These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Maybe Somer Blink is offering a valuable service

First post
Author
Sexy Cakes
Have A Seat
#21 - 2013-10-07 12:26:28 UTC
Ya... like slot machines provide a valuable service.

Not today spaghetti.

Prince Kobol
#22 - 2013-10-07 12:34:09 UTC
Amhra Rho wrote:
Prince Kobol wrote:
[Sure about that?

Pretty sure the guys who develop EveMon, EveHQ, Eft, Aurora, Dotlan, Z Killboard, Battle Clinic etc have managed pretty good without having CCP announce, sanction and publicize them.

Also pretty sure Somer has been going for a fair few years without any help from CCP.

It's looking more and more like you really *do* want an uneven playing field. Even more surprisingly, you're practically making my case for me. Why not Dotlan, who obviously needs those billions more than SOMER Blink? - they've got a digital tip jar on their website, for gawd's sake. Now that's a party who's ethics seem never to be questioned, so why SOMER BLink instead of Dotlan? Or EveMon, or Aurora?

Or if you insist on tying the dubious casino into all this, then there's an alternative way to go about that as well. Go with the Lottery system with SOMER Blink as their main sponsor. The slag goes to the Lottery, however - not to SOMER Blink. Problem solved.


Not at all, I'm just not into spewing Hyperbole.

I have said on numerous occasions that these groups deserve something however the issue is not with somer.

I would have issues if CCP gave any group any free items that could have an effect in game in secrecy.

Just because it is Somer doesn't make it any worse.

They could of gave the guys at Eve Radio, Dotlan, Chribba even and I would still have the same reservations I do now.

Your issue seems to be with Somer and not what CCP did.

The FACT (capitalized, bolded and underlined so you don't miss it) is that Somer has done nothing wrong.

That is right, nothing wrong at all.

The fault all lies with CCP.

If CCP produced a blog saying that they had given Somer vouchers for the Eve Store, some mugs, keyrings, time added on their account, pictures of CCP (inset dev here) in a compromising position etc for their hard work blah blah blah then fine, no issues what so ever.

However they chose to give in game items that can be sold for billions in secrecy.

If you have a personal issues with Somer and I imagine Eve Bet as well, and Eve Poker then that is fine as well, but you seem to be getting the 2 subjects confused.
Amhra Rho
Accujac Elimination
#23 - 2013-10-07 12:46:32 UTC
Who's confused, @Prince Kobol? Across my last three posts, I've delineated five ways CCP could have done things differently - not SOMER Blink.

You have a lot of evidence that my objection is with CCP, and almost none that it is with SOMER Blink, yet you still guessed wrong.

There's real reasons why your Eve character doesn't do /dance.

Prince Kobol
#24 - 2013-10-07 12:54:25 UTC
Amhra Rho wrote:
Who's confused, @Prince Kobol? Across my last three posts, I've delineated five ways CCP could have done things differently - not SOMER Blink.

You have a lot of evidence that my objection is with CCP, and almost none that it is with SOMER Blink, yet you still guessed wrong.


No.. I have been saying that you quite obviously have issues with Somer as an entity when in fact Somer have done nothing wrong and it is CCP at fault.

You have either worded your post incorrectly (most likely due to the frothing at mouth in a incoherent rage) or you simply refusing to read what has been posted.

Amhra Rho
Accujac Elimination
#25 - 2013-10-07 12:58:10 UTC
Prince Kobol wrote:
Amhra Rho wrote:
Who's confused, @Prince Kobol? Across my last three posts, I've delineated five ways CCP could have done things differently - not SOMER Blink.

You have a lot of evidence that my objection is with CCP, and almost none that it is with SOMER Blink, yet you still guessed wrong.


No.. I have been saying that you quite obviously have issues with Somer as an entity when in fact Somer have done nothing wrong and it is CCP at fault.

You have either worded your post incorrectly (most likely due to the frothing at mouth in a incoherent rage) or you simply refusing to read what has been posted.


Ok. Have it your way. I'll let you tell me exactly where my sensibilities lie. What would I do without you? - kthxbai.

There's real reasons why your Eve character doesn't do /dance.

Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#26 - 2013-10-07 13:05:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Mr Kidd
Joan, as usual, your powers of deduction are tragic....

