planets by providing those strikes against populated planets?

Kurilaivonen|Concern

John Revenent
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#26 - 2014-01-10 14:22:09 UTC  |  Edited by: John Revenent
Heiian Kirjuun is a organization, a coalition if you will of Caldari aligned mercenaries. If you wish to go further into Ishukone-Raata's tactical regulations, and operational procedures I suggest you make a inquiry to Oniseki-haani.

Ishukone Loyalist - Private Contractor

"Holding on to anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned."

Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Doomheim
#27 - 2014-01-10 14:33:53 UTC
As far as I can see you're the ones that made a vague public statement and apparently made the contradicting objectives of seeking to prevent supposed collateral damage done by orbital strikes (Which seems odd given the size and yield of orbital weaponry cleared for use by CONCORD designed to minimize such collateral damage by tactical orbital strikes -- note that the truly destructive ammunition such as antimatter or nuclear rounds are banned) by interceding through providing orbital strikes.

This is of course unless I-RED seeks to intervene and interfere in the orbital tactical strike support of State Peacekeeper operations in the CEWPA warzone in order to defend Ishukone interests and assets to the detriment of Caldari militia operations?

Kurilaivonen|Concern

John Revenent
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#28 - 2014-01-10 15:27:56 UTC
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
This is of course unless I-RED seeks to intervene and interfere in the orbital tactical strike support of State Peacekeeper operations in the CEWPA warzone in order to defend Ishukone interests and assets to the detriment of Caldari militia operations?


To echo Nemo-haan in his original statement. Ishukone-Raata will do whatever is necessary to ensure our interests remain intact.

Ishukone Loyalist - Private Contractor

"Holding on to anger is like grasping a hot coal with the intent of throwing it at someone else; you are the one who gets burned."

Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#29 - 2014-01-10 23:40:09 UTC
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:

This is of course unless I-RED seeks to intervene and interfere in the orbital tactical strike support of State Peacekeeper operations in the CEWPA warzone in order to defend Ishukone interests and assets to the detriment of Caldari militia operations?


No. We're not going to fight you, Gesakaarin-haani. We're not looking for a fight with you or the Protectorate or the Peacekeepers. After countless [failed] attempts at diplomacy with your corporation directly, you yourself should understand that we aren't your enemy nor do we wish to be. You and yours need not worry about being fired upon by our vessels. Unlike your organization, we don't shoot neutrals in low-sec, of which you are one (by your own choice). Perhaps you should look elsewhere for an enemy, because we will not humor you.

Those who aren't neutral have already demonstrated hostility against I-RED vessels, and our pilots will not hesitate to shoot first and ask questions later. That said, even in those cases we aren't going to be crawling the warzone looking for destroyers to pop. All that said, this really isn't about Capsuleers or our cobweb of diplomatic standings.

This is about clone mercs. I'll try to simplify the flowery language:

Nova Corps Marines, a division of I-RED, is going to start showing up in Intaki to ensure the stability and safety of our assets and those of Ishukone. We will also be managing a channel to organize tactically sound orbital bombardments for the benefit of Coalition members. As for the Intaki Assembly's stance on them, let me restate what the Intaki Assembly actually said about orbital strikes:

Quote:
"Orbital strikes, even tactical ones on remote sites, can kick up dust and spread pollution and wreckage," the press release read. "It is unconscionable that someone thought these activities were acceptable for entertainment and profit. That doesn't even consider the fact that it was essentially killing for fun. The Intaki Assembly would have never sanctioned such an event."


We aren't doing this for entertainment or profit. We aren't going to be doing it as often as possible. Furthermore, we're not in the business of trying to 'protect Intaki's biosphere'. We're in the business of looking out for Ishukone's interests by force of finance and arms. We'll try not to make too much of a mess in the process, however, as that tends to interfere with the profitability of our agreement with the Intaki.

Katrina Oniseki

Caviar Liberta
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#30 - 2014-01-11 04:30:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Caviar Liberta
Natasha Vynneve wrote:
Seriphyn Inhonores wrote:
Crazy Captain Nemo wrote:
1) Despite its statements, the Federation not only continues, but is increasing its invasions of Caldari and Intaki worlds along the border, threatening Ishukone assets both directly, and indirectly.


So the Federation is invading itself?

Cute statement, at any rate. It's as if Ishukone isn't spying on not only Intaki but the wider Federation as well (which it most certainly is).


