Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Now if only bigger ships going into warp pulled smaller ships into their warp tunnel with them.

Adding the ability to fight in warp would do interesting things to pvp.

Excellent change.

For paying up your bet / bribe, I recommend a good Armagnac. It's the single-malt to cognac's blended whisky, and because nobody writes raps about it the price is better too.

Wow just wow. You sir will not be missed when you quit this game.

Since the closing of the evegate, agility and speed at the cost of sound structural integrity has been an engineering trademark of the tribes of matar. This can be seen at the following transcript of a conversion between two Boundless Creations starship engineers.

Since Quantum Rise, other nations plundered our heritage and technological marvel of strapping oversized rockets onto anything and everything, closing the speed gap. All the while refusing to share advances in locking range and sensor strength.

Upon seeing these new advances in warp flight physics, many Matari engineers exclaimed "Oh, that's how we did it all along. Guess now we know why it worked in the first place." realizing their ships were 2.5% better than anyone elses in the same class.

why do you hate freighters so much? it's a pain in the ass to travel with them atm if you are not afk... but making them even slower... thats just cruel. :(

anyway. i like the concept.

Someone's record player keeps playing the same record it seems. Everyhting must be compared to null.

To bad you don't understand how the regular bounty system works compared to the incursion bounty system. The regular system isn't base don site completion it's based on individual ship bounties. Trhe longer it take syou to get to a new site, the longer it takes to start killing.

Also, the longer warps are going to impact null anoms more, because a null anomaly is in an upgrade system most likely used by multiple people. As it is now you sometimes have to warp around to find an empty anom, this process will take longer now. in addition, the warp ins on many anomalies arne't set in stone like the (gate based) incursions, meaning sometimes you have to warp out and come back because you are to far (for a close range ship with no prop mod) or to to close (for a sniper ship or a long range ship in Blood Raider space that wants to avoid neuting).

And this (along with the interceptor buff) will REALLY affect carrier ratting, meaning more sentry carrier losses and then fewer carriers being risked in anoms. Carriers are among the few ships that can match or exceed the individual isk/hr incursion runners make in an active fleet.

The bottom line is that these changes hit null sec (that magical place NOT protected by magical space police, unlike high sec) much harder than it does incursions. Don't let this affect your paranoia and unreasonableness though.

To rephrase:

"So are you saying, that I can actually intercept in my interceptor now?* "







*unless you're a lowsec pirate

Best change ever!

It would be perfect if you could shift a bigger proportion of the accel/decel part into the acceleration, so that we can get the same kind of impressive drop out of warp as in the incursion trailer (when the Revenant drops almost instantly into the picture).

But even without that, it's awesome! Thank you guys!

No. Agility only factors in to sub-warp mobilty. (They will help you hit the 75% alignment slightly quicker, but once the warp kicks in, you need something else like a rig)