SOMER Blink is not an isk sink. The isk exists, is not taken out of the game, that the corp doesn't spend it is not a valid sink mechanic. Otherwise, everyone that has isk in their wallets are considered sinks. This just isn't the case.

Also, that you're implying CCP is somehow placating SOMER from using their massive profits to manipulate the game doesn't make sense. There is a clause in the TOS that basically states that if a groups game play adversely impacts the service CCP is providing that CCP can act upon such up to and including permanent bans.

This is a adverse action for any reason statement and is available to CCP should they make such a decision.

Unfortunately, your argument is based off the premise that CCP has nothing other than ingame mechanics to "deal" with SOMER and is in the position of being extorted. It is not and never will be.

There is the question as to why CCP chose SOMER to give all these valuable gifts. There are several possible answers:

1) SOMER provides a service to the community promoting game play. Unfortunately, it does not. It does provide a service but that service in no way promotes new players joining or their continuance in the game. You already have to be a player to utilize the service. And if the service were gone tomorrow it would not affect one's game play other than the absence of a non-essential service. On the contrary, there are many more services available to the players that are more vital to game play and have been around much much longer.

2) The relationship between SOMER and CCP is nepotistic and/or cronyistic and as such CCP employees are gifting items to CCP friends. This more likely the case. We can't know the extent of the relationships since the mechanics of toons and their creation obfuscate any such discovery of associations. I would not be surprised that SOMER is actually a CCP employee developed site, commissioned by CCP allowing the company to escape legal entanglements with gambling associations completely while reaping the benefits of empty wallets and easy access to GTC. SOMER certainly does appear to have an inordinate level of support from CCP. Afterall, there are other for profit sites out there doing the exact same thing as SOMER and yet they get the big CCP middle finger. I mean, if the relationship wasn't nepotistic then it would be logical to conclude that CCP would make every effort to promote as many community sites in the same manner as possible in order to sell more GTC. But no, they've chosen one.

3) CCP is an inept organization ran by infantile scrubs.

Now, if you're a shill or you're dense you may well believe answer #1 as that is how CCP, SOMER, CSM are portraying the relationship. Or you will believe answer #3.

But, if you're like the rest of us realizing that noone does anything out of the goodness of their little hearts, especially a corporation. And that anytime something seemly so wrong happens as is the case here while hiding behind the guise of an excuse of "for the community" while obviously the vast majority of the community contributors are left twisting in the wind, it usually means there's something else going on behind the scenes. And so, while you don't have irrefutable evidence, you will always suspect the answer is #2.

You've seen this type of manipulation before in the vast majority of those charity commercials where they show little children from impoverished countries starving and a narrator is asking you for money, you do realize that 95% of what you give goes straight into someone's pockets, 3% goes into running more commercials, 1% goes to paying for the employees. 0.5% goes into the employees' pensions that you can raid later and 0.5% goes to actually helping all those little children just so the organization can say "Yes....for the children!"

Just remember, that any time someone says "....for the children" and "....for the community" the same thing is being done and that is to make you suspend your disbelief in the hopes of a greater cause which is always BS.

This is the same thing just different circumstances.

Don't ban me, bro!

Joan Greywind
The Lazy Crabs
#27 - 2013-10-07 13:19:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Joan Greywind
@ Mr. Kidd, I have stated multiple times that I don't believe have done anything for the community out of the kindness of their heart. And even if inadvertently they did, I also said I can think of countless other third parties that deserve the attention much more.

As examples:

Eve board: making character sales possible

EFT and Pyfa: making theory crafting possible without spending isk

Themittani.com: Making EVE a more interesting place by delivering the news to us

and countless more, now we have this out of the way.

Mr kidd isk sitting in any wallet without changing hands (velocity of money if you want to wiki it) is as good as the imaginary isk that sits in the npc wallet. If the isk just sits in any wallet, it is considered an isk sink. For instance all the isk that is in banned / inactive accounts is sunk isk as almost all of it is never recovered. Now you can call me out on the fact that the isk doesn't sit in Somber's wallet, which is a very valid argument. But with the amounts they are making I doubt that they are spending any or at least a big chunk of it.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#28 - 2013-10-07 13:20:07 UTC
Prince Kobol wrote:
Seriously dude, we've been over this.

