These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The silent Incursion

First post
Author
Anslo
Scope Works
#61 - 2013-11-07 17:13:52 UTC
Silas Vitalia wrote:
The battle was over before the engagement started, Mr. Anslo.


They never had a chance to win because....they engaged short range brawlers with long range vessels with superior pilot ability and legions worth of drones to swarm them? I'm trying to understand why they would never have even been able to take them on if they had more electronic warfare such as damps...in situations I've been and have been taught by folks from some of the larger low sec groups, once you break a repair chain or ruin their ability to complement each other, you've taken a very, very strong advantage.

But you're saying even IF they had more dampeners, they wouldn't have won anyway? Why?

EDIT: Also I won 40mil. Woo!

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

Silas Vitalia
Doomheim
#62 - 2013-11-07 17:25:33 UTC
Anslo wrote:
Silas Vitalia wrote:
The battle was over before the engagement started, Mr. Anslo.


They never had a chance to win because....they engaged short range brawlers with long range vessels with superior pilot ability and legions worth of drones to swarm them? I'm trying to understand why they would never have even been able to take them on if they had more electronic warfare such as damps...in situations I've been and have been taught by folks from some of the larger low sec groups, once you break a repair chain or ruin their ability to complement each other, you've taken a very, very strong advantage.

But you're saying even IF they had more dampeners, they wouldn't have won anyway? Why?

EDIT: Also I won 40mil. Woo!




With the numbers being roughly equal every ship you start dedicating to EWAR is a ship you are removing from applying firepower to your enemy. They were already at a significant firepower disadvantage to begin with, compounding the effect would do little.

The aggressors in this case had more than enough firepower to not care in the slightest if a few ships were temporarily affected with fickle EWAR. Drones tend to keep fighting regardless as well. Even if jamming or damping began to be an issue, I see enough firepower there to remove such problem ships nearly instantaneously.

'Breaking a repair chain' tends to be more useful for "stand up" fights and not fast moving skirmish gangs.

Again with this sort of firepower output against such small hulls you can often completely ignore the logistics and break through any ship you like in a few volleys. There's simply not enough 'meat' there for them to last long under such duress.








Sabik now, Sabik forever

Ava Starfire
Khushakor Clan
#63 - 2013-11-07 17:40:43 UTC
What is this thread actually about?

"There is no strength in numbers; have no such misconception." -Jayka Vofur, "Warfare in the North"

Mebrithiel Ju'wien
Anshar Incorporated
#64 - 2013-11-07 17:43:41 UTC
Ava Starfire wrote:
What is this thread actually about?


I think it's Mr Anslo trying to have a clue... now.
Anslo
Scope Works
#65 - 2013-11-07 17:58:35 UTC
Silas Vitalia wrote:
With the numbers being roughly equal every ship you start dedicating to EWAR is a ship you are removing from applying firepower to your enemy. They were already at a significant firepower disadvantage to begin with, compounding the effect would do little. The aggressors in this case had more than enough firepower to not care in the slightest if a few ships were temporarily affected with fickle EWAR. Drones tend to keep fighting regardless as well. Even if jamming or damping began to be an issue, I see enough firepower there to remove such problem ships nearly instantaneously.


OK I see there was a disconnect in my proposal. I didn't mean switch people out. I literally meant they should have had their fleet as it was+5 more in ewar. I should have clarified that before. Sorry.

But I 100% agree with you and noticed that. Ishtars are not to be taken lightly. That's why I suggested +5 more pilots in ewar to possibly assist. However, the sheer force that is an Ishtar would, in retrospect, make it useless.

Quote:
'Breaking a repair chain' tends to be more useful for "stand up" fights and not fast moving skirmish gangs.

I dunno about that. I've studied BALKAN's tactics against enemies and, despite it being a quick skirmish gang fight, they still won the day by breaking the enemy's chain. But hey maybe that's unique to armor.

Quote:
Again with this sort of firepower output against such small hulls you can often completely ignore the logistics and break through any ship you like in a few volleys. There's simply not enough 'meat' there for them to last long under such duress.

It was essentially glass bashing cannons against some very very heavy firepower with a good bit of tank to boot. I understand now. Thank you!
....but why were their shield logistics for Deimos and Ishtars? Are they not traditionally armor?...

