These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Somer Blink - Asked to stop but have got worse!

First post
Author
Josef Djugashvilis
#341 - 2013-11-02 23:13:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Josef Djugashvilis
I would suggest that at long last Somer are acting in accordance with the true spirit of Eve Online and taking CCP for a ride.

I wonder if CCP still think Somer are nice trustworthy folk with whom they can do 'honest' business?

This is not a signature.

Diomedes Calypso
Aetolian Armada
#342 - 2013-11-02 23:30:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Diomedes Calypso
Baali Tekitsu wrote:


I thought that SOMER just buys the ships they raffle off the market as everybody else does. At the first view the volume of ships blinked seems ridiculous but the actual number of ships payed out is much less as many chose to get the ISK value or blink credit as reward, not the ship/item itself. Means the number of ships in game doesnt actually increase.


My thought is that people are flying Machariels that they never would have "maybe I'll go spend $15 to get a Machariel" wasn't something really on their mind.

If they decide "This blink is really fun.. look a Macheirel is up ! damn .. no credits !.. better buy a GTC"
they've essentially spent $15 to buy the Macherial (or however you spell that ) Actually, given rules of probablity.. the price would be more than the $15 because the house takes a cut.

I could afford a dozen machs no sweat. But .. well, it changes the game and the game goals in a few ways. The other post touched on it...

I really don't think there is a solution to harvest the extra gambling motivated gtc purchases that is good for the game as a whole

Absolutely, there can be no compromise on the direct ISK bonus to outside action.

.. I can think of some that are less bad though.
... I can think of some ways that could jam some pegs in the holes that weren't quite RMT . Things that made it take more clicks and navigation steps . Rules to only pay bonus's on in game assets with no bias from where they were purchased -- instead pay bonuses based on past play triggered with the surrender of any plex. The path of least resistance would still lead lots to buy through them.. due to marketing ... still somewhat gray...

but.


EDIT >
lol after enjoying thinking about it. and after finally figuring out what the nagging misgivings I've had my fun in looking at the puzzle

.. that fun behind, I don't have much interest in helping find a way for in-game gambling motivations to buy plex for $ sucede now that I see the fallout that really isn't based on the ills of RMT itself.. just the way -too much blink- changes the game.

.

Careby
#343 - 2013-11-03 00:07:27 UTC
Sturmwolke wrote:

Wrong attribution.

Somer doesn't sell 300K GTCs in a week ... the right term to use is captured. Put it this way, the demand for GTC is one whole pie ... they stole a significant portion of the pie.
If Somer didn't exist, that portion would have otherwise gone to other vendors/CCPdirectly.

Made wonder me if some fools at CCP thought the same way too, thinking Somer sold them a lot GTCs. Big smile

I understand what you are saying, and there is some truth to it but it doesn't tell the whole story.

First of all, GTC are directly convertible to Plex, and Plex can be "used up" (removed from the game) in ways other than paying for game time. So the demand for Plex is not really constant. Otherwise CCP would have little incentive to run Plex sales.

Additionally, the effective price of GTC affects the number of active accounts. A player wavering between allowing an account to expire may be swayed by the bonus deal, or an active player may decide to add an additional account.

But I do agree that the normal "market share" for GTC has been captured at the expense of other resellers and other community websites.

TigerXtrm
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#344 - 2013-11-03 00:48:16 UTC
Iudicium Vastus wrote:
Baali Tekitsu wrote:

Peopel will always buy GTCs, there is a certain total demand for GTC.
By giving people an incentive to buy through SOMER they take away from other sites like dotlan who have an affiliate link but no incentive.


I would say that for the cost of a 30day GTC vs paying sub as normal there should be something for that extra $5/mo.
Using GTCs for 3 months I could have paid sub for 4 months. So I may be part of a small group that blatantly express that for my extra $5/mo I expect some sort of bonus or incentive.

And even for those times I want to pay for longer periods of subs at once, paying it directly is still cheaper than any bulk pack of GTCs could offer.


For those of us forced to pay the direct game time in local currency (Euro or Pound), it's often cheaper to buy a GTC with dollars. Buying directly on the EVE website only becomes cheaper with 6 month plans or more and not everyone is willing to buy that much gametime in one go all the time.

If I buy on a month to month basis directly from CCP I pay €15,- ($20,-) for one month. If I buy a 60 day GTC I pay $35,- (€25,-). So that comes down to €12,50 a month instead of €15,-. Even CCP's 3 month plan is slightly more expensive than that at €12,95 a month.

My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!

