These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Missions & Complexes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Materials for War Pre—

First post First post
Author
stoicfaux
#21 - 2013-10-29 22:05:42 UTC
"Materials for War Preparation"

So... when's the freaking war?

Pon Farr Memorial: once every 7 years, all the carebears in high-sec must PvP or they will be temp-banned.

Lors Dornick
Kallisti Industries
#22 - 2013-10-29 22:12:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Lors Dornick
Mara Rinn wrote:
[the agent falls silent, his throat being crushed by the garrotte]

So Uh … who else wishes this mission would either go away or be converted to a mining mission?

So you've been living under a rock for several years and didn't buy the minerals before the mission?

Can we sort this under "Please CCP Help me, I'm to stupid to play this game"?
edit:
And didn't even look at the offered mission in the journal?

CCP Greyscale: As to starbases, we agree it's pretty terrible, but we don't want to delay the entire release just for this one factor.

Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#23 - 2013-10-29 22:18:36 UTC
This is a ridiculous mission. You'd hope storyline missions would be more difficult or entertaining, but this one? Too simple, too boring, too easy. Of course I like getting it, because it's so easy. But it's not right.

Missions need an overhaul. All of them. This is only one of many problems.
Carmen Electra
AlcoDOTTE
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#24 - 2013-10-29 22:48:47 UTC
I kind of like this mission. There's always enough of the ore for sale at the stations. IIRC, you plop down 2m and get a free implant + faction stadings. What's not to like?
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#25 - 2013-10-29 23:21:24 UTC
Why not just decouple missions from the standings grind?
Lors Dornick
Kallisti Industries
#26 - 2013-10-29 23:24:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Lors Dornick
Tippia wrote:
Why not just decouple missions from the standings grind?

Pointing out a problem is so much easier than pointing out a solution.

I don't have one, do you?

CCP Greyscale: As to starbases, we agree it's pretty terrible, but we don't want to delay the entire release just for this one factor.

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#27 - 2013-10-29 23:36:18 UTC
Lors Dornick wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Why not just decouple missions from the standings grind?

Pointing out a problem is so much easier than pointing out a solution.

I don't have one, do you?

Yes: decouple the standings grind from missions.

To get the standings for zero waste/clones/taxbreaks/L4 missions, you do some other unrelated service for the NPC entity in question. The actual mechanism is less important — bribery, tags, mandatory FW service, R&D-like flat timesink… the options are endless.
Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#28 - 2013-10-30 00:26:14 UTC
I have bad standings with Min and Gal because as a newbie, I didn't know how missions were affecting my standings with empire factions. They never tell you about the standings losses nor the consequences.

So I guess I can do level one missions for a few weeks to repair them. If I can ever be bothered.

Newbies are directed right into missions by the tutorial structure and then the SoE arc. But level one/two/three (four) missions are soooo boring for a newbie. Have you read comments about EVE on gamers' forums and all that? A ton of them are a variant of 'EVE is so boring, you do a mission and then do another one, you never see anyone. Solo MMO lol'. I wonder how many subs EVE has thrown away by pushing newbies into the terrible PVE?
Freakdevil
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#29 - 2013-10-30 00:32:06 UTC
The other day I went to the doctor. I said doctor this mission is giving me a headache, what do I do?

Doctor looked at me with a serious face and said, don't mission noob.

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#30 - 2013-10-30 01:24:06 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Why not just decouple missions from the standings grind?


Having a certain amount of "make work" to do means fewer people will have the standings, which means having the standings becomes a valuable trade advantage. Always assume players have far more money than you can imagine: any attempt to restrict entry into some venue (in this case, high standings) through resource consumption will just lead players to discover ways to multiply the resources they have. If it can be bought with ISK, assume an infinite supply of ISK.

Standings for tags could work since the tags are a first-order proxy for hours of NPC grinding.

At some point, making it easier to get standings reduces the value of those standings. I guess the L4 MfWP is a way for CCP to tell players, "no, you can't have your extremely profitable L4 missions and have your standings gains too!" Standings for tags would bypass this regulator function of the mission reward scaling system.

So for standings, go back to L3 courier missions in blockade runners :)

See, solved my own problem by sleeping on it for a day.
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
#31 - 2013-10-30 01:32:16 UTC
Mara Rinn wrote:


So for standings, go back to L3 courier missions in blockade runners :)



Couple that with COSMOS and tags and you are golden.

I have yet to have a new character trained to put up a high sec POS any where near as fast as I can build their standings to put one in a 0.7 system. If you have a combat character you can fleet with you can do it in a day or two.

