These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CSM Statement on the SOMER Promotion (with reply from CCP Pokethulu)

First post First post
Author
Liam Todd Bloodstar
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#221 - 2013-10-02 15:22:40 UTC
Varius Xeral wrote:
Yeah, as interesting as this issue is (Jita Park is a better place for it), can we get some feedback from the CSM on the idea of asking CCP to ensure that in-game benefits are not given to in-game entities ever again? That would be the only positive return from this whole event now that it has gone through regardless because they didn't discuss it with the CSM until they were too far gone to turn back anyway.


Yeah... we wont get that.

They said they are going to do it again in the other thread... 3rd party yadda yadda
TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#222 - 2013-10-02 16:14:21 UTC
Varius Xeral wrote:
Yeah, as interesting as this issue is (Jita Park is a better place for it), can we get some feedback from the CSM on the idea of asking CCP to ensure that in-game benefits are not given to in-game entities ever again? That would be the only positive return from this whole event now that it has gone through regardless because they didn't discuss it with the CSM until they were too far gone to turn back anyway.


Those of us with more spare tinfoil than the others may argue thats the result CCP want: To go ahead with their extremely biased, poorly thought out ideas then use the backlash as justification to not ever offer other in-game entities similar opportunities. Test it out with the people who cause players to purchase GTCs, rather than with people who provide a massive service to the betterment of the community but without gtc sales mixed in
Cursan Voran
Jita Traders Society
#223 - 2013-10-02 19:47:07 UTC
So how much did Somer Blink actually make from this?

Is the 35 trillion figure being claimed total nonsense or not?
Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#224 - 2013-10-02 21:52:36 UTC
Mike Azariah wrote:
Tao Dolcino wrote:


Damn, you're right.
In fact what is annoying me the most with the CSM is that they claim to do a lot of things for us which they don't have the right to tell us about.
It's maybe true, but in a normal democracy, the ones who are supposed to represent you (the CSM is supposed to represent us, right ?) have the duty to report to us what they do. They are accountable for what they do in our name.
I don't have to believe them, i have the right to read transparent and complete reports.


You're serious, aren't you?

8 seasons of working to build trust with CCP to the point that we are allowed to see things that warrant an NDA. And you would have us throw away that trust by being 'open and transparent'. Representation is more than being spies to what is coming next. It is telling CCP what will happen if they do this or that. It is bringing concerns of the players to CCP.

We are not your reporters or your pipeline to the 3 or 5 year plans.

I signed an NDA and i have seen things, heard things, that give reason for that document.

m

btw if you think any democracy is totally transparent you live in a utopia far beyond any way for me to reach you with an argument based on rational thought


Fck you just got me before I could do it, well I'd be a bit less comprehensive and bit ruder. Mkay I'm out don't ban me yet Lol

removed inappropriate ASCII art signature - CCP Eterne

Varius Xeral
Doomheim
#225 - 2013-10-03 01:05:01 UTC
Liam Todd Bloodstar wrote:


Yeah... we wont get that.

They said they are going to do it again in the other thread... 3rd party yadda yadda


Well I'm not ready to accept that. I'd also like assurances that the ToS issue is moving forward.

CCP can pretend this stuff never happened, but the general sense of disappointment and dissatisfaction that these incidents create is cumulative, and they're running up a steep tab at an accelerated pace. A few more disasters like this, and they'll be back to Incarna levels of player mistrust.

Official Representative of The Nullsec Zealot Cabal

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#226 - 2013-10-03 07:41:12 UTC
Varius Xeral wrote:
CCP can pretend this stuff never happened, but the general sense of disappointment and dissatisfaction that these incidents create is cumulative, and they're running up a steep tab at an accelerated pace. A few more disasters like this, and they'll be back to Incarna levels of player mistrust.

oh comeon, it's just spawning expensive stuff for their starlet 100% honest heros of the day

and clarifying a tos change that was actually always like that

and

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#227 - 2013-10-03 07:42:35 UTC
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:
Mike Azariah wrote:
Tao Dolcino wrote:


Damn, you're right.
In fact what is annoying me the most with the CSM is that they claim to do a lot of things for us which they don't have the right to tell us about.
It's maybe true, but in a normal democracy, the ones who are supposed to represent you (the CSM is supposed to represent us, right ?) have the duty to report to us what they do. They are accountable for what they do in our name.
I don't have to believe them, i have the right to read transparent and complete reports.


You're serious, aren't you?

8 seasons of working to build trust with CCP to the point that we are allowed to see things that warrant an NDA. And you would have us throw away that trust by being 'open and transparent'. Representation is more than being spies to what is coming next. It is telling CCP what will happen if they do this or that. It is bringing concerns of the players to CCP.

