These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Rubicon] Sisters of EVE faction ships

First post First post First post
Author
Hena Muri
Perkone
Caldari State
#2541 - 2013-11-06 09:18:07 UTC
So, from the perspective of a WH occupant that generally prefers PVE content I have to say I’m just underwhelmed with the Stratios. I’m going to EFT warrior this ship because I fly a Gila so I should be able to compare numbers when applying the same play style.

My play style is to wait for small stuff and pick it off with light/medium drones, stay at range for the medium ships while I pick them off with heavy/medium drones and then fly in to short range and circle the Battle ships at 5k while pounding on them with heavies. This minimizes drone loss and maximizes effective DPS.

For this, my Gila usually has 100 shield/sec with ~80, 71, 78, 82 resists, 62k EHP, ~650 DPS, 560 m/s with an AB and a 225m sig. This is a passively tanked cap stable Gila. With drones alone I get just under 600 DPS, the missiles are only used to pull agro.

I can easily modify this spec to get 173 shield/sec with 78k EHP and over 500 DPS if I ditch the AB and the drone damage amp for another shield extender and a shield power relay.

Or, I can get 760 DPS by dropping to 76 shield/sec from swapping the Shield power relay for a second Drone Damage Amp. I still move 560 m/s in this spec as it keeps the AB and it is still cap stable.

There’s a lot of versatility there for clearing missions and WH sites and it take no ammo or chargers to run (unless you want another 50dps from wasting missiles), but you have to be careful with the drones. Because of this, when I look at the “balanced” Stratios I have to ask how much is a covert cloak really worth?

Keep in mind my design goals here are: Cap Stable, no ammo or charges, reasonable EHP to take the absurd Sleeper BS damage, and an omni tank. This is what will make the ship useful to me.

For tech 2 gear the best all-around fit I could come up with has these specs:
110 armor/sec but uses nanite paste with only ~75, 67, 67, 69 resists, 50k EHP, ~500 dps, 511 m/s with an AB, and a 150m sig. It’s not cap stable (but not far from it), and the 4 heavies only pull 380 dps.

So I get a smaller sig but a slower ship, that’s going to die faster, it takes significantly longer to kill stuff as the lasers have to track, and I had to use conflag to get the ship to 500 dps so I have a lot of up close fighting to do. Also, I’m going to loose more drones as orbiting at max speed at 5k around an enemy to scoop drones on a moment’s notice significantly reduces my DPS. This isn't an issue when slinging missiles in the Gila (still a waste of ammo, but at least you don't have to worry about reduced damage from your speed/transversal).

For a cloak, +10 to hacking, a probe bonus (for a launcher that I can’t fit at the same time as the cloak without taking another DPS loss), and a smaller sig I’m giving up 10k ehp, 25-35% of my DPS, 50m/s and cap stability. I don’t think it’s worth it. Swapping from a dedicated probing ship to a hacking ship to the Gila for fighting makes far too much sense when this requires refitting for each of those roles to be effective at them anyway.

I personally think this is underpowered compared to its brethren. Give it back the 5th heavy and 500 m^3 drone bay. Applying both effective heavy drone DPS and Laser DPS is near impossible without gimping your tank (speed) so while I love seeing the 700 dps number in EFT I know it’s not realistic. The Gila - with similar play style and limitations - reasonably does 584 DPS, or 650 in empire in L4 missions because missiles are also OP for PVE. This will reasonably do ~500 with the extra drone bandwidth. You have to give up a lot of tank to get that drone damage amp, and giving up that tank while maintaining minimal transversal on a target to maximize DPS is going to make the Stratios really squishy. Even if the Stratios has Gila bandwidth the Gila is still the better DPS drone boat.

The PVP aspect is a conundrum though. Cloaking is strong in PVP because you can wait for your target to get into a bad spot before engaging. This will effectively minimizes the chance they leave before you can lock them down and a 600+ DPS boat means the easier to fit buffer tank opens up a lot of gank options.

A reasonable option might be to remove a high slot (or two) and give it another low slot. Drones (even with only 4 heavies) are still the majority of the DPS. 1 Laser for starting fights, 1 probe, 1 drone link augmenter, and 1 cloak is sufficient when you are pulling just under 500 DPS with your drones alone.