You keep saying they RMT there isk but never back it up with any proof.

So here we go.

CFC RMT massive amounts isk and get away with it because they have friends in CCP.

Also I do not have to prove because like you say, you must be dumb not to believe they don't.
Firstly, people always say CFC RMT without proof anyway. I don;t see you going up in arms when they do. What are you getting from Somer that make you so protective of them?

Secondly, they DO RMT, at least thorough their GTC referral, that's easily seen for yourself.

So you reckon they are just sitting on trillions of isk? They don't do that much in game, yet if you look at the amount they have run through, with them taking 20% on average, they should have racked up 241 trillion isk, enough to buy 400,000 plex, and they are simply sitting on the majority of that?

Major alliances don't earn even close to that, and still stay stable despite spending trillions on wars. Blink don't have that kind of expenditure. If you honestly think someone that would pay isk to get referrals to convert their isk to cash wouldn't see the dollar signs in anonymously shilling out funds to push into RMT, you are truly mental.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Prince Kobol
#29 - 2013-10-07 13:24:11 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Prince Kobol wrote:
Seriously dude, we've been over this.

You keep saying they RMT there isk but never back it up with any proof.

So here we go.

CFC RMT massive amounts isk and get away with it because they have friends in CCP.

Also I do not have to prove because like you say, you must be dumb not to believe they don't.
Firstly, people always say CFC RMT without proof anyway. I don;t see you going up in arms when they do. What are you getting from Somer that make you so protective of them?

Secondly, they DO RMT, at least thorough their GTC referral, that's easily seen for yourself.

So you reckon they are just sitting on trillions of isk? They don't do that much in game, yet if you look at the amount they have run through, with them taking 20% on average, they should have racked up 241 trillion isk, enough to buy 400,000 plex, and they are simply sitting on the majority of that?

Major alliances don't earn even close to that, and still stay stable despite spending trillions on wars. Blink don't have that kind of expenditure. If you honestly think someone that would pay isk to get referrals to convert their isk to cash wouldn't see the dollar signs in anonymously shilling out funds to push into RMT, you are truly mental.


The issue of whether the GTC referral is classed as RMT is a very grey area, one that CCP have already stated isn't, something I am not entirely comfortable with however CCP have passed judgement.

As to everything else, its all speculation and rumor, nothing else.

Once can easily say null sec alliances that have been making billions of Moon Goo over the last few years and massive market manipulation have also been converting isk to rl money.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#30 - 2013-10-07 13:31:09 UTC
Prince Kobol wrote:
Vera Algaert wrote:
Prince Kobol wrote:


Seriously dude, we've been over this.

You keep saying they RMT there isk but never back it up with any proof.

http://cogdev.net/blink/?act=gtc

this wasn't hard, was it?


What about Battle Clinic.

https://www.deepspacesupply.com/60-day-eve-game-time-code.html

They also involved in RMT?

Here is a list of where you can buy GTC's

https://secure.eveonline.com/etc.aspx

Most of those sites offer a referral scheme.

So you could simply setup a website offering the best deals of GTC's with nothing but links to many of those sites. Somebody buys a plex via your site you make RL money.

That is how referral schemes work.
Erm, you've totally missed the point here Kobol. Which of those site pay you ISK to buy through them?
The answer is: only Somer.
Somer are giving away isk in order to receive their referral fee. They pay isk, they get RL money. THAT is what make it RMT. A referral is a referral, on it's own it's fine. But by paying in game incentives to give you an advantage over the competition, you are using your isk to secure the transaction. If that was officially announced as allowed, RMT sites would simply change their wording so you aren't buying ISK or items, you are buying another product, and the ISK/items are an incentive, and would effectively be legal.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#31 - 2013-10-07 13:34:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Lucas Kell
Prince Kobol wrote:
The issue of whether the GTC referral is classed as RMT is a very grey area, one that CCP have already stated isn't, something I am not entirely comfortable with however CCP have passed judgement.

As to everything else, its all speculation and rumor, nothing else.

Once can easily say null sec alliances that have been making billions of Moon Goo over the last few years and massive market manipulation have also been converting isk to rl money.


