These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Dev Blog: No Honor Among Thieves - Siphon Units in Rubicon

First post First post First post
Author
mynnna
State War Academy
Caldari State
#481 - 2013-10-17 22:34:15 UTC  |  Edited by: mynnna
Shkiki wrote:
How exactly are you supposed to get near a pos at 50km? pos guns will instantly kill you... especially if you are in a hauler. No the siphons should jettison the cargo like PI does. Then leave it up to the player to either probe down the can or warp to bookmark.



As has been stated half a dozen times in the thread, POS guns have a randomized delay of several seconds before they even start to lock, and then a lock time low enough that it's a few more seconds before they lock you, and even once they do lock you, the warp disruption batteries take a couple minutes to lock anything small so you can just warp off anyway. So you warp in, bookmark the pos, warp out, come back at 30km or so, drop your siphon, and leave before it does anything to you at all.


e: Oh yeah and because POS gun damage is balanced for an era when Dreads had less EHP than some cruisers have now, they're not really a threat to like, anything.

Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal

Roime
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#482 - 2013-10-17 22:35:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Roime
Powers Sa wrote:
Roime wrote:
xttz wrote:

What do you think our small group of guys who suicide billions of isk a day ganking hi-sec freighters will do with this feature?


Go to forums and cry oceans before it's even released?


You should show some respect, that man knows more and has discovered more about eve mechanics than all of the posters combined in this thread.



That's awesome dude

.

Courthouse
Perkone
Caldari State
#483 - 2013-10-17 22:35:26 UTC
Powers Sa wrote:
Roime wrote:
xttz wrote:

What do you think our small group of guys who suicide billions of isk a day ganking hi-sec freighters will do with this feature?


Go to forums and cry oceans before it's even released?


You should show some respect, that man knows more and has discovered more about eve mechanics than all of the posters combined in this thread.


Nice "Leave Brittany Alone!" post there.
Deathwalley
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#484 - 2013-10-17 22:37:36 UTC
Krios Ahzek wrote:
gascanu wrote:
Vladimir Norkoff wrote:
gascanu wrote:
this is the first tool in a long time CCP give to small/medium alliances in npc 0.0 or low sec that will help them fight the large coalitions, and put a better defence of "their space";
.... It's like you've never played EvE before. Any tool that a small group can use a large group will be able to use more effectively. That being said, these siphons will far less effective than the panic-stricken Goons would like to make them out to be.


you faill to understand that atm the "small groups" have around 0(ZERO) R64 moons; given that, can you tell me how the "large groups" can use this tool to grief them?


We can double all the T2 ship prices.


Okay, go on. But a lot of goons in this topic, many populist phrases like "We can double all the T2 ship prices",
are telling that siphons can cause some problems for goons. Pirate
SMT008
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#485 - 2013-10-17 22:39:33 UTC
I guess I'll just spam the hell out of them and see what happens/how much money I'll get/how much tears I'll get.

Happy times for everyone but the one who gets his stuff stolen.
Powers Sa
#486 - 2013-10-17 22:42:43 UTC
Unforgiven Storm wrote:
Quote:
The name of the player that deployed the siphon unit is visible in Show Info.


Now this is something I don't like at all.

Lets pretend I need to buy a new leviathan and decide that Mynnna will pay for it, but Mynnna refuses!!!

but since I know where is 80 poses reaction farm is located I decided to go to his ATM machine and make a isk redraw from it, but my name is on the thing...

...

In a more serious note and realist use case, I'm a spy in enemy alliance and move with no problem in their systems, how can I steal my enemy if I leave a finger print everywhere?

Do it with your alt and scout with your spy.

Do you like winning t2 frigs and dictors for Dirt Cheap?https://eveninggames.net/register/ref/dQddmNgyLhFBqNJk

Remeber: Gambling addiction is no laughing matter unless you've lost a vast space fortune on the internet.

