These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

What if neutrals that hit a FW plex got limited engagement timers?

Author
Lord X3n0s Aeon
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#1 - 2013-12-03 22:29:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Lord X3n0s Aeon
Posted this on the eve subreddit a while back and it got some support, was told to bring it up here.

First off, let me start by saying that this *only* effects people who choose to warp to a FW plex and activate the gate. This doesn't apply to all of low sec.

The issue: neutral pirates jump in to your plex. They're there to fight you plain and simple. If you shoot first you take a sec-status hit because current mechanics interpret this as an act of aggression. If you wait until they shoot first you've given up the high ground, letting them dictate the range / terms of the engagement.

Proposed solution: upon activation of a FW gate limited engagement (or some other type of timer, but one that works like a LE timer) is created between the non-FW players that activate the gate and anyone inside the PLEX. This allows milita to engage hostiles just like they were enemy militia.

Justification: FW is supposed to be a warzone, and plexes are secluded military bases inside that warzone. Why should capsuleers that sign up to defend these plexes take a sec hit for doing exactly what their factions have asked them to do?

Issues:

#1 "what if someone who's not a pirate hits the gate, why should they get shot at for free?"

-The solution to that problem is a pop up along the lines of "Warning: Concord has declared the following zone an active war zone. Enter this region at your own risk" with a "do not show me this again" check box ala low-sec.

#2 "If they're pirates you can shoot them anyways"

-this is not always true, I've personally taken several sec status hits because of this.

#3 "Sec status is dumb anyways, and you're dumb for caring"

-fine, but this isn't a debate about the merits of sec status/being able to enter hi-sec. The question is "why is it logical to penalize players for engaging in combat inside a milita compound?" Because sec status hits are just that, a *penalty*.

#4 "You just want to reduce the consequences/are risk-averse"

-Wrong, I want to fight people without illogical consequences. Remember, LE timers are a two-way street. This also lets pirates engage militia inside a PLEX without a sec status hit (for better or for worse). It's my opinion that the current sec status system works great for normal aggression senarios in low sec, but I think milita compounds/capture points deserve to be treated differently.

Thoughts?
Kahega Amielden
Rifterlings
#2 - 2013-12-03 22:43:00 UTC
This is a band-aid to the larger problem of sec status. The same issues with neutrals in FW plexes exist elsewhere as well.
Lord X3n0s Aeon
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#3 - 2013-12-03 22:44:46 UTC
Kahega Amielden wrote:
This is a band-aid to the larger problem of sec status. The same issues with neutrals in FW plexes exist elsewhere as well.



Would you mind sharing where else this is an issue?

Perhaps this band-aid could grow into a patch.
Paranoid Loyd
#4 - 2013-12-03 22:45:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Paranoid Loyd
Lol, test whining about sec status hits. Roll

You forgot:

"Go back to Null"

-We can't cause we were booted

Lol

"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix

Fix the Prospect!

Domanique Altares
Rifterlings
#5 - 2013-12-03 22:47:01 UTC
Lord X3n0s Aeon wrote:
Thoughts?


Shoot first. If they're not blue, they're not there to make nice.

The less you care about your sec status, the happier you'll be.
Domanique Altares
Rifterlings
#6 - 2013-12-03 22:51:01 UTC
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Lol, test whining about sec status hits. Roll

You forgot "Go back to Null" Lol


Null is exactly the reason for the whining. Spare the rod, spoil the child.
Lord X3n0s Aeon
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#7 - 2013-12-03 22:59:05 UTC
Domanique Altares wrote:
Lord X3n0s Aeon wrote:
Thoughts?


Shoot first. If they're not blue, they're not there to make nice.

The less you care about your sec status, the happier you'll be.


So #3 then.
Lord X3n0s Aeon
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#8 - 2013-12-03 23:06:20 UTC
Domanique Altares wrote:
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Lol, test whining about sec status hits. Roll

You forgot "Go back to Null" Lol


Null is exactly the reason for the whining. Spare the rod, spoil the child.



Did we just get time-warped to a bizarro world where all discussion of change is either "whining" or "crying"?


If not, then do your best to discuss the merits of the idea outside the realm of current nul/sov politics.