How quaint. Please do not pretend the Federation is so upstanding and benevolent...especially with FDU members proudly and publicly boasting of mass executions of Mordu's Legionnaires.


I'll stop you right there. Mordu's are mercenaries, guns for hire. They sided with enemy combatant forces to the Federation.

*clears throat and ends transmission*
Crazy Captain Nemo
Nova Corps Marines
#31 - 2014-01-11 06:23:12 UTC
I would like to point out a few things.

1. The channel and the coalition is "Kirjuun Heiian" not "Heiian Kirjuun"

2. As I-RED is not a member alliance of the Caldari Militia we are prohibited from dropping Orbital Strikes and thusly are only able to defend planets from hostile forces.

3. I have had numerous capsuleers contact me and tell me that they are trying to support the Caldari war efforts in the Border Zone but are unable too because of the number of Gallente aligned fleets supporting the clone soldiers on the ground. The Caldari loyal Capsuleers are begging for assistance and seemingly no one is willing to support them.

The long and short of this is that the Capsuleers aligned with the State are getting decimated on a daily basis and they need assistance. Just like the clones on the ground who claim fealty to the State are in desperate need of assistance. I don't care about past issues or squabbles.

Warriors of the State NEED our help. My cousin and I have been trying to rally support for the last two months and just now is anyone seeming to notice. The soldiers of the State in the Border Zone are being pushed back at a disturbing rate by the Gallente forces, let us aid our brothers and sisters not bicker about politics and causality. Those men and women both in space and on the ground need our help, and that is the most compelling thing I could ever say on the topic.
Simon Louvaki
Khaldari InnoTektoniks and Analytical Solutions
#32 - 2014-01-11 15:53:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Simon Louvaki
Caviar Liberta wrote:
Natasha Vynneve wrote:
Seriphyn Inhonores wrote:
Crazy Captain Nemo wrote:
1) Despite its statements, the Federation not only continues, but is increasing its invasions of Caldari and Intaki worlds along the border, threatening Ishukone assets both directly, and indirectly.


So the Federation is invading itself?

Cute statement, at any rate. It's as if Ishukone isn't spying on not only Intaki but the wider Federation as well (which it most certainly is).


How quaint. Please do not pretend the Federation is so upstanding and benevolent...especially with FDU members proudly and publicly boasting of mass executions of Mordu's Legionnaires.


I'll stop you right there. Mordu's are mercenaries, guns for hire. They sided with enemy combatant forces to the Federation.

*clears throat and ends transmission*


Pardon, but how does Mordu's Legion being mercenaries make it any more justifiable to summarily execute them?

Did they engage Federal Forces unprovoked? I only ask because it was explicitly stated by Mr. Gallentius they were executed. Execution doesn't denote combat as you seem to suggest as much as it does murder. One would think they would have been better ransomed back to Mordu's Legion rather than killing them in cold blood.

-- "The weak of mind are quick to judge with slightest tempt; Thus fools go forth to spread false word." - The Scriptures, Book of Trials 2:13 - 2:21

--"At the narrow passage, there is no brother and no friend." - Hyasyoda Proverb

Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#33 - 2014-01-11 16:11:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Lyn Farel
Caviar Liberta wrote:
Natasha Vynneve wrote:
Seriphyn Inhonores wrote:
Crazy Captain Nemo wrote:
1) Despite its statements, the Federation not only continues, but is increasing its invasions of Caldari and Intaki worlds along the border, threatening Ishukone assets both directly, and indirectly.


So the Federation is invading itself?

Cute statement, at any rate. It's as if Ishukone isn't spying on not only Intaki but the wider Federation as well (which it most certainly is).


How quaint. Please do not pretend the Federation is so upstanding and benevolent...especially with FDU members proudly and publicly boasting of mass executions of Mordu's Legionnaires.


I'll stop you right there. Mordu's are mercenaries, guns for hire. They sided with enemy combatant forces to the Federation.

*clears throat and ends transmission*


Mordu signed a deal with the Intaki assembly, where they were auctionned the S&S franchise for the Intaki system.

FDU members attacking Mordu forces in their legal mission in Intaki are therefore breaching federal law and stepping on a Federation signatory jurisdiction.

Edit : By the way, Ishukone Corp is also the legal holder of the Intaki S&S franchise. Attacking them is therefore attacking a Federation signatory member.
Previous page12