These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Rubicon] Sisters of EVE faction ships

First post First post First post
Author
Nyancat Audeles
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#681 - 2013-10-04 00:25:49 UTC
Dehval wrote:
Nyancat Audeles wrote:


Seems like a glass cannon. What happens if you try to put some tank on it? How much EHP does it have? Speed?

849 DPS does seem like a bit much, I agree. But the fit itself is bad - it would die relatively easily to any kiting cruiser.

That said, a 5% per level optimal and damage bonus seems much better on 2 turrets.

16,564 EHP with that Fit. 597.36m/s, 787.97 OH. But, why engage a kiting cruiser without the advantage? You have a cloak and I assume any pilot worth a damn would use it.

I'd use a DC over a second ENAM though, even with it being local rep. The ship is built like a Tanaris and nearly half of its EHP is in the hull. (3000 armor vs 3063 Hull at all V). Gets 21k with a DC.


Flying a ship that would cost 300M to 400M with just about twice the tank of an Assault Frigate and a third of the speed - not sure how many people would want to do that.

Sure, you could, but there's not much you could effectively engage. Which is sort of the point to restricting to the fit I posted - these won't be the solopwnmobiles with a max-gank fit. Cut the shield buffer in half, and you're pretty much set.
Ragehaven
Son's of Plunder
#682 - 2013-10-04 00:27:12 UTC
love the look of these ships but really seem they should have 2 utility slots for a probe launcher and a cloaky as well as the gun slots. Other then that great :)
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#683 - 2013-10-04 00:32:04 UTC
Quote:
I think this would be the best possible change. Remove 2 hardpoints, add a 100% laser damage bonus.

What this does:
>> Removes OP neutron fits
>> Gears ship more towards exploration rather than PvP
>> Makes using longer-range drones viable
>> Makes speed tanking / kiting more viable


Well, first you would need to demonstrate why any of those things are a problem. Aside from "I don't want it to be a pvp ship", you really have no argument.

Every ship in EVE is a PvP ship, as far as principle is concerned. So if it ends up being useful for PvP, it's TS for you guys (not to mention everyone I meet after this hits live).

I said it before, but I am pretty sure the reason the devs claim it can do 6/10s doesn't have anything to do with the turrets on this ship. Every last bit of that is from being able to field 5 bonused Sentry Drones. 4 turrets worth of unbonused lasers at 20km or so is almost not even contributing as far as doing DED sites.

So, let's deal with your points one at a time.

"OP neutron fits". First of all, they aren't OP. It's about the DPS you would expect given it's bandwidth and fittings. It does what it's designed to do, melt stuff at very short range. If it weren't a cloak ship, it wouldn't be in consideration of being overpowered any more than the Thorax or the Myrmidon are.

"Exploration, not PvP". Yeah, gotta call TS on you for this. It works the way it works, and honestly aside from the OP using the word "laser" in the post, it wouldn't even have been in consideration. Lasers do nothing for either version of the cruiser being designed for "exploration". Adding a greater focus on lasers doesn't help it do data or relic sites any better, and it only makes doing DED sites harder. It does nothing, and there is no reason for it whatsoever.

"Longer range drones viable" They already were. It has enough bandwidth to drop 5 sentries. Doesn't get more long range than that.

"Speed tanking/kiting" Not even remotely possibly in this ship, lasers or otherwise. This thing is slower than hell.

So none of your rationale for adding greater focus on lasers is really valid. Not only do I sincerely hope they won't listen to you, I don't find it likely either.

(Hint, they won't change turrets this late in the process, as it looks like the model is already made. Once the art department makes up their minds, it's done)

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Eko Fromtv
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#684 - 2013-10-04 00:33:54 UTC
35 pages of baseless and senseless arguing.

It is NOT a pvp boat, forget the EFT capital turret fits with 10k dps. It is a combat exploration ship, emphasis on pve not pvp.

"but people will use it for pvp" - So let them! Even more tears for you to harvest when they lose a 400mil ship...


