These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Nice Job CCP. Now Can We All Get 17m Free Skillpoints Also?

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Praetor Meles
Black Mount Industrial
Breakpoint.
#81 - 2013-11-08 22:34:26 UTC
"No one hates school shootings more than the New Order. We know that a free, democratic society like the one we're trying to build in highsec depends on an educated populace."

Actually did make me laugh out loud.

[insert random rubbish that irritates you personally] is further evidence that Eve is dying/thriving*

  • delete as required to make your point
Darius JOHNSON
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#82 - 2013-11-08 22:34:53 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:


No one said anything about demanding to speak to them before they do their jobs.


erotica 1 wrote:
I requested CCP speak to me before taking any action, but I did not receive a response.


Read much?
Frying Doom
#83 - 2013-11-08 22:36:42 UTC
Darius JOHNSON wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:


No one said anything about demanding to speak to them before they do their jobs.


erotica 1 wrote:
I requested CCP speak to me before taking any action, but I did not receive a response.


Read much?

Maybe you should buy a dictionary and look up the words

Demand and requested.

LolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLol

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!
Nathalie LaPorte
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#84 - 2013-11-08 22:36:47 UTC
Darius JOHNSON wrote:

If the answer you give isn't "Nobody" it's the wrong answer, because in this instance that's exactly who all of you are.


Your definitions are 100% opposite from the truth.

Asking someone to talk to you, because you have in your possession pertinent evidence: a reasonable request. Not showing entitlement.

Calling a bunch of other people "nobody": An insult which obviously says much more about you than it possibly could about a huge crowd of random people. This shows that you consider yourself entitled. Calling everyone pubbies and publords only continues to show your feelings of entitlement.

I'm glad I could help with your lack of understanding in this matter.
Darius JOHNSON
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#85 - 2013-11-08 22:38:37 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Darius JOHNSON wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:


No one said anything about demanding to speak to them before they do their jobs.


erotica 1 wrote:
I requested CCP speak to me before taking any action, but I did not receive a response.


Read much?

Maybe you should buy a dictionary and look up the words

Demand and requested.

LolLolLolLolLolLolLolLolLol


Given that there's very little difference when questioning one's sense of entitlement I guess I'll just go ahead and lean back.
Dream Kim
Solar Winds Security Solutions
#86 - 2013-11-08 22:39:13 UTC
ITT Darius gets ******* PWNED.
Darius JOHNSON
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#87 - 2013-11-08 22:39:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Darius JOHNSON
Nathalie LaPorte wrote:
Darius JOHNSON wrote:

If the answer you give isn't "Nobody" it's the wrong answer, because in this instance that's exactly who all of you are.


Your definitions are 100% opposite from the truth.

Asking someone to talk to you, because you have in your possession pertinent evidence: a reasonable request. Not showing entitlement.

Calling a bunch of other people "nobody": An insult which obviously says much more about you than it possibly could about a huge crowd of random people. This shows that you consider yourself entitled. Calling everyone pubbies and publords only continues to show your feelings of entitlement.

I'm glad I could help with your lack of understanding in this matter.



You may want to look up "entitlement" I don't think it means what you think it means. Especially given that in that context the insinuation was not that I was "Somebody" but rather merely that you are "nobody" in the context of a communication between CCP and another customer. It was pretty clearly stated as such.
Frying Doom
#88 - 2013-11-08 22:41:07 UTC
Darius JOHNSON wrote:


Given that there's very little difference when questioning one's sense of entitlement I guess I'll just go ahead and lean back.

That would probably be good.

Seeing as you seem to be the one suffering from a huge sense of self entitlement.

Nor the ability to understand the English language.Lol

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!
BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#89 - 2013-11-08 22:41:13 UTC
ZheoTheThird wrote:
I don't even care what this thread is about - I'm just laughing my butt off that people are supporting erotica

Like, he's the most successful scammer in this game, you guys really shouldn't take him serious at all...

I'll vote for him for CSM though, I'd love to see the highsec pubbie outcry when they realize who they voted for


Totally agree with the voting for csm bit. Erotica is my second choice right after monk.

Founder of Violet Squadron, a small gang NPSI community! Mail me for more information.

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie's Space Mediation Service!
Carmen Electra
AlcoDOTTE
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#90 - 2013-11-08 22:41:38 UTC
Dear EVE players,

u mad?

Bacon makes us stronger
Nathalie LaPorte
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#91 - 2013-11-08 22:42:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Nathalie LaPorte
Darius JOHNSON wrote:
Nathalie LaPorte wrote:
Darius JOHNSON wrote:

If the answer you give isn't "Nobody" it's the wrong answer, because in this instance that's exactly who all of you are.


