EVE General Discussion

Hi,

I have created a suggestion thread about new ships class: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=3996301#post3996301


What I was initially thinking was about something between battleships and capital ships, because at the moment there is such a HUGE gap between the both of those. You cant deny this.

So basically I had thrown my thoughts in a basic suggestion thread.


But tonight moments before I woke up I had a dream, i swear I dreamed about this lol


And that dream is of a new battleships class, called ASSAULT BATTLESHIPS


They could/would have attributes as, very fast and agile battleships, high dps (2k+ dps), but with a weak tank.

Attributes would/could be something like (and these are just an example):

- 95% less power grid and cpu needed for capital sized turrets/missiles if caldari.
- Agility increased to battlecruiser sized ship
- Speed - 500m/s
- 75% tracking speed bonuses
- Bonuses to damage if not capital sized guns

(the numbers above are not correct at all, just to give you an idea)


If they could fit capital sized guns, then all of the above would be needed
If they cant fit capital sized guns, then BONUSES TO TURRETS DAMAGE.


I even dreamed about the caldari assault ship name, I swear, it was called: Himutico

So yea, Id like to make a suggestion thread, but first posted here for discussion on possibilities and adjustments.

Please leave your coherent thoughts and ideas, thanks.

Also, these battleships would possibly fit the same price range of CNRs (500-700mil)

Its not an idea, everyone knows where to post ideas here, please dont spam.
Im here to get other people thoughts and suggestions on what could be the right way to do this so I can put up a structured suggestion on the right forums after.

Also reported for spam, trolling and harassment, cause thats what you had in mind when you decided to post that, to call for attention cause youre such a loser, thank you.

Your post has been reported too for continuing the negative trend and harassment attempt.

This is not a suggestion thread, please read before post.

Thank you

I read your OP just fine. You're throwing a tantrum over being called out. No ISD is going to take any of your reporting seriously, but they will move this to F&I where it belongs, if it's not outright just locked because you're being a moody cranky pants and abusing the report feature.

I'm gonna have to agree here with where they're saying the thread belongs.

Gotta keep in mind, negative feedback is still feedback.

It's not harassment until they're negative towards you for being you, not the idea or where you put it.

Also, just saying it's not one thread or another doesn't change the fact that the formatting and layout of your thread can classify it differently.

The notion that there ever be a set of battleships designed like Attack BCs were is certainly an idea that deserves to be in the F&I section of the forums. Asking us of suggestions as to how this idea should be implemented or changed to better suit the game is the express purpose of the F&I.

So yes, this is an idea thread, whose feedback needs to be done from F&I.

Sure ISD.... Oh, wait, you're not an ISD and you have no authority. Never mind, I guess we'll just ignore you then and continue to post here about how bad your post is and why it doesn't belong here.

Sometimes I think that we should have a forum option to down vote a specific character resulting in an involuntary biomass of all the characters and accounts linked to the down voted poster. I fully realise this would be (ab)used for great lulz by Grr Goons but in this case I'd be worth it and I humbly ask CCP to terminate the OP's accounts by force.


Thank you.

So like a Marauder?