Regardless, as is, this ship isn’t for me. It seems like it should be perfect for Wormhole exploration but execution wise I’m still going to have to return to base to reconfigure constantly and if I’m going to do that then I might as well just hop into a more specialized ship. Fixing this problem requires fixing the slot distribution issues, and by that I mean three types of slots is insufficient for categorizing ships the way you want. I.E. trying to give this ship enough mid slots that it can effectively equip analyzing equipment means that it has a lot of opens slots for EWAR, shield tanking, cap stability, or damage projection.

_WAter_
Kagura Nikon
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#2542 - 2013-11-06 09:21:19 UTC
Cheng Musana wrote:
Kagura Nikon wrote:
Cheng Musana wrote:
in my opinion the ship is intended for pure PVE+exploration and with that not really supposed to sneak up on people. Give the original drone bonus back but add a penalty for sensor recalibration.

Role penalty: sensor recalibration time rised to 10-15 seconds after decloaking.
This kills the PVP capability while still remain the ability to fly around cloaked and do exploration. And when you do a site you are uncloaked and can target stright away.



No ship is made for PURE PVE!!! All ships that can fit weapons are also PVP ships and are balanced taking that into account.

Its not even a t2 ship, so would never be pingeonholed in a single focused usage like exploration.

Its meant to be GOOD at exploration and a very obvious choice at that. That doe snto mean it was not supposed to be use don other things.

Going by that i could aswell get a hauler, fit 1-2 guns and shield tank it with ancillery shield boosters and go PVP in FW with it. Sure you can do it but if it is a smart choice is a different story.



Yet CCP does not create any artificial penalty for deter from PVP on any ships with any type of combat bonuses.

They are even changign the maradeurs because they agree that a PVE focused ship is not withi neve spirit

"If brute force does not solve your problem....  then you are  surely not using enough!"

Kagura Nikon
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#2543 - 2013-11-06 09:36:04 UTC
Shrike Arghast wrote:
Quote:
Looks like i will only be able to use it as a can cracker, i dont see any PVE use otherwise.


Thus continuing their recent string of releasing ships that can only excel in one role. I'm not a fan, either. It'd be nice to see some PvE utility.



Still better than the tempest that cannot excel at any role.

"If brute force does not solve your problem....  then you are  surely not using enough!"

Kagura Nikon
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#2544 - 2013-11-06 09:37:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Kagura Nikon
Cheng Musana wrote:
Kagura Nikon wrote:
Cheng Musana wrote:
in my opinion the ship is intended for pure PVE+exploration and with that not really supposed to sneak up on people. Give the original drone bonus back but add a penalty for sensor recalibration.

Role penalty: sensor recalibration time rised to 10-15 seconds after decloaking.
This kills the PVP capability while still remain the ability to fly around cloaked and do exploration. And when you do a site you are uncloaked and can target stright away.



No ship is made for PURE PVE!!! All ships that can fit weapons are also PVP ships and are balanced taking that into account.

Its not even a t2 ship, so would never be pingeonholed in a single focused usage like exploration.

Its meant to be GOOD at exploration and a very obvious choice at that. That doe snto mean it was not supposed to be use don other things.

Going by that i could aswell get a hauler, fit 1-2 guns and shield tank it with ancillery shield boosters and go PVP in FW with it. Sure you can do it but if it is a smart choice is a different story.



btw try it.. you would get surprised how powerful a gang of battle haulers can be :)


Still amazed how peopel can think that a 100m bay cruiser is useles.

So the myrmidon is useles? The prophecy ?

The prophecy is maybe ther most powerful t1 BC as of now!!!


Peopel are delusionals if they thing that a cruiser must have 125.500 to be useful. Not eevn the typhoon kept the 125 drone bay!!!


Somethign that shoudl be considered is NERFING the drone bay of most drone cruisers with over 150 bay (its ridiculous that peopel want a Cruiser to carry as much drones as a Dominix!

"If brute force does not solve your problem....  then you are  surely not using enough!"

Ron Jester
Jester's Fleet
Jester's Alliance
#2545 - 2013-11-06 10:27:23 UTC
From the dev blog ...

