These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CFC Declares War on N3.

First post
Author
Rekon X
Doomheim
#161 - 2013-12-16 03:41:11 UTC
Moar goon tears. Goon tears best tears.

Definition of goon - a stupid person Those who can do, those who can't spew

Mr. Orange
Band of Freelancers
#162 - 2013-12-16 03:46:01 UTC
Who knows, maybe a disgruntled CCP employee will fall into Mittens lap again and he'll be able to flip a switch and claim total victory?

Idea


EL OH EL

Lol
Honest Blob
Doomheim
#163 - 2013-12-16 03:50:04 UTC
Mr. Orange wrote:
Who knows, maybe a disgruntled CCP employee will fall into Mittens lap again and he'll be able to flip a switch and claim total victory?

Idea


EL OH EL

Lol



You mean like how the goon FC clearly on live stream called for cfc to purposely crash the node and talked about logging in and out in system with alts would crash it to save his dread fleet. Then cheered when it happened? I do hope we see a ban incoming for blatant EULA violations like that.
Aiwha
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#164 - 2013-12-16 03:57:40 UTC
Goons miss that tech crutch.

Sanity is fun leaving the body.

Rekon X
Doomheim
#165 - 2013-12-16 03:59:07 UTC
Honest Blob wrote:
Mr. Orange wrote:
Who knows, maybe a disgruntled CCP employee will fall into Mittens lap again and he'll be able to flip a switch and claim total victory?

Idea


EL OH EL

Lol



You mean like how the goon FC clearly on live stream called for cfc to purposely crash the node and talked about logging in and out in system with alts would crash it to save his dread fleet. Then cheered when it happened? I do hope we see a ban incoming for blatant EULA violations like that.


Yea, crashes seem to only happen when da goonz are losing. That's why it happens so often.

Definition of goon - a stupid person Those who can do, those who can't spew

Rekon X
Doomheim
#166 - 2013-12-16 04:02:34 UTC
Beekeeper Bob wrote:
Onictus wrote:
Frostys Virpio wrote:
Onictus wrote:
....and more ******* carriers.....great.

http://eve-dingo.com/formRecive.php?id=eXTZ0IC


VIVA LA DOWNTIME!


I am reading this wrong or there really is 600+ carrier?



No it was doubled because I used the IGB and the server is busy dying......half all of the numbers http://eve-dingo.com/formRecive.php?id=QBbYp7Y there that one isn't hosed.

MonkeyMagic Thiesant wrote:
Node crash?


Getting there


You started losing Dreads, so you started jumping people in and out to crash the node? Well played. Lol


It's the way of the goonz.

Definition of goon - a stupid person Those who can do, those who can't spew

Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#167 - 2013-12-16 04:11:21 UTC
Honest Blob wrote:
I do hope we see a ban incoming for blatant EULA violations like that.


I'm totally ignorant on this, but what clause of the EULA has been violated?
Hasikan Miallok
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#168 - 2013-12-16 04:13:16 UTC
Scipio Artelius wrote:
Honest Blob wrote:
I do hope we see a ban incoming for blatant EULA violations like that.


I'm totally ignorant on this, but what clause of the EULA has been violated?


Probably this:

CONDUCT
A. Specifically Restricted Conduct

Your continued access to the System and license to play the Game is subject to proper conduct. Without limiting CCP's rights to control the Game environment, and the conduct of the players within that environment, CCP prohibits the following practices that CCP has determined detract from the overall user experience of the users playing the Game.

1. You may not take any action that imposes an unreasonable or disproportionately large load on the System.
Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#169 - 2013-12-16 04:15:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Scipio Artelius
Hasikan Miallok wrote:
Probably this:

CONDUCT
A. Specifically Restricted Conduct

Your continued access to the System and license to play the Game is subject to proper conduct. Without limiting CCP's rights to control the Game environment, and the conduct of the players within that environment, CCP prohibits the following practices that CCP has determined detract from the overall user experience of the users playing the Game.

1. You may not take any action that imposes an unreasonable or disproportionately large load on the System.


Fair enough. That's seems clear and easy to interpret.
Honest Blob
Doomheim
#170 - 2013-12-16 04:28:02 UTC
Scipio Artelius wrote:
Hasikan Miallok wrote:
Probably this:

CONDUCT
A. Specifically Restricted Conduct

Your continued access to the System and license to play the Game is subject to proper conduct. Without limiting CCP's rights to control the Game environment, and the conduct of the players within that environment, CCP prohibits the following practices that CCP has determined detract from the overall user experience of the users playing the Game.

1. You may not take any action that imposes an unreasonable or disproportionately large load on the System.


Fair enough. That's seems clear and easy to interpret.



Even easyer when the goon fc was herd calling on twitch for goons to violate this. Twitch which is obv a partner of ccp now that ccp plans on syncing it to the ingamebrowser. If they let this go then ccp should just fire thier gms as this is the most obvious and blatant violation of EULA with direct proof of it happening.
Onictus
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#171 - 2013-12-16 04:30:32 UTC
Honest Blob wrote:
Scipio Artelius wrote:
Hasikan Miallok wrote:
Probably this:

CONDUCT
A. Specifically Restricted Conduct

Your continued access to the System and license to play the Game is subject to proper conduct. Without limiting CCP's rights to control the Game environment, and the conduct of the players within that environment, CCP prohibits the following practices that CCP has determined detract from the overall user experience of the users playing the Game.

1. You may not take any action that imposes an unreasonable or disproportionately large load on the System.


Fair enough. That's seems clear and easy to interpret.