If anything, it needs a buff to lasers. Any kind, CCP Rise's idea of optimal is excellent. It will just support CCP's idea for "drones and lazors". Motivate us to use the lasers, add a laser bonus.

(Ice) Miner for life.

Dehval
Ascendance Rising
Ascendance..
#685 - 2013-10-04 00:36:26 UTC
Large Collidable Object wrote:
Dehval wrote:


But you used Ogres... It's only theoretical dps.



True - your point being?

The joke was that the fit he posted had two webs and a scram. The ogres would be able to shred anything he caught because it wouldn't be moving.

People would still point out that its only theoretical dps because the Ogres "wouldn't" be able to catch/track the ship moving at sub 100m/s.
Nyancat Audeles
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#686 - 2013-10-04 00:39:23 UTC
Eko Fromtv wrote:
35 pages of baseless and senseless arguing.

It is NOT a pvp boat, forget the EFT capital turret fits with 10k dps. It is a combat exploration ship, emphasis on pve not pvp.

"but people will use it for pvp" - So let them! Even more tears for you to harvest when they lose a 400mil ship...


If anything, it needs a buff to lasers. Any kind, CCP Rise's idea of optimal is excellent. It will just support CCP's idea for "drones and lazors". Motivate us to use the lasers, add a laser bonus.

Finally, some sense!
Tragedy
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#687 - 2013-10-04 00:41:01 UTC
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
stuff.

Again. Just like ABCs made most other sniping ships obsolete, these ships are stepping on the toes of a hell of a lot of other ships. You seriously dont see anything wrong with a 5/5/5 slot layout cruiser able to use a covert cloak and put out a shitload of heay drone dps? Heavy drones are brutal if you can get on top of someone with them. This ship wont have troubles doing that.

Why do we need this in game?

Why not tweak existing ships to fit exploration roles better? They still have ton of rebalancing to do.

These things just arent needed.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#688 - 2013-10-04 00:43:13 UTC
Nyancat Audeles wrote:
Eko Fromtv wrote:
35 pages of baseless and senseless arguing.

It is NOT a pvp boat, forget the EFT capital turret fits with 10k dps. It is a combat exploration ship, emphasis on pve not pvp.

"but people will use it for pvp" - So let them! Even more tears for you to harvest when they lose a 400mil ship...


If anything, it needs a buff to lasers. Any kind, CCP Rise's idea of optimal is excellent. It will just support CCP's idea for "drones and lazors". Motivate us to use the lasers, add a laser bonus.

Finally, some sense!


No, not really. Just typical carebear wishful thinking. And I quote:

CCP Rise wrote:
What we're shooting for is ships that are themed around exploration and therefor make good platforms for a range of activities including probing, hacking, exploration combat sites, anoms, killing anom runners, spying on people, looking super sexy and generally being kind of awesome.


Emphasis mine.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Tragedy
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#689 - 2013-10-04 00:47:15 UTC
Eko Fromtv wrote:
35 pages of baseless and senseless arguing.

It is NOT a pvp boat, forget the EFT capital turret fits with 10k dps. It is a combat exploration ship, emphasis on pve not pvp.

"but people will use it for pvp" - So let them! Even more tears for you to harvest when they lose a 400mil ship...


If anything, it needs a buff to lasers. Any kind, CCP Rise's idea of optimal is excellent. It will just support CCP's idea for "drones and lazors". Motivate us to use the lasers, add a laser bonus.

You obviously dont understand how eve players are. Any slight advantage, anything that can be exploited to give someone anedge, will be taken. Price is not a consideration for balance. Why would people NOT use this for pvp? Covert cloak, 800+ drone dps which WILL be applied. Screw eft numbers. Look at the damn slot layout and use your imagination. You'll be able to shut people down with this thing.

People have used haulers to pvp in before. They suck. This ship will be abused hard.
Eko Fromtv
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#690 - 2013-10-04 00:49:30 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Nyancat Audeles wrote:
Eko Fromtv wrote:
35 pages of baseless and senseless arguing.

It is NOT a pvp boat, forget the EFT capital turret fits with 10k dps. It is a combat exploration ship, emphasis on pve not pvp.

