These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Being "Relevant" in W-Space

First post
Author
Jon Obstergo
Obstergo
Red Coat Conspiracy
#1 - 2013-11-29 22:54:55 UTC
tl;dr - What makes a Corporation or Alliance "relevant" in a wormhole community?

Please explain the “relevancy” of wormhole organizations. There seems to be a large number of individuals who make note of the “irrelevancy” of particular groups within Anoikis, however it seems to be an odd notion. What dictates relevancy in a community of individuals?

In a wormhole, “comfortable” alliance/corporate size is determined by your individual infrastructure and limited by roles, number of moons, and stuff. Technically, those limits only apply to groups that forego caution and are fine with spies, thieves, and internal strife. Also, economic restrictions inhibit the infinite expansion of an organization without occupying multiple wormholes, or dedicating alternate corporations, or wormholes for expos. That said, your relevancy in the wormhole is limited to your corporation or alliance, or in some odd cases, the various residents in the same wormholes.

That can change ofcourse. Alliances split, evictions occur, coups are staged, and drama inevitably happens. Now, your relevancy is extended to the shards that break apart, only if anyone in the shards is interested in your progression. Sometimes that interest is not friendly in nature and that could lead to conflict, which would mean relevance to those who monitor the wars within Anoikis. Then your relevancy can be dictated by the number of people interested in your stories as you progress in your community.

That aside, we aren’t null sovereignty. We don’t, for the most part, have coalitions. We have friends in some cases, and definitely have many enemies, if you are doing it right. What makes some of the groups in Anoikis feel that they are more “relevant” than other organizations? Is this about being “liked” or “popular”? Is this related to some draw to feel exclusive, cool, or edgy?

Other than the drama/meta aspect leading to some notoriety, it would seem most “relevancy” between members in this community should extend about the lifespan of a wormhole.
ChrisLCTR
Lazerhawks
L A Z E R H A W K S
#2 - 2013-11-29 23:05:15 UTC
Simply put, I believe that relevancy in WH's is dictated by how active and influential a group is. They can be either immensely disliked or very well liked.

I don't really think that KB efficiency, forum activity, or reputation have very much to do with relevance.

(Although I still hold a special place in my heart for Guillotine Therapy, they are immortal in their relevance)
Bane Nucleus
Dark Venture Corporation
Kitchen Sinkhole
#3 - 2013-11-29 23:07:37 UTC
ChrisLCTR wrote:
Simply put, I believe that relevancy in WH's is dictated by how active and influential a group is. They can be either immensely disliked or very well liked.

I don't really think that KB efficiency, forum activity, or reputation have very much to do with relevance.



This is pretty much it.

No trolling please

M1k3y Koontz
House of Musashi
Stay Feral
#4 - 2013-11-29 23:59:26 UTC
Relevance? Don't be a farmer... that helps a lot.
Pewpew your way into relevance-land.

How much herp could a herp derp derp if a herp derp could herp derp.

Proclus Diadochu
Mar Sarrim
Red Coat Conspiracy
#5 - 2013-11-30 00:39:06 UTC
ChrisLCTR wrote:
Simply put, I believe that relevancy in WH's is dictated by how active and influential a group is. They can be either immensely disliked or very well liked.

I don't really think that KB efficiency, forum activity, or reputation have very much to do with relevance.

(Although I still hold a special place in my heart for Guillotine Therapy, they are immortal in their relevance)


I'm also a Guillotine Therapy fanboi :)

How would you measure the influence of a group in wormholes? If I were to measure each group, there are a ton of relevant groups in our community based on their capacity to influence, and some are quite active. I agree with you about it being on both ends of the spectrum (liked v. disliked).

I think efficiency holds some weight in the opinions of our community (HARK, for example), and I think that forum activity and reputation can be measured in to a degree. I'm sure a ton of the members in our community are probably not fond of the RCC v. VL v. Disavowed stuff, but any publicity can lead to reputation, some of this is being done through the forums, and not always leading to "popularity", but definitely affecting the reputation of those groups.

Minister of High Society | Twitter: @autoritare

E-mail: diogenes.proc@gmail.com

My Blog: http://diogenes-club.blogspot.com/

The Diogenes Club | Join W-Space | Down The Pipe

bubble trout
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#6 - 2013-11-30 04:05:09 UTC
If you get batphoned you are "relevant" I think. Somebody out there thinks you can help them, and are better/ have more numbers.
GeneralJosh
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#7 - 2013-11-30 06:03:19 UTC
The increasing number of T3s you can field increases your relevancy!

