These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

SOLUTION FOR ANTI AFK CLOAK APOLOGISTS! - READ THIS CCP

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
No Means No
meh fackit
#1 - 2013-10-18 20:37:46 UTC
CCP READ THIS 1 TEXT LINE:





MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO NOT BLUES TO CLOAK IN SYSTEMS WITH A - CERTAIN - SOV LEVEL!







DONE, SOLVED, DO IT CCP, PEACE.
Jim Roebuck
State War Academy
Caldari State
#2 - 2013-10-18 20:38:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Jim Roebuck
0/10.

Hell, you don't even get a score actually.

When Bon Scott died and he appeared before St. Peter at the gates of Heaven, St. Peter looked at his record and told him he couldn't get in. Just then, God screams at Peter, "Let him in, Karen Carpenter is driving me nuts. I want to hear some music with balls. We'll haggle over the paperwork later." At least I hope that's what happened.
Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
#3 - 2013-10-18 20:39:09 UTC

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=216699

☼

There's a million angry citizens looking down their tubes..at me.
Lilliana Stelles
#4 - 2013-10-18 20:39:10 UTC
"impossible to not blues"

I am what.

Not a forum alt. 
bloodknight2
Revenu.Quebec
#5 - 2013-10-18 20:39:54 UTC
Simple solution to AFK cloaking : go back in empire and stop crying like a little girl.
Bernie Nator
Seal Club Six
Plug N Play
#6 - 2013-10-18 20:40:53 UTC
My only response to this idea is OP's name
No Means No
meh fackit
#7 - 2013-10-18 20:42:07 UTC
Lilliana Stelles wrote:
"impossible to not blues"

I am what.


You dont speak american??
Lilliana Stelles
#8 - 2013-10-18 20:43:43 UTC
Do you mean "impossible for non-blues to cloak"?

Because that's not what you said.

"impossible to not blues" makes it seem like "blues" is the verb. In which case, I assume you mean "to blue" or to make a player blue.

if it were impossible to not blue, it would mean that you'd have to blue everybody.
Impossible to not blues to cloak, I guess, would mean, impossible to not blue cloaked players.

So I guess OP loves AFK cloaks.

Not a forum alt. 
No Means No
meh fackit
#9 - 2013-10-18 20:49:00 UTC
Lilliana Stelles wrote:
Do you mean "impossible for non-blues to cloak"?

Because that's not what you said.

"impossible to not blues" makes it seem like "blues" is the verb. In which case, I assume you mean "to blue" or to make a player blue.

if it were impossible to not blue, it would mean that you'd have to blue everybody.
Impossible to not blues to cloak, I guess, would mean, impossible to not blue cloaked players.

So I guess OP loves AFK cloaks.


I dont care much of afk cloaks rather it is annoyinh to see them in local.

Buti think there should be some sort of control/limit over it.
Akrasjel Lanate
Immemorial Coalescence Administration
Immemorial Coalescence
#10 - 2013-10-18 21:38:10 UTC
Hahahaha... Lol

CEO of Lanate Industries

Citizen of Solitude
Jarod Garamonde
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#11 - 2013-10-18 21:38:34 UTC
AFK cloak all the things.

CCP, buff AFK cloaking, plox?

That moment when you realize the crazy lady with all the cats was right...

    [#savethelance]
Jarod Garamonde
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#12 - 2013-10-18 21:40:13 UTC
Solution:

Remove cloaker's name from local, in nullsec. No more nullbears QQ'ing about afk cloakers.
Problem solved. Problem staying solved.

That moment when you realize the crazy lady with all the cats was right...

    [#savethelance]
Alduin666 Shikkoken
Doomheim
#13 - 2013-10-18 21:41:07 UTC
No Means No wrote:
Lilliana Stelles wrote:
"impossible to not blues"

I am what.


You dont speak american??


You're a shining example of why the rest of the world hates us.

Honor is a fools prize. [I]Glory is of no use to the dead.[/I]

Be a man! Post with your main! ~Vas'Avi Community Manager
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
#14 - 2013-10-18 21:41:21 UTC
I would just like to share a true story.

Tired of all the AFK cloaking threads, I decided to test whether or not the crybabies who post ANTI AFK CLOAKING POSTS really do attempt to find their campers. I took 4 of the most vocal ANTI AFK thread makers, ran locator agents on them, and took 4 different alts in noobships to their systems. All 4 noobships had ONLY civilian blaster and civilian miners fitted. NO CLOAKS whatsoever. I placed all 4 alts in relatively easy to scan safes quickly made between planets. I then logged all 4 on UNCLOAKED (because they had no cloaks fitted) and safed them up in the target systems, and went to work.

The results: When I came home, all 4 toons were still in their safes, still in their undamaged noobships. All 4 had their local chats filled with posts calling them all sorts of evil names and some very private things about my mother's bedroom habits. Not 1 person had attempted to probe them down. Not 1 person attempted to do anything but stay docked / POS nested and yammer in local about me.

If people who make these threads cant even find a ******* non-cloaky AFK noobship next to a planet outside of d-scan range from a station, then absolutely none of them have any measure of reason to even consider posting anything about someone who is truly cloaked up and AFK in their precious system.

That's right people, you don't even have to be cloaked to AFK camp a system anymore! No more training for cloaks for your campers! The MOST that will happen is a new thread will be posted on the forums!

Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#15 - 2013-10-18 21:45:01 UTC
If you have a decent well worded proposal, I would suggest to post it in Features & Ideas Discussion. As this one is neither and posted in the wrong forum section, it gets a lock.

ISD Ezwal Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)