These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Why do so many see EvE as "shoot at other people PvP" game?

First post
Author
Inxentas Ultramar
Ultramar Independent Contracting
#101 - 2013-10-21 08:12:13 UTC
In direct response to the OP, take a look at the stuff you can do outside of highsec. Claim SOV, claim POCO's, claim moons... many game mechanics revolve around ownership of things-that-are-not-spaceships, but require spaceships to conquer. The motivation to conquer these is twofold: some will mainly enjoy the additional income sources, and others are mainly happy with ownership itself and having their name plastered over space assets or the SOV map. In order to build for my group I have to make some room destroying things from your group. It makes an odd kind of sense to state whatever hurts my enemy, helps my friends.

"I figure, everytime someone dies and it's not me, my chances of survival go up."
Tron 3K
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#102 - 2013-10-21 11:21:14 UTC
Solstice Project's Alt wrote:
Probably.


Edit: TRON, DAMMIT !! -.-

Editedit:
What's the ******* point of quoting that huge OP,
when you have the first post following ?

Use your brain ! -.-

I do it just to **** you off ;)
Enduros
UK Corp
Goonswarm Federation
#103 - 2013-10-21 12:13:29 UTC
Tron 3K wrote:
Solstice Project's Alt wrote:
Probably.


Edit: TRON, DAMMIT !! -.-

Editedit:
What's the ******* point of quoting that huge OP,
when you have the first post following ?

Use your brain ! -.-

I do it just to **** you off ;)

And it's working too
Yummy Chocolate
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#104 - 2013-10-21 12:42:51 UTC
after reading the title: because that's what it is.

Frostys Virpio > CCP: Continously Crying Playerbase

Felicity Love >... was thinking "moar popcorn"... but now, seeing the truly awesome contribution this thread is going to make to the Greater Glory Of EVE.... imagonnamakkadapizza....

Silvetica Dian
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#105 - 2013-10-21 13:02:25 UTC
Enduros wrote:
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:
Possibly one of the best, well thought out, and reasonable requests for a button in the esc menu that allows you to go back to WoW.


Why do you bring up wow when we are talking about PvP. I've never played wow, mostly because it doesn't have any spaceships in it.


This post confirms the excellent link to the Dunning-Kruger effect earlier and the quote he is failing to understand should inform OP that not only is he too stupid to fly an internet spaceship but he is also too stupid to post on these forums.
Please don't do either again.

Money at its root is a form of rationing. When the richest 85 people have as much wealth as the poorest 3.5 billion (50% of humanity) it is clear where the source of poverty is. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/20/trickle-down-economics-broken-promise-richest-85

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#106 - 2013-10-21 13:23:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenn aSide
Enduros wrote:
Just looked at the topics on the forums and many threads have something in the lines of "eve is a pvp game, remove hi-sec, all miners must die, all carebears must be ganked, need force-undock module, etc" Basically if you aren't flying around trying to shoot at other people you are playing the game wrong and should just biomass yourself. I'm interested in where this is coming from. Obviously it mostly comes up for trolling purposes, but a great deal of people do subscribe to this notion and are unwilling to see past it and I would like to know why that is.


I haven't read the entire thread because we've been over this over and over again.

But what you say here OP is a gross over-simplification of what people say here. I PVP occassionally, but i'm mostly a PVE player.

EVE is a pvp sandbox game. Most everything you can do in EVE is some form of PVP. The guy mining in high sec is PVPing other miners (by making their mins less valuable). So pvp isn't just shooting stuff.

HOWEVER, lots of people like to shoot things in this pvp sandbox game. The game features non-consesnual pvp across the entire universe (notice you guns don't magically turn off in high sec). By undocking, you consent to be shot, and you best bet is to fly something in high sec to survice all but the most serious gank attempts for as long as it takes CONCORD to kill your aggressors. Of course, this is "flying with training wheels" compared to the rest of EVE space where your only defense against aggression is you and your friends.

When I tell people they are "doing it wrong" I mean from the start. If they don't like the features of EVE online (universe wide non-consensual pvp, one of the harshest death penalties in the MMO universe, etc) then they are playing the wrong game.
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#107 - 2013-10-21 15:18:04 UTC
Enduros wrote:
Just looked at the topics on the forums and many threads have something in the lines of "eve is a pvp game, remove hi-sec, all miners must die, all carebears must be ganked, need force-undock module, etc" Basically if you aren't flying around trying to shoot at other people you are playing the game wrong and should just biomass yourself. I'm interested in where this is coming from. Obviously it mostly comes up for trolling purposes, but a great deal of people do subscribe to this notion and are unwilling to see past it and I would like to know why that is.