Billions, sure. But they've also been spending billions. From Somers own site stats, they should have pulled in 241 TRILLION. That's an awful lot of isk to be simply sitting on. They also have a unique opportunity, where they have a high volume isk transferral method which they completely control. Somer wont get flagged for transferring a random char a heap of isk. This is how they shill out the cash to alts, to then sell on. The big alliances would have more trouble transferring large volumes of isk, as they have no reason to put on the transfer.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Cierra Royce
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#32 - 2013-10-07 18:04:09 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Prince Kobol wrote:
The issue of whether the GTC referral is classed as RMT is a very grey area, one that CCP have already stated isn't, something I am not entirely comfortable with however CCP have passed judgement.

As to everything else, its all speculation and rumor, nothing else.

Once can easily say null sec alliances that have been making billions of Moon Goo over the last few years and massive market manipulation have also been converting isk to rl money.


Billions, sure. But they've also been spending billions. From Somers own site stats, they should have pulled in 241 TRILLION. That's an awful lot of isk to be simply sitting on. They also have a unique opportunity, where they have a high volume isk transferral method which they completely control. Somer wont get flagged for transferring a random char a heap of isk. This is how they shill out the cash to alts, to then sell on. The big alliances would have more trouble transferring large volumes of isk, as they have no reason to put on the transfer.


Except there is no good reason to trust Somer's own figures, they could simply be lies without any foundation (and probably are, or at least heavily distorted in some fashion).

But also, who do you actually imagine would buy 'isk' in that sort of volume and why? I doubt any of the in game corps or alliances would do so, it's easy enough to obtain and cheap enough to just buy ETCs and sell the plexes without running any of the risks of getting busted.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#33 - 2013-10-07 20:51:59 UTC
Cierra Royce wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Prince Kobol wrote:
The issue of whether the GTC referral is classed as RMT is a very grey area, one that CCP have already stated isn't, something I am not entirely comfortable with however CCP have passed judgement.

As to everything else, its all speculation and rumor, nothing else.

Once can easily say null sec alliances that have been making billions of Moon Goo over the last few years and massive market manipulation have also been converting isk to rl money.


Billions, sure. But they've also been spending billions. From Somers own site stats, they should have pulled in 241 TRILLION. That's an awful lot of isk to be simply sitting on. They also have a unique opportunity, where they have a high volume isk transferral method which they completely control. Somer wont get flagged for transferring a random char a heap of isk. This is how they shill out the cash to alts, to then sell on. The big alliances would have more trouble transferring large volumes of isk, as they have no reason to put on the transfer.


Except there is no good reason to trust Somer's own figures, they could simply be lies without any foundation (and probably are, or at least heavily distorted in some fashion).

But also, who do you actually imagine would buy 'isk' in that sort of volume and why? I doubt any of the in game corps or alliances would do so, it's easy enough to obtain and cheap enough to just buy ETCs and sell the plexes without running any of the risks of getting busted.
The don;t run the risk though. Unless you have access to their site backend, it's impossible to prove a shill account is connected to Somer, so if the shill account is found out, you only lose that. IP addresses can be easily masked.
And people buy billions of isk and items in RMT, why do you think CCP are constantly pushing to shut down RMT accounts.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Murk Paradox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#34 - 2013-10-07 21:06:55 UTC
Chribba wrote:
Just a note when it comes to the numbers and how it's being displayed.

Most of the games is played with credit, that is not the same thing as ISK. Someone winning 50b and takes it as credit, will not result in them "giving out" 50b ISK. So them saying they given out 1200 trillion ISK is just a manipulation of numbers.

So, player A deposit 100m, spend that on one ticket, and wins a BS worth 100m, he decides to take the win as credit and then spends those 100m credit and lose. Somer will now display this as 200m - yet the original deposit is still and will only ever be 100m.

I'm sure there's still trillions in deposits, but claiming that this is how much ISK they handled or sink is not really accurate. And still is it really an ISK sink if the ISK just gets transferred into someones wallet? Sure they might sink 500b into an alliance tournament, but that's still not close to a 1200 trillion sink.

Damn numbers! Smile

/c



Not to mention "giving out" and "paying out" are 2 very different things.

This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate.