We are not your reporters or your pipeline to the 3 or 5 year plans.

I signed an NDA and i have seen things, heard things, that give reason for that document.

m

btw if you think any democracy is totally transparent you live in a utopia far beyond any way for me to reach you with an argument based on rational thought


Fck you just got me before I could do it, well I'd be a bit less comprehensive and bit ruder. Mkay I'm out don't ban me yet Lol

basically sit down and shut up its all taken care of

nothing to see here

play somer blink more

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Little Dragon Khamez
Guardians of the Underworld
#228 - 2013-10-03 08:14:04 UTC
Mike Azariah wrote:
Tao Dolcino wrote:


Damn, you're right.
In fact what is annoying me the most with the CSM is that they claim to do a lot of things for us which they don't have the right to tell us about.
It's maybe true, but in a normal democracy, the ones who are supposed to represent you (the CSM is supposed to represent us, right ?) have the duty to report to us what they do. They are accountable for what they do in our name.
I don't have to believe them, i have the right to read transparent and complete reports.


You're serious, aren't you?

8 seasons of working to build trust with CCP to the point that we are allowed to see things that warrant an NDA. And you would have us throw away that trust by being 'open and transparent'. Representation is more than being spies to what is coming next. It is telling CCP what will happen if they do this or that. It is bringing concerns of the players to CCP.

We are not your reporters or your pipeline to the 3 or 5 year plans.

I signed an NDA and i have seen things, heard things, that give reason for that document.

m

btw if you think any democracy is totally transparent you live in a utopia far beyond any way for me to reach you with an argument based on rational thought


This is the lamest attempt at legitimacy I've yet read. Personally, I don't think it's your job to represent the player base to CCP as most of them didn't vote for you. However evidenced by your reply we can all tell that it is your job to represent CCP to the player base. You do not serve the people, you are a pipeline or a mouth piece for CCP, nothing more.

Dumbing down of Eve Online will result in it's destruction...

Veshta Yoshida
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#229 - 2013-10-03 13:30:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Veshta Yoshida
Let me get this straight; CCP decided to try to outsource a bit of nepot-/favouritism (assume because their skin is raw from all the hand-washing the past few years) by putting up some collectors items that have close to zero impact on Eve as a whole only to pull them and add a rather significant real world cash prize on top of a collectors item .. how is that better?
Trebor Daehdoow wrote:
... Supporting groups that have a clear educational/public service focus in-game is one thing; supporting a group that is distinctly for-profit -- and one that can use the ISK it generates to secretly support in-game groups -- breeds distrust for CCP in the community.

Nothing new, Devs have been accused of bias (in some cases probably warranted) ever since CCP started recruiting heavily from the player base.
The mere fact that the game, especially 0.0 was allowed to develop as it has with 2-3 massive power-blocs each with the in-game funds and sheep herds to break the game at any time should they so choose more than indicates that some decision makers in Iceland has agendas that goes beyond offering an awesome game .. null is being revised and that revision will reveal if it has become systemic, woe unto us if it has.

Not sure when the camel broke its back, best guess would be the melding of real world money with ISK when PLEX were introduced. That alone essentially incentivizes CCP employees to favour changes that benefit the bottom-line rather than the game proper, in most cases it is probably not conscious though (or at least I hope not!) but the impetus is there .. IA needs to be put to buffed and given the task of giving all plans a once over, flagging anything that involves or encourages PLEX sales either directly or indirectly.

In short: CCP has like each and every corporate and governmental entity before it grown corrupt due to the lack of measured regulation, oversight and ability to police itself.

PS: In Denmark any winnings from a game or lottery outside the EU is generally to be taxed as personal income, just FYI .. hope that extra 20-30% is included in the 'all expenses paid' line Big smile.
There are exceptions, but they pretty much all involve game/lottery being either state run, government regulated or non-profit oriented none of which seem to apply.
Liam Todd Bloodstar
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#230 - 2013-10-04 04:33:22 UTC
Cursan Voran wrote:
So how much did Somer Blink actually make from this?

Is the 35 trillion figure being claimed total nonsense or not?


I would like to know this...