"but people will use it for pvp" - So let them! Even more tears for you to harvest when they lose a 400mil ship...


If anything, it needs a buff to lasers. Any kind, CCP Rise's idea of optimal is excellent. It will just support CCP's idea for "drones and lazors". Motivate us to use the lasers, add a laser bonus.

Finally, some sense!


No, not really. Just typical carebear wishful thinking. And I quote:

CCP Rise wrote:
What we're shooting for is ships that are themed around exploration and therefor make good platforms for a range of activities including probing, hacking, exploration combat sites, anoms, killing anom runners, spying on people, looking super sexy and generally being kind of awesome.


Emphasis mine.


Yeah, pick one out of eight. Good job on being objective!

(Ice) Miner for life.

Xequecal
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#691 - 2013-10-04 00:53:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Xequecal
Quote:


Flying a ship that would cost 300M to 400M with just about twice the tank of an Assault Frigate and a third of the speed - not sure how many people would want to do that.

Sure, you could, but there's not much you could effectively engage. Which is sort of the point to restricting to the fit I posted - these won't be the solopwnmobiles with a max-gank fit. Cut the shield buffer in half, and you're pretty much set.


Oh, it's definitely a solopwnmobile, just don't put guns on it.

1600mm Steel Plates II
2x EANM II
2x DDA II

AB II
Warp Scrambler
Fleeting Web
Fleeting Web/Balmer TD
Small Capacitor Booster II, Navy Cap Booster 400

4x Medium Unstable Power Fluctuator
Covops Cloak

ACR II
2x Trimark II

Fits easily on CPU, 1343/1322.5 PG so you need Genolution implants or a PG implant. It's cap stable (while you have charges, obv) with Genolution CA-1 and CA-2 and strong mindflood, none of mindflood's drawbacks apply to you at all. If you want to use slaves use a RT plate and you don't need fitting implants.

700 DPS and 53.33 cap/sec neuting. A Maller has 44k EHP with this fit, Stratios will be very close to that. Why does the Pilgrim exist again, exactly?
Nyancat Audeles
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#692 - 2013-10-04 00:55:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Nyancat Audeles
Xequecal wrote:

Oh, it's definitely a solopwnmobile, just don't put guns on it.

1600mm Steel Plates II
2x EANM II
2x DDA II

AB II
Warp Scrambler
Fleeting Web
Fleeting Web/Balmer TD
Small Capacitor Booster II, Navy Cap Booster 400

4x Medium Unstable Power Fluctuator
Covops Cloak

ACR II
2x Trimark II

Fits easily on CPU, 1343/1322.5 PG so you need Genolution implants or a PG implant. It's cap stable (while you have charges, obv) with Genolution CA-1 and CA-2 and strong mindflood, none of mindflood's drawbacks apply to you at all. If you want to use slaves use a RT plate and you don't need fitting implants.

700 DPS and 53.33 cap/sec neuting. A Maller has 44k EHP with this fit, Stratios will be very close to that. Why does the Pilgrim exist again, exactly?


700 DPS is just fine, it's common for any droneboat (Vexor? Vexor Navy? Ishtar?).

Keep in mind, a lot of other buffs are coming along the way too - along with recon cruiser rebalances.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#693 - 2013-10-04 00:58:31 UTC
Quote:
Yeah, pick one out of eight. Good job on being objective!


You presume I was trying to be. From the outset of the announcement of this ship, I have predicted it's use for ganking, and stated my intentions for using it thusly.

And I'd question your objectivity as well, given your semi obvious attempt to try and crowd out the fact that this ship is actually intended to do something besides hack cans and shoot at red crosses.

Quote:
It is NOT a pvp boat, forget the EFT capital turret fits with 10k dps. It is a combat exploration ship, emphasis on pve not pvp.


Which is an outright falsehood. So, either you were deliberately lying, or in some way you failed to properly read through the announcement. Neither reflects well upon you.