Even easyer when the goon fc was herd calling on twitch for goons to violate this. Twitch which is obv a partner of ccp now that ccp plans on syncing it to the ingamebrowser. If they let this go then ccp should just fire thier gms as this is the most obvious and blatant violation of EULA with direct proof of it happening.



Yeah so what about the 15 flights of sentries PL dropped an abandoned back to back?
Super spikinator
Hegemonous Conscripts
#172 - 2013-12-16 04:36:18 UTC
Faceless Parmala wrote:
How CFC wins anything is beyond me... the stupidity of the average line members is just so damn funny.


CFC is the virtual incarnation of the infinite monkey theorem.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#173 - 2013-12-16 04:41:16 UTC
Honest Blob wrote:
Mr. Orange wrote:
Who knows, maybe a disgruntled CCP employee will fall into Mittens lap again and he'll be able to flip a switch and claim total victory?

Idea


EL OH EL

Lol



You mean like how the goon FC clearly on live stream called for cfc to purposely crash the node and talked about logging in and out in system with alts would crash it to save his dread fleet. Then cheered when it happened? I do hope we see a ban incoming for blatant EULA violations like that.

Implying anyone actually listens to him anymore.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Aiwha
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#174 - 2013-12-16 04:44:25 UTC
Onictus wrote:
Honest Blob wrote:
Scipio Artelius wrote:
Hasikan Miallok wrote:
Probably this:

CONDUCT
A. Specifically Restricted Conduct

Your continued access to the System and license to play the Game is subject to proper conduct. Without limiting CCP's rights to control the Game environment, and the conduct of the players within that environment, CCP prohibits the following practices that CCP has determined detract from the overall user experience of the users playing the Game.

1. You may not take any action that imposes an unreasonable or disproportionately large load on the System.


Fair enough. That's seems clear and easy to interpret.



Even easyer when the goon fc was herd calling on twitch for goons to violate this. Twitch which is obv a partner of ccp now that ccp plans on syncing it to the ingamebrowser. If they let this go then ccp should just fire thier gms as this is the most obvious and blatant violation of EULA with direct proof of it happening.



Yeah so what about the 15 flights of sentries PL dropped an abandoned back to back?



Post a video.

Sanity is fun leaving the body.

Onictus
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#175 - 2013-12-16 04:46:14 UTC
Aiwha wrote:
Onictus wrote:
Honest Blob wrote:
Scipio Artelius wrote:
Hasikan Miallok wrote:
Probably this:

CONDUCT
A. Specifically Restricted Conduct

Your continued access to the System and license to play the Game is subject to proper conduct. Without limiting CCP's rights to control the Game environment, and the conduct of the players within that environment, CCP prohibits the following practices that CCP has determined detract from the overall user experience of the users playing the Game.

1. You may not take any action that imposes an unreasonable or disproportionately large load on the System.


Fair enough. That's seems clear and easy to interpret.



Even easyer when the goon fc was herd calling on twitch for goons to violate this. Twitch which is obv a partner of ccp now that ccp plans on syncing it to the ingamebrowser. If they let this go then ccp should just fire thier gms as this is the most obvious and blatant violation of EULA with direct proof of it happening.



Yeah so what about the 15 flights of sentries PL dropped an abandoned back to back?



Post a video.


I wasn't fapsing in that mess. I wasn't the only one that noticed though. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=305096&find=unread


What were they making more space?

MestariBation
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#176 - 2013-12-16 04:50:56 UTC
Back to the drone whine I see..Sad

Send me isk im poor

Rekon X
Doomheim
#177 - 2013-12-16 04:54:40 UTC
Tina Tin **** wrote:
Confirming that ,just like a short Uncle from NK, all mentions of Omegafleet will now be scrubbed from the Goon records and DBRB will once again be /commisared back to grinding structures with bombers.

In other news, Mittens in his glorious new Gloria Estafan pants announces the new Goon doctrine of calling for everyone to get into a system where they are getting roflstomped to crash the node over open comms. Initial testing shows promise.


Oh, news update. I like it.

Definition of goon - a stupid person Those who can do, those who can't spew

Rekon X
Doomheim
#178 - 2013-12-16 04:57:22 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Honest Blob wrote:
Mr. Orange wrote:
Who knows, maybe a disgruntled CCP employee will fall into Mittens lap again and he'll be able to flip a switch and claim total victory?

Idea


EL OH EL

Lol



You mean like how the goon FC clearly on live stream called for cfc to purposely crash the node and talked about logging in and out in system with alts would crash it to save his dread fleet. Then cheered when it happened? I do hope we see a ban incoming for blatant EULA violations like that.

Implying anyone actually listens to him anymore.


So you're confirming it happened. That's 2.

Definition of goon - a stupid person Those who can do, those who can't spew

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#179 - 2013-12-16 05:01:49 UTC
Funny how we get blamed for for forcing the node down when there are 300 carriers dumping 10 sentries each and seemingly abandoning them to launch yet more.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#180 - 2013-12-16 05:02:55 UTC
Rekon X wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Honest Blob wrote:
Mr. Orange wrote:
Who knows, maybe a disgruntled CCP employee will fall into Mittens lap again and he'll be able to flip a switch and claim total victory?

Idea


EL OH EL

Lol



You mean like how the goon FC clearly on live stream called for cfc to purposely crash the node and talked about logging in and out in system with alts would crash it to save his dread fleet. Then cheered when it happened? I do hope we see a ban incoming for blatant EULA violations like that.

Implying anyone actually listens to him anymore.


So you're confirming it happened. That's 2.

I can't confirm something I don't know.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)