I play EvE because I like flying spaceships. I like how you can fit ships in EvE. I like the huge amount of ships and modules available and that there is actually a balance and everything is useful depending on the situation. I like that there is no end-game and no "best ship". I like the lack of safety, "no respawn" and that you can kill anyone and everything (supercap proliferation aside ofc). I like the way the economy works and that there is a history behind every piece of equipment. I like how EvE works, for the most part anyway.

Someone found a DED site and sold me the bookmark. I ran the site and got a mach bpc. I took all my bpcs to empire and paid a guy to move them to a factory station. I had to avoid many people that were out to get me soon as they saw me. Someone had to mine the ice to fuel my carrier. I then got on my alt and bought some minerals in Jita. Someone had to make the ships to mine the rocks to get those minerals and move them to jita and then list them where they eventually end up in my hands. I then paid another guy to move the minerals to my factory station because there were 7 wardecs on me. After my ships were ready they were sold. Perhaps one of them is in low-sec hunting other people, one might be in an incursion fleet as this post is written and I'm sure that at least 2 are busy shooting red crosses in lvl 4s. Eventually they will die, but hopefully not before bringing either wealth or glory to their owners, reduced to a wreck which might live on as a piece of a rig that I myself might buy one day. I think this is beautiful. Why people see this game as only the assisting in the destruction of things is beyond me.

And this PvP that many hold in such high regard isn't even that good. I like reading about all those 2k man blob fests, but I still know that it's a bunch of F1 monkeys with only a few people doing anything skillful. So small-gank... erm gang warfare. Well most of those fights are ganks. Most fights have the outcome decided before the fight begins and if it's not favorable all effort is made to avoid the fight. Most of the time PvP in EvE boils down to a bunch of running around and then a little bit of shooting. It's fun to do sometimes, but it doesn't exactly stand out as something great. The closest thing to a fair fight in eve are the alliance tournaments, but such an arranged arena style combat has no place in the sandbox and thus can be ingored.

PvP can ofcourse be fun. Dropping a bunch of bombers on someone is funny. Being on the receiving end however is not and I can totally relate to the unfortunate victim. For me blowing stuff up just for killmail's sake falls short of having a good time especially if you factor all the time and effort it takes to get it done. The pace and balance of it all is not enough for my liking to elevate it above the other things you can do in this game.

If you compare EvE to something like quake, dota or starcraft you will need to admit that an encounter in those other games will require way more skill then your average skirmish in EvE. And incidentally the more people you have the less skill you need. For pvp I like those games way more. I love getting the perfect rocket-plasma-rail combo in quake, I love a perfectly timed combo in a dota teamfight and I like they way I placed my units in starcraft as they destroyed the other guy's army without me having to worry about someone not aligning or flying out of rep range. With all these and more options why would I waste my time on EvE pvp when in the same time I could get way more good fights from any of those other options that I enjoy more?

I like spaceships and spreadsheets. I would like for someone to explain why I'm playing the game wrong. Oh and there isn't any butthurt in this post. Many will try to prove otherwise, but most of the losses on this toon are from flying drunk or bad cynos so nothing to complain about.

I'm really interested why one activity (pew pew) is so overwhelmingly favored that anyone not of the same mind set and favoring something different deserves ridicule. Anyone got an answer?


Who said you're doing anything wrong. It seems like you're the one saying that the "F1 Monkeys" are doing it wrong.

As far as I'm concerned, you're "doing it" just fine. So long as you recognise that your right to PvP my wallet is no greater than my right to PvP your ship, then we're all good. Carry on doing what suits you.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Enduros
UK Corp
Goonswarm Federation
#108 - 2013-10-21 16:16:26 UTC
Silvetica Dian wrote:
Enduros wrote:
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:
Possibly one of the best, well thought out, and reasonable requests for a button in the esc menu that allows you to go back to WoW.


Why do you bring up wow when we are talking about PvP. I've never played wow, mostly because it doesn't have any spaceships in it.


This post confirms the excellent link to the Dunning-Kruger effect earlier and the quote he is failing to understand should inform OP that not only is he too stupid to fly an internet spaceship but he is also too stupid to post on these forums.
Please don't do either again.

If you are gonna spew some kind of pseudo-intellectual drivel at least put in the effort and make a case, this is sub-standard.