Axloth Okiah
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#8 - 2013-11-30 08:00:17 UTC
It definitely doesnt have anything to do with being "liked". For example BU are extremely relevant, yet quite unpopular. To me "relevancy" is the same vague concept as being "notable". It has something to do with how visible and active you are, how your actions impact other groups, how can you throw your weight around.

And it absolutely is a subjective variable. A group can be relevant/notable to some, but not so to others. Either way, its usually those who are very worried about their own relevancy who throw it around and "accuse others" of being irrelevant. Some dont care, some care a lot... v0v
Elindreal
Planetary Interactors
#9 - 2013-11-30 08:09:53 UTC
If I see you and we pew and get some giggles we are both relevant and may seek one another out again.
Tul Breetai
Impromptu Asset Requisition
#10 - 2013-11-30 09:07:19 UTC
Jon Obstergo wrote:
tl;dr - What makes a Corporation or Alliance "relevant" in a wormhole community?

Please explain the “relevancy” of wormhole organizations. There seems to be a large number of individuals who make note of the “irrelevancy” of particular groups within Anoikis, however it seems to be an odd notion. What dictates relevancy in a community of individuals?

In a wormhole, “comfortable” alliance/corporate size is determined by your individual infrastructure and limited by roles, number of moons, and stuff. Technically, those limits only apply to groups that forego caution and are fine with spies, thieves, and internal strife. Also, economic restrictions inhibit the infinite expansion of an organization without occupying multiple wormholes, or dedicating alternate corporations, or wormholes for expos. That said, your relevancy in the wormhole is limited to your corporation or alliance, or in some odd cases, the various residents in the same wormholes.

That can change ofcourse. Alliances split, evictions occur, coups are staged, and drama inevitably happens. Now, your relevancy is extended to the shards that break apart, only if anyone in the shards is interested in your progression. Sometimes that interest is not friendly in nature and that could lead to conflict, which would mean relevance to those who monitor the wars within Anoikis. Then your relevancy can be dictated by the number of people interested in your stories as you progress in your community.

That aside, we aren’t null sovereignty. We don’t, for the most part, have coalitions. We have friends in some cases, and definitely have many enemies, if you are doing it right. What makes some of the groups in Anoikis feel that they are more “relevant” than other organizations? Is this about being “liked” or “popular”? Is this related to some draw to feel exclusive, cool, or edgy?

Other than the drama/meta aspect leading to some notoriety, it would seem most “relevancy” between members in this community should extend about the lifespan of a wormhole.

Holy ****. A good post from a Red Coat. A very good post.

Isn't relevancy commonly thought to be determined by killboard, size, and content-provider vs farmer status? Those are the most common insults I receive from other w-space corps, all of it relative of course, as we are positive on all counts by my own interpretation.

There's nothing worse than an EVE player, generally considered to be top of the food chain in the MMO world, that cannot smacktalk with wit and coherency.

Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#11 - 2013-11-30 10:44:45 UTC
Relevancy in WHs comes down almost entirely to a combination of public image and PVP activity levels in WHs.
As in, if a corp lives in WH space but doesnt PVP or does all their PVP in kspace then regardless of how good their image and abilities are, theyre not relevant in WH space.

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout

Lloyd Roses
Artificial Memories
#12 - 2013-11-30 13:17:55 UTC
RCC are pretty relevant forum posters, that at least.
Proclus Diadochu
Mar Sarrim
Red Coat Conspiracy
#13 - 2013-11-30 16:09:41 UTC
Tul Breetai wrote:
Jon Obstergo wrote:
tl;dr - What makes a Corporation or Alliance "relevant" in a wormhole community?

Please explain the “relevancy” of wormhole organizations. There seems to be a large number of individuals who make note of the “irrelevancy” of particular groups within Anoikis, however it seems to be an odd notion. What dictates relevancy in a community of individuals?

In a wormhole, “comfortable” alliance/corporate size is determined by your individual infrastructure and limited by roles, number of moons, and stuff. Technically, those limits only apply to groups that forego caution and are fine with spies, thieves, and internal strife. Also, economic restrictions inhibit the infinite expansion of an organization without occupying multiple wormholes, or dedicating alternate corporations, or wormholes for expos. That said, your relevancy in the wormhole is limited to your corporation or alliance, or in some odd cases, the various residents in the same wormholes.