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations
#66 - 2013-11-07 18:16:51 UTC
Anslo wrote:
Silas Vitalia wrote:
With the numbers being roughly equal every ship you start dedicating to EWAR is a ship you are removing from applying firepower to your enemy. They were already at a significant firepower disadvantage to begin with, compounding the effect would do little. The aggressors in this case had more than enough firepower to not care in the slightest if a few ships were temporarily affected with fickle EWAR. Drones tend to keep fighting regardless as well. Even if jamming or damping began to be an issue, I see enough firepower there to remove such problem ships nearly instantaneously.


OK I see there was a disconnect in my proposal. I didn't mean switch people out. I literally meant they should have had their fleet as it was+5 more in ewar. I should have clarified that before. Sorry.

But I 100% agree with you and noticed that. Ishtars are not to be taken lightly. That's why I suggested +5 more pilots in ewar to possibly assist. However, the sheer force that is an Ishtar would, in retrospect, make it useless.

Quote:
'Breaking a repair chain' tends to be more useful for "stand up" fights and not fast moving skirmish gangs.

I dunno about that. I've studied BALKAN's tactics against enemies and, despite it being a quick skirmish gang fight, they still won the day by breaking the enemy's chain. But hey maybe that's unique to armor.

Quote:
Again with this sort of firepower output against such small hulls you can often completely ignore the logistics and break through any ship you like in a few volleys. There's simply not enough 'meat' there for them to last long under such duress.

It was essentially glass bashing cannons against some very very heavy firepower with a good bit of tank to boot. I understand now. Thank you!
....but why were their shield logistics for Deimos and Ishtars? Are they not traditionally armor?...


Also, and this is actually good advice, you can fit a Blackbird or a falcon with an armor tank, and this actually frees up more of its slots to be used on E-war.

There is also the issue of "Where do you find five falcons at the drop of a hat". We can use falcons. We own falcons. But not everyone has a copy of every single ship in New Eden ready at hand, nor do we who live in lowsec have the luxury of immediately popping into a station to purchase what is necessary. Had either side the luxury of foresight, then they would win every engagement.

As it stands, I don't think EITHER side expected Shadow Cartel or Snuff Box to show up in the numbers that they did, nor do I think that Snuffbox joining the Coreli side of the fight with 12 extra guardians was in their plans, because I really do think they intended to get a fight out of us, which we were happy to bring until we saw what was going on. Instead, other tactics were adopted, and they appear to have worked out for our side, this time.

If I have any criticism of the enemy side, it is to say that they ought not to trust the people whom they blew up the carrier of an hour before, in the future, to be forgiving. If I have any advice to give to Shadow Cartel and Snuff Box, it is that if they want to get a real fight, they have to at least make it look like the fight it worth taking. No one is going to, as it was so eloquently put in local "Just send out the True Slaves to die"

But hey, lessons learned on all sides.
Anslo
Scope Works
#67 - 2013-11-07 18:24:58 UTC
Thanks for the advice Tiberious. And Silas.

OK what the hell I'm being pleasant with a Toaster and a Blooder. What's the verse coming to?

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

Caellach Marellus
Stormcrows
#68 - 2013-11-07 18:33:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Caellach Marellus
Quote:
....but why were their shield logistics for Deimos and Ishtars? Are they not traditionally armor?...


If you aren't relying on them for tackle and web support. It's better to shield tank Ishtars and drop them at 50k+ with DDAs in the lows. They're mobile and offer both high damage and great damage projection.

When your gut instincts tell you something is wrong, trust them. When your heart tells you something is right, ignore it, check with your brain first. Accept nothing, challenge everything.

Silas Vitalia
Doomheim
#69 - 2013-11-07 18:33:18 UTC
Anslo wrote:

I dunno about that. I've studied BALKAN's tactics against enemies and, despite it being a quick skirmish gang fight, they still won the day by breaking the enemy's chain. But hey maybe that's unique to armor.


If you are the ranged skirmish gang orbiting a slower group at range, your logistic are often even further removed from the targets, typically putting them well outside of enemy range. Very hard to break, let along target or tackle.