If you can't do that then why are you even in the features/idea forum?
Domanique Altares
Rifterlings
#9 - 2013-12-03 23:08:26 UTC
Lord X3n0s Aeon wrote:
Domanique Altares wrote:
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Lol, test whining about sec status hits. Roll

You forgot "Go back to Null" Lol


Null is exactly the reason for the whining. Spare the rod, spoil the child.



Did we just get time-warped to a bizarro world where all discussion of change is either "whining" or "crying"?


If not, then do your best to discuss the merits of the idea outside the realm of current nul/sov politics.

If you can't do that then why are you even in the features/idea forum?


No, this is EVE-O, where discussion of change has always been either "whining" or "crying."

The idea has no merits. FW complexes are not special snowflakes that allow you to be immune to sec status hits for firing first at a neutral, nor should they be. If you don't want to fight, warp out.
Lord X3n0s Aeon
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#10 - 2013-12-03 23:16:18 UTC
Domanique Altares wrote:
Lord X3n0s Aeon wrote:
Domanique Altares wrote:
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Lol, test whining about sec status hits. Roll

You forgot "Go back to Null" Lol


Null is exactly the reason for the whining. Spare the rod, spoil the child.



Did we just get time-warped to a bizarro world where all discussion of change is either "whining" or "crying"?


If not, then do your best to discuss the merits of the idea outside the realm of current nul/sov politics.

If you can't do that then why are you even in the features/idea forum?


No, this is EVE-O, where discussion of change has always been either "whining" or "crying."

The idea has no merits. FW complexes are not special snowflakes that allow you to be immune to sec status hits for firing first at a neutral, nor should they be. If you don't want to fight, warp out.



> suggests go back to nul

> claims change would make FW plexes spwecial snowflake land

>changes would basically make inside plexes nul

> nul must be spwecial snowflake land

Your logic.
Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
#11 - 2013-12-03 23:16:25 UTC
Lord X3n0s Aeon wrote:
Kahega Amielden wrote:
This is a band-aid to the larger problem of sec status. The same issues with neutrals in FW plexes exist elsewhere as well.



Would you mind sharing where else this is an issue?

Perhaps this band-aid could grow into a patch.


If that pirate warps into a Plex, Anomaly, data/relic site, or perhaps even your mission?

The truth is, you can shoot first. If they aren't prirate, you take a sec hit. If they are pirate, you can legally engage them. There is a price for shooting first, and I don't see why it should go away!
Domanique Altares
Rifterlings
#12 - 2013-12-03 23:26:22 UTC
Lord X3n0s Aeon wrote:
Domanique Altares wrote:
Lord X3n0s Aeon wrote:
Domanique Altares wrote:
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Lol, test whining about sec status hits. Roll

You forgot "Go back to Null" Lol


Null is exactly the reason for the whining. Spare the rod, spoil the child.



Did we just get time-warped to a bizarro world where all discussion of change is either "whining" or "crying"?


If not, then do your best to discuss the merits of the idea outside the realm of current nul/sov politics.

If you can't do that then why are you even in the features/idea forum?


No, this is EVE-O, where discussion of change has always been either "whining" or "crying."

The idea has no merits. FW complexes are not special snowflakes that allow you to be immune to sec status hits for firing first at a neutral, nor should they be. If you don't want to fight, warp out.



> suggests go back to nul

> claims change would make FW plexes spwecial snowflake land

>changes would basically make inside plexes nul

> nul must be spwecial snowflake land

Your logic.


Not my logic. I never said you should go back to null. I said it was the reason for your whining.

Your requested change is indeed intended to make FW plexes into special snowflakes; you want them to become a deadspace pocket that has mechanics unlike any other deadspace pocket in lowsec.

If you want to shoot first at a non-flashy neutral, you incur the sec status penalty. This applies to everyone in lowsec equally.

Your logic:

>Doesn't want to have low sec status.
>Is afraid Santa will give him coal.
>Please change FW plexes so he can farm LP and still ask Santa for Malibu Barbie.
Fourteen Maken
Karma and Causality
#13 - 2013-12-03 23:44:59 UTC
Lord X3n0s Aeon wrote:


Justification: FW is supposed to be a warzone, and plexes are secluded military bases inside that warzone. Why should capsuleers that sign up to defend these plexes take a sec hit for doing exactly what their factions have asked them to do?