Malcanis wrote:
[quote=Enduros]
As far as I'm concerned, you're "doing it" just fine. So long as you recognise that your right to PvP my wallet is no greater than my right to PvP your ship, then we're all good. Carry on doing what suits you.


See you in the contract pages.
Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#109 - 2013-10-21 16:27:45 UTC
Enduros wrote:

I was referring to how combat is in eve and how it compares to other games.



No you weren't.

You were saying a) How you feel that players consider PvP superior to Industry and b) PvP is too easy


But its ok, I forgive your constant moving of the goal posts due to not being big enough to admit when you are wrong

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Radelix Cisko
JUMP DRIVE ACTIVE
#110 - 2013-10-21 16:39:05 UTC
without reading your post OP cause I don't want to., show me on this badger model where the bad people violenced your ship.

Despite my posting prowess I really am terrible at this game

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#111 - 2013-10-21 17:14:35 UTC
One of the most subtle troll threads I've read in a long time. Well done sir.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Jamwara DelCalicoe Ashley
New Eden Tech Support
#112 - 2013-10-21 17:16:44 UTC
Enduros wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Iudicium Vastus wrote:
The pvp is pretty cool and all, but it isn't what EVE, or any sandbox ever, are supposed to be all about. These folk who treat the sandbox no differently than some online FPS remind me so much of some self-righteous vegans and their dogmatic hold that even though our species [human] are omnivore, everyone touching meat is just DOING IT WRONG!


Actually, they recently came out with some research that shows that soybeans when used as a primary source of protein, may be a significant carcinogen.

Not to mention the plants you need for your vegan diet don't even grow in most climates. The resource drain to even enable you to survive a vegan diet with all the supplements you need I imagine are far more taxing on the environment then raising livestock. As for the ethical part... well nature is neither good nor evil, it's neutral.


It requires more energy to produce a cow than it does grass.

While the OP is clearly a sodheaded ninny muggins ... you are wrong.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#113 - 2013-10-21 17:31:57 UTC
Jamwara DelCalicoe Ashley wrote:
Enduros wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Iudicium Vastus wrote:
The pvp is pretty cool and all, but it isn't what EVE, or any sandbox ever, are supposed to be all about. These folk who treat the sandbox no differently than some online FPS remind me so much of some self-righteous vegans and their dogmatic hold that even though our species [human] are omnivore, everyone touching meat is just DOING IT WRONG!


Actually, they recently came out with some research that shows that soybeans when used as a primary source of protein, may be a significant carcinogen.

Not to mention the plants you need for your vegan diet don't even grow in most climates. The resource drain to even enable you to survive a vegan diet with all the supplements you need I imagine are far more taxing on the environment then raising livestock. As for the ethical part... well nature is neither good nor evil, it's neutral.


It requires more energy to produce a cow than it does grass.

While the OP is clearly a sodheaded ninny muggins ... you are wrong.


Plain old grass? Yes.

The stringent regulatory requirements for all this "organic whole grain no hormones blessed by a hippy pagan princess vegan-acceptable" foods? Ludicrously more than cattle. Why else do you think I can buy 3 pounds of beef for the same price as I can put together one of those vegan meals?

Veganism is the pinnacle of American selfishness and narcissism.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

HollyShocker 2inthestink
HOW to PEG SAFETY
#114 - 2013-10-21 17:33:42 UTC
Tippia wrote:
I take it that the OP hasn't seen any trailers or PR material for this game?

This game has a high learning curve not a high skill requirement as related to twitch. There are some people that solo pvp that have exceptional knowledge and skill. The OP is correct that the vast majority of pvp are blops pvp and most of those cant spread points.
Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#115 - 2013-10-21 17:40:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Ramona McCandless
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
pagan princess.


Yes?


I prefer the term High Priestess Designate, Heir to The Vestibule of The Temple of the Holy Amarr Suicide Cult of Haimeh

But whatever ignorant title floats yer boat

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#116 - 2013-10-21 17:43:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:
This game has a high learning curve not a high skill requirement as related to twitch.
…but as luck would have it, twitch is just one of many skills. As the steep and high learning curve shows, EVE requires a huge variety and a large amount of skill in many of the other areas.

So the OP's claim that Quake requires higher skill because it has more buttons (a dozen compared to EVE's hundred or so) is pretty nonsensical.

And as to his main question, I still take it that the OP hasn't seen any trailers or PR material for this game.

Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Plain old grass? Yes.