When you attack a group of ships with logistic support, it is very much a 'judgement call' based on past experience as to whether you have enough firepower to 'muscle through' any repairs being done to your targets. Experienced commanders will usually guess correctly the first time... or very, very quickly adapt and change targets as soon as they see they aren't making progress.

Anslo wrote:

....but why were their shield logistics for Deimos and Ishtars? Are they not traditionally armor?...


I'm sure you can figure that one out.

Sabik now, Sabik forever

Anslo
Scope Works
#70 - 2013-11-07 19:17:01 UTC
Silas Vitalia wrote:
Anslo wrote:

I dunno about that. I've studied BALKAN's tactics against enemies and, despite it being a quick skirmish gang fight, they still won the day by breaking the enemy's chain. But hey maybe that's unique to armor.


If you are the ranged skirmish gang orbiting a slower group at range, your logistic are often even further removed from the targets, typically putting them well outside of enemy range. Very hard to break, let along target or tackle.


But won't the enemy just run away then and try to get on top of you? I mean...it seems like it'll just become a game of cat and mouse.

Quote:
When you attack a group of ships with logistic support, it is very much a 'judgement call' based on past experience as to whether you have enough firepower to 'muscle through' any repairs being done to your targets. Experienced commanders will usually guess correctly the first time... or very, very quickly adapt and change targets as soon as they see they aren't making progress.

Any experiences you could share, I'd love to hear. Privately if that'd suit you.

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

Sofia Roseburn
Verdant Inquiries
#71 - 2013-11-07 20:11:21 UTC
And today we learned that there's more than one way to fit a ship.
Makkal Hanaya
Revenent Defence Corperation
#72 - 2013-11-07 23:22:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Makkal Hanaya
Evi Polevhia wrote:
Anslo wrote:
19? I see. Then five Falcons should have been added.


Let me just reach into my magical Bag of Falcon and pull a few out...

She's making a list, she's checking it twice.
Going to find who's naughty or nice.
Sansha Claus is coming to town.

She's got a bag of goodies,
for all the girls and boys.
A Falcon or a Thorax,
and other ships bring joy.

Oh, you better not welp, you better not flee,
gotta broadcast for reps and obey the FC.
('cause) Sansha Claus is coming to town
(oh yeah!) Sansha Claus is coming to town.
Sansha Claus is coming to town~!

Anslo wrote:
Look they acted instead of just talked. To me, that says far, far more than anything else.

I am starting to think the optimal pattern is 'win significant engagement' -> 'start a thread about how you're winning.' As opposed to 'talk about how you're going to smack someone down' -> 'fail to smack someone down.'

That said, yes, I agree that attempting to rid a system of undesirable elements is a good thing.

Render unto Khanid the things which are Khanid's; and unto God the things that are God's.

Joshua Foiritain
Coreli Corporation
Pandemic Legion
#73 - 2013-11-08 01:26:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Joshua Foiritain
Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:
If I have any criticism of the enemy side, it is to say that they ought not to trust the people whom they blew up the carrier of an hour before, in the future, to be forgiving.[

We have no need for Shadow Cartel to be forgiving. The Angel Cartel informed us one of their fleets was under attack from a carrier so we lend a hand and destroyed it. If Shadow Cartel wants to avenge it they are welcome to do so.

Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
Looking at the recent combat records for Coreli corporation and their allies in the Reynire system is this a call to arms out of dubious philanthropy or simply sheer ineptitude?

The Reynire fight took place after this call and there was no ineptitude involved (Well apart from fielding Ashimmu's). We destroyed the TSF customs office after which scouts reported a Shadow Cartel fleet. As our primary purpose behind our low-sec campaign is training our pilots and new fleet commanders we decided to engage them.

After killing a rapier and losing a few tech 1 ships we ran into a stalemate with neither side being able to break each other logistics and as we only brought a very limited amount of strategic assets into the area we had no way of escalating while we knew Shadow Cartel could. So the call was made to pull out, abandon those tackled on field and save the rest. Sometimes you win, and sometimes you lose.

Unfortunately we forgot about actually replacing the TSF customs office so they sneakily dropped a new one. Oops

The Coreli Corporation is recruiting.