Aryth
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#487 - 2013-10-17 22:43:23 UTC
SMT008 wrote:
I guess I'll just spam the hell out of them and see what happens/how much money I'll get/how much tears I'll get.

Happy times for everyone but the one who gets his stuff stolen.


Unless those people stockpile!

Leader of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal.

Creator of Burn Jita

Vile Rat: You're the greatest sociopath that has ever played eve.

MeBiatch
GRR GOONS
#488 - 2013-10-17 22:44:00 UTC
Deathwalley wrote:

Okay, go on. But a lot of goons in this topic, many populist phrases like "We can double all the T2 ship prices",
are telling that siphons can cause some problems for goons. Pirate


yes in the very very very long run... perhaps after two years.

but remember goons had a monoploy on high end minerals for a long long time... and they knew that thier tech would be nerfed so they more then likely bought up huge stockpiles of r64 that i would guess can last just alone for 1-2 years.

so yes in the long run this is bad for goons... but from thier stated plans... they will make enough money from this now to cover themselves for perhaps 2 more years on top of that...

There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... CCP Goliath wrote:

Ugh ti-di pooping makes me sad.

Klyith
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#489 - 2013-10-17 22:45:26 UTC
Courthouse wrote:

Nice "Leave Brittany Alone!" post there.

If, in a game of three hundred thousand players, nobody else is doing what you're thinking of, that's probably because it is extremely dumb.
Exception: Rule does not apply if you are Xttz

mynnna wrote:

As has been stated half a dozen times in the thread, POS guns

But dey POS guns can shoot me! If dey shoot me I might die, good lord. I never been anywhere dat someone mi' shoot me before!

Save me, save me! Pray save me from dem POS guns Br'er Rabbit!
Laendra
Universalis Imperium
Goonswarm Federation
#490 - 2013-10-17 22:46:40 UTC
It gives me great pleasure to see how retardedly stupid that many of the posters on this topic are.

The big players in Goonswarm are pointing out obvious flaws in the design of this "feature". Everyone assumes that it will result in Goonswarm tears about lost income, boo hoo hoo.

What you retards fail to understand, is that if CCP continues to go down this path, with this terribly implemented feature, that we are going to use our vast infrastructure and playerbase to DECIMATE moon production everywhere in EVE....for everyone.

You all thought the Threadnaught was bad, lol, you have no ******* clue.

As for CCP. Really, the API is going to LIE now? What's the ******* point? Who the **** thought that was a good idea? Are you all ******* morons now? Is there anyone at CCP with a ******* brain anymore?
PotatoOverdose
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#491 - 2013-10-17 22:51:18 UTC  |  Edited by: PotatoOverdose
Laendra wrote:
that we are going to use our vast infrastructure and playerbase to DECIMATE moon production everywhere in EVE....for everyone.

Excellent, can't wait to see it happen..... and partake a bit myself. Twisted

Content for everyone!
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#492 - 2013-10-17 22:55:24 UTC
Roime wrote:
Tippia wrote:
CCP Tuxford wrote:
Not. The API will lie about the content. Sorry thought that was clear.
This is in every way a horrible idea. If you want there to be a window of non-detection, just delay the cache refresh, but to make the system designed to export data from in-game to out-of-game for the analysis through player tools not fulfil its purpose of providing in-game data, means you might as well not provide the data to begin with since you've just made it inherently useless.

This is a bad solution. Come up with a new one.

Only thing they need to change is the name of the data stream from "silo content" or whatever it currently is to "output". The siphon taps into the chain after the API data point.

This changes nothing but may help people with OCD issues

That just makes it even more meaningless. The API doesn't need to stream static data that is available in the database. If the (semi-live) data export system does not export (semi-live) data, it might as well be removed since it no longer serves any purpose.

Especially since I don't really see any adequately explained reason why the data should be incorrect to begin with. Ok, so they don't want players to be able to use the APi to detect siphoning. Why? What's the design goal here? What's the gameplay they want to create?