"Both of these ships will be on offer from all Servant Sisters of EVE corporations in the game, which means these will be the first ‘pirate faction’ ships available in high sec. This doesn’t come without a cost though. Only the Sanctuary Corporation, who are credited with actually creating the Stratios and Astero, will offer them at the normal pirate faction prices. If you get them from the Sisters of EVE Corporation in high security space get ready for a mark-up of up to 50%."

The Sanctuary Corporation doesn't actually exist in game, is it being added in Rubicon?
Kagura Nikon
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#2546 - 2013-11-06 10:55:09 UTC
Ron Jester wrote:
From the dev blog ...

"Both of these ships will be on offer from all Servant Sisters of EVE corporations in the game, which means these will be the first ‘pirate faction’ ships available in high sec. This doesn’t come without a cost though. Only the Sanctuary Corporation, who are credited with actually creating the Stratios and Astero, will offer them at the normal pirate faction prices. If you get them from the Sisters of EVE Corporation in high security space get ready for a mark-up of up to 50%."

The Sanctuary Corporation doesn't actually exist in game, is it being added in Rubicon?



most of them will come from high sec. 50% its not worth for anyone that does not alredy live there. And concord conversion is not much difference.


Take as standard cost the 120k and live with it.

"If brute force does not solve your problem....  then you are  surely not using enough!"

erg cz
Federal Jegerouns
#2547 - 2013-11-06 11:16:31 UTC
Ron Jester wrote:
From the dev blog ...

"Both of these ships will be on offer from all Servant Sisters of EVE corporations in the game, which means these will be the first ‘pirate faction’ ships available in high sec. This doesn’t come without a cost though. Only the Sanctuary Corporation, who are credited with actually creating the Stratios and Astero, will offer them at the normal pirate faction prices. If you get them from the Sisters of EVE Corporation in high security space get ready for a mark-up of up to 50%."

The Sanctuary Corporation doesn't actually exist in game, is it being added in Rubicon?


Sanctuary . Vigilant cost about 240 000 LP. If Stratios is 50 % more, it makes 360 000 LP. I hope they will nerf the ship so much, that no one will want to buy it. Cause I do ;) And I do not see any possibility ot earn those 360 000 LP in reasonable time frame. So please remove all turrets hard points, make all high slots utility slots. For eve online tourists like me it is the best ship to fly and make pictures ;)
Electrique Wizard
Mutually Lucrative Business Proposals
#2548 - 2013-11-06 12:40:19 UTC
Interesting, bandwidth on test server got nerfed from 125 to 100

I am the Zodiac, I am the stars, You are the sorceress, my priestess of Mars, Queen of the night, swathed in satin black, Your ivory flesh upon my torture rack.

Niena Nuamzzar
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#2549 - 2013-11-06 12:44:43 UTC
Electrique Wizard wrote:
Interesting, bandwidth on test server got nerfed from 125 to 100

Nooo, when? No no, I can't believe this is true Roll
Mr Floydy
Questionable Ethics.
Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
#2550 - 2013-11-06 13:37:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Mr Floydy
Happened about a week or so ago iirc? Can't remember. Not sure I actually tried it with 125mb bandwidth come to think of it!
Onictus
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#2551 - 2013-11-06 13:42:09 UTC
Kagura Nikon wrote:
Cheng Musana wrote:
Kagura Nikon wrote:
Cheng Musana wrote:
in my opinion the ship is intended for pure PVE+exploration and with that not really supposed to sneak up on people. Give the original drone bonus back but add a penalty for sensor recalibration.

Role penalty: sensor recalibration time rised to 10-15 seconds after decloaking.
This kills the PVP capability while still remain the ability to fly around cloaked and do exploration. And when you do a site you are uncloaked and can target stright away.



No ship is made for PURE PVE!!! All ships that can fit weapons are also PVP ships and are balanced taking that into account.

Its not even a t2 ship, so would never be pingeonholed in a single focused usage like exploration.

Its meant to be GOOD at exploration and a very obvious choice at that. That doe snto mean it was not supposed to be use don other things.

Going by that i could aswell get a hauler, fit 1-2 guns and shield tank it with ancillery shield boosters and go PVP in FW with it. Sure you can do it but if it is a smart choice is a different story.



btw try it.. you would get surprised how powerful a gang of battle haulers can be :)


Still amazed how peopel can think that a 100m bay cruiser is useles.

So the myrmidon is useles? The prophecy ?