My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums

Frying Doom
#345 - 2013-11-03 02:32:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Frying Doom
TigerXtrm wrote:
Iudicium Vastus wrote:
Baali Tekitsu wrote:

Peopel will always buy GTCs, there is a certain total demand for GTC.
By giving people an incentive to buy through SOMER they take away from other sites like dotlan who have an affiliate link but no incentive.


I would say that for the cost of a 30day GTC vs paying sub as normal there should be something for that extra $5/mo.
Using GTCs for 3 months I could have paid sub for 4 months. So I may be part of a small group that blatantly express that for my extra $5/mo I expect some sort of bonus or incentive.

And even for those times I want to pay for longer periods of subs at once, paying it directly is still cheaper than any bulk pack of GTCs could offer.


For those of us forced to pay the direct game time in local currency (Euro or Pound), it's often cheaper to buy a GTC with dollars. Buying directly on the EVE website only becomes cheaper with 6 month plans or more and not everyone is willing to buy that much gametime in one go all the time.

If I buy on a month to month basis directly from CCP I pay €15,- ($20,-) for one month. If I buy a 60 day GTC I pay $35,- (€25,-). So that comes down to €12,50 a month instead of €15,-. Even CCP's 3 month plan is slightly more expensive than that at €12,95 a month.

I can honestly say that is the first post of yours that has made sense.

Look on the bright side, with the 'bonus' removed yourself and people in the same boat as you are more likely to buy GTCs off actual community sites, allowing them to once more grow and become more numerous.

Somer and its 'redacted' have acted as a cancer on this games community, stripping the rightful support from those community sites and giving them to a business.

Yes people will choose to support Somer as well on a level playing field but at least people such as yourself are more likely to actually consider buying off other sites now.

Hell EvE radio needs help, but atm they have not even got a GTC link.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

YesYes NoNoNo
Karmic Rebalance
#346 - 2013-11-03 03:01:28 UTC
TigerXtrm wrote:
Sturmwolke wrote:
Careby wrote:

If Somer can actually sell 300,000 GTC's in a week (which they would have to do to make that estimated $800,000), just imagine the millions CCP will rake in.

Wrong attribution.

Somer doesn't sell 300K GTCs in a week ... the right term to use is captured. Put it this way, the demand for GTC is one whole pie ... they stole a significant portion of the pie.
If Somer didn't exists, that portion would otherwise gone to other vendors/CCPdirectly.

Made wonder me if some fools at CCP thought the same way too, thinking Somer sold them a lot GTCs. Big smile


That makes no sense... at all. Please elaborate on the point you're trying to make?


I think the point he's trying to make is that he was awake in highschool economics class.
AnUnskilled Pilot
Doomheim
#347 - 2013-11-03 07:30:48 UTC
It's assumed at this point that CCP or certain rogue CCP employees are behind this scandal to enrich themselves. CCP themselves profiting from Somerblink seems unlikely as they would get the money from the GTC itself. A group of rogue employees getting kickbacks on the other hand is likely given how carefully CCP is handling the situation and doing nothing just praying for it to be over.

Even if certain rogue employees were caught it would be in CCPs best interest to hide it as this would be an even bigger scandal and perhaps break laws and/or be the end of the company.
Dudley Schwartz
Magic Hamsters
Miners Inn University
#348 - 2013-11-03 12:14:22 UTC
Still waiting for a detailed response from CCP. I see BLINK is still cashing out in the meantime.

On a less serious note, that CCP/SOMER teamspeak leak spoof was hilarious, that was until ISD Fcktard locked it ;D




Yep still mad about this whole BLINK scandal, let's hope we receive some explanation very soon.

Jita 4/4, the heart and soul of New Eden.

Reiisha
#349 - 2013-11-03 12:32:59 UTC
So no one has thought of the fact that PLEX are soaring up in price right now, maybe CCP and Blink are working together to introduce more PLEX into the economy to get the price down? Maybe Blink isn't actually getting the cut on sales and everything goes straight to CCP?

Of course, such a logical explanation must be heresy and the conspiracy theorists are obviously right.

If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all...

Baali Tekitsu
AQUILA INC
Verge of Collapse
#350 - 2013-11-03 12:35:01 UTC
Reiisha wrote:
So no one has thought of the fact that PLEX are soaring up in price right now, maybe CCP and Blink are working together to introduce more PLEX into the economy to get the price down? Maybe Blink isn't actually getting the cut on sales and everything goes straight to CCP?

Of course, such a logical explanation must be heresy and the conspiracy theorists are obviously right.

And why would CCP tell them to stop it then?
Why would CCP stay silent about the matter for a whole week then?
Questions questions...