That can change ofcourse. Alliances split, evictions occur, coups are staged, and drama inevitably happens. Now, your relevancy is extended to the shards that break apart, only if anyone in the shards is interested in your progression. Sometimes that interest is not friendly in nature and that could lead to conflict, which would mean relevance to those who monitor the wars within Anoikis. Then your relevancy can be dictated by the number of people interested in your stories as you progress in your community.

That aside, we aren’t null sovereignty. We don’t, for the most part, have coalitions. We have friends in some cases, and definitely have many enemies, if you are doing it right. What makes some of the groups in Anoikis feel that they are more “relevant” than other organizations? Is this about being “liked” or “popular”? Is this related to some draw to feel exclusive, cool, or edgy?

Other than the drama/meta aspect leading to some notoriety, it would seem most “relevancy” between members in this community should extend about the lifespan of a wormhole.

Holy ****. A good post from a Red Coat. A very good post.

Isn't relevancy commonly thought to be determined by killboard, size, and content-provider vs farmer status? Those are the most common insults I receive from other w-space corps, all of it relative of course, as we are positive on all counts by my own interpretation.


I agree with you about "relevancy" being relative, especially in the wormhole community. Earlier, Axloth basically said that notoriety may serve as a form of relevancy, with Blood Union as the example. I'd venture to say based on my perspective alone, that Obstergo has decent PVP effeciency, expecially for our modest size, and serve more toward the "content creator" group than the "farmer" group. That being said, different people have a different view on what factors determine relevance.

For Example, on our own, the possibility for RCC to evict SSC, KILL, NOHO, or another larger entity is probably close to zero, and for some that would deem our small alliance irrelevant. Axloth also noted a relevant entity's ability to impact others, which I feel would be an important factor to include in a "relevancy" formula. Again, using RCC as the example, we have the ability to engage and fight, and also have the ability to invade and evict. That means that groups we would engage would be impacted by us, similarly to their or other's effect on our alliance in similar circumstances, making others relevant to RCC.

This topic is less on the troll, and as a topic itself, probably irrelevant to most people that play the game. However, this is a computer game forum, I'm bored, and this seems like an interesting enough topic between the "Target: Alliance" and "RCC is Bad" threads.

Minister of High Society | Twitter: @autoritare

E-mail: diogenes.proc@gmail.com

My Blog: http://diogenes-club.blogspot.com/

The Diogenes Club | Join W-Space | Down The Pipe

Hidden Fremen
Lazerhawks
L A Z E R H A W K S
#14 - 2013-11-30 17:38:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Hidden Fremen
Relevancy is much more simple than all this. You can have **** stats, be dirt poor, dishonorable, cowardly, and still find your way into the back of our minds. Relevance is not synonymous with power. You become relevant when you become a household name. Relevance is relative to whomever is asking.

Relevance is also meaningless.
Proclus Diadochu
Mar Sarrim
Red Coat Conspiracy
#15 - 2013-11-30 18:10:00 UTC
Hidden Fremen wrote:
Relevancy is much more simple than all this. You can have **** stats, be dirt poor, dishonorable, cowardly, and still find your way into the back of our minds. Relevance is not synonymous with power. You become relevant when you become a household name. Relevance is relative to whomever is asking.

Relevance is also meaningless.


Assuming you were just referring to social relevance, then it's a matter of opinion whether or not an individual places any meaning to the topic.

Relevance is critical to success in wormholes. I'm not just referring to social relevance, which is what this thread is primarily about, but relevance in terms of "appropriate" or "fitting". Social relevance has it's place in the community and simply being in the "back of [your] minds" doesn't make you relevant.

If you take an armor fleet into a Pulsar and engage a shield fleet, you are ignoring the bonus's, which are very relevant and also meaningful regarding the probable outcome of your engagement. Relevance is meaningful, and sometimes critical.

Social relevance is also meaningful to a degree, as it is the foundation for community building and development. I think you are referring to being "popular" or "notorious", which I would agree is meaningless or even detrimental, if people begin refusing to engage you.

Minister of High Society | Twitter: @autoritare

E-mail: diogenes.proc@gmail.com

My Blog: http://diogenes-club.blogspot.com/

The Diogenes Club | Join W-Space | Down The Pipe

ChrisLCTR
Lazerhawks
L A Z E R H A W K S
#16 - 2013-11-30 22:39:47 UTC
There are a good amount of valid points here. I guess most folks find different avenues more important in the battle for relevance than others.

I particularly enjoy when people are not risk-averse. For example, One Percent. came out at us last night with 2 drakes and 2 basilisks. What happened? We blobbed them (sorry). Buuut, the point being, they came, probably knew the outcome would not be in their favor, but brought SOMETHING anyway. They very well could have POS'd up, or logged off, but chose not to.