Your definitions are 100% opposite from the truth.

Asking someone to talk to you, because you have in your possession pertinent evidence: a reasonable request. Not showing entitlement.

Calling a bunch of other people "nobody": An insult which obviously says much more about you than it possibly could about a huge crowd of random people. This shows that you consider yourself entitled. Calling everyone pubbies and publords only continues to show your feelings of entitlement.

I'm glad I could help with your lack of understanding in this matter.



You may want to look up "entitlement" I don't think it means what you think it means. Especially given that in that context the insinuation was not that I was "Somebody" but rather merely that you are "nobody" in the context of a communication between CCP and another customer. It was pretty clearly stated as such.


Entitle:v tr
"3. to confer a title of rank or honour upon"

So, the opposite of being a nobody, just as I said.

If you're not "Somebody", then who are you to call someone else a "nobody"? The one implies the other.
Darius JOHNSON
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#92 - 2013-11-08 22:42:35 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Darius JOHNSON wrote:


Given that there's very little difference when questioning one's sense of entitlement I guess I'll just go ahead and lean back.

That would probably be good.

Seeing as you seem to be the one suffering from a huge sense of self entitlement.

Nor the ability to understand the English language.Lol


You should probably look that word up as well. Calling your "CSM Candidate" or whatever the OP out for acting entitled doesn't confer any entitlement on me. I'm presuming this is what passes for some pubbie attempt at being macchiavellian but for the record you look pretty dumb.
ElQuirko
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#93 - 2013-11-08 22:42:53 UTC  |  Edited by: ElQuirko
Darius JOHNSON wrote:
I don't understand what it is with you people and reading comprehension but I never suggested that you weren't entitled to quality customer service. I understand it's difficult to handle someone suggesting that you are less important than you've convinced yourself that you are but it will be more helpful to the conversation if you'd at least pretend to respond to what I was asking instead of offering something unrelated as an excuse for your boorish behavior.

I also never said you shouldn't be mad. Nor did I suggest the person in question should have gotten this SP back. I will repeat for the third time in caps in case maybe you folks have eye problems "WHO THE **** ARE YOU THAT CCP SHOULD CONSULT YOU ON THE PRIVATE COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN THEM AND ANOTHER CUSTOMER BEFORE TAKING ACTION?"

The response you posted to the second quote doesn't even make sense. Just post it in your native language next time and let me google translate it.

These communications aren't exactly "private" if we have our hands on 'em.

Who am I? I'll put it in capitals for you since you obviously seem to be hard of thinking:

I. AM. A. PAYING. CUSTOMER. DO. YOU. SPEAK-A. MY. LANGUAGE? ENTITLEMENT. TO. THESE. COMMUNICATIONS. COMES. THROUGH. THE. SCRUTINY. PROVIDED. BY. THIS. PARTICULAR. "WHISTLEBLOWING". -. CCP. ARE. NOT. DOING. PART. OF. WHAT. THEY. ARE. PAID. FOR. WHICH. IS. TO. RUN. THE. GAME. PROPERLY.

Mais si vous voulez, je peux parler en Francais? C'est pas d'une probleme, meme si je n'ai pas les accents pour des caracteres dans mon clavier. Je ne suis pas forte aussi avec le masculin ou feminin. Maintenant, je vais repeter moi-meme:

"VOUS ETEZ IDIOT. VOUS N'ETES PAS 'FLOCON DE NEIGE SPECIALE'. NOUS SOMMES LES PERSONNES DE QUI LES EMPLOIÉS DE CCP GAGNER LEUR ARGENT. POURQUOI NOUS N'AVONS PAS LE DROIT D'ENTENDRE CE QUI PASSÉ?"

Darius JOHNSON wrote:
I understand it's difficult to handle someone suggesting that you are less important than you've convinced yourself that you are.

And oh please, in the light of your posting, this is just cute.

Dodixie > Hek
Erotica 1
Krypteia Operations
#94 - 2013-11-08 22:44:55 UTC
Dear Darius, before posting in GD, perhaps you should run your ideas by your corpmates first. I look forward to representing you in the next CSM.

In regards to my petition, I will not divulge the details or screen shot it. I'll just say that I gave more than enough information to have the petitions linked and provide ample evidence for any questions they may have. Instead, mine was closed and he was awarded the SP. One would think that someone making a decision like this should have some internal checks and balanes, or at least think to himself as he's pressing the button, that this is going to be a **** storm. What happens in the petition department and is there no oversight?

See Bio for isk doubling rules. If you didn't read bio, chances are you funded those who did.
Frying Doom
#95 - 2013-11-08 22:45:12 UTC
Darius JOHNSON wrote:
Nathalie LaPorte wrote:
Darius JOHNSON wrote:

If the answer you give isn't "Nobody" it's the wrong answer, because in this instance that's exactly who all of you are.