Because if they actually made 35 trillion.... That equates to almost $1million at PLEX prices.
Jowen Datloran
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#231 - 2013-10-04 09:06:58 UTC
Well, all there is now is to wait for the inevitable RMT scandal.Roll

Mr. Science & Trade Institute, EVE Online Lorebook 

Scooter McCabe
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#232 - 2013-10-05 06:13:14 UTC
Mike Azariah wrote:
Tao Dolcino wrote:


Damn, you're right.
In fact what is annoying me the most with the CSM is that they claim to do a lot of things for us which they don't have the right to tell us about.
It's maybe true, but in a normal democracy, the ones who are supposed to represent you (the CSM is supposed to represent us, right ?) have the duty to report to us what they do. They are accountable for what they do in our name.
I don't have to believe them, i have the right to read transparent and complete reports.


You're serious, aren't you?

8 seasons of working to build trust with CCP to the point that we are allowed to see things that warrant an NDA. And you would have us throw away that trust by being 'open and transparent'. Representation is more than being spies to what is coming next. It is telling CCP what will happen if they do this or that. It is bringing concerns of the players to CCP.

We are not your reporters or your pipeline to the 3 or 5 year plans.

I signed an NDA and i have seen things, heard things, that give reason for that document.

m

btw if you think any democracy is totally transparent you live in a utopia far beyond any way for me to reach you with an argument based on rational thought


I think you need to step down from the CSM as your attitude does not reflect what the actual role of a CSM member should be. The whole reason the CSM came into existence were CCP was an incident just like this. In fact the CSM was designed to bridge the schism of trust between CCP and the player base, not the other way around. CCP was supposed to be getting better over those 8 years and regaining the players trust.

You are certainly not a "spy," you are a safeguard against what could happen when CCP got ethically lazy. Trust can only exist in an environment that is open and transparent. A lack of transparency is an EVEmail privately telling a group of players not to suddenly rush the market with gifted ships because "it would look weird." That's exactly the thing you are supposed to protect against. You hand waving this all away because of an NDA is just chicken ****.

What if CCP told you that they were going to secretly favor a select few players and this was all going to be covered under the NDA so you can't alert the player base something is terribly wrong? What becomes of your purpose on the CSM?

As for democracies not being "totally transparent" you'll notice that people seem to have a problem a lack of transparency in real life. The argument for the necessity of transparency is a rational one and is a reoccurring theme in what makes for good governance. The other part of good governance is actually representing those that elected you and I don't remember the player base clamoring the enabling of CCP's secrecy and favoritism.
Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers
Brotherhood of Spacers
#233 - 2013-10-05 06:40:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Argus Sorn
Has there been an official CCP response on any of this? Even if Somer is not profiting directly from this they are benefiting from what seems to be a CCP endorsement of their site/activity. Add to that the recent revelation that they are gifting a bunch of ships to employees, CCP favoritism toward BLINK becomes concerning.

As Trebor said, there are some issues here that are CCP's business decision to make - but their decisions have been horrdenous.

There is literally no defense for this sort of favoritism. The fact is that the only way to truly be sure there are no conflicts of interest is to avoid absolutely everything and anything that even smells of one. Engaging in the slightest of questionable activities opens the door to tremendous abuse and EVEN IF NOT ABUSED, creates questions that seed distrustt between the company and its customer base. And that is exactly what we are seeing here.

And nothing can really be said to ever make that customer base feel comfortable with the situation. The fact is that the appearance creates the sentiment, no matter what the truth. This is why you simply NEVER engage in this sort of favoritism. And CCP Pokethulu makes the age old mistake of trying to defend by saying that CCP will be able to make sure it is not abused and remains balanced. These are the sorts of claims made by the foolish and corrupt. No one can be sure this is not abused - therefore it should not occur. Simple as that.

No player run organization should be gifted items of such significant value within the game. Give them plaques, letters, tours of CCP offices, or their name engraved on the walls of Hilmar's private bathroom - but to grant them items of in game value is to give them isk. And herein lies the problem. For CCP to be in the business of handing out isk to players is highly disturbing and threatens the integrity of the game itself. Even when those items are given to be given out via lottery - they will profit the entity in question, therefore providing them with isk! Why is CCP basically handing a ton of isk over to SomerBLINK?

I sat with Hilmar at Fan Fest and had dinner with him. I basically said something along the lines that I felt he got a bit of a rough shake when it came to the whole monocle debacle. I mean, why can't a CEO be glad his company is making money? Despite my support, he took ownership and apologized and made it clear he felt he had made a mistake, and had failed to understand what the players wanted.

Hilmar, if you have any sense of what the players care about you will realize what a tremendous mistake this favoritism toward SomerBLINK is. It reeks of impropriety and corruption and secret deals with Somer. And for your own people to sit there and say they think Somer is 100% trustworthy - first it makes them look like complete fools and shows a complete failure on their part to understand the problem. Does CCP know who every alt of every Somer employee is? Why you might think so, I highly doubt it given that I've seen more than one player receive a permaban on their main while their alts did not. Once again: the ONLY way to insure no impropriety is to not engage in any activity that could come close to it.