The stringent regulatory requirements for all this "organic whole grain no hormones blessed by a hippy pagan princess vegan-acceptable" foods? Still Ludicrously more less than cattle. Why else do you think I can buy 3 pounds of beef for the same price as I can put together one of those vegan meals?

Because of subsidies, scale, and short-cuts in the handling process. Non-meats are still a lot less resource-intensive to produce and distribute.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#117 - 2013-10-21 17:54:32 UTC
Tippia wrote:
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:
This game has a high learning curve not a high skill requirement as related to twitch.
…but as luck would have it, twitch is just one of many skills. As the steep and high learning curve shows, EVE requires a huge variety and a large amount of skill in many of the other areas.

So the OP's claim that Quake requires higher skill because it has more buttons (a dozen compared to EVE's hundred or so) is pretty nonsensical.

And as to his main question, I still take it that the OP hasn't seen any trailers or PR material for this game.

Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Plain old grass? Yes.

The stringent regulatory requirements for all this "organic whole grain no hormones blessed by a hippy pagan princess vegan-acceptable" foods? Still Ludicrously more less than cattle. Why else do you think I can buy 3 pounds of beef for the same price as I can put together one of those vegan meals?

Because of subsidies, scale, and short-cuts in the handling process. Non-meats are still a lot less resource-intensive to produce and distribute.


Subsidies for whole foods exist too, are still paid for by somebody, though. Every time a vegan takes a bite of some soy-wackiness, that's your tax dollars he's biting into.

I have 2 farmers in the family. Farmers (the good ones anyway) mathhammer their business out to the kind of minutia that would make an EVE day trader nauseous. They've told me outright that if it weren't for the feds paying for it, organic whole foods crap would be impossible to make a profit from. Beef on the other hand is downright easy, and in Kansas, those guys don't get squat for subsidies.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Angeal MacNova
Holefood Inc.
Warriors of the Blood God
#118 - 2013-10-21 18:53:48 UTC
Very well thought out post OP.

Quote:
PvP can ofcourse be fun. Dropping a bunch of bombers on someone is funny. Being on the receiving end however is not and I can totally relate to the unfortunate victim. For me blowing stuff up just for killmail's sake falls short of having a good time especially if you factor all the time and effort it takes to get it done. The pace and balance of it all is not enough for my liking to elevate it above the other things you can do in this game


This is the most intelligent part of it all.

It's all isk PvP. PvP'ing someone's ship is still PvP'ing their wallet. They either have to buy a replacement or make one and if they make one, then that production could've went to something they could've sold.

I recently discussed comparing this game to WW2. Honestly the true pvp of this game compares better to a game of Risk or a sport like football.

What do I mean by 'True PvP'?

Cuttong off buy/sell orders on the market
Fighting over control of systems
Indies hiring mercs to drive away competing indies

Just to name three.

Hell, even 'ganking' a freighter because of the possibility of making more isk than what you would lose from being CONCORDed.

Or, destroying more isk than what you lose even if you know you won't make more back than what you lost. You set them back more than you set yourself back and that's all that matters.

Where this is completely lost, is when people go out of their way to do things simply to get the satisfaction out from upsetting the other player. Something that is rampant in EVE. Too many late teens/early twenties with the mindset/maturity of early teens paired with heavily over inflated egos that would make the prerecession economy envious, as evident with many of the unintelligent and sometimes unintelligible troll replies in this very thread.

There is the 'sport' of the game and then there is the 'sportsmanship' of the game. If you're not willing to have good sportsmanship, then the sport of the game is lost on you.

http://www.projectvaulderie.com/goodnight-sweet-prince/

http://www.projectvaulderie.com/the-untold-story/

CCP's true, butthurt, colors.

Because those who can't do themselves keep others from doing too.

Bagrat Skalski
Koinuun Kotei
#119 - 2013-10-21 18:59:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Bagrat Skalski
Answer to your question: because it is possible.
Enduros
UK Corp
Goonswarm Federation
#120 - 2013-10-21 20:17:28 UTC
Tippia wrote:

And as to his main question, I still take it that the OP hasn't seen any trailers or PR material for this game.


You mean like the one about the inty flying 200km though gunfire to get a warp-in or the one where russians put 2 avatars in the system with nobody noticing? Also I think you missed the one where some carebare alliance put a bounty on vic. Or the one about stealing alliance assets? The last one is about exploration only and the rest of them are pretty much beauty shots of ships with DnB type of stuff in the background. Which ones am I suppose to watch again?

Oh and Trinity trailer has the best music by far.