I think a better idea would be for nobody to take a sec hit for fighting inside a fw plex.
Naomi Anthar
#14 - 2013-12-04 00:46:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Naomi Anthar
Domanique Altares wrote:
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Lol, test whining about sec status hits. Roll

You forgot "Go back to Null" Lol


Null is exactly the reason for the whining. Spare the rod, spoil the child.


You sound like spoiled brat who enjoys shooting at milita who are too confused to shoot first due to sec status hit.

If you would think for one moment, you would understand what op is trying to say. He ACTUALLY wants to fight ... but won't because he will get sec status hit .

Not everyone in this game want to be BIG BAD PIWATE like Domanique Altares who "gives no fcks about sec status yo".
If the guy wants to be milita , let him be milita guy. Not everyone must be PIWATE by deafult in low sec.

He is right. He wants to fight - in place created for pvp fights - fw complex.

It's so ironic that people like Domanique complain about people who want to pew pew in FW , but will not due to stupid mechanics.

Because if this guy would actually fly stabbed/cloaked frig he would not care about that problem - WHY ? Because he would not shoot in first place to war target or neutral.

Yet he want to be viable target in FW zone and provide content for players all around.

So yeah force him into stabbs and cloaks Domanique , because obviously he does not want to fight neutrals.
From 2 choices you got Domanique : 1st another pvper in low , 2nd another stabber/cloaked **** - you pick 2nd option.
Why may i ask ?
So start using brain before you post.

Kinda sad that everyone thinks that we all got countless alts with 5.0 sec carebearing all day long. Some people must be able to access high to do shopping etc. But no ... we don't want those players in EvE right ?stop posting.
Paranoid Loyd
#15 - 2013-12-04 01:01:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Paranoid Loyd
Naomi Anthar wrote:
Domanique Altares wrote:
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Lol, test whining about sec status hits. Roll

You forgot "Go back to Null" Lol


Null is exactly the reason for the whining. Spare the rod, spoil the child.


You sound like spoiled brat who enjoys shooting at milita who are too confused to shoot first due to sec status hit.

If you would think for one moment, you would understand what op is trying to say. He ACTUALLY wants to fight ... but won't because he will get sec status hit .

Not everyone in this game want to be BIG BAD PIWATE like Domanique Altares who "gives no fcks about sec status yo".
If the guy wants to be milita , let him be milita guy. Not everyone must be PIWATE by deafult in low sec.

He is right. He wants to fight - in place created for pvp fights - fw complex.

It's so ironic that people like Domanique complain about people who want to pew pew in FW , but will not due to stupid mechanics.

Because if this guy would actually fly stabbed/cloaked frig he would not care about that problem - WHY ? Because he would not shoot in first place to war target or neutral.

Yet he want to be viable target in FW zone and provide content for players all around.

So yeah force him into stabbs and cloaks Domanique , because obviously he does not want to fight neutrals.
From 2 choices you got Domanique : 1st another pvper in low , 2nd another stabber/cloaked **** - you pick 2nd option.
Why may i ask ?
So start using brain before you post.

Kinda sad that everyone thinks that we all got countless alts with 5.0 sec carebearing all day long. Some people must be able to access high to do shopping etc. But no ... we don't want those players in EvE right ?stop posting.


Eve is about choices and the consequences of those choices, he is trying to propose a mechanic that circumvents a core aspect of the game, that is why he is getting flamed for his idea.

His proposal is no different than those that propose changes to hi-sec mechanics, so that they can be "safe".

"There is only one authority in this game, and that my friend is violence. The supreme authority upon which all other authority is derived." ISD Max Trix

Fix the Prospect!

Lord X3n0s Aeon
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#16 - 2013-12-04 01:17:57 UTC
Fourteen Maken wrote:
Lord X3n0s Aeon wrote:


Justification: FW is supposed to be a warzone, and plexes are secluded military bases inside that warzone. Why should capsuleers that sign up to defend these plexes take a sec hit for doing exactly what their factions have asked them to do?



I think a better idea would be for nobody to take a sec hit for fighting inside a fw plex.


That's what this does. The LE timer means no one gets sec penalties for shooting at someone inside a warzone (unless it's friendly fire)
Lord X3n0s Aeon
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#17 - 2013-12-04 01:19:14 UTC
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Naomi Anthar wrote:
Domanique Altares wrote:
Paranoid Loyd wrote:
Lol, test whining about sec status hits. Roll

You forgot "Go back to Null" Lol


Null is exactly the reason for the whining. Spare the rod, spoil the child.