YesYes NoNoNo
Karmic Rebalance
#35 - 2013-10-07 21:12:16 UTC
Cierra Royce wrote:
Chribba wrote:
Just a note when it comes to the numbers and how it's being displayed.

Most of the games is played with credit, that is not the same thing as ISK. Someone winning 50b and takes it as credit, will not result in them "giving out" 50b ISK. So them saying they given out 1200 trillion ISK is just a manipulation of numbers.

So, player A deposit 100m, spend that on one ticket, and wins a BS worth 100m, he decides to take the win as credit and then spends those 100m credit and lose. Somer will now display this as 200m - yet the original deposit is still and will only ever be 100m.

I'm sure there's still trillions in deposits, but claiming that this is how much ISK they handled or sink is not really accurate. And still is it really an ISK sink if the ISK just gets transferred into someones wallet? Sure they might sink 500b into an alliance tournament, but that's still not close to a 1200 trillion sink.

Damn numbers! Smile

/c


Just to further add that it's irrelevant really, we have no way of knowing how accurate Somers figures actually are.

To address the op:
That they give some money out for sponsorship etc is a good thing, and maybe in need of recognition of some kind, but not by shady under the table deals and the spawning of trillions of free Isk.

Imagine if they gave Chribba 250bn units of Veldspar as a reward, on the grounds that, hey he has so much Veldspar already it's just a drop in the ocean for him. It might be and the big guy might deserve a nice reward for everything he has done for us all, but I would have just as much a problem with that as I do with Somer right now.


Just to clarify - they dont GIVE OUT anything for free.

They SPONSOR events and BUY exposure/publicity with the money. Same as the cigarette companies used to do on saturday morning TV...
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#36 - 2013-10-08 10:08:43 UTC
Chribba wrote:
Just a note when it comes to the numbers and how it's being displayed.

Most of the games is played with credit, that is not the same thing as ISK. Someone winning 50b and takes it as credit, will not result in them "giving out" 50b ISK. So them saying they given out 1200 trillion ISK is just a manipulation of numbers.

So, player A deposit 100m, spend that on one ticket, and wins a BS worth 100m, he decides to take the win as credit and then spends those 100m credit and lose. Somer will now display this as 200m - yet the original deposit is still and will only ever be 100m.

I'm sure there's still trillions in deposits, but claiming that this is how much ISK they handled or sink is not really accurate. And still is it really an ISK sink if the ISK just gets transferred into someones wallet? Sure they might sink 500b into an alliance tournament, but that's still not close to a 1200 trillion sink.

Damn numbers! Smile

/c

While this is true this is considering it from the point of view of a single player
If I pay in 100m, then win a lottery that costs 10m with 10 tickets after buying one ticket, I get 80m, and Somer gets 20m. Other players have still paid the other 90m.
Now I'm on 170m, while blink is on 20m. I play another lottery exactly the same, Others again pay in 90m, I get 80m, blink gets 20m.

So this would now show as
Total Played: 200m
Total paid out: 160m
Total paid in: 200m
Somer profit: 40m

Whatever gets played has to have been credited to a player at some point, so will be in the system somewhere. When Somer gives credit to players, they are simply shifting isk from their "profit" pot to the players pot.
This means (assuming 80% payout on lotteries) that Somer has made 20% of the total played minus any they've given to players. So it still means the amount of isk they had as potential profit is 20% of the total played (or 25% of the total paid out in winnings).
When you buy a GTC it's that profit pot they are paying across to you.

So it's fairly safe to say that if they paid out figures they show are really how much they have paid out (12,000T), then 300T isk is how much they would have had in potential profit. how much of that they have spent is up to them, they convert a lot to cash through GTCs, and rumour has it shill out a lot to RMT. They also sponsor events and such.
But then you also have to consider that most of these gambling sites have limits on accounts. If you don't log in for x amount of time, your whole pot is invalidated, giving them additional profit.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

CCP Eterne
C C P
C C P Alliance
#37 - 2013-10-08 14:54:02 UTC
Locking this as a duplicate thread. We already have discussion threads for this issue here and here.

EVE Online/DUST 514 Community Representative ※ EVE Illuminati ※ Fiction Adept

@CCP_Eterne ※ @EVE_LiveEvents

Previous page12