RATE LIKE SUBSCRIBE

IDGAD
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#351 - 2013-11-03 12:41:57 UTC
Baali Tekitsu wrote:
Reiisha wrote:
So no one has thought of the fact that PLEX are soaring up in price right now, maybe CCP and Blink are working together to introduce more PLEX into the economy to get the price down? Maybe Blink isn't actually getting the cut on sales and everything goes straight to CCP?

Of course, such a logical explanation must be heresy and the conspiracy theorists are obviously right.

And why would CCP tell them to stop it then?
Why would CCP stay silent about the matter for a whole week then?
Questions questions...


They will never be honest with the community. It's pretty obvious CCP has some sort of investment in Blink, and we will instead get some diversion from the truth. No one will ever know the truth, and CCP will continue to slowly degrade from within. But why don't we all enjoy EVE while we still can? It's still fun for now.
Abulurd Boniface
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#352 - 2013-11-03 12:58:16 UTC
I'm frankly amazed at the rather sparse amount of sophisticated thinking surrounding the Blink phenomenon. I didn't think about that myself until recently I wondered what they'd be doing it for.

Ask yourself: if Blink is getting 20% out of every auction [not the very small ones, but most every other one], and they admit to 1.25 trillion payout so far, say roughly 250 Trillion ISK for the house, what is it that they want the money for?

What would they be doing with that much ISK? Money at that level, of and by itself, becomes a geo-political entity. They could finance wars lasting indefinitely. Assuming they would be interested in EVE on that level. Which we may readily assume they are not.

But then we see that through the great idea of PLEX, CCP have devised a way out for all that glorious ISK, into the real world where it can be converted into cold, hard cash.

The only thing you need then is to find a way to position oneself at the far end of the equation, where real money exchanges hands for the virtual goods. Your actual money in the bank.

If EVE teaches us one lesson it is that greed trumps our better nature. Once people have the kind of money that makes them a player, they will start to play.

Because you're only scarcely able to glance over the wall, and you're not playing yourself, you never quite get what the game is they are playing.
Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers
Brotherhood of Spacers
#353 - 2013-11-03 12:59:59 UTC
Aivo Dresden wrote:

Argus Sorn wrote:
In fact, if you turned down SOMER prizes you might have more folks like myself included interested in donating.
Empty words, why should your contribution depend on who else is contributing? That makes no sense.


It makes complete sense. First, why would I give to your event when you are more than adequately supported by SOMER. I'd much rather give to someone who needs my contribution. But more importantly - in real life and in EVE, what charities and organizations I give to depends greatly on who they choose to associate with, endorse, accept money from, etc.. A donation is business, and it is more than reasonable for me to choose to not do business with people who do business with SOMER.

SOMER has bought your support, by supporting your charity - and that is fine. But it does not make it okay for them to violate the EULA and it also means you need to own that support - and the good and bad that comes with it.


RAW23
#354 - 2013-11-03 13:00:48 UTC
Reiisha wrote:
So no one has thought of the fact that PLEX are soaring up in price right now, maybe CCP and Blink are working together to introduce more PLEX into the economy to get the price down? Maybe Blink isn't actually getting the cut on sales and everything goes straight to CCP?

Of course, such a logical explanation must be heresy and the conspiracy theorists are obviously right.


Since this is an explanation without any supporting evidence your analysis falls far better under the heading of a 'conspiracy theory' than the reality-based analyses that you attack. Hundreds of groundless 'logical explanations' can be run up but they are meaningless without evidence. This is the very essence of a 'conspiracy theory', which tends to be an explanatory narrative used to connect data that otherwise seems difficult to account for.

There are two types of EVE player:

those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not.

KAKgaanspat
Battle Toad Brigade
Ribbit.
#355 - 2013-11-03 13:03:47 UTC
So seeing as Somer have a nice way of converting ISK to RMT throught GTC what precludes them to sell Assets for RMT, and just using Somer to distribute said assets.

Baali Tekitsu
AQUILA INC
Verge of Collapse
#356 - 2013-11-03 13:06:01 UTC
KAKgaanspat wrote:
So seeing as Somer have a nice way of converting ISK to RMT throught GTC what precludes them to sell Assets for RMT, and just using Somer to distribute said assets.


Who is "them"?

RATE LIKE SUBSCRIBE

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers
Brotherhood of Spacers
#357 - 2013-11-03 13:11:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Argus Sorn
Reiisha wrote:
So no one has thought of the fact that PLEX are soaring up in price right now, maybe CCP and Blink are working together to introduce more PLEX into the economy to get the price down? Maybe Blink isn't actually getting the cut on sales and everything goes straight to CCP?