Desiderya
Blue Canary
Watch This
#74 - 2013-11-08 01:56:33 UTC
I've not read everything, but Anslo, you're talking out of your ass.
I think shaving might be in order.

Ruthlessness is the kindness of the wise.

Anslo
Scope Works
#75 - 2013-11-08 04:26:57 UTC
Desiderya wrote:
I've not read everything, but Anslo, you're talking out of your ass.
I think shaving might be in order.

Come get us.

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

Diana Kim
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#76 - 2013-11-08 05:11:05 UTC
Sansha, Gallentes, Serpentis... just different sides of same medal.
They have one common name: Enemies of the State.

Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.

In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.

Caviar Liberta
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#77 - 2013-11-08 05:11:36 UTC
Caellach Marellus wrote:
I look forward to watching you slaughter each other.

That is should the toasters bring enough points to counter your absurd amount of warp core stabilisers.


I won't mourn losses either way, die well, and frequently.


Pure alpha fire power can counter warp core stabilizers.
Caviar Liberta
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#78 - 2013-11-08 05:12:56 UTC
Diana Kim wrote:
Sansha, Gallentes, Serpentis... just different sides of same medal.
They have one common name: Enemies of the State.


Seems those known as TEST aren't really friends of your State either.
Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations
#79 - 2013-11-08 10:45:28 UTC
Joshua Foiritain wrote:
Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:
If I have any criticism of the enemy side, it is to say that they ought not to trust the people whom they blew up the carrier of an hour before, in the future, to be forgiving.[

We have no need for Shadow Cartel to be forgiving. The Angel Cartel informed us one of their fleets was under attack from a carrier so we lend a hand and destroyed it. If Shadow Cartel wants to avenge it they are welcome to do so.

Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
Looking at the recent combat records for Coreli corporation and their allies in the Reynire system is this a call to arms out of dubious philanthropy or simply sheer ineptitude?

The Reynire fight took place after this call and there was no ineptitude involved (Well apart from fielding Ashimmu's). We destroyed the TSF customs office after which scouts reported a Shadow Cartel fleet. As our primary purpose behind our low-sec campaign is training our pilots and new fleet commanders we decided to engage them.

After killing a rapier and losing a few tech 1 ships we ran into a stalemate with neither side being able to break each other logistics and as we only brought a very limited amount of strategic assets into the area we had no way of escalating while we knew Shadow Cartel could. So the call was made to pull out, abandon those tackled on field and save the rest. Sometimes you win, and sometimes you lose.

Unfortunately we forgot about actually replacing the TSF customs office so they sneakily dropped a new one. Oops


Shadow Cartel was there before you attacked the POCO, Hulemand. We noticed you 'shooting' at each other in an attempt to bait us out. We also noticed that you all appeared to be shooting at each other with one gun each.

We made the determination that you were working together, either through preplanned co-ordination or on the fly improvisation. We found this odd because you HAD just destroyed their carrier. Either Shadow Cartel was being forgiving in trying to get a fight, or you guys had just set up the most expensive misdirection campaign I have ever seen.

Regardless, we made a count of the ships on field arrayed between yourselves, Shadow Cartel, and Snuff Box, and determined that we could not break the repping power of 19 guardians without significantly more investment, so the the decision was made to let the POCO go and adapt to other tactics.

When you went off to shoot at another POCO, we put another up in the place of the one lost, at which point we learned that the Shadow Cartel fleet had begun shooting you in earnest. Then the so called 'good fights' started going up in local, and someone exclaimed that their carrier had been avenged.

Then everyone started to filter out of the system, as per normal.

So, you guys won the battle, certainly. I am not going to claim that TS-F won this particular fight, because we did not. However, with a few more defeats like this one, I think we will be sitting very nicely.

For the record, Hulemand, you spent roughly 200 million ISK per minute keeping that POCO down. You could destroy every single Customs Office we own and still not cover the losses you incurred in your victory over a single one. I would be seriously rethinking whether you actually consider this fight worth the effort.
Desiderya
Blue Canary
Watch This
#80 - 2013-11-08 10:54:02 UTC
Anslo wrote:

Come get us.


Don't worry, we'll continue the reaping, as usual.

Ruthlessness is the kindness of the wise.