Your definitions are 100% opposite from the truth.

Asking someone to talk to you, because you have in your possession pertinent evidence: a reasonable request. Not showing entitlement.

Calling a bunch of other people "nobody": An insult which obviously says much more about you than it possibly could about a huge crowd of random people. This shows that you consider yourself entitled. Calling everyone pubbies and publords only continues to show your feelings of entitlement.

I'm glad I could help with your lack of understanding in this matter.



You may want to look up "entitlement" I don't think it means what you think it means. Especially given that in that context the insinuation was not that I was "Somebody" but rather merely that you are "nobody" in the context of a communication between CCP and another customer. It was pretty clearly stated as such.

Wikipedia wrote:
In a casual sense, the term "entitlement" refers to a notion or belief that one (or oneself) has a right to some particular reward or benefit—if given without deeper legal or principled cause, the term is often given with pejorative connotation (e.g. a "sense of entitlement").

You feel an entitlement to criticize other people because you believe you are better than everyone else.

You feel entitled to this........................Unfortunately you are Wrong.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!
Brusanan
Free State Project
#96 - 2013-11-08 22:45:13 UTC
Darius JOHNSON wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:


No one said anything about demanding to speak to them before they do their jobs.


erotica 1 wrote:
I requested CCP speak to me before taking any action, but I did not receive a response.


Read much?

Stop derailing the thread by focusing on what was obviously a troll instead of the dangerous precedent that CCP could be setting here.
dexington
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#97 - 2013-11-08 22:45:41 UTC
Darius JOHNSON wrote:
You may want to look up "entitlement" I don't think it means what you think it means.


If you don't think it means what he thinks it means, does then mean non of you actually know what it means?

I'm a relatively respectable citizen. Multiple felon perhaps, but certainly not dangerous.
Frying Doom
#98 - 2013-11-08 22:46:30 UTC
Darius JOHNSON wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
Darius JOHNSON wrote:


Given that there's very little difference when questioning one's sense of entitlement I guess I'll just go ahead and lean back.

That would probably be good.

Seeing as you seem to be the one suffering from a huge sense of self entitlement.

Nor the ability to understand the English language.Lol


You should probably look that word up as well. Calling your "CSM Candidate" or whatever the OP out for acting entitled doesn't confer any entitlement on me. I'm presuming this is what passes for some pubbie attempt at being macchiavellian but for the record you look pretty dumb.

Once again insults because you believe you are better than me.

You feel entitled to insult others.


FAIL!!!

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!
Agent Kailethre
Tengoo Uninstallation Service
#99 - 2013-11-08 22:47:21 UTC
Darius JOHNSON wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
Darius JOHNSON wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
Darius JOHNSON wrote:

Don't have anything else to say in this thread except who the **** are you that CCP should talk to you before dealing with another customer? Talk about having your entitled nose in the air.

I believe the answer to that would be.

Someone who was about to publish yet another travesty by CCP.


First off "Travesty"? Secondly, AND?

I'd love to know what some of you people have accomplished to warrant this degree of entitlement. Are you perhaps all princes and princesses?

Ok so we have your opinion then that giving someone 17,000,000 SP back for their stupidity is just great then.

As to the degree of entitlement, well how about we just believe the EULA should be enforced the same for every player, not just on CCPs whim. You may believe that CCP should just give people what ever they feel like at any moment, I however do not.


I was pretty clear in what I said. You're a pubbie so you're obviously slow but you can't quote someone then say they said something they didn't. At least edit/remove it to fit your invented narrative. Nothing you said answers in any way the question which is who the **** are you to be privvy to the communications between CCP and another customer? Least of all to the degree that you demand they speak to you before doing their jobs?

If the answer you give isn't "Nobody" it's the wrong answer, because in this instance that's exactly who all of you are.

:edit: for the record I agree that if the facts are what they are the dude shouldn't have gotten any SP back. Not disputing that just disgusted with how some of you plebs present yourselves.



"Hee hee they aren't in my super sekrit goons club, they're all dirty pubbies!"
So tell me, where did you get your sense of entitlement from? You're in Goonswarm, good for you. Point out to me why your opinion is suddenly the top notch in this thread.

i think i am pretty kawaii =333
Kate stark
#100 - 2013-11-08 22:47:43 UTC
Brusanan wrote:
Stop derailing the thread by focusing on what was obviously a troll instead of the dangerous precedent that CCP could be setting here.


you say that like CCP care about setting dangerous and dumb precedents.
see the sticky that has been abandoned for nearly a month.

Yay, this account hasn't had its signature banned. or its account, if you're reading this.