Not saying everyone should only suicide into blobs for my amusement, but if you have the members, show a little balls once in awhile. Our WH community seems to unanimously agree that stepping up to fight will grant you respect from other groups, therefor making you "relevant".
Aelias Zero
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#17 - 2013-12-01 03:04:58 UTC
ChrisLCTR wrote:
There are a good amount of valid points here. I guess most folks find different avenues more important in the battle for relevance than others.

I particularly enjoy when people are not risk-averse. For example, One Percent. came out at us last night with 2 drakes and 2 basilisks. What happened? We blobbed them (sorry). Buuut, the point being, they came, probably knew the outcome would not be in their favor, but brought SOMETHING anyway. They very well could have POS'd up, or logged off, but chose not to.

Not saying everyone should only suicide into blobs for my amusement, but if you have the members, show a little balls once in awhile. Our WH community seems to unanimously agree that stepping up to fight will grant you respect from other groups, therefor making you "relevant".



Agreed. I love it when people just bring a fight. I don't give a **** if it's ~the gudfite~ or not.

"Is probably the best person alive."                      -Ron Paul

Gnaw LF
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#18 - 2013-12-02 21:35:09 UTC
Jon Obstergo wrote:
tl;dr - What makes a Corporation or Alliance "relevant" in a wormhole community?

Please explain the “relevancy” of wormhole organizations. There seems to be a large number of individuals who make note of the “irrelevancy” of particular groups within Anoikis, however it seems to be an odd notion. What dictates relevancy in a community of individuals?

In a wormhole, “comfortable” alliance/corporate size is determined by your individual infrastructure and limited by roles, number of moons, and stuff. Technically, those limits only apply to groups that forego caution and are fine with spies, thieves, and internal strife. Also, economic restrictions inhibit the infinite expansion of an organization without occupying multiple wormholes, or dedicating alternate corporations, or wormholes for expos. That said, your relevancy in the wormhole is limited to your corporation or alliance, or in some odd cases, the various residents in the same wormholes.

That can change ofcourse. Alliances split, evictions occur, coups are staged, and drama inevitably happens. Now, your relevancy is extended to the shards that break apart, only if anyone in the shards is interested in your progression. Sometimes that interest is not friendly in nature and that could lead to conflict, which would mean relevance to those who monitor the wars within Anoikis. Then your relevancy can be dictated by the number of people interested in your stories as you progress in your community.

That aside, we aren’t null sovereignty. We don’t, for the most part, have coalitions. We have friends in some cases, and definitely have many enemies, if you are doing it right. What makes some of the groups in Anoikis feel that they are more “relevant” than other organizations? Is this about being “liked” or “popular”? Is this related to some draw to feel exclusive, cool, or edgy?

Other than the drama/meta aspect leading to some notoriety, it would seem most “relevancy” between members in this community should extend about the lifespan of a wormhole.



The distinction is very easy, if you live, rat or hunt in w-space you are relevant. Yeah, we might come across each other fairly rarely but if you are out there and we do come across each other then we instantly provide content. That is the key, providing content to each other. No matter who it is in this game everyone lives for the same idea, content made by players. Yeah, some do it by building massive sov blocks, others just camp gate, but no matter what it is and how you do it, its content. You become relevant as soon as you generate it for w-space.

Which brings me onto my most important point, you are relevant in w-space as soon as you start making content there. In w-space. W-Space. Not wormholes, or wormholes space, or unknown space or u-space and most certainly not Anoikis. Only scrubs live in Anoikis, and they are definitely irrelevant.
Nariya Kentaya
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#19 - 2013-12-03 20:58:29 UTC
Was going to use examples from wormhole space to explain relevancy.

then i remembered the big players since my time with SYJ have changed so much i dont think theres any references i can make that youd know...

But yeah, if your going to go in a wormhole, be active, offer fights to the big guys who roll around.

in general BE FUN. no-fun farmers and people who just POS up and hide are GUARANTEED to get evicted.

not sure how much wormhole protocol has changed since i ran with SYJ, but back in the day, even little guys would get defended when they batphoned if they were legitimate pvp groups, even the biggest farming groups were removed, since relevant WH space cares only about your ability to keep everyone from getting bored as ****. pretty nice pvp community.
Alundil
Rolled Out
#20 - 2013-12-04 16:12:27 UTC
We enjoyed it and learned a good deal. And made some nice acquaintances (of the shoot each other the face kind) :)

I'm right behind you

12Next page