Of course, such a logical explanation must be heresy and the conspiracy theorists are obviously right.


I don't tend to buy into the conspiracy theories. I am not sure if it is some sort of "icelandic" thing, but this is par for the course in how CCP tends to deal with these things. We've all seen it before. It doesn't mean it is right mind you, or the smartest course of action, but it is pretty typical and so I am not overly tinfoiled over it.

Additionally, it is pretty clear that some 'real world' contracts and legal obligations come into play, with resellers, etc.., and so they are probably being cautious for that reason. They've given people a "cease and desist" order, and I don't expect them to take any action against SOMER (if they do at all) until that grace period elapses.

SOMER is well within their rights to milk this for all its worth, but their abuse of the grace period sends a message to CCP and the community how they think. It is easy to let them off the hook with "they are just doing what they are allowed to do". Is that really how most people think? That we should always run out and do whatever the rules or law "allow" us to do - I doubt that. There is right and wrong beyond the letter of the rules. You all know that.

Once again - I am not saying SOMER should be punished purely for abusing the grace period, but their actions speak a great deal about who they are - about their ethics and business practices. They've basically thrown pie in CCP's face, and the only saving grace is that it is so obvious that I am sure CCP sees it. The only thing that comes next is them having the courage to shut the whole thing down, which they can do, based on multiple EULA violations.

As for PLEX, CCP has more than enough PLEX at their disposal to keep the price down, and they often inject PLEX to do so. They stated at fanfest that they put PLEX that have been confiscated from RMT'ers on the market at times (sort of acting as a "federal reserve bank") and they also tend to put plex on sale when the price increases. In fact, SOMER represents a potential threat to the economy when they sell an extra billion isk with every GTC sale, as this can result in a huge flood of isk into the economy and thus increase the price of PLEX.
Rroff
Antagonistic Tendencies
#358 - 2013-11-03 14:26:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Rroff
Argus Sorn wrote:

Once again - I am not saying SOMER should be punished purely for abusing the grace period, but their actions speak a great deal about who they are - about their ethics and business practices. They've basically thrown pie in CCP's face, and the only saving grace is that it is so obvious that I am sure CCP sees it. The only thing that comes next is them having the courage to shut the whole thing down, which they can do, based on multiple EULA violations.


I think theres a bit more to it than that - theres atleast as many (and probably a lot more) players that are complicit with the last minute firesale as there are condemning it - I'd go as far as to say its not purely a Somer motivated move though I'm not discounting that aspect of it (and I'd be just as cynical of their own motivations) - regular blink players are probably as much up for and encouraging a bit of a last hurrah as Somer.

If the community was more universal in their condemnation of what Somer is doing I suspect they'd be more contrite whether genuine or not - the truth is the vast majority don't care one way or another and the factions that support or comden Somer are relative minorities.

Bare in mind also that from the way CCP has handled it they have approached these 3rd parties from the perspective of a "policy change" rather than "you've been bad and wrong" and slapping them on the wrist.
Sal Landry
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#359 - 2013-11-03 14:57:38 UTC
Argus Sorn wrote:
As for PLEX, CCP has more than enough PLEX at their disposal to keep the price down, and they often inject PLEX to do so. They stated at fanfest that they put PLEX that have been confiscated from RMT'ers on the market at times (sort of acting as a "federal reserve bank") and they also tend to put plex on sale when the price increases. In fact, SOMER represents a potential threat to the economy when they sell an extra billion isk with every GTC sale, as this can result in a huge flood of isk into the economy and thus increase the price of PLEX.

If anything, Somer has increased the price of plex. How many plex did Somer employees give away at Vegas? The 100 plex for the fiction contest came through Somer. Who knows how many more plex Somer has bought (increasing demand and the price for everyone else) only to shove them into the Blink corporate vault for later use.
Silvetica Dian
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#360 - 2013-11-03 15:36:38 UTC
Altrue wrote:
Every player or entity is equal when facing the EULA. But some entities are more equal than others.

You will see, CCP will let blink continue, otherwise they wouldn't have waited for all this noise from their playerbase to "act".


The dramatic drop in PLEX prices tells me that the yelling on the forums is not a majority view. Looks like the very opposite of a somer boycott is underway.

Money at its root is a form of rationing. When the richest 85 people have as much wealth as the poorest 3.5 billion (50% of humanity) it is clear where the source of poverty is. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/20/trickle-down-economics-broken-promise-richest-85