Is it to make people patrol their space? Then just remove the data stream entirely and make it mandatory.
Is it to provide a window of opportunity? Then just expand the pre-existing window.
Is it to alter the balance between entities? Then just remove the data stream entirely, since the same (not actual) rebalance will happen.

Either way, feeding the system bad data only makes the system pointless — it does absolutely nothing else, but does it more inefficiently and stupidly than any of the alternative solutions.
Deathwalley
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#493 - 2013-10-17 22:55:57 UTC
MeBiatch wrote:
Deathwalley wrote:

Okay, go on. But a lot of goons in this topic, many populist phrases like "We can double all the T2 ship prices",
are telling that siphons can cause some problems for goons. Pirate


yes in the very very very long run... perhaps after two years.

but remember goons had a monoploy on high end minerals for a long long time... and they knew that thier tech would be nerfed so they more then likely bought up huge stockpiles of r64 that i would guess can last just alone for 1-2 years.

so yes in the long run this is bad for goons... but from thier stated plans... they will make enough money from this now to cover themselves for perhaps 2 more years on top of that...


But why in this topic, over 70% of all comments are by goons? And all of them, is about how bad siphons are, and how they will crush all of us.
Courthouse
Perkone
Caldari State
#494 - 2013-10-17 22:57:13 UTC
PotatoOverdose wrote:
Laendra wrote:
that we are going to use our vast infrastructure and playerbase to DECIMATE moon production everywhere in EVE....for everyone.

Excellent, can't wait to see it happen..... and partake a bit myself. Twisted

Content for everyone!


If your idea of a good game is rampant price manipulation, barriers for entry for new pilots being much larger and the richest, most entrenched nullsec entities getting richer, then go hog wild.

Personally I'd rather see bad ideas fixed before release, lower barriers for entry and some sort of existential threat to ourselves and some of the other nullsec old bloods.

The sort of binary logic that anything someone in Goonswarm doesn't like must be good is problematic, not the least of reasons why being that we also pay subscriptions or PLEX for this game and it's in our vested interest that it not be overly boring or troublesome to play.
Courthouse
Perkone
Caldari State
#495 - 2013-10-17 22:58:51 UTC
Deathwalley wrote:

But why in this topic, over 70% of all comments are by goons? And all of them, is about how bad siphons are, and how they will crush all of us.


For the uninitiated, rule #1 is never stop posting.
GeeShizzle MacCloud
#496 - 2013-10-17 23:02:40 UTC  |  Edited by: GeeShizzle MacCloud
so what i see is a module that has been designed from the ground up by someone who wants to break the will of many people who has to deal with terrible game mechanics to deal with POS's, moon mining, reactions and t2 production.

i would suggest which ever CCP Dev that is, contact your resident Eve economist guru Dr. Eyjo Gudmundsson, and ask him how such a module will affect Eve from an economic level. ill let him b*tch slap u back to where u belong.

The numbers decided upon im certain were dreamt up from the view of the aggressor, not taking into account how insanely OP they are. as unforgiven storm says, the compression ratio is insane, the siphoning amount is insane (especially considering this is meant to be the SMALL version) and the cost is insanely small for their power. The fact its undetectable from an API standpoint is also OP.


The whole point that i got from the original announcement about this is to be able to punish POS owners who DON'T take care of their POS's. |If you dont take care of it, chances are u dont have dedicated programs and spreadsheets working to alert you and to crunch all the calculations u need to stay sane running POS's. So the idea of masking the siphoning from the API is ridiculous imho.

if you're the aggressor using this mod, you're trying to capitalise on the response time of the owner(s)... right??
The actual POS owner(s) has to do something to respond to any API alert they receive right?
Its like suddently some people believe POS owners run vast automated botting groups to protect their POS's.