It's a pvp ship. At least, the way I intend to use it certainly is. Interestingly enough, as far as quite a few types of exploration are concerned, it's more of a pvp ship than it is otherwise. The mere +5 virus strength pretty much invalidates it's use in nullsec (and lowsec unless you have pretty good skills for it).

So, whatever else the devs might say, it's good at 2 things: Doing DED sites with drones, and ganking people. I plan to use it for one of those. You and yours, on the other hand, want to stomp your proverbial feet, kick up a fuss, and try to take that toy from other people. You don't see me advocating to have it's ability to do DED sites nerfed, have you?

Live and let live, as far as playstyles go.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Dehval
Ascendance Rising
Ascendance..
#694 - 2013-10-04 00:59:43 UTC
Xequecal wrote:
Quote:


Flying a ship that would cost 300M to 400M with just about twice the tank of an Assault Frigate and a third of the speed - not sure how many people would want to do that.

Sure, you could, but there's not much you could effectively engage. Which is sort of the point to restricting to the fit I posted - these won't be the solopwnmobiles with a max-gank fit. Cut the shield buffer in half, and you're pretty much set.


Oh, it's definitely a solopwnmobile, just don't put guns on it.

1600mm Steel Plates II
2x EANM II
2x DDA II

AB II
Warp Scrambler
Fleeting Web
Fleeting Web/Balmer TD
Small Capacitor Booster II, Navy Cap Booster 400

4x Medium Unstable Power Fluctuator
Covops Cloak

ACR II
2x Trimark II

Fits easily on CPU, 1343/1322.5 PG so you need Genolution implants or a PG implant. It's cap stable (while you have charges, obv) with Genolution CA-1 and CA-2 and strong mindflood, none of mindflood's drawbacks apply to you at all. If you want to use slaves use a RT plate and you don't need fitting implants.

700 DPS and 53.33 cap/sec neuting. A Maller has 44k EHP with this fit, Stratios will be very close to that. Why does the Pilgrim exist again, exactly?
Pretty sure this thing caps out at 1150 PG with skills (920*1.25 = 1150). You'd need to downsize two of those neuts to get it to fit.

Gets 46,651 EHP with that fit, (A DC over EANM would up that to 49.5k).
Eko Fromtv
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#695 - 2013-10-04 01:04:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Eko Fromtv
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
Yeah, pick one out of eight. Good job on being objective!


You presume I was trying to be.


Well, yes I did, since that's how people should approach a subject under debate.

Quote:
It's a pvp ship. At least, the way I intend to use it certainly is. Interestingly enough, as far as quite a few types of exploration are concerned, it's more of a pvp ship than it is otherwise. The mere +5 virus strength pretty much invalidates it's use in nullsec (and lowsec unless you have pretty good skills for it).

So, whatever else the devs might say, it's good at 2 things: Doing DED sites with drones, and ganking people. I plan to use it for one of those. You and yours, on the other hand, want to stomp your proverbial feet, kick up a fuss, and try to take that toy from other people. You don't see me advocating to have it's ability to do DED sites nerfed, have you?

Live and let live, as far as playstyles go.


It is not a pvp ship. The CCP statement you cited clearly shows that. You might want it to be and you may use it any way you wish, that's your right, but don't try to change the facts.

NOT a pvp ship.

(Ice) Miner for life.

Xequecal
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#696 - 2013-10-04 01:04:50 UTC
Dehval wrote:
]Pretty sure this thing caps out at 1150 PG with skills (920*1.25 = 1150). You'd need to downsize two of those neuts to get it to fit.

Gets 46,651 EHP with that fit, (A DC over EANM would up that to 49.5k).


That's what the ACR II is for. 1150 * 1.15 = 1322.5.

Quote:
700 DPS is just fine, it's common for any droneboat (Vexor? Vexor Navy? Ishtar?).

Keep in mind, a lot of other buffs are coming along the way too - along with recon cruiser rebalances.


Vexor and Ishtar don't have covops cloaks *headdesk* *facepalm*
Tragedy
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#697 - 2013-10-04 01:06:02 UTC
Nyancat Audeles wrote:
Xequecal wrote:

Oh, it's definitely a solopwnmobile, just don't put guns on it.