So now, on the heels of this we find that Somer 'employees' are being gifted hundreds of billions of isk in special release ships. Once again, this is giving players isk. And for what? Because they are such a great fansite? They have already been rewarded for this. If they've paid out more than a quadrillion in isk, then just think how much they've made in profit! That profit is their reward. CCP is going to hand them rare, in game prizes for being good at getting you to pay them isk? That's ludicrous. Clearly there is some level of bias here, or plain stupidity... one or the other.

And please realize, Somer is just as much to blame. It is the responsibility of a business to turn down gifts that could either result in or give an image of impropriety.

So for the players, the answer is simple: stop patronizing SomerBlink. Boycott SomerBlink and if they truly value your business they will return any and all gifts and prize ships. Otherwise, kiss them goodby and stop handing over your hard earned isk so that they can bask in the glory of CCP's adoration. They are being gifted ships from CCP for one reason: YOU GAVE THEM ISK. So, stop giving them your isk. They clearly don't deserve it.



P.S. And for the love of god, stop witch hunting the CSM on this. Look to Somer and CCP as that is where the problem is. Boycott Somer and demand better of CCP.
Scooter McCabe
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#234 - 2013-10-05 06:46:44 UTC
Argus Sorn wrote:

P.S. And for the love of god, stop witch hunting the CSM on this. Look to Somer and CCP as that is where the problem is. Boycott Somer and demand better of CCP.


A witch hunt would be like going after people who sign their posts. This is a legitimate expression of concern that the people elected to the CSM may not understand why it is they are actually there.
Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers
Brotherhood of Spacers
#235 - 2013-10-05 06:55:41 UTC
Scooter McCabe wrote:
Argus Sorn wrote:

P.S. And for the love of god, stop witch hunting the CSM on this. Look to Somer and CCP as that is where the problem is. Boycott Somer and demand better of CCP.


A witch hunt would be like going after people who sign their posts. This is a legitimate expression of concern that the people elected to the CSM may not understand why it is they are actually there.



I get your point and you are entitled to your opinion. However I think it has derailed the discussion from something which seems more concerning to me, and that is CCP gifting isk to EVE players because they think that their gambling site is nifty.

Tao Dolcino
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#236 - 2013-10-05 07:16:11 UTC
Argus Sorn wrote:
Scooter McCabe wrote:
Argus Sorn wrote:

P.S. And for the love of god, stop witch hunting the CSM on this. Look to Somer and CCP as that is where the problem is. Boycott Somer and demand better of CCP.


A witch hunt would be like going after people who sign their posts. This is a legitimate expression of concern that the people elected to the CSM may not understand why it is they are actually there.



I get your point and you are entitled to your opinion. However I think it has derailed the discussion from something which seems more concerning to me, and that is CCP gifting isk to EVE players because they think that their gambling site is nifty.



As much as i agree with all the rest of your post, which is excellent, i don't agree about the CSM : it is linked.
If there is, as you say and as we are a growing number of players saying, a very concerning problem with CCP, it's the CSM's job to stand and fight at our side, for the CSM has been precisely created in similar circumstances to avoid that it happens again.
The answers the CSM members have given to us so far are very disappointing. But don't worry, i think that no one here forgets that the top priority is to make CCP stop their shady practises and start to respect their paying customers.
Jerick Ludhowe
Internet Tuff Guys
#237 - 2013-10-05 11:14:48 UTC
lol, -2 subs.

Thanks for making the quit decision for me CCP... How far you lot have fallen, rather fuckin sad tbh.
Le Petite More
Doomheim
#238 - 2013-10-05 11:21:00 UTC
So did they tell you about the Special Edition Scorpions they gave Somer in secret? Your job is to stop them from giving players unfair advantages in game. Please restore the sandbox.
OldWolf69
EVE-RO
Goonswarm Federation
#239 - 2013-10-05 11:54:45 UTC
Why's this a CSM thread instead of a CCP thread?Lol
Dramaticus
State War Academy
Caldari State
#240 - 2013-10-05 14:21:16 UTC
CCP should have just cut out the middle man and give SOMER a gigantic pile of timecards to sell

The 'do-nothing' member of the GoonSwarm Economic Warfare Cabal

The edge is REALLY hard to see at times but it DOES exist and in this case we were looking at a situation where a new feature created for all of our customers was being virtually curbstomped by five of them