People complaining about programmes made by people will insta alert possible siphoning seem to think that the response time is always going to be immediate. This is generally not the case, and where it is the case is most likely a POS thats used for other things than just mining/reactions. So its unlikely you'll generate anything from it anyway.


Alternatively look at it from an RP perspective...

A 20m3 module that costs 10 mil can within an hour breach the hardened shields of a structure costing between 6x and 26x its cost and extract items. Something that a full 250 man fleet dedicated to that action cannot do in 10's of hours of play (including reinforcement period). it can also reconfigure data systems of the structure and rewrite data logs to mask its actions but wont touch things like onlining/offlining systems and POS shield harmonics cause u know, who'd want to breach those things!


the whole things stupidly short sighted in initial implementation both in a game mechanics sense and in RP sense and seems to be vastly unbalanced in favour of the aggressors. sort it out.
MeBiatch
GRR GOONS
#497 - 2013-10-17 23:09:44 UTC
Deathwalley wrote:
MeBiatch wrote:
Deathwalley wrote:

Okay, go on. But a lot of goons in this topic, many populist phrases like "We can double all the T2 ship prices",
are telling that siphons can cause some problems for goons. Pirate


yes in the very very very long run... perhaps after two years.

but remember goons had a monoploy on high end minerals for a long long time... and they knew that thier tech would be nerfed so they more then likely bought up huge stockpiles of r64 that i would guess can last just alone for 1-2 years.

so yes in the long run this is bad for goons... but from thier stated plans... they will make enough money from this now to cover themselves for perhaps 2 more years on top of that...


But why in this topic, over 70% of all comments are by goons? And all of them, is about how bad siphons are, and how they will crush all of us.


they have a habbit of pointing out bad game mechanics by taking them to the extream. they are simply warning ccp what the problem is and how they are going to exploit it.

by removing the 20% base loss this will remove the bulk of the problem.

There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... CCP Goliath wrote:

Ugh ti-di pooping makes me sad.

MeBiatch
GRR GOONS
#498 - 2013-10-17 23:11:25 UTC
Courthouse wrote:
PotatoOverdose wrote:
Laendra wrote:
that we are going to use our vast infrastructure and playerbase to DECIMATE moon production everywhere in EVE....for everyone.

Excellent, can't wait to see it happen..... and partake a bit myself. Twisted

Content for everyone!


If your idea of a good game is rampant price manipulation, barriers for entry for new pilots being much larger and the richest, most entrenched nullsec entities getting richer, then go hog wild.

Personally I'd rather see bad ideas fixed before release, lower barriers for entry and some sort of existential threat to ourselves and some of the other nullsec old bloods.

The sort of binary logic that anything someone in Goonswarm doesn't like must be good is problematic, not the least of reasons why being that we also pay subscriptions or PLEX for this game and it's in our vested interest that it not be overly boring or troublesome to play.


you know goons should stop putting thier alts in GSF... that way you can post with a npc alt so people will take you seriously...

so please dont post with your main.

There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... CCP Goliath wrote:

Ugh ti-di pooping makes me sad.

MeBiatch
GRR GOONS
#499 - 2013-10-17 23:14:05 UTC
SMT008 wrote:
I guess I'll just spam the hell out of them and see what happens/how much money I'll get/how much tears I'll get.

Happy times for everyone but the one who gets his stuff stolen.



so i heard TRI is reforming... you upset some of your brosefs are leaving?

There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... CCP Goliath wrote:

Ugh ti-di pooping makes me sad.

Klyith
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#500 - 2013-10-17 23:19:30 UTC
MeBiatch wrote:

you know goons should stop putting thier alts in GSF... that way you can post with a npc alt so people will take you seriously...

so please dont post with your main.

We prefer to post with our real GS characters. We do it so that when we're right, we can be openly smug about how right we were.


Especially when we post about things that are stupidly abusable, which we go on to abuse to the maximum extent possible, and everyone else complains grrr Goons. "We told you so" smug is the best smug.