The prophecy is maybe ther most powerful t1 BC as of now!!!


Peopel are delusionals if they thing that a cruiser must have 125.500 to be useful. Not eevn the typhoon kept the 125 drone bay!!!


Somethign that shoudl be considered is NERFING the drone bay of most drone cruisers with over 150 bay (its ridiculous that peopel want a Cruiser to carry as much drones as a Dominix!



That is easy the slot layout doesn't allow a real shield tank and adequate damage mods, so to do any appriciable damage your have to shield tank and ignore a tank bonus.

And still do less damage than an armor tanked ishtar, with a bigger sig, worse resists, and slower.
Michael Harari
Genos Occidere
HYDRA RELOADED
#2552 - 2013-11-06 13:59:06 UTC
Onictus wrote:


And still do less damage than an armor tanked ishtar, with a bigger sig, worse resists, and slower.


Oh man its almost like covert ops ships are by design weaker than heavy assault cruisers in direct combat
Kagura Nikon
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#2553 - 2013-11-06 14:52:46 UTC
Michael Harari wrote:
Onictus wrote:


And still do less damage than an armor tanked ishtar, with a bigger sig, worse resists, and slower.


Oh man its almost like covert ops ships are by design weaker than heavy assault cruisers in direct combat



Who would have guessed that?

Expect them complaining when we get SOE battleships that the ship cannot match mega firepower and maelstrom tank while warping cloaked.

"If brute force does not solve your problem....  then you are  surely not using enough!"

Niena Nuamzzar
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#2554 - 2013-11-06 15:01:11 UTC
Michael Harari wrote:
Onictus wrote:


And still do less damage than an armor tanked ishtar, with a bigger sig, worse resists, and slower.


Oh man its almost like covert ops ships are by design weaker than heavy assault cruisers in direct combat

Oh man, even crappier Stratios can be used for stalking and sneaking up on prey. PvP aspect has never been an issue - PvE is Roll
Thaddeus Eggeras
Urkrathos Corp
#2555 - 2013-11-06 16:50:04 UTC
Question, how much ISK and LP will the BPCs and and ships them selfs cost? Thanks.
Olga Chukarin
Twenty Questions
#2556 - 2013-11-06 17:40:13 UTC
Wont the cruiser make the Gnosis completely obsolete?
Hoshi Sorano
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#2557 - 2013-11-06 17:43:55 UTC
Quote:
Both of these ships will be on offer from all Servant Sisters of EVE corporations in the game, which means these will be the first ‘pirate faction’ ships available in high sec. This doesn’t come without a cost though. Only the Sanctuary Corporation, who are credited with actually creating the Stratios and Astero, will offer them at the normal pirate faction prices. If you get them from the Sisters of EVE Corporation in high security space get ready for a mark-up of up to 50%.


Quote:
Mission running for The Sanctuary at their only station in X-7OMU promises to be extremely difficult, as the station is deep in the heart of CFC-owned Pure Blind. However, Concord loyalty points can be converted to Sanctuary LP at the standard 1:0.4 ratio for pirate factions. Getting the blueprints out will be a tricky task, even with the new interceptors, but those who manage it will profit even more.


I see what you did there.
Narcotic Gryffin
Digital Mercenaries Inc.
#2558 - 2013-11-06 17:48:00 UTC
Thaddeus Eggeras wrote:
Question, how much ISK and LP will the BPCs and and ships them selfs cost? Thanks.


LP cost for bpc should roughly be: Frigate: 30k lp, cruiser 120k lp. I would figure the straight up buy costs but I'm at work and can't get in game atm. Those are for high sec though if you do sanctuary it should have lp costs that mirror current pirate ships.

Also a friend of mine can't seem to find the bpc on the test server anyone know if they weren't implemented there yet?

http://www.sortius-is-a-geek.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/history-channel-hd-aliens-thumb.jpg

Thaddeus Eggeras
Urkrathos Corp
#2559 - 2013-11-06 18:32:30 UTC
Thanks for the info. So pretty much I should be able to get the ships and/or BPCs in Osmon I'm guessing.

I do think they just seeded the SoE ships on the test server as of now, no BPCs yet, but I have been known to be wrong,rarely haha,
Imiarr Timshae
Funny Men In Funny Hats
#2560 - 2013-11-06 18:38:08 UTC