1600mm Steel Plates II
2x EANM II
2x DDA II

AB II
Warp Scrambler
Fleeting Web
Fleeting Web/Balmer TD
Small Capacitor Booster II, Navy Cap Booster 400

4x Medium Unstable Power Fluctuator
Covops Cloak

ACR II
2x Trimark II

Fits easily on CPU, 1343/1322.5 PG so you need Genolution implants or a PG implant. It's cap stable (while you have charges, obv) with Genolution CA-1 and CA-2 and strong mindflood, none of mindflood's drawbacks apply to you at all. If you want to use slaves use a RT plate and you don't need fitting implants.

700 DPS and 53.33 cap/sec neuting. A Maller has 44k EHP with this fit, Stratios will be very close to that. Why does the Pilgrim exist again, exactly?


700 DPS is just fine, it's common for any droneboat (Vexor? Vexor Navy? Ishtar?).

Keep in mind, a lot of other buffs are coming along the way too - along with recon cruiser rebalances.
None of those ships can use a covert cloak and land on top of their target to drop their heavies.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#698 - 2013-10-04 01:07:56 UTC
Quote:
It is not a pvp ship. The CCP statement you cited clearly shows that. You might want it to be and you may use it any way you wish, that's your right, but don't try to change the facts.

NOT a pvp ship.


So, the part about "killing anom runners" was... what, precisely? A joke?

Or unless Rise was just blowing smoke, he meant that it has pvp applications. Which is how I intend to use it. PvP ship.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Tragedy
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#699 - 2013-10-04 01:08:11 UTC
Eko Fromtv wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
Yeah, pick one out of eight. Good job on being objective!


You presume I was trying to be.


Well, yes I did, since that's how people should approach a subject under debate.

Quote:
It's a pvp ship. At least, the way I intend to use it certainly is. Interestingly enough, as far as quite a few types of exploration are concerned, it's more of a pvp ship than it is otherwise. The mere +5 virus strength pretty much invalidates it's use in nullsec (and lowsec unless you have pretty good skills for it).

So, whatever else the devs might say, it's good at 2 things: Doing DED sites with drones, and ganking people. I plan to use it for one of those. You and yours, on the other hand, want to stomp your proverbial feet, kick up a fuss, and try to take that toy from other people. You don't see me advocating to have it's ability to do DED sites nerfed, have you?

Live and let live, as far as playstyles go.


It is not a pvp ship. The CCP statement you cited clearly shows that. You might want it to be and you may use it any way you wish, that's your right, but don't try to change the facts.

NOT a pvp ship.

Its whatever I want it to be. And yeah, rise saying to use it to gank anom runners? Hes saying that too. This is like saying stealth bombers are pure pve ships because people use them to run missions for fw.
Large Collidable Object
morons.
#700 - 2013-10-04 01:09:06 UTC
Eko Fromtv wrote:
35 pages of baseless and senseless arguing.

It is NOT a pvp boat, forget the EFT capital turret fits with 10k dps. It is a combat exploration ship, emphasis on pve not pvp.

"but people will use it for pvp" - So let them! Even more tears for you to harvest when they lose a 400mil ship...


If anything, it needs a buff to lasers. Any kind, CCP Rise's idea of optimal is excellent. It will just support CCP's idea for "drones and lazors". Motivate us to use the lasers, add a laser bonus.



I absolutely agree except for the part where it 'needs a buff to lasers' .

CCP Obamas approach obviously aims at giving ships counter-intuitive bonuses. Only ignoring the bonuses will render the ships somewhat viable.

Now let's assume I'm a SOE engineer:

- I construct a ship with poor grid and CPU, able to sneak up to other ships really closely thanks to a cov ops cloak.
- I decide to give it a really useless bonus to the absolutely worst turret class for the desired engagement.
- The ship ends up usable for people who learned that ignoring its bonus is the only way to make them remotely viable.
???
- Smoke some more crack and win.
You know... [morons.](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gjOx65yD5A)