You sound like spoiled brat who enjoys shooting at milita who are too confused to shoot first due to sec status hit.

If you would think for one moment, you would understand what op is trying to say. He ACTUALLY wants to fight ... but won't because he will get sec status hit .

Not everyone in this game want to be BIG BAD PIWATE like Domanique Altares who "gives no fcks about sec status yo".
If the guy wants to be milita , let him be milita guy. Not everyone must be PIWATE by deafult in low sec.

He is right. He wants to fight - in place created for pvp fights - fw complex.

It's so ironic that people like Domanique complain about people who want to pew pew in FW , but will not due to stupid mechanics.

Because if this guy would actually fly stabbed/cloaked frig he would not care about that problem - WHY ? Because he would not shoot in first place to war target or neutral.

Yet he want to be viable target in FW zone and provide content for players all around.

So yeah force him into stabbs and cloaks Domanique , because obviously he does not want to fight neutrals.
From 2 choices you got Domanique : 1st another pvper in low , 2nd another stabber/cloaked **** - you pick 2nd option.
Why may i ask ?
So start using brain before you post.

Kinda sad that everyone thinks that we all got countless alts with 5.0 sec carebearing all day long. Some people must be able to access high to do shopping etc. But no ... we don't want those players in EvE right ?stop posting.


Eve is about choices and the consequences of those choices, he is trying to propose a mechanic that circumvents a core aspect of the game, that is why he is getting flamed for his idea.

His proposal is no different than those that propose changes to hi-sec mechanics, so that they can be "safe".



FW has tons of "consequences". This is about removing unnecessary barriers to PVP, something "pirates" should applaud.
Bienator II
madmen of the skies
#18 - 2013-12-04 01:35:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Bienator II
yes i fully support this proposal. The only reason why i lose sec status is because i am often forced to shoot first while offensive plexing. And we all know that neutrals entering plexes are there to kill you, since there is nothing else they can do in those. So why to wait till they shoot? It doesn't make sense lore wise since you should not lose security status while you doing your job in militia.

Players liking the concept of a militia shouldn't be outlaws within a month - only if they like the idea of pirating. Right now there is no clear line between both.

I would even go further and make all kind of complexes and mission sites (outside FW) behave this way. There are still more than enough opportunities to lose your sec status everywhere else.

how to fix eve: 1) remove ECM 2) rename dampeners to ECM 3) add new anti-drone ewar for caldari 4) give offgrid boosters ongrid combat value

Seranova Farreach
Biomass Negative
#19 - 2013-12-04 01:44:21 UTC
sounds good but i have a problem with it.. more so tied to Local and its FREE INTEL!.. where if some one goes "limited engagment" in local people will zerg to the plex's to try get the kill this can be both good and bad, im sure people can work out why i guess.

for this to be implemented id suggest the local list to be removed or on a Semi-Wormhole like list where 2 things happen..

#1 if you speak in local you pop up immediatly. ( or perhaps time delayed for list)

#2 time delay on showing up in local (even if you dont speak in local) so if your there after timer hits 5 minutes itll put you on the list.

#3 cloak , #1 will still count but useing cloak adds extra minutes giving "local list immunity" for like an additional 5 to 10 minutes (effective total of 10-15 minutes befor showing up on local)



.finally. no i havnt figured out how to "fix" the issue with afk cloakers..Yet :P

[u]___________________ http://i.imgur.com/d9Ee2ik.jpg[/u]

Naomi Anthar
#20 - 2013-12-04 01:51:42 UTC
"
Eve is about choices and the consequences of those choices, he is trying to propose a mechanic that circumvents a core aspect of the game, that is why he is getting flamed for his idea.

His proposal is no different than those that propose changes to hi-sec mechanics, so that they can be "safe".
"


Completly opposite he wants to lose ships and risk them instead of sitting in cloak or running with stabs. But why also security status must drop inside of fw plex ? Where is logic behind this ?

Only "local neutral badass piwates" are against it for unknown reason.

The OP ... just wants to defend plex . He WANTS TO FIGHT , hence he made this topic.

He wants to shoot people and DEFEND military outpost he is capturing/securing. But if that means he won't be able to enter high sec of empire he fights for - THEN HE WON'T fight.

This is completly stupid.
123Next pageLast page