Mr Epeen Cool
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#32 - 2013-10-30 01:38:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Mara Rinn wrote:
Having a certain amount of "make work" to do means fewer people will have the standings, which means having the standings becomes a valuable trade advantage. Always assume players have far more money than you can imagine: any attempt to restrict entry into some venue (in this case, high standings) through resource consumption will just lead players to discover ways to multiply the resources they have. If it can be bought with ISK, assume an infinite supply of ISK.

Standings for tags could work since the tags are a first-order proxy for hours of NPC grinding.

At some point, making it easier to get standings reduces the value of those standings. I guess the L4 MfWP is a way for CCP to tell players, "no, you can't have your extremely profitable L4 missions and have your standings gains too!" Standings for tags would bypass this regulator function of the mission reward scaling system.
Oh sure. I'm not necessarily saying that the effort should be cut down, but rather that it should be moved away from this one narrow (and horribly poorly designed) mechanism. As it is, it is entangled in one of the rewards for having high standings already, and that reward is itself already self-rewarding so this additional bonus makes little sense to begin with.

If the standings grind was its own module, that tiny part could be modified, nerfed, buffed, tweaked, twisted and in any number of ways adjusted to serve the goal of providing the right level and rate of progression. It would be possible to offer alternate routes depending on exactly how you want to pay: grind time, skill time, daily increments, whathaveyou—each with its own benefits and penalties. Make it universal rather than force people down the same tedious activity and skill path. It's just a much more elegant way than forcing people to shoot red pluses or cart around dummy materials, possibly training otherwise pointless skills for that purpose alone.

Hell, with the right design, it could be turned into a proper business: yes, we have standings sharing right now, but its inelegant and severely limited. Just industrialise that sucker instead! Twisted
CCP Eterne
C C P
C C P Alliance
#33 - 2013-10-30 12:43:07 UTC
Moving this to Missions & Complexes.

EVE Online/DUST 514 Community Representative ※ EVE Illuminati ※ Fiction Adept

@CCP_Eterne ※ @EVE_LiveEvents

Sergei Turov
Coreli Corporation
Pandemic Legion
#34 - 2013-10-31 00:22:12 UTC
This mission is terrible because of the ****** standing increase. Such a waste of a storyline opportunity.
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#35 - 2013-10-31 00:26:08 UTC
Sergei Turov wrote:
This mission is terrible because of the ****** standing increase. Such a waste of a storyline opportunity.


Not only that, but why would the agent not simply buy the ore from the sell orders in station? At the very least the reward is high enough that the agent could have sold the implant and bought a dozen loads of Kernite.
Tauranon
Weeesearch
CAStabouts
#36 - 2013-10-31 00:32:16 UTC
Sergei Turov wrote:
This mission is terrible because of the ****** standing increase. Such a waste of a storyline opportunity.


The mission pays 20mil for 2 minutes work, and doesn't blow out your standings, so doesn't force you to move to fix them. ie its exactly what I wanted once my standings were above 5 for the faction concerned.

Ginger Barbarella
#37 - 2013-11-01 17:51:05 UTC
Domanique Altares wrote:
Jacob Holland wrote:
Why?


Likely because it's ridiculous to have to swap out of a combat ship or buy minerals just to satisfy some non-sequitur mission.


Pay for standings bump. How is that any different from any other "pay for [fill in the blank here]" activity in Eve? I stopped mining just to fulfill this mission req like 5 years ago; buy on market (typically at same station), be done with it.

"Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#38 - 2013-11-02 22:11:50 UTC  |  Edited by: DeMichael Crimson
Benny Ohu wrote:
I have bad standings with Min and Gal because as a newbie, I didn't know how missions were affecting my standings with empire factions. They never tell you about the standings losses nor the consequences.

So I guess I can do level one missions for a few weeks to repair them. If I can ever be bothered.

Newbies are directed right into missions by the tutorial structure and then the SoE arc. But level one/two/three (four) missions are soooo boring for a newbie. Have you read comments about EVE on gamers' forums and all that? A ton of them are a variant of 'EVE is so boring, you do a mission and then do another one, you never see anyone. Solo MMO lol'. I wonder how many subs EVE has thrown away by pushing newbies into the terrible PVE?

Well, you can grind level 1 missions if you want.

I could have sworn I posted 'The Plan' in a reply to a thread of yours about fixing negative Faction standings. Maybe not, when a person get's older it's easy to forget the 5 W's (Who, What, When, Where and Why).

Straight



DMC

Edit :

Oh yeah, I like the "Materials For War Preparation" missions. Also see what I mean about forgetting the 5